Life in the T.S. of A.

· Sunday, November 21, 2010

WASHINGTON -- Fifty years ago William F. Buckley wrote a memorable complaint about the fact that Americans do not complain enough. His point, like most of the points he made during his well-lived life, is, unfortunately, more pertinent than ever. Were he still with us he would favor awarding the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which he received in 1991, to John Tyner, who, when attempting to board a plane in San Diego, was provoked by some Transportation Security Administration personnel.

When Buckley was asked how he came up with topics for three columns a week, he jauntily replied that the world annoyed him that frequently. The fecundity of the world as an irritant was on display one winter evening in 1960 when Buckley found himself in an insufferably hot car on a New Haven Railroad commuter train from Grand Central Station to his Stamford, Conn., home. Everyone was acutely uncomfortable; no one was complaining.

"In a more virile age, I thought, the passengers would have seized the conductor and strapped him down on a seat over the radiator to share the fate of his patrons." But he had "nonchalantly walked down the gauntlet of eighty sweating American freemen, and not one of them had asked him to explain why the passengers in that car had been consigned to suffer."

Buckley, who was gifted at discerning the metaphysical significance of the quotidian, thought he saw civilization tottering on its pedestal. He was not mistaken:

"It isn't just the commuters, whom we have come to visualize as a supine breed who have got onto the trick of suspending their sensory faculties twice a day while they submit to the creeping dissolution of the railroad industry. It isn't just they who have given up trying to rectify irrational vexations. It is the American people everywhere."

Happily, not quite everywhere today. Not anywhere where Tyners are.

When TSA personnel began looking for weapons of mass destruction in Tyner's underpants, he objected to having his groin patted. A TSA functionary, determined to do his duty pitilessly -- his duty is to administer the latest (but surely not the last) wrinkle in the government's ever-intensifying protection of us -- said: "If you're not comfortable with that, we can escort you back out and you don't have to fly today."

Tyner: "I don't understand how a sexual assault can be made a condition of my flying."

TSA: "This is not considered a sexual assault."

Tyner: "It would be if you weren't the government. ..."

TSA: "Upon buying your ticket you gave up a lot of rights."

Oh? John Locke, call your office.

The theory -- perhaps by now it seems like a quaint anachronism -- on which the nation was founded is, or was: Government is instituted to protect pre-existing natural rights essential to the pursuit of happiness. Today, that pursuit often requires flying, which sometimes involves the wanding of 3-year-olds and their equally suspect teddy bears.

What the TSA is doing is mostly security theater, a pageant to reassure passengers that flying is safe. Reassurance is necessary if commerce is going to flourish, and if we are going to get to grandma's house on Thursday to give thanks for the Pilgrims and for freedom. If grandma is coming to our house, she may be wanded while barefoot at the airport because democracy -- or the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment; anyway, something -- requires the amiable nonsense of pretending that no one has the foggiest idea what an actual potential terrorist might look like.

But enough, already. Enough trivializing important values -- e.g., air safety -- by monomaniacal attempts to maximize them. Disproportion is the common denominator of almost all of life's absurdities. Automobile safety is important. But attempting to maximize it would begin (but by no means end) with forbidding left turns.

Bureaucracies try to maximize their missions. They can't help themselves. Adult supervision is required to stand athwart this tendency, yelling "Stop!"

Again, Buckley: "Every year, whether the Republican or the Democratic Party is in office, more and more power drains away from the individual to feed vast reservoirs in far-off places; and we have less and less say about the shape of events which shape our future."

The average American has regular contact with the federal government at three points -- the IRS, the post office and the TSA. Start with that fact if you are formulating a unified field theory to explain the public's current political mood.

(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Jimmy D

"The average American has regular contact with the federal government at three points -- the IRS, the post office and the TSA."

...and, increasingly, at the Doctors office.

...and, ultimately, at every place of publicly funded education.

...and, for about a quarter of us now, at the umemployment office.

Abolish the IRS with Fair Tax or shrink it 90% with a Flat Tax.

Sell off the Post office to the highest bidder. And AMTRACK while we're at it.

Terminate TSA. Let Airlines provide their own security. Bring in consultants from Israel.

Repeal ObamaCare. Remove impediments to the Free Market and let affordable Capitalist Medicine thrive.

Eliminate the Department of (Youth Propaganda)Education.

Pass the Balanced Budget Amendment. And just watch people go back to work.

Posted November 21, 2010 at 9:12:27 AM


MARINE

Interesting article at a coincidental time. My daughter,husband, and grandson were at my house yesterday for an early thanksgiving. They are leaving for Disneyland on Wednesday, and the topic of airport screening came up. She is a liberal by the way and I a conservative. I voiced my opinion about Govt. control and how the process hasen't caught anybody, it was just another act of the Govt. taking control of our lives. How the paranoia of terrorism has affected our better judgement, and we have submitted to the theory that the Govt. can protect us better than we can protect ourselves.

Her response was " well if it stops another 9/11 then it's not so bad". I dropped the conversation on that remark, knowing that explaining 9/11 would only irritate my wife futher--she dosen't like me talking politics with the girl's--as one is a Lawyer, one a Teacher, and the brilliant one an Occupational Therepist. As you can see I'am out numbered when it comes to common sense. I'am retired and in no hurry to get anywhere, so I think I will hook-up the camper and drive where I'am going rather than fly anymore. I told her I will look for her body-scan on the internet and see if they did her justice.

Posted November 21, 2010 at 9:30:32 AM


contrary1

Great column

@Jimmy D

Ditto and Amen!

@Marine

thanks for trying - sometimes it eventually works. :)

Posted November 21, 2010 at 12:50:00 PM


Ruth Ann Wilson

REPLY TO MARINE:

You sent them to college because you wanted the "BEST" for them, they turned your children against you and all that you valiantly did for the Country seems at an end.

There is HOPE. The End is not YET. Your Common Sense will prevail, and because Common Sense is based on the Ten Commandments of Almighty God, the Truth, always prevails. Your children will hear your comments echoing in their ears, for the Truth always prevails, so keep, keeping on.

I here that stuff, too. "I'd rather be safe, than sorry." "Is life so sweet and peace so dear, as to bought at the price of chains and slavery????

Forbid it Almighty God, I know not what course other may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty or give me death." Patrick Henry The founders had it just right.

For God & Country

The American

Posted November 21, 2010 at 2:00:24 PM


Kim Costanzo

Jimmy D, every single one of your ideas were right on target. Going to keep that list alive for all those politicians who need it.

Marine, your kids are the reminder of what our colleges are producing, liberals (marxists) with a half education and plenty of indoctrination. There has been however, some talk going around lately that due to what I just layed out and the outrageous cost of an Ivy League (or lesser) education, the tuition bill just doesn't seem worth it anymore. Not going to college and becoming business savvy as in small business starts is being encouraged now by some parents.

A couple years ago, I was flying to Florida to see the kids for extended (winter) visits and always had a one way ticket as I wanted to buy my ticket when I was ready to go home. Pretty much everytime I was singled out for that extra check with the wand and my arms stretched out while they asked if I had a problem with "touching", to which I responded, "Depends on what you are touching." After a few trips like this, it was getting on my nerves. So on a day I when I was just a bit stressed and overtired and when they informed me I had to go through it again, I said with an attitude, "Do I look like an ARAB to you??? What is this, flying while blonde"? Got no reaction except stares. Haven't flown since this new nude scanner and grope has been instituted and I won't. Driving while blonde is what I will be doing. There is a solution for every problem. As you guys well know. Take Care.

Posted November 21, 2010 at 2:19:16 PM


SCC

I have worked at a hub airport, and it really blows my mind that folks are okay with being felt up and publicly humiliated in the name of "security" while the vast majority of air cargo goes unscreened. There are very few commercial passenger flights that do not have some sort of cargo onboard, and chances are that it was not screened except to verify that it came from a known shipper. Why should passengers have to be x-rayed and assaulted when most packages aren't given a first look, never mind a second?

Posted November 21, 2010 at 3:42:30 PM


Army Officer

I always travel in my uniform when I'm on orders, and right after 9/11 I got a lot of extra attention at check-ins. I'm sure it was because the bottom-feeders who make up most "security" organizations wanted to show how they were being sensitive and not profiling (a.k.a. doing their job), so I usually got wanded when traveling - on orders, with my military ID, in uniform. I remember one flight when a really big dude in a turban sauntered right through while I was being re-checked after I cleared the metal detector without setting it off. Go figure. We're in a war, for heaven's sake. In a saner world a soldier on duty would be consider out of uniform if he did NOT have a weapon.

The TSA rent-a-cops made such idiots of themselves during that time that they must have been told to knock that nonsense off. Now when I travel I never get pulled aside. Apparently it's not the uniform (anybody can buy one of those and get a short haircut), but when the ticket is purchased by the military and the traveler presents official orders at check-in, they don't seem screw with us any more. (I would hope that a civilian wearing a complete uniform - thereby impersonating a military member - would automatically get more attention.)

It irks me that every other law-abiding American doesn't get the same consideration I do though. George Will is right to refer to the kabuki dance at the gate as "security theater." Being forced to choose between 1) posing for porno pictures or 2) submitting to sexual assault as a condition of flying is not making us safer: it only conditions us to be sheep. I intend to curtail my off-duty flying as much as possible.

One more thing while I'm ranting. TSA only permits males to grope males and females to grope females. Why? The answer is that it is supposed to be non-sexual, but doesn't that presume both the groper and the gropee are heterosexual? Does TSA permit homosexuals to feel up members of the same sex? Just wondering...

Posted November 21, 2010 at 10:42:36 PM


CharlieEcho

My last flight was in a military helicopter. Until there is a family emergency of some kind, it will remain so. We are giving up a great deal to these terrorists. China is smiling.

Posted November 22, 2010 at 10:56:36 AM


MoeLarryCurley

Jimmy D:

Fair Tax, Heck yeah....but let's not abolish the IRS. We just use them to audit the government (with congressional oversight) instead of the taxpayer.

Posted November 22, 2010 at 11:21:12 AM


BT

Score another one for the terrorists (our PC police) and the middle eastern young Muslim men that started all this. When we are presumed to be the enemy who is safe? Bin Laden must be laughing his head off.

Posted November 22, 2010 at 12:39:13 PM


MIKE LESTER

"Bin Laden must be laughing his head off." -BT

My thoughts exactly:

http://rn-t.com/view/full_story_cartoon/10328941/article-Mike-Lester-s-Cartoon--11-16-10?instance=top_right_cartoon

Posted November 22, 2010 at 1:40:12 PM


TomDLew

SCC, you asked

"Why should passengers have to be x-rayed and assaulted when most packages aren't given a first look, never mind a second?"

The packages don't care.

Packages don't constitute an appreciative audience for the Kabuki theatre that TSA conducts.

TSA actually is doing profiling: if it walks or talks, it is not a package, therefore must be x-rayed or groped. (This from the TSA Screener Training Manual)

Posted November 22, 2010 at 3:27:56 PM


Howard Last

Exercise your First Amendment Right by asking when the Fourth Amendment was modified by "not at airports." Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Adams and James Madison call your office.

Posted November 22, 2010 at 6:32:34 PM


Robert the Scot

Some things to think about:

(1) You cannot legislate common sense.

(2) IGNORANCE can be cured, but STUPID is forever.

(3) Personal responsibility is what it's all about.

Posted November 22, 2010 at 6:43:34 PM


karl anglin

Give me the liberty to know,

to utter, and to argue freely

according to concience, above

all liberties.---John milton

(1608-1674)

Posted November 22, 2010 at 7:04:01 PM


Monkeyshooter

May I suggest that we use the automobile insurance argument to solve the airport security issue of the TSA. This administration told us they can force Obamacare on us because we can be required to buy automobile insurance. Everyone knows that a male under 25 pays more for car insurance because they are considered a statistical liability. Let’s figure out who presents the greatest statistical liability and focus our screening on them. If it isolates middle-eastern 17-36 year old Muslim males, so be it. If the statistical liability approach of car insurance is good enough for the young men we are asking to protect us in war, then it is good enough for the potential enemies who wish to drag us into that war.

The advantages to this approach are: 1) Everyday freedom loving Americans will be less likely to be treated as potential terrorists. 2) Limited funds (has anyone noted that we are out of money?) can be used where they are most needed. 3) The administration can avoid using the term “profiling” with the same vigor it wishes to avoid the term “terrorist”. 4) If this administration will not use the automobile insurance approach on terrorists, then maybe they will repent from using the automobile insurance approach to force Obamacare on peace loving law abiding liberty seeking citizens.

Posted November 22, 2010 at 10:07:58 PM


p3orion

Dear TSA Agent-

I have to say I'm disappointed that after our "intimate encounter" the other day, I haven't heard from you. I thought we had something special. I guess you're busy these days though, LOL.

Since you made it clear that you want a close relationship with me, I've been reading up on all this business at the security gates lately. It seems like it's pretty clear to everyone but your boss Janet Napolitano that the PornoScan 2010 and "enhanced pat-downs" (some people are calling it "Gate Rape", haha!) violate the Fourth Amendment right of all Americans to be free from unreasonable searches without probable cause.

But I know you TSA screeners would not on your own choose to do these humiliating, invasive, and borderline-criminal searches; that sort of thing is decided well above your paygrade. You're just following orders, right?

I'm sure your GED class didn't cover a lot of world history (you should Google it when you have some free time; there's a lot of good stuff, especially all that about something called the "Bill of Rights.") Anyway, there were some trials a while back at a place called Nuremberg, where a lot of folks tried that very same "just following orders" defense. I don't want to ruin the ending for you, but let's just say, it didn't work very well, haha!

Can't wait to get together again. See you at the trials!

Sincerely,

We the People

Posted November 23, 2010 at 2:38:37 PM


JB

Thankfully it is sounding like there are other Americans out there who are FED UP with what America has morphed into. We are now a totalitarian state and the government dictates to us the terms of our existence and we have no choice but to take it. Wow, I can remember long ago, thinking we were better than North Korea, China, the Soviet Union and other despotic states because WE were the government. Not any more. We have lost our freedom. Its gone. Didnt we fight a War of Independence over such things once, long ago?

Posted November 23, 2010 at 4:01:42 PM


DrThunder

Great comments above from all you Patriots. And yes, JB, we did fight that War of Independence long ago. Perhaps it's time we fight another one. As Thomas Jefferson said, "A little rebellion now and then is a good thing. It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government."

Stay armed and ready, Patriots. God bless you all and Happy Thanksgiving.

Posted November 23, 2010 at 8:59:44 PM


hank

Obama has two more years to complete the dismantling of our country and there is nothing we can do about it.

Posted November 24, 2010 at 2:31:20 AM


James R. Cooke

Response to @ hank: Yes, there is something we can do about the actions and behavior of Obama & Co. - but it will take an investment of that most valuable commodity, time. We shall have to speak quite plainly and quite frequently with our elected representatives. Part of the short and simple message will be our deep concern about having one more chance to get the "federal" government under control and down to size. Plainly and frequently, but respectfully. Or we will elect someone who will.

Response to those who have well-worded logical solutions: this whole Obama kabuki dance is not about logic - it is about power. Raw, sustained power. That is why Obama and Co. are blatantly pushing class warfare upon Americans, the tactic of divide and conquer, that his mentors and many of his associates promoted and with which they continue to wound us.

Posted November 25, 2010 at 11:39:44 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund