Options
Top Ten, but Falling
· Sunday, January 22, 2012
If you were to rank the countries of the world in terms of economic freedom, where would the United States fall? First, or at least in the top three? The top five, surely.
Guess again.
Because there is, in fact, a resource that ranks every country by this measure -- the 2012 Index of Economic Freedom, and the United States comes in at No. 10. That's right: the nation that is supposed to lead the world in liberty finishes behind nine others, including Ireland, Chile, Switzerland and Canada. Even the small African nation of Mauritius beats us.
And while this ranking represents a new low for the U.S., which was ninth last year, it's part of a recent trend. As recently as 2008, the U.S. ranked seventh worldwide, had a score of 81 (on a 0-100 scale, with 100 being the freest), and was listed as a "free" economy. Today, the U.S. has a score of 76.3 and is "mostly free," the Index's second-highest category.
Now before we explain why, let's back up and briefly touch on how the editors of the Index -- published annually since 1995 by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal -- figure out the scores. Each country is evaluated in four broad areas of economic freedom:
1) Rule of Law. Are property rights protected through an effective and honest judicial system? How widespread is corruption -- bribery, extortion, graft, and the like?
2) Regulatory Efficiency. Are businesses able to operate without burdensome and redundant regulations? Are individuals able to work where and how much they want? Is inflation in check? Are prices stable?
3) Limited Government. Are taxes high or low? Is government spending kept under control, or is it growing unchecked?
4) Open Markets: Can goods be traded freely? Are there tariffs, quota or other restrictions? Can individuals invest their money where and how they see fit? Is there an open banking environment that encourages competition?
For the most part, of course, the United States does very well on these measures. Finishing 10th out of 179 countries, after all, is impossible if you don't have a large degree of economic freedom, and the U.S. is very free. Property rights are strong. Our court system is independent. Business start-up procedures are efficient. The labor market is flexible.
But in certain key areas, the United States is lagging badly. A big one is government spending. The U.S. now ranks 127th in the world in this category. Spending by government consumes 42.2 percent of gross domestic product. Total public debt is now larger than the entire economy.
Taxes are another problem. The U.S. score isn't helped by the fact that the U.S. tax structure relies so much on taxes on capital and investment, which restrict growth. Regulations continue to grow in number, making it harder than necessary for our economy to recover. How bad is it? More than 70 major rules have been imposed since 2009, and they cost Americans nearly $40 billion last year.
The deterioration of the U.S. score on freedom from corruption is especially troubling. Blame the government (read: taxpayer) bailouts of troubled industries such as automakers. These create the perception of corruption. As far as many Americans are considered, it's politically well-connected companies and special-interest groups who get the breaks. They see the more than 1,100 companies that have won exceptions to Obamacare, and they can't help but wonder if some form of cronyism is involved.
We can't hope to create the number of jobs we need under these conditions.
That's why we have to get serious about cutting government down to size, overhauling our tax system, and transforming costly entitlement programs. Otherwise, the United States has just completed its last year as a top-10 finalist in the Index.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Lyn Nofziger, "North Star" of the Reagan Revolution: "The Patriot not only does the best job of putting important news, policy and opinion in proper context, but also of cutting down to size the pompous praters and propagandists on the left." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Arnold Ahlert: Catholics vs. Obama
- Michael Reagan: White House Website Gone Wild
- Ken Blackwell: I'll Have Another
- Jeff Jacoby: The Peace Process Battered Israel's Reputation
- Victor Davis Hanson: The Bad/Good Idea of Removing Assad
- Michael Barone: Cocooned Liberals Are Unprepared for Political Debate
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Great Debate
- Cal Thomas: The Media's Religion Deficit
- Larry Elder: Why Jeremiah Wright Matters -- Still
- Ben Shapiro: First, They Came for Cory Booker
- Ann Coulter: Figures Don't Lie: Democrats Do
- Burt Prelutsky: A President Not Fit for Man or Beast
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























mmccrindle
Obama-Soetoro, whom I'll refer to as the Obastard (an apt moniker since his flakey mother married his flakier father who was married to several other flakey women at the time), will have us in the bottom ten should he somehow win/fraudulently steal this election.
Posted January 22, 2012 at 8:54:49 AM
wjmccrindle
These create the perception of corruption.
Perception? I think actual corruption would be more apt. This administration is criminal, way beyond mere perception of corruption.
Posted January 22, 2012 at 10:18:53 AM
Howard Last
Don't forget the Patriot Act thanks to Dubya and the Defense Appropriations Act that was recently passed. Both of these were passed with the help of the RINO's. So if anyone says there is a difference between the democrap and the republicrats mention these two minor items.
Posted January 22, 2012 at 11:50:02 AM
Howard Last
mmccrindle - Obastard, it fits!
Posted January 22, 2012 at 11:53:03 AM
nauart
Do any of our congressmen/women read any of this information or do they wait for the political bosses to tell them how to reach or think? What I have wseen in Washington DC sinse my teen years is a bunch of lawyers marching lock step just as my father did when he voted based only on the union voter's guide (order).
Can any of these politicians read or apply rational thinking?
Posted January 23, 2012 at 1:24:44 PM
AngelAuthor
Of course! It's all going according to Obama's plan to bring the U.S. down from it's exceptionalism "high horse" and more in ordinary line with the rest of the world.
Posted January 23, 2012 at 2:00:34 PM
Alison
Re: Obastard, no, Obamas parents were legally married at the time of his birth, IN Hawaii (an American state), TO an American citizen who had not left the US prior to his birth. Soetero was her SECOND husband, and she sent Obama from the Phillipines to live with her parents (in Hawaii) while she was married to him. The fact that his father Obama may have had another wife or two in Nigeria matters not to the legitimacy of her marriage and her baby. McCrindle, if there are criminal acts going on, why is there not a judicial outcry on Capitol Hill? Angel: what proof do you have (not rumors, not bad mouthing, actual proof) that the President of the United States has a plan to "bring the U.S. down"? Do tell!!!
Posted January 23, 2012 at 8:38:22 PM