Whose Blowout Is It, Anyway?

· Friday, May 28, 2010

WASHINGTON -- Here’s my question: Why are we drilling in 5,000 feet of water in the first place?

Many reasons, but this one goes unmentioned: Environmental chic has driven us out there. As production from the shallower Gulf of Mexico wells declines, we go deep (1,000 feet and more) and ultra deep (5,000 feet and more), in part because environmentalists have succeeded in rendering the Pacific and nearly all the Atlantic coast off-limits to oil production. (President Obama's tentative, selective opening of some Atlantic and offshore Alaska sites is now dead.) And of course, in the safest of all places, on land, we’ve had a 30-year ban on drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

So we go deep, ultra deep -- to such a technological frontier that no precedent exists for the April 20 blowout in the Gulf of Mexico.

There will always be catastrophic oil spills. You make them as rare as humanly possible, but where would you rather have one: in the Gulf of Mexico, upon which thousands depend for their livelihood, or in the Arctic, where there are practically no people? All spills seriously damage wildlife. That’s a given. But why have we pushed the drilling from the barren to the populated, from the remote wilderness to a center of fishing, shipping, tourism and recreation?

Not that the environmentalists are the only ones to blame. Not by far. But it is odd that they’ve escaped any mention at all.

The other culprits are pretty obvious. It starts with BP, which seems not only to have had an amazing string of perfect-storm engineering lapses but no contingencies to deal with a catastrophic system failure.

However, the railing against BP for its performance since the accident is harder to understand. I attribute no virtue to BP, just self-interest. What possible interest can it have to do anything but cap the well as quickly as possible? Every day that oil is spilled means millions more in losses, cleanup and restitution.

Federal officials who rage against BP would like to deflect attention from their own role in this disaster. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, whose department’s laxity in environmental permitting and safety oversight renders it among the many bearing responsibility, expresses outrage at BP’s inability to stop the leak, and even threatens to "push them out of the way."

"To replace them with what?” asked the estimable, admirably candid Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the national incident commander. No one has the assets and expertise of BP. The federal government can fight wars, conduct a census and hand out billions in earmarks, but it has not a clue how to cap a one-mile-deep out-of-control oil well.

Obama didn't help much with his finger-pointing Rose Garden speech in which he denounced finger-pointing, then proceeded to blame everyone but himself. Even the grace note of admitting some federal responsibility turned sour when he reflexively added that these problems have been going on “for a decade or more” -- translation: Bush did it -- while, in contrast, his own interior secretary had worked diligently to solve the problem “from the day he took office.”

Really? Why hadn't we heard a thing about this? What about the September 2009 letter from Obama's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration accusing Interior's Minerals Management Service of understating the "risk and impacts" of a major oil spill? When you get a blowout 15 months into your administration, and your own Interior Department had given BP a "categorical" environmental exemption in April 2009, the buck stops.

In the end, speeches will make no difference. If BP can cap the well in time to prevent an absolute calamity in the Gulf, the president will escape politically. If it doesn't -- if the gusher isn't stopped before the relief wells are completed in August -- it will become Obama's Katrina.

That will be unfair, because Obama is no more responsible for the damage caused by this than Bush was for the damage caused by Katrina. But that's the nature of American politics and its presidential cult of personality: We expect our presidents to play Superman. Helplessness, however undeniable, is no defense.

Moreover, Obama has never been overly modest about his own powers. Two years ago next week, he declared that history will mark his ascent to the presidency as the moment when "our planet began to heal" and "the rise of the oceans began to slow."

Well, when you anoint yourself King Canute, you mustn’t be surprised when your subjects expect you to command the tides.

(c) 2010, The Washington Post Writers Group


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Ruth Ann Wilson

We know that this "CRISIS" is an example of Rahm Emanuel's suggestion, "not to let a CRISIS go to waste."

EPA is behind this one. As they have "HATED" oil drilling and have only worked to come to a "pristine environment" that is only a figment of their "Utopian minds". Satisfying "UNELECTED BUREAUCRATS" will have repercussions.

We, in America, can pray that their "stupidity, incompetence, and laziness" will be found out, before they do any more damage to our Beloved Country.

We must elect a Congress that has fortitude to REPEAL all legislation contrary to the Constitution, "down-size the "Office of the President" with it's huge "Federal Employment Agency" of UNELECTED BUREAUCRATS that eat out our substance daily.

God Save America

For God & Country

The American

Posted May 28, 2010 at 8:54:34 AM


RiverKing

Forget all that logical analysis, Charles. You had the reason for this disaster in one short sentence: Bush did it.

Now where have I heard tbat before? Is there an echo everywhere I go?

Posted May 28, 2010 at 9:49:13 AM


Hard Thought

Remember, Republicans and Conservatives are in Big Oil's pocket. That's why this happened.

This from Obama, the largest recipient of PAC and private contributions from BP in twenty years!

No wonder BP got a "categorical environmental exemption" from this administration.

Amazing......

Posted May 28, 2010 at 10:34:49 AM


Gary Smith

Obama should resign as soon as possible;as we knew he would be out of his league!

Posted May 28, 2010 at 11:19:03 AM


U.S.A.

I have just read this A.M.'s news which said the oil 'leak' has been stopped... Who will get/take the credit?? Does Obama have that much power that could stop the oil with just this one visit? There are so many deeply important items on our plate and the oil is only one of them. When and how can we get these evil people out of D.C. and OUT of power. Obama has put an end to Space Exploration. Now we will ahve to depend on the Russians to get our people to the I.S.S. and home again. Not to mention a cost of abt. $50M a trip. How many people will this put out iof work. Now we have a bill thst allows the Gov't. to keep track of everything we do with our money, by having access to all our ATM transaction's, what we buy, anywhere. What we eat, drink,etc. Well, welcome to 1984. I hope the morons who voted for Obama are noticing all the negative's and here we will be: the second U.S.S.R. I had no idea we had so many socialists, communists, marxist and traitors in our country. Well, I guess they're satisfied, I haven't heard anyone say, out loud or in print "Boy, am I sorry I voted for Obama !" He really made suckers out of all of us.. When all those illegal aliens are "given" citizenship, they (the libs, democrats,etc.) will be in power forever and we will be in bondage forever!!!! WAKE UP !! We have a real fight on ourn hands and most of you can't/won't admit it...

Just keep herding all the sheepish and timid and cowards over cliff!!

It is the saddest of times and the worse of times. And if we want our country to be passive and take all their crap, then I guess I can't do much all by myself!!

Posted May 28, 2010 at 1:31:44 PM


Shawn

Leave it to Charles Krauthammer to come at this mess from a completely different angle. His analysis is, as normal, spot on. Excellent article Charles and excellent addition to the Patriot Post Mr. Alexander.

Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:14:13 PM


Brian

To U.S.A.

You are not alone...

Posted May 28, 2010 at 2:28:39 PM


Tex

I dont have a World Globe, so I am not sure of the location of the well that is spewing crude,,,,So,someone tell me, is it on the fault line of the recent earthquakes in South America and Haiti? If so,,, then it IS Bush's fault,,because I heard they were going to re-name that fault line "Bush's Fault"! No joke intended!

Posted May 28, 2010 at 7:49:57 PM


M Rick Timms MD

Why ARE we drilling in mile deep water. Is it because there is no oil closer to shore - in water shallow enough to send divers to handle well problems?

Have we pumped all that dry.. or has government restriction limited drilling , and even exploration for new deposits in closer, shallow areas.

I realize the risks in offshore drilling -- problems are harder to handle... but since the greens do not want us to drill on land it seems that the drilling has been pushed farther out from shore where the technology is pushing the limits and the "problem management" skills have clearly not been rehearsed.

Are we drilling in mile deep water because thats where the oil is, or because the environmentalists have forced drilling out of safer oil fields and prevented the exploration of shallow waters near any populated coast. I would just like to know.

By the way, remember when Saddam set ALL the wells on fire in the dessert. It took months to stop the fires and cap those wells -- and barely a word from the greens criticizing Saddam. Shock, certainly. Outrage and condemnation, not that I remember..

Oh yea, while we are getting ready to make the case for criminal charges of negligence against the oil profiteers, just remember that the same profiteering and negligence in the mortgage industry at Fannie and Freddie, got those guys a bonus and the two worst culprits, Barney and Chris got put in charge of the "clean-up". Give me a break...

Posted May 29, 2010 at 2:30:07 AM


theoldpatriot

Great article, Mr. Krauthammer. The Emperor has no clothes. Big surprise: Elect an unqualified, zero-executive experience, marxist, egomaniac as president, and this is what you get. Hire a bunch of unqualified, marxist department heads, and again, this is what you get - a fumbling, hands-off "management" of the crisis. Letting your big campaign contributor (BP) run their unprepared, experimental Chinese menu of "remedies", with your Government overseer bureaucry paralized with indecision and lack of any helpful knowledge. Please, please, someone save us from the boring "Bush is responsible" mantra, because we "ain't believin'your excuses anymore. And Mr. President, how about giving up your weekend basketball game to excercise some on-site leadership until at least your agencies are releasing the stockpiles of protective booms, barges, and personnel to the Louisiana authorities, who at least seem genuinely convinced we are facing a disaster of potentially epic proportions. P.S., on your way to Louisiana, how about stopping by Arlington National Cemetery to place the wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier? It would sure help show that your support of our troops, veterans and their families are top on your list of concerns, wouldn't it?

You said you were accepting responsibility for the spill response and "the buck stops with you". Well how about staying on scene for a week or so to demonstrate your unequivocal support for the devastated communities of Louisiana.

Still Waiting.........

Posted May 30, 2010 at 6:14:22 PM


MichaelSSEC

Mr Krauthammer is right again. The eco-Left is far more culpable than BP for this so-called disaster. It was the eco-Left's self-defeating and narcissistic policies that drove the oil companies to drill in these places. But like all Leftist con artists, when their terrible policies result in terrible consequences, they don't admit they were wrong; they simply blame everyone else. It wasn't their fault the oil companies obeyed the Leftists' insane requirements.

Really, what would the Left have these companies do? Stop drilling entirely? Why, yes. That's EXACTLY what the eco-radicals want. Let's look at the facts.

They lobbied hard for years to force us to "invest" in hydro-electric power. Then when we spent zillions of dollars on massive dams with massive generators, the same eco-radicals complained the stupid fish couldn't swim upstream. Nobody thought to ask the eco-radicals why they didn't think of that BEFORE we spent all that money on dams. So we spent zillions more on ridiculous "fish ladders" to allow the fish to continue making their way upstream, but were the radicals happy then? No, they still complained that the ladders were too rough on the fish!

They lobbied hard for nuclear energy, but when one tiny little accident happened -- an accident in which nobody was seriously injured, nobody was killed, and the amount of radiation released was less than an average smoker doses himself with in one year's time -- they suddenly lost their minds and called nuclear energy a Capitalist enterprise bent on destroying the planet!

They lobbied hard for wind power, but whenever we try to build a wind farm some limousine Liberals come flying out of the woodwork to file lawsuits because the farms block their view of Nantucket Sound or something. Now that Teddy Kennedy is dead, the eco-radical Left has concocted a brand-new piece of insanity: the wind farms are supposedly killing BIRDS! And that doesn't even discuss the dishonesty inherent in these projects, as we're promised wind farms will pay for themselves in energy savings. But only AFTER we fund the projects are we told that the windmills pay for themselves 75 years down the road, yet the life expectancy of the windmills themselves is only 30 years -- so they cannot possibly pay for themselves and the whole claim was a lie from Day One.

They lobbied hard for electric cars and hybrid cars and hydrogen cars and every other damned thing, but they can't simply rely on the markets to produce affordable cars that people actually want to buy. No, they feel compelled to force people to buy these "green" cars because it turns out nobody will buy them on their own. That's because those of us who live in northern climes know that a Prius is useless in the snow and ice, whereas an SUV is sure-footed and dependable. Those of us who live in the South know that a Prius with AC is like a 500 lb woman with a diet soda -- it's a punch line.

Another columnist wrote a column lamenting Obama's lost "reputation for competence." I commented that in order to have such a reputation one must first have an accomplishment or even a whole string of them, in order to demonstrate competence. Otherwise, such a label is like a boxer who's called a great fighter when he hasn't won any fights. It's another punch line. And thank goodness Obama is totally incompetent. Can we even imagine what this country would be like today if Obama actually WAS competent?? Krauthammer, Sowell, Limbaugh, Beck, Malkin, Coulter and a slew of others would be dead. And that's just the main events of January 21, 2009. Things would get scary after that.

Posted May 31, 2010 at 3:41:51 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund