Syria: It's Not Just About Freedom

· Friday, February 3, 2012

WASHINGTON -- Imperial regimes can crack when they are driven out of their major foreign outposts. The fall of the Berlin Wall did not just signal the liberation of Eastern Europe from Moscow. It prefigured the collapse of the Soviet Union itself just two years later.

The fall of Bashar al-Assad's Syria could be similarly ominous for Iran. The alliance with Syria is the centerpiece of Iran's expanding sphere of influence, a mini-Comintern that includes such clients as Iranian armed and directed Hezbollah, now the dominant power in Lebanon; and Hamas, which controls Gaza and threatens to take the rest of Palestine (the West Bank) from a feeble Fatah.

Additionally, Iran exerts growing pressure on Afghanistan to the east and growing influence in Iraq to the west. Tehran has even extended its horizon to Latin America, as symbolized by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's solidarity tour through Venezuela, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Cuba.

Of all these clients, Syria is the most important. It's the only Arab state openly allied with non-Arab Iran. This is significant because the Arabs see the Persians as having had centuries-old designs to dominate the Middle East. Indeed, Iranian arms and trainers, transshipped to Hezbollah through Syria, have given the Persians their first outpost on the Mediterranean in 2,300 years.

But the Arab-Iranian divide is not just national/ethnic. It is sectarian. The Arabs are overwhelmingly Sunni. Iran is Shiite. The Arab states fear Shiite Iran infiltrating the Sunni homeland through (apart from Iraq) Hezbollah in Lebanon, and through Syria, run by Assad's Alawites, a heterodox offshoot of Shiism.

Which is why the fate of the Assad regime is geopolitically crucial. It is, of course, highly significant for reasons of democracy and human rights as well. Syrian Baathism, while not as capricious and deranged as the Saddam Hussein variant, runs a ruthless police state that once killed 20,000 in Hama, and has now killed more than 5,400 during the current uprising.

Human rights -- decency -- is reason enough to do everything we can to bring down Assad. But strategic opportunity compounds the urgency. With its archipelago of clients anchored by Syria, Iran is today the greatest regional threat -- to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states terrified of Iranian nuclear hegemony; to traditional regimes menaced by Iranian jihadist subversion; to Israel, which the Islamic republic has pledged to annihilate; to America and the West, whom the mullahs have vowed to drive from the region.

No surprise that the Arab League, many of whose members are no tenderhearted humanitarians, is pressing hard for Assad's departure. His fall would deprive Iran of an intra-Arab staging area and sever its corridor to the Mediterranean. Syria would return to the Sunni fold. Hezbollah, Tehran's agent in Lebanon, could be next, withering on the vine without Syrian support and Iranian materiel. And Hamas would revert to Egyptian patronage.

At the end of this causal chain, Iran, shorn of key allies and already reeling from economic sanctions over its nuclear program, would be thrown back on its heels. The mullahs are already shaky enough to be making near-suicidal threats of blocking the Strait of Hormuz. The population they put down in the 2009 Green Revolution is still seething. The regime is particularly reviled by the young. And its increasing attempts to shore up Assad financially and militarily have only compounded anti-Iranian feeling in the region.

It's not just the Sunni Arabs lining up against Assad. Turkey, after a recent flirtation with a Syrian-Iranian-Turkish entente, has turned firmly against Assad, seeing an opportunity to extend its influence, as in Ottoman days, as protector/master of the Sunni Arabs. The alignment of forces suggests a unique opportunity for the West to help finish the job.

How? First, a total boycott of Syria, beyond just oil and including a full arms embargo. Second, a flood of aid to the resistance (through Turkey, which harbors both rebel militias and the political opposition, or directly and clandestinely into Syria). Third, a Security Council resolution calling for the removal of the Assad regime. Russia, Assad's last major outside ally, should be forced to either accede or incur the wrath of the Arab states with a veto.

Force the issue. Draw bright lines. Make clear American solidarity with the Arab League against a hegemonic Iran and its tottering Syrian client. In diplomacy, one often has to choose between human rights and strategic advantage. This is a rare case where we can advance both -- so long as we do not compromise with Russia or relent until Assad falls.

(c) 2012, The Washington Post Writers Group


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

wjmccrindle

Don't hold your breath waiting for our Marxist in chief traitor to do anything other than play golf or lead from behind. As long as Assad is backing Hamas and is complicit in anti Israel activities, he will be a friend to Obamao. The treason of O will continue at home and abroad, until he can be defeated in November. Hang on Israel, when we get the marxist traitor out of office, we will again support you against the islamic caliphate of terror you must fight against.

Posted February 3, 2012 at 10:45:36 AM


Holmes Simons

Dr. Krauthammer, it seems, even after three years of observing the anti-American activities of the Obama administration, that you still do not see the reality that all this man is ever going to do is implement as many policies as possible to subvert and undermine our Constitutional Republic.

I find myself on the edge of giving up hope that you and other politically correct pundits will ever see this man as anything but "a real nice guy whose policies, unfortunately, have failed." I suppose the allure of popularity among the pseudo-elitists in DC clouds one’s logic. Is there another explanation? Payoffs? Cowardice? Fear of death? Incompetence? Stupidity? Naïveté? Drugs? Lack of drugs?

Please tell me, because I cannot figure it out.

Does anyone know the answer?

Posted February 3, 2012 at 11:22:43 AM


Robert A. Hall

Just because we doubt Obama’s ability, courage or commitment to doing the right thing, doesn’t mean that Dr. Krauthammer is not right to lay out the right thing to do, both to hold Obama accountable and to convince Americans that our only survival lies in regime change. In Washington, not Damascus. I will link to this from my Old Jarhead blog.

Robert A. Hall

Author: The Coming Collapse of the American Republic

All royalties go to help wounded veterans

For a free PDF of my book, write tartanmarine(at)gmail.com

Posted February 3, 2012 at 11:41:41 AM


Jeannette

Mr. Krauthammer for President! Why won't those who are in a position to effect change read the above?

And there's no doubt whatever that what is laughingly referred to as the "administration" in D.C. will never do anything as rational as what's outlined so beautifully by Mr. Krauthammer.

Posted February 3, 2012 at 9:58:51 PM


Howard Last

Jeannette - before you make Krauthammer, how do you say neocon?

Posted February 3, 2012 at 11:44:54 PM


Howard Last

oops - hit submit to fast.

Jeannette - before you make Krauthammer President, how do you say neocon? We have had way to many neocons as President and advisers.

Posted February 3, 2012 at 11:48:07 PM


mmccrindle

As rational as Krauthammer is he should know by now that our Muslim-in-Chief would kiss the feet of the rag-heads in Tehran given half a chance.

You think 'ol Leon Panetta just kinda maybe wanted to take a stab at guessing at an Israeli attack date to stop the Iranian nuclear program? Make no mistake, he can't fart without Obama's say-so. That was just another edict from a totally inept administration.

What ever the reason (warning to fellow jihadists?) it came from the top.

Posted February 4, 2012 at 4:19:41 PM


Howard Last

mmccrindle - It is not an inept administration, they know exactly what they are doing, turning us into communist state.

Posted February 4, 2012 at 6:26:53 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund