Options
The Last Refuge of the Liberal
· Friday, August 27, 2010
WASHINGTON -- Liberalism under siege is an ugly sight indeed. Just yesterday it was all hope and change and returning power to the people. But the people have proved so disappointing. Their recalcitrance has, in only 19 months, turned the predicted 40-year liberal ascendancy (James Carville) into a full retreat. Ah, the people, the little people, the small-town people, the "bitter" people, as Barack Obama in an unguarded moment once memorably called them, clinging "to guns or religion or" -- this part is less remembered -- "antipathy toward people who aren't like them."
That's a polite way of saying: clinging to bigotry. And promiscuous charges of bigotry are precisely how our current rulers and their vast media auxiliary react to an obstreperous citizenry that insists on incorrect thinking.
-- Resistance to the vast expansion of government power, intrusiveness and debt, as represented by the tea party movement? Why, racist resentment toward a black president.
-- Disgust and alarm with the federal government's unwillingness to curb illegal immigration, as crystallized in the Arizona law? Nativism.
-- Opposition to the most radical redefinition of marriage in human history, as expressed in Proposition 8 in California? Homophobia.
-- Opposition to a 15-story Islamic center and mosque near Ground Zero? Islamophobia.
Now we know why the country has become "ungovernable," last year's excuse for the Democrats' failure of governance: Who can possibly govern a nation of racist, nativist, homophobic Islamophobes?
Note what connects these issues. In every one, liberals have lost the argument in the court of public opinion. Majorities -- often lopsided majorities -- oppose President Obama's social-democratic agenda (e.g., the stimulus, Obamacare), support the Arizona law, oppose gay marriage and reject a Ground Zero mosque.
What's a liberal to do? Pull out the bigotry charge, the trump that pre-empts debate and gives no credit to the seriousness and substance of the contrary argument. The most venerable of these trumps is, of course, the race card. When the tea party arose, a spontaneous, leaderless and perfectly natural (and traditionally American) reaction to the vast expansion of government intrinsic to the president's proudly proclaimed transformational agenda, the liberal commentariat cast it as a mob of angry white yahoos disguising their antipathy to a black president by cleverly speaking in economic terms.
Then came Arizona and SB 1070. It seems impossible for the left to believe that people of good will could hold that: (a) illegal immigration should be illegal, (b) the federal government should not hold border enforcement hostage to comprehensive reform, i.e., amnesty, (c) every country has the right to determine the composition of its immigrant population.
As for Proposition 8, is it so hard to see why people might believe that a single judge overturning the will of 7 million voters is an affront to democracy? And that seeing merit in retaining the structure of the most ancient and fundamental of all social institutions is something other than an alleged hatred of gays -- particularly since the opposite-gender requirement has characterized virtually every society in all the millennia until just a few years ago?
And now the Ground Zero mosque. The intelligentsia is near unanimous that the only possible grounds for opposition is bigotry toward Muslims. This smug attribution of bigotry to two-thirds of the population hinges on the insistence on a complete lack of connection between Islam and radical Islam, a proposition that dovetails perfectly with the Obama administration's pretense that we are at war with nothing more than "violent extremists" of inscrutable motive and indiscernible belief. Those who reject this as both ridiculous and politically correct (an admitted redundancy) are declared Islamophobes, the ad hominem du jour.
It is a measure of the corruption of liberal thought and the collapse of its self-confidence that, finding itself so widely repudiated, it resorts reflexively to the cheapest race-baiting (in a colorful variety of forms). Indeed, how can one reason with a nation of pitchfork-wielding mobs brimming with "antipathy toward people who aren't like them" -- blacks, Hispanics, gays and Muslims -- a nation that is, as Michelle Obama once put it succinctly, "just downright mean"?
The Democrats are going to get beaten badly in November. Not just because the economy is ailing. And not just because Obama overread his mandate in governing too far left. But because a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites whose undisguised contempt for the great unwashed prevents them from conceding a modicum of serious thought to those who dare oppose them.
(c) 2010, The Washington Post Writers Group
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Author Dr. Bill Bennett: "The Patriot is leading the charge in the battle to restore America's values -- a vital ally on the front...." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Arnold Ahlert: Catholics vs. Obama
- Michael Reagan: White House Website Gone Wild
- Ken Blackwell: I'll Have Another
- Jeff Jacoby: The Peace Process Battered Israel's Reputation
- Victor Davis Hanson: The Bad/Good Idea of Removing Assad
- Michael Barone: Cocooned Liberals Are Unprepared for Political Debate
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Great Debate
- Cal Thomas: The Media's Religion Deficit
- Larry Elder: Why Jeremiah Wright Matters -- Still
- Ben Shapiro: First, They Came for Cory Booker
- Ann Coulter: Figures Don't Lie: Democrats Do
- Burt Prelutsky: A President Not Fit for Man or Beast
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























G Dub
An excellent article.
I live such a simple life. I try my best to stick to the facts. I live by the law. I carry a copy of the DoI and the Constitution, both of which I often read, in my briefcase. It is so easy to be a Conservative. I never have to worry about which "Talking Points" lie I am trying to defend.
My Conservative Wife's side of the Family is all at-least Liberals, some further Left. All educated / indoctrinated at KU. All of them receive the daily Progressive talking points and religiously spout them.
With me, they don't even bother to debate. Their first words are the accusatory terms written above: Homophobe, Muslim Hater, Raciest, etc ad nasuem.
But, I now realize that those terms are indeed their public announcement that they have reached their intellectual nadir. They have nothing with which to press their mission. They are lost in a sea of propaganda – and there is no life jacket available to them.
It is indeed so easy to be a Conservative – except when the DC elites wish you silent.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 6:42:36 AM
RiverKing
RINOs and "moderate" Republicans should be added to the Democrats described in the last paragraph.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 9:12:57 AM
Dalyce Logan
@RiverKing - Agreed.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 9:23:31 AM
Roger
"The Democrats are going to get beaten badly in November. Not just because the economy is ailing. And not just because Obama overread his mandate in governing too far left. But because a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites whose undisguised contempt for the great unwashed prevents them from conceding a modicum of serious thought to those who dare oppose them."
Beautifully said, Charles. Let's pray that it happens.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 11:50:45 AM
Harriett
Dr. Krauthammer, I agree with all you have said here. Thank you for putting it in such simple truthful terms, as you always do. We need your steady hand so badly. Every time you are on Fox news in their topical sessions, I look forward to your summations of the problem being discussed. It's straightforward, intelligent and to the core of the problem. We need more people like you. Thank you for your insightful and truthful comments.
Harriett
Posted August 27, 2010 at 12:11:23 PM
Jo Gray
Yes, a thousand times yes! Such arrogance rises beyond the reach of all ordered, logical thought, and will only be curtailed by voting them ALL out of office! That day can't come soon enough.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 12:23:20 PM
Jan
Harriett,
I agree wholeheartedly with all your comments about Dr. Krauthammer. He is truly the best commentator I have ever heard or read, with always objective, thoughtful, Conservative analysis of political events.
Thanks again,
Jan
Posted August 27, 2010 at 1:00:03 PM
Gene
I thought about posting a comment but after reading Harriett's post I will just say:
Amen Harriette!!!
Posted August 27, 2010 at 1:08:33 PM
Paoli Pete
My God! What an article! I've read it three times in a row. I just can't get enough of it. The raw intelligence, coupled with the rhythm of the prose, is just so perfect-- even mesmerizing. Thank God for you, Dr. K.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 3:57:28 PM
Spook
Racist, nativist, homophobic, Islamophobes? Just down right mean?
Add them to my resume.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 4:23:59 PM
Joseph W.
Dr. Krauthammer,
You call it the way you see it and your eyesight is exceedingly fine!
Posted August 27, 2010 at 7:10:12 PM
Chris
A day without Dr. K. is like a day without sunshine.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 8:26:21 PM
Greg welch
I heard your article read on one of my regular radio talk shows. I finally got to read it tonight. It is even better reading it. my political adversaries try to shame me into feeling so anti-everything and phobic about every stance I take. I just look them in the eye and say, " Absolutely, and I am so damn proud of whatever you say I am against. " If you are against these positions, then I know that i are correct." That disarms them almost immediately. They don't know how to react to my saying that I sure am everything you say I am, and I am proud of it.
Posted August 27, 2010 at 10:27:18 PM
Don
For a sniff of what Charles is talking about, go to
www.salon.com
and read the letters to the editor on any number of issues, and the comments made about we knuckle-dragging, trailer trash, uneducated, stupid, bigoted, racist neo-cons. Alex Pereene, who writes several articles a day as a Salon contributor, is particularly nasty - and he's an actual columnist for thee mag.
Have a look at what thee "progressives" think of the majority of their fellow Ameericans.
Posted August 28, 2010 at 9:24:24 AM
TJS
Krauthammer has it nailed. We've heard all the liberal ideas, and we've rejected every one. They cannot argue their case any longer, so they simply attack and call names. Now it is time to go and vote, and pray to God we're not too late.
Posted August 28, 2010 at 1:26:21 PM
Abu Nudnik
Only one correction: they are socialists, not liberals but they don't know the difference. A true liberal accounts his opponents arguments seriously. That's why liberal democracies have legislative bodies.
Socialism posits that society can be perfected by those who know what's in your best interest and it's government's job to mold this society. Liberalism posits that you yourself know best and it's government's job to get out of your way. Conservatism is the attempt to conserve what is best in the liberal (I mean Classic Liberalism in Europe and America) tradition. Socialism has two faces: National Socialism and Internationalism. Let know one be fooled by their apparent differences. There is nothing liberal about liberal democrats. Their contempt proves that.
Posted August 28, 2010 at 2:11:50 PM
David Hines
Intolerance and hatred are not the correct way to fight intolerance and hatred. Just more of the same. What good could it possibly do to deny Muslims the right to build a mosque near ground zero? Muslims, who in all likelihood, are law-abiding and valuable members of our society and not bloodthirsty killers? In many people's eyes, it would just serve to validate the idea that America is fighting a global war against Islam and provide more fuel for the fire. We need to stand up for the rights of our Muslim brothers and sisters just as we would for those of other religions.
Posted August 28, 2010 at 3:27:30 PM
Ron
Does anyone say it better than Charles? No! Love ya, Man!
Posted August 28, 2010 at 5:18:47 PM
MichaelSSEC
What's hilarious about Liberals is that when they're proven wrong, they simply carry on as though nothing happened. And when proven dangerously, hatefully, spectacularly wrong, they simply attribute their blunders to Right-wingers and act as though they opposed whatever was wrong from the start.
Eugenics is a good example. Fascism is another. In both cases the Left was madly in love with the concepts and strongly urged America to emulate or adopt those hateful, murderous ideologies. Later, after the horrors they brought were exposed for all to see, the Left simply rewrote history so that Fascism was a RIGHT-WING system and eugenics was something the Progressives opposed, both of which were stunning fabrications of the first order.
To this day, children are taught in school that "everybody knows" Fascism was Right-wing. Just as "everybody knows" Republicans opposed civil rights while Democrats saved liberty for everyone -- even though the opposite is true.
Liberalism means never having to say you're sorry? It also means never having to say your ideology murdered 100 million innocent people.
Posted August 29, 2010 at 2:56:00 AM
Great Basin rancher
Yes, Liberals are blown out windbags but they are fellow Americans. If they are not moved by the sight of thousands at the gathering in Washington last weekend or feel the re-ignition of Dr. King's words, and question their own motives, what is the antidote for the poisoned apple? How can they be coaxed home?
Posted August 30, 2010 at 1:11:06 PM
Patriot
American liberties are guaranteed to those willing to defend them against all enemies foreign and domestic. Now is the time to come to the aid of our Country. Sound the tocsins loud and long between now and election day. Assemble your friends and neighbors to use their votes to reestablish integrity, intelligence, and common sense to the Nation's governance.
Posted August 31, 2010 at 11:16:58 PM
West Traveler
Dr. CK is a true patriot and one of few in main stream media. I wonder, if Mr.Hines had lost a loved one during 9/11 how he would feel about his Muslin brothers and sisters. I suggest he live with them for awhile and see how he is accepted and how long he is tolerated.
Posted September 1, 2010 at 7:41:20 AM
JJStryder
Bravo Charles: Describing the nuts in a nutshell!
Posted September 1, 2010 at 9:27:58 AM