A Nation of Takers

· Saturday, February 18, 2012

Americans pride themselves on being a self-reliant people. We know that the freedom to make our own fortune sets us apart from many other nations. It's what has drawn generations of immigrants to our shores -- men and women risking their lives to live a life in which they, not the government, are in charge.

But with each passing year, that portrait flies more and more in the face of reality. The numbers plainly show that we are becoming a people dependent not on ourselves, but on government. We are evolving into a nation of takers, not givers.

The numbers in question come in the form of a new Heritage Foundation report titled "The 2012 Index of Dependence on Government." You don't have to read far before you realize that the days of Horatio Alger stories are behind us.

Start with the most basic facts: Today, more than 67.3 million Americans rely on assistance from Washington for everything from food, shelter and clothing to college tuition and health care. These benefits cost federal taxpayers roughly $2.5 trillion annually.

Oh, about those taxpayers: Even as the number of Americans receiving federal aid rises, the number of federal taxpayers continues to drop: Nearly half of all Americans -- 49.5 percent -- don't pay any federal income taxes. And if that strikes you as an equation that will spell trouble down the road, you have a better grasp of the problem than many politicians have right now.

"The danger of a growing government-dependent population," says William Beach, Index co-author and director of Heritage's Center for Data Analysis, "is that it's voting for more benefits that end up being paid by fewer taxpayers. At some point, this unsustainable fiscal model will collapse."

Perhaps the most startling part of the Index concerns how much assistance is being distributed. Americans who rely on government receive an average $32,748 worth of benefits. How high is that? Higher than the average American's disposable personal income: $32,446.

Yes, being dependent on government is actually a better deal for some people than working. If that doesn't turn the whole American ideal on its head, nothing does.

The pace of the change is troubling, too. Overall, the Index -- which scores the nation's dependency across numerous federal assistance programs that were once done through communities, churches, neighborhood groups and the private sector -- rose 8.1 percent in 2010 (the most recent data available).

Not surprisingly, all this spending is eating up a larger and larger portion of Washington's budget. The amount of federal spending that went toward dependence-creating government programs was 28.3 percent in 1962. By 1990, it was 48.5 percent. Now it's 70.5 percent. How much higher can it go without making it impossible to pay for other essential functions? Defense, for example, already faces draconian cuts in the near future.

We shouldn't be fatalistic, of course. This disturbing course can be reversed. But it's going to take some serious political will -- the kind that comes only when We the People apply pressure. Congress has got to curb federal spending, reform welfare and entitlement programs, and encourage more community-based aid and personal responsibility.

Otherwise, we'll see the downward spiral continue. The research shows that as bureaucratic programs replace aid from private charities, communities and neighbors, Americans are less likely to prosper and achieve true independence.

"Liberty means responsibility," George Bernard Shaw once wrote. "That is why most men dread it." Most men, perhaps, but surely not Americans. Or will later generations look back and see that we stood by and allowed our once-great nation lose its charter as the beacon of independence for the rest of the world?


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

LinnieBeth

I think it may be worse: all federal expenses are paid by PRIVATE SECTOR taxes, that means the private sector is also paying the taxes that public sector folks pay out of their paychecks, which we pay them.

Posted February 18, 2012 at 3:39:44 AM


Richard D Wheeler

It is even worse than that. Just last week I heard a Politician (don't remember name but it had a D after it) Was on the news talking about how much in taxes all those new 100,000 dollar a year federal workers paid. They just don't get it that when they pay those wages and get back 13% we the taxpayers still lost 87%. I don't know what we can do but it is starting to look like a lost cause.

Posted February 18, 2012 at 4:08:17 AM


mac

So what brilliant schemes are our most noble progressives implementing that Greece obviously missed?

Oh, yes. We can just print more money.

You just gotta love those liberals.

Posted February 18, 2012 at 10:46:15 AM


mac

If Obama gets back in it will be a lost cause.

The options then will be few but I believe the dividing of our nation to be a worthwile cause. Let the progressives have their utopia, I don't want any part of it.

We can take our Constitution with us and narrow the scope of the commerse clause that the left has used to destroy our country.

I already feel that Obama is NOT my president after repeatedly violating his oath of office. The POTUS is supposed to protect and defend the Constitution not try to fundamentally transform the nation. He is guilty of deriliction of duty at best or treason. Take your pick. He is an insideous domestic enemy.

Posted February 19, 2012 at 7:50:44 AM


pete

We didn't become a dependent nation overnight and by ourselves. It took government and forced excessive taxation to get us here.

We've paid SS tax for years, most of us on 100% of our income as our earnings were below the cap, while the really rich and famous paid on a comparative pittance of what their income.

Had we been allowed to invest that same amount, had our government had some honor and integrity and invested our money as tho it were their own instead of spending it like it was their own, we'd all be better off.

As it is, they have been screwing us for so long and so hard they have left many of us with no choice. If it wasn't for my SS and VA disability I'd have been in the streets long ago.

As a disabled veteran, I can tell you what I get isn't an 'entitlement.' I earn that monthly payment today the same as I did nearly 40 years ago, with sleepless nights, distrust of anybody - including my own family - approaching from my blind side, and pain in the heart every time I hear of another of my brothers ailing or dying from this or that cancer. People who have been in combat don't come home the same, and very few if any ever return to any semblance the person they once were. This impedes their ability to succeed in most jobs and limits their chances for promotion right off the bat, and when the media is complicit in lying to the public, telling them selective stories and making us the bad guys, in building up public resentment of us, it makes it even worse.

After working for a company for nearly a decade, buying a home, and beginning a family, I went to work one day and was greeted by the new district manager with, "You were in Nam. As far as I'm concerned all of you are drug addicts and alcoholics and you don't deserve a dam thing. You're all a bunch of losers. I'll fire you the first chance I get."

Now if you think the smack upside the head, the emotional trauma and stress from that wasn't as bad as getting blown up by a 120mm mortar or an 500 pound bomb IED, well ...

Posted February 19, 2012 at 12:32:06 PM


mac

Hey Pete,

Sounds like a wonderful guy.

Why, I'd like to meet that dist. manager of yours, I think we'd get along just dandy. I'd even like to show him my collection.

Ask him if he'd be interested in a little hunting trip and get back to me.

Posted February 19, 2012 at 1:49:17 PM


BoFromTexas

@Pete. Thanks for what you did. I missed being drafted by the fact that Nixon decided no more warm bodies would be taken into the military as of Jan 1, 1973. I preach to folks all the time about the lousy food, beds, billets, missions, etc., not to mention the common occurrence of getting wounded or killed. Those of us in the red portions of the country gratefully acknowledge your many and tremendous sacrifices. As for your former boss, I like to fish at a particularly deep lake. Think he would like to learn how to fish in a deep lake?

Posted February 19, 2012 at 10:13:39 PM


Capt. Call

Pete, I honor you for your sacrifices! The attitude demonstrated by the district manager is part of the problem! Sir, I salute you!

Posted February 20, 2012 at 12:05:47 AM


JoeF

This column plainly presents THE single, pivotal issue of this election year. In every debate and appearance this dependency/self-reliance issue can be raised and hung around the President's neck, and each Republican challenger should present ideas to address the problem. This is how you campaign against Obama, and I believe it must be hammered home that he is the candidate and the party of dependency, and federal government dependency must be reduced if America is to retain its promises of freedom and opportunity to its citizens, and the world.

Posted February 20, 2012 at 12:46:20 PM


Robert A. Hall

Alas, we may have already passed the tipping point. As Edward Gibbon wrote: “In the end more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free.” I will link to this from my Old Jarhead blog.

Robert A. Hall

Author: The Coming Collapse of the American Republic

All royalties go to help wounded veterans

For a free PDF of my book, write tartanmarine(at)gmail.com

Posted February 20, 2012 at 1:05:13 PM


John S

@pete,

Cripple, I do not know where to begin, os, I'll just start:

I don't know when you served, but you have internet access. Did you have such in the mud and blood??

What skills do you bring to your employer??

Why are you not self employed??

My crippled @ss has been that way for the last 28.

I found a job that would pay the bills. I thought about being an entrepenuer, but my cripples don't make me the most photogenic salesman.

But I motivated my younger to graduate HS @ 16. (Private school, 10K/y for the both of them.) The elder is getting ready to Graduate from a Private University with only 10K in debt, @ 8%, which really chaps my behind.

The younger is still seeking, but understands that her future is hers, and hers alone. I've paid enough.

I was really pi ssed when I found out that my monthly VA Disability/WELfare check completely erased Bush II's "Tax rebate".

In other words: Get off your sorry @ss and DO! Refuse to depend. Or, Spend your welfare checks on "Depends".

js, Army Infantry, Ranger, Airborne, DAV.

Be blessed, and be transfigured, not malfigured. js

Posted February 20, 2012 at 1:23:32 PM


Steve

@Pete et al

Pete, I don't think anyone here has a problem with the U.S. paying benefits to its combat veterans just as workers injured on their jobs should get benfits to make them whole (as near as can be). As you note, they earn it. Washington once wrote that the willingness of our young people to serve is directly related to their perception of how the veterans of past wars are treated.

Paying able-bodied couch potatoes to lay on their arses is another matter.

The point of Feulner's commentary is much broader. With one half of Americans paying NO TAXES, they are voting for more and more benefits (by voting for corrupt politicians who promise them The IMPOSSIBLE), we are bound to have a conflict. At some point ATLAS will decide to SHRUG.

Ben Franklin predicted that all liberty would be lost when voters determined they could vote themselves money from the treasury.

Having long ago abandoned our Constitution as being relevant to limiting the D.C. Leviathan, we are now in the Tyranny of the Majority phase. As Thomas Jefferson described it, "Democracy is nothing more than mob rule where 51 percent of the people take away the rights of the other 49."

We are long past the tipping point where just over half the country votes to force the 49% (or less) to provide material comforts for the rest. The 49% no longer own the fruits of their own labor.

Long ago, we called that condition of servitude "slavery." We even Amended the Constitution in 1865 to forbid chattel slavery before we ratified an Amendment to enable tax slavery in 1913 (16th - Income taxes). Now, progressives like Ohdrama call it "fairness."

Adjust your chains, folks, and get comfortable.

Posted February 20, 2012 at 3:42:19 PM


Bob Marshall

Pete, that is a good post. I too served in the nam. Three tours as a U.S. Marine. I am sorry you were disabled as i only suffered from PTSD which is not considered a disability. Thank for your service to our country.We have become a nation where 49.5 % pay no taxes.There are too many entitlement programs for the number of tax payers.we have a congress that spends like there is no tomorrow.easy to spend someone else's money. Had Social Security been left in its own fund there would be plenty of money. Had millions of jobs not been outsourced there would be plenty of jobs in America so many entitlement programs would have not been necessary. it has been said, if you take from Peter to pay Paul, you can always count of the support of Paul.

Posted February 20, 2012 at 6:00:18 PM


Amok

Atlas Shrugged?

Posted February 20, 2012 at 7:49:46 PM


JAC

Mr. Feulner says, "But it's going to take some serious political will -- the kind that comes only when We the People apply pressure." The problem is, as he mentions elsewhere in the column, that nearly half of the people are those who won't apply the pressure of "We the People," because they don't want to cut off their entitlements and government handouts.

Posted February 21, 2012 at 4:29:36 PM


Mike Schuerger Sr.

I suppose this is so late that no one will read it. But I think it needs to be said.

Does anyone here doubt that much of the current mess we are in has been CAUSED by Bad Government?

Things were rough enough for us before the housing crash in 2008. Since then things have been worse. I probably lost $40k in 2009 when I sold the house I had been trying to sell for 6 years. That was long enough that I had to pay tax on the "gain." But I just had to get out from under 2 mortgage payments. That really hurt. It was supposed to pay off the debt that I had been accumulating while carrying 2 mortgages. The housing crash also eliminated the good contract I was working. I have been scrounging since May 2008 for work and never have enough. Should I NOT get food stamps to help feed my kids? I am also a vet, and the VA has been of some help. Should I not get the help available now when we need it after all the years of paying taxes? When the Government CAUSED much of the pain we are in?

I would rather work and have to worry about having enough to pay the tax man. But that is not where we are at and I don't think I'll be there again until after the next election. Until then, scrounge for work and scrimp and try to get by.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 7:14:00 PM


kev

if you will look carefully at the entitlements - a staggering majority of these are going to the elderly.

Your Money Is Spent On %

National Defense 20%

Veterans and Foreign Affairs 4%

Medicaid, Food Stamps, and Related Programs 16%

Unemployment and Social Services 9%

Social Security, Medicare, and Other Retirement 36%

Net Interest on the Debt 6%

Law Enforcement and General Government 2%

Physical, Human, and Community Development 7%

Posted April 14, 2012 at 1:42:42 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund