The Colbert Democrats

· Friday, October 8, 2010

WASHINGTON -- A president's first midterm election is inevitably a referendum on his two years in office. The bad news for Democrats is that President Obama's "re-elect" number is 38 percent -- precisely Bill Clinton's in October 1994, the eve of the wave election that gave Republicans control of the House for the first time in 40 years.

Yet this same poll found that 65 percent view Obama favorably "as a person." The current Democratic crisis is not about the man -- his alleged lack of empathy, ability to emote, etc., requiring remediation with backyard, shirt-sleeved shoulder rubbing with the folks -- but about the policies.

And the problem with the policies is twofold: ideology and effectiveness. First, Obama, abetted by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, tried to take a center-right country to the left. They grossly misread the 2008 election. It was a mandate to fix the economy and restore American confidence. Obama read it as a mandate to change the American social contract, giving it a more European social-democratic stamp, by fundamentally extending the reach and power of government in health care, energy, education, finance and industrial policy.

Obama succeeded with health care. Unfortunately for the Democrats, that and Obama's other signature achievement -- the stimulus -- were not exactly what the folks were clamoring for. What they wanted was economic recovery.

Here the Democrats failed the simple test of effectiveness. The economy is extraordinarily weak, unemployment is unacceptably high and the only sure consequence of the stimulus is nearly $1 trillion added to the national debt in a single stroke.

And yet, to these albatrosses of ideological overreach and economic ineffectiveness, the Democrats have managed in the last few weeks to add a third indictment: incompetence.

For the first time since modern budgeting was introduced with the Budget Act of 1974, the House failed to even write a budget. This in a year of extraordinary deficits, rising uncertainty and jittery financial markets. Gold is going through the roof. Confidence in the dollar and the American economy is falling -- largely because of massive overhanging debt. Yet no budget emerged from Congress to give guidance, let alone reassurance, about future U.S. revenues and spending.

That's not all. Congress has not passed a single appropriations bill. To keep the government going, Congress passed a so-called continuing resolution (CR) before adjourning to campaign. The problem with continuing to spend at the current level is that the last two years have seen a huge 28 percent jump in non-defense discretionary spending. The CR continues this profligacy, aggravating an already serious debt problem.

As if this was not enough, Congress then adjourned without even a vote -- nay, without even a Democratic bill -- on the expiring Bush tax cuts. This is the ultimate in incompetence. After 20 months of control of the White House and Congress -- during which they passed an elaborate, 1,000-page micromanagement of every detail of American health care -- the Democrats adjourned without being able to tell the country what its tax rates will be on Jan. 1.

It's not just income taxes. It's capital gains and dividends too. And the estate tax, which will careen insanely from 0 to 55 percent when the ball drops on Times Square on New Year's Eve.

Nor is this harmless incompetence. To do this at a time when $2 trillion of capital is sitting on the sidelines because of rising uncertainty -- and there is no greater uncertainty than next year's tax rates -- is staggeringly irresponsible.

As if this display of unseriousness -- no budget, no appropriations bill, no tax bill -- was not enough, some genius on a House Judiciary subcommittee invites parodist Stephen Colbert to testify as an expert witness on immigration. He then pulls off a nervy mockery of the whole proceedings -- my favorite was his request to have his colonoscopy inserted in the Congressional Record -- while the chairwoman sits there clueless.

A fitting end for the 111th Congress. But not quite. Colbert will return to the scene of the crime on Oct. 30 as the leader of one of two mock rallies on the National Mall. Comedian Jon Stewart leads the other. At a time of near-10 percent unemployment, a difficult and draining war abroad, and widespread disgust with government overreach and incompetence, they will light up the TV screens as the hip face of the new liberalism -- just three days before the election.

I suspect the electorate will declare itself not amused.

(c) 2010, The Washington Post Writers Group


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Rod

Awesome. The incompetence is astounding. The voice of the people on 2 NOV will be deafening.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 8:43:48 AM


g.wegmann

Doctor, you said/wrote:" This in a year of extraordinary deficits, rising uncertainty and jittery financial markets. Gold is going through the roof. Confidence in the dollar and the American economy is falling -- largely because of massive overhanging debt. Yet no budget emerged from Congress to give guidance, let alone reassurance, about future U.S. revenues and spending."

I and many other people think that this is just what Obama, Pelosi and Reid want. If they could make it worse, and unles a miracle happens on November 2nd, they will!

Then the "crisis" they manufactured will give them the opportunity to come before the people with their brand of revisionism/state socialism as the "savior" for the debacle he and his co-conspirators created.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 9:28:29 AM


Talman

That two trillion sitting on side lines could easily pay for the deficit? Obama shafted the GM stockholders, then us old geezers with the Medicare theft. He and his Congress could easily shaft us again. Me, I am taking my tiny share out, converting it to gold and burying it. Of course, he'll know that I have the gold and will probably come for it. We're so screwed.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 10:49:49 AM


Roger McBee

The Colbert "mockery" seemed to this citizen to fit perfectly with the mockery of this entire Congress. I, as an independent, declare myself not amused by either party. They are all incompetent. If not, how do we find ourselves in the predicament we're in?

Posted October 8, 2010 at 12:10:48 PM


David Roberts

It's the Progressives in both parties - we have Progressive (Dems) and Progressive light (Republican guard) right now. The Republicans had best wake up and purge their ranks and become conservative Cosntitutionalists or We the People will form a new party out of the remnants of both.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 12:54:06 PM


Sam

As usual, Charles has hit the "nail on the head"! If the democrats don't lose control of one or both houses, the downward spiral will continue at a rate that is so fast our heads won't hvae time to spin. God help us all!!!!!!

Posted October 8, 2010 at 1:01:37 PM


Abu Nudnik

Their failure to pass a budget or vote on the tax cuts was by design. They want 55% of your estate to go to them, not your kids.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 1:17:42 PM


Caseace

Let's get one thing straight, Progressives are not bumbling idiots trying to fix the economy, they are trying to BREAK it.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 1:37:09 PM


TimN

"As if this was not enough, Congress then adjourned without even a vote -- nay, without even a Democratic bill -- on the expiring Bush tax cuts. This is the ultimate in incompetence.' They did vote by leaving the expiration of the tax cuts in place.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 1:57:36 PM


Ron

Sixty-five percent view Obama favorably "as a person?" They must not see the same things that I see in him. There's nothing I find favorable about him.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 2:20:34 PM


JAC

You're all forgetting the major legislation Congress rammed through before leaving--they fixed it so our television commercials won't be louder than the programs they interrupt. They have their priorities and fixing the budget was lower than television volume. Is there a message here?

Posted October 8, 2010 at 3:08:53 PM


J Henry Jr

America is on to them and they know it. By 2012 conservatives should be able to muster a filibuster-proof majority and America can get back to being America again.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 4:16:24 PM


Jon C Savage, AZ

J Henry Jr is closest. Disagreement here on the dates; 2012? More nearly early 2011, is my view. On the assumption that RINO's and Dems become a minority, and real Republicans control both Houses. Which, it is hoped, will result in impeachment of Obama/Biden, elevate the Speaker (Boehner) to POTUS, who will appoint---your guess. I have a name in mind for VP.

Semper Fi'

Posted October 8, 2010 at 6:07:45 PM


Nam Vet-68

It's important for the American people to keep an eye on the winners of the next election both democrats and republicans. We can afford to let politicians continue to destroy this country bit by bit. People need to be held accountable for their actions. What is really sad is that both parties can't work together for the betterment of the country instead of bickering and fighting. We could accomplish so much. I think people are really tired of it.

Posted October 8, 2010 at 9:56:37 PM


bahmi

Obama succeeded with healthcare? Charles, you nuts? Forcing this down our throats is good? What about the million loopholes and defects? The healthcare bill is all about the virtues of tyranny. Is the goodness of the bill the reason so many states are suing the Feds to withdraw from the tentacles of the Federal government health plan? As a doctor, you may have reasons to say a health care bill is good in general, but the travesty of how we arrived at the bill is patently obvious.

Posted October 11, 2010 at 2:00:44 PM


Clarence De Barrows

Ah, for the good old days of the much maligned Joseph McCarthy when the Country searched out Communists and their sympathizers for condemnation rather than election to the White House and Congress.

Posted October 11, 2010 at 5:36:00 PM


JJStryder

What do we do if the Republicans turn out to be the same version as in 2000 to 2006? That is my biggest fear.

Posted October 14, 2010 at 10:32:08 AM


Jody

Sixty-five percent view Obama favorably "as a person."

People are still afraid that if they say, "I hate his guts," they're admitting to at least a spark of bigotry, even though race has nothing to do with it. Saying they hate his policies but like him personally is much safer emotionally. We have been taught/forced to be politically correct for so long, it will take some time before most of us have the nerve to call a spade a spade, even in an anonymous poll.

Posted October 15, 2010 at 5:54:23 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund