Throw the WikiBook at Them

· Friday, December 3, 2010

WASHINGTON -- It is understandable for the administration to underplay the significance of the WikiLeaks State Department cables. But while it is wise not to go into a public panic, it is delusional to think that this is merely embarrassing gossip and indiscretion. The leaks have done major damage.

First, quite specific damage to our war-fighting capacity. Take just one revelation among hundreds: The Yemeni president and deputy prime minister are quoted as saying that they're letting the U.S. bomb al-Qaeda in their country, while claiming that the bombing is the government's doing. Well, that cover is pretty well blown. And given the unpopularity of the San'a government's tenuous cooperation with us in the war against al-Qaeda, this will undoubtedly limit our freedom of action against its Yemeni branch, identified by the CIA as the most urgent terrorist threat to U.S. security.

Second, we've suffered a major blow to our ability to collect information. Talking candidly to a U.S. diplomat can now earn you headlines around the world, reprisals at home, or worse. Success in the war on terror depends on being trusted with other countries' secrets. Who's going to trust us now?

Third, this makes us look bad, very bad. But not in the way Secretary of State Hillary Clinton implied in her cringe-inducing apology speech in which she scolded these awful leakers for having done a disservice to "the international community," and plaintively deplored how this hampers U.S. attempts to bring about a better world.

She sounded like a cross between an exasperated school principal and a Miss America contestant professing world peace to be her fondest wish. The problem is not that the purloined cables exposed U.S. hypocrisy or double-dealing. Good God, that's the essence of diplomacy. That's what we do; that's what everyone does. Hence the famous aphorism that a diplomat is an honest man sent abroad to lie for his country.

Nothing new here. What is notable, indeed shocking, is the administration's torpid and passive response to the leaks. What's appalling is the helplessness of a superpower that not only cannot protect its own secrets but shows the world that if you violate its secrets -- massively, wantonly and maliciously -- there are no consequences.

Time to show a little steel. To show that such miscreants don't get to walk away.

At a Monday news conference, Attorney General Eric Holder assured the nation that his people are diligently looking into possible legal action against WikiLeaks. Where has Holder been? The WikiLeaks exposure of Afghan War documents occurred five months ago. Holder is looking now at possible indictments? This is a country where a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. Months after the first leak, Justice's thousands of lawyers have yet to prepare charges against Julian Assange and his confederates?

Throw the Espionage Act of 1917 at them. And if that is not adequate, if that law has been too constrained and watered down by subsequent Supreme Court rulings, then why hasn't the administration prepared new legislation adapted to these kinds of Internet-age violations of U.S. security? It's not as if we didn't know more leaks were coming. And that more leaks are coming still.

Think creatively. The WikiLeaks document dump is sabotage, however quaint that term may seem. We are at war -- a hot war in Afghanistan where six Americans were killed just this past Monday, and a shadowy world war where enemies from Yemen to Portland, Ore., are planning holy terror. Franklin Roosevelt had German saboteurs tried by military tribunal and electrocuted. Assange has done more damage to the U.S. than all six of those Germans combined. Putting U.S. secrets on the Internet, a medium of universal dissemination new in human history, requires a reconceptualization of sabotage and espionage -- and the laws to punish and prevent them. Where is the Justice Department?

And where are the intelligence agencies on which we lavish $80 billion a year? Assange has gone missing. Well, he's no cave-dwelling jihadi ascetic. Find him. Start with every five-star hotel in England and work your way down.

Want to prevent this from happening again? Let the world see a man who can't sleep in the same bed on consecutive nights, who fears the long arm of American justice. I'm not advocating that we bring out of retirement the KGB proxy who, on a London street, killed a Bulgarian dissident with a poisoned umbrella tip. But it would be nice if people like Assange were made to worry every time they go out in the rain.

(c) 2010, The Washington Post Writers Group


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Larry Thacker Jr.

Everyone's talking about the "one guy with a laptop" but what about the people who provided the information in the first place? a wiki by definition is a collaborative site. Shut him down, but there's a much bigger house cleaning that needs to occur.

Posted December 3, 2010 at 7:23:05 AM


JTG

Perhaps the idiot Holder can send the Black Panthers to club Assange. I heard that they owe him a favor.

Posted December 3, 2010 at 8:31:54 AM


kevin

Another piece of the puzzle of Obama displaying his anti-colonialist attitude towards the US.

And another thing your not hearing much about Pvt. Manning, the noted person whom stole the secrets: He's gay and his drag-queen boyfriend 'talked' him into it.

Posted December 3, 2010 at 9:36:43 AM


RAY EIFLER

Are we ignoring the obvious? Aren't these documents stolen property? Isn't Assange a recpient of known stolen property? Why don't we demand the reutrn of the documents and any copies that were made? Why don't we also press charges against Assange for trafficing in stolen goods in addition to all the other offenses.

Posted December 3, 2010 at 12:27:30 PM


CalAnnie

Charles,

We can always depend on you for some common sense and a wonderful sense of humor. I'm such a fan!

Posted December 3, 2010 at 12:39:37 PM


Richard Ryan

If Obama had any guts or at least a smidgen of love for this country, he would have hired several hundred professional hit men to go after Assange and then would have gone on tv and announced as much. Of course if you are a gutless wonder who hates the US it follows as sure as night follows day, that won`t happen.

Richard Ryan

Lamar, Missouri (Birthplace of Harry S Truman)

Posted December 3, 2010 at 12:49:02 PM


57Cynic

Hear Hear!!

Posted December 3, 2010 at 1:02:45 PM


Sammy

There is no steel in obungle. He thinks if you ignore a problem long enough, it will go away. He hasn't dealt with any situation that requires those hangy down things.

Posted December 3, 2010 at 4:33:19 PM


Jimmy D

Well, after all, Obama's just a good man in a jam, without the experience he needs to sort it all out, y'know. Really?

And why, at this late date, does it remain largely unfathomable, even to our best and brightest, that he may very well be a very bad man, putting us all, daily, into an ever deeper jam, ON PURPOSE, with about 100 million man-hours of communist subversive experience backing every move.

We must stop dreaming about what we have at hand here!

Posted December 3, 2010 at 5:40:30 PM


mac

The DOJ is probably the most politicised department in the foggy area of Washington and staffed by the most wrong headed folks imaginable. Daily, they and their leader become more and more of a sick joke.

Posted December 3, 2010 at 6:23:34 PM


MichaelSSEC

The despicable truth is, the Obama administration isn't doing anything about this because they WANT American to seem weak and helpless. That's part of their goal.

Worse, they WANT to encourage others to attack us, by not leveling any consequences against those who have attacked us. Good lord, in the wake of 9/11 these same ideologues were chiding us that America's chickens had come home to roost! Obama's gone around the world -- particularly the Islamic world -- apologizing for America's sins.

It's time we stopped pretending this is an ordinary President who takes his duties seriously. This man is an anti-American radical who is working as hard as he possibly can to destroy this country.

Posted December 4, 2010 at 12:26:56 AM


MichaelSSEC

Any readers wondering what Kevin meant in a comment above referring to Obama's "anticolonialist" attitude can pick up a copy of Dinesh D'Souza's "The Roots of Obama's Rage," which explains in great detail where this radical President's anti-American agenda comes from. D'Souza terms it anticolonialism, which is a term not heard very often here, so many people may not know what it means. He makes a devastating case, but the ideology undeniably manifests itself in Obama as a seething desire to weaken America in every possible way. Obama is literally fulfilling the "Dreams from [his] Father."

Posted December 4, 2010 at 12:32:00 PM


Talman

A few years back a foreign nation solved their spy problem by injecting the alleged spy with some form of radiation. The assinination took place in London I believe. There was some objection from the free world but it all faded and not much else was hears. That's how a they solved a bad problem. This is how you deal with problems in the real world. If we had any spine we'd do the same thing not continue in the fantasy world we are in. Anyone who jepordizes our national security, puts our citizens and military in danger, betrays or is complicit in betraying our nations should be eliminated one way or the other, period.

Posted December 5, 2010 at 8:20:23 PM


Drifter

There is a question here that all of all-knowing pundits seem to be studiously avoiding. Pfc Manning is far too low on the food chain to have the security clearance for the information.

Who, in the State Department is actually providing the information? Who is the mole in our government?

The NYT appeared to be recieving classified information before Wikileaks was ever heard of.

Regardless of what is done with Manning, we need to find the "bad guys", within or own government, try them for treason and put them away for life.

Posted December 6, 2010 at 11:31:46 AM


Abu Nudnik

I want to go on record as being against Plutonium poisoning. Shame on you, Talman: it's too easy to subject innocent bystanders to damage that way!

Kraut': you're overboard when you say it's done more damage than the 6 (and you rarely go overboard). So far, nothing is even surprising to me. If anything I think the leaks show America's a great country which I already knew.

Posted December 6, 2010 at 1:03:20 PM


Roy

The reason Holder has not gone after him until now is that he was busy going after Arizona and everything else that is American.

Posted December 6, 2010 at 3:01:38 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund