There Was the President's Speech, and There Is Reality

· Friday, January 29, 2010

Watching President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech makes me wonder whether the reason he tells so many fibs is that he believes them himself. Either that or he is an even better actor than he is a teleprompter reader.

Obama not only wasn't contrite about his broken promises and disastrous record; he was on the attack, daring anyone to oppose his agenda -- even in the face of the Massachusetts rebuke. But let's see how some of his statements match up with reality.

On health care, he taunted congressmen to "let me know" if any of them have "a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors and stop insurance company abuses," as if his own plan would do those things.

Even the Congressional Budget Office has said most of the Democratic plans would increase the budget. Besides, you can't reduce overall costs when government forces an increase in demand, even if it caps insurance premiums and shifts costs elsewhere and/or imposes rationing. The CBO has also reported that with Obamacare, millions would remain uninsured. So under his plan, costs would rise, quality and choice would decrease, care would be rationed, millions would remain uninsured and, worst of all, the government would acquire an unprecedented level of control over all aspects of our lives.

Do conservatives have better ideas? Of course. Restore market forces through tort reform, strengthening health savings accounts, abolishing government coverage mandates, allowing consumers to purchase policies across state lines and eliminating the tax laws incentivizing employer-provided health care, which unnecessarily increase demand by making prices invisible to consumers.

A candid Obama would have said, "If any of you have a plan that does not involve restoring market forces and reducing government's role in the health care industry, I'll at least pretend to look at it." "Make no mistake," neither Obama nor his Democratic colleagues will support genuine health care reform, because to reduce costs, we must reduce government control, and they can't abide that. Period.

As for spending, Obama didn't once apologize for his reckless expenditures. Instead, he blamed his soaring deficits on his predecessor, completely misrepresenting the projected deficits under President Bush and ignoring his own deliberate doubling of the national debt over the next 10 years. That's the issue Americans are losing sleep over, and he offers only Band-Aids and smoke and mirrors.

He says he will freeze a portion of the discretionary budget, but as Cato Institute reports, 83 percent of the budget will be off-limits. Other than his "stimulus" insanity, the real explosion in spending is occurring in the entitlements that he refuses to touch. Even his mini-freeze wouldn't begin until 2011 (why wait?), and it would be dwarfed by his planned spending increases for other socialistic projects, including a new "stimulus plan." And how about that assault on personal and fiscal responsibility with his promise to forgive student loans after 20 years?

How Obama can stand before the nation and insist on spending more borrowed money to accomplish something his first "stimulus plan" didn't achieve (job creation), but exacerbated, is beyond me. How he can blame President Bush for his own broken promise that unemployment wouldn't exceed 8 percent if his "stimulus" bill were implemented is jaw-dropping. He even said he saved 2 million jobs. Scary delusional! Or scary sinister!

Speaking of chutzpah, did he actually dare to utter the words "transparent" and "accountable"? How about those phantom legislative districts receiving stimulus monies, Mr. President? How about that promise to televise the health care debates on C-SPAN?

He said he hadn't raised income taxes "a single dime" on 95 percent of the people. Yet in almost the same breath, he promised to redouble his efforts on cap and tax, which would increase the average family's energy costs by almost $3,000 per year. I don't believe his campaign promise was limited to income taxes, by the way.

How about his righteous ranting on earmark reform? Sorry, we've been down that twisted road with you before, Mr. President.

Then there was his audacious riff on lobbyists. Been there, done that, too, Mr. President, with your phony promise to keep lobbyists out of the White House.

Obama also railed against "partisanship, shouting and pettiness" as he filled most of his speech with just those things, even castigating the Supreme Court, erroneously, for opening the door to foreign corporations' campaign contributions.

How about his statement that "America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity"? Hmm. Tell that to the Iranian and Honduran peoples. He must have meant once he's out of office.

Then there was his bizarre out-of-body pivot, when he blamed Washington for our problems.

All of this, especially Obama's obvious incapacity for self-doubt, is disturbingly surreal.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Alex Torello

David: Don't you think Obama's belief that he can keep pulling the wool over everyone's eyes began when, as a candidate, he got away with the most blatant lies, excuses, obfuscations and cover-ups?

Even now we hear his mindless toadies declaring this choppy, preachy, condescending, banal reporting on the state of the nation to be "inspiring," etc.

His (and their) ignorance of history is a testament to the ills of the modern educational system in our Country.

Keep on exposing this fraud.

Posted January 29, 2010 at 12:50:45 PM


MichaelSSEC

It's difficult to decide which deceit or blunder was most disturbing, since there were so many and they were so serious. Was it his continuing effort to blame everybody and everything, especially George W Bush, for the problems the nation faces? That's pretty alarming, quite frankly.

Was it his insistence on pursuing Cap & Tax to "solve" the global warming crisis, even after scientists were caught repeatedly faking their research? That's stunning.

Was it his obsession with the personal pronoun "I" that he used in virtually every sentence, most often as the subject thereof? That's creepy.

Was it the realization that he really does believe Americans are too stupid to see through his act? That's outrageous.

Was it his baffling attempt to take credit for human rights advances even as he snuffed them in Iran and tried to cut the legs out from under them in Honduras? That's alarming.

Or was it the fact that a self-described "Constitutional scholar," former editor of the Harvard Law Review and sworn defender of the United States Constitution does not grasp any of its most basic principles -- especially that of free speech? That's terrifying.

Nevertheless, his speech was a good one -- for Republicans. If we've learned nothing from this foolish experiment in radical Leftist politics, it's that the best remedy for Liberal damnfoolishness is Liberals themselves. So my motto has been and continues to be: KEEP TALKING, LIBERALS! Keep talking...

They've been doing a LOT of talking for the last year, and Americans have heard what they were saying. And they do not like it one bit. Best thing for America is to let the Liberals shoot their mouths off as much they want, the louder the better! They'll talk themselves right out of a job, sooner or later!

Posted January 31, 2010 at 3:11:13 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund