Faking the Pledge: Republican Promises of Fiscal Sobriety Ring Hollow

· Wednesday, September 29, 2010

In the "Pledge to America" they unveiled last week, House Republicans promise they will "launch a sustained effort to stem the relentless growth in government that has occurred over the past decade." Who better for the job than the folks who ran the government for most of that time?

If the GOP's record of fiscal fecklessness were not enough reason to doubt its newfound commitment to curbing "Washington's irresponsible spending habits," the pledge's failure to address entitlement and defense programs would be.

The Republicans say they want to "have a responsible, fact-based conversation with the American people about the scale of the fiscal challenges we face and the urgent action that is required to deal with them." That's hard to do when only a small share of the $3.8 trillion budget is open for discussion, and then only in the vaguest terms.

The Pledge to America, which seems to be based on the assumption that America has a short memory, castigates Democrats for "their out-of-control spending spree." Republicans, you may recall, had a spending spree of their own during George W. Bush's recently concluded administration, when both discretionary and total spending doubled -- nearly 10 times the growth seen during Bill Clinton's two terms.

In fact, says Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow at George Mason University's Mercatus Center, "President Bush increased government spending more than any of the six presidents preceding him, including LBJ." Republicans controlled the House of Representatives for six of Bush's eight years, and their fingerprints are all over Bush's budget busters, including the trillion-dollar wars to replace dictators with democrats in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Medicare prescription drug benefit, enacted in 2003, is expected to cost something like $800 billion during its first decade, further darkening Medicare's already dire fiscal outlook. It passed the Senate with 42 Republican votes and the House with 207.

The Troubled Asset Relief Program, which the Republicans now promise to "cancel" because it exemplifies the "bailouts" that have "rightly outraged" the public by "forc(ing) responsible taxpayers to subsidize irresponsible behavior," received 34 Republican votes in the Senate and 91 in the House. The yeas included House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, Republican Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla. -- all of whom are pictured in the Pledge to America as models of fiscal rectitude and all of whom also supported the reckless Medicare expansion.

As of last week, however, the Republicans pledge to "make the decisions that are necessary to protect our entitlement programs for today's seniors and future generations." Such as? Sorry, that's all you're getting before the elections.

"Let's not get to the potential solutions," Boehner said in a Fox News interview on Sunday. "When you start down that path, you just invite all kinds of problems." Aren't solutions that invite problems what Congress is all about?

Boehner's insistence that an "adult conversation" about entitlements need not include any discussion of what to do about them suggests a certain lack of seriousness. Likewise the Pledge to America's complaints about Barack Obama's "massive Medicare cuts" and its treatment of anything pertaining to "seniors" (one-third of the budget) as a sacred category.

The Republicans think expenditures related to "security" deserve the same exalted status, presumably because a government that is bumbling, wasteful and ineffective in every other endeavor could not possibly display those characteristics when protecting Americans from terrorists. Yet defense is, among other things, a fiscal issue, consuming a fifth of the budget. The Republicans' grandiose goal of "bringing certainty to an uncertain world" is inconsistent with their goal of "a smaller, less costly and more accountable government."

Even if you trust the Republicans when they say "we have a plan" to cut $100 billion from the budget, that amounts to just 8 percent of the current $1.3 trillion deficit. And why trust them? As the Pledge to America warns, "It's not enough" to "swap out one set of leaders for another."

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Luther

It has been my contention that the Tea Party movement has been largely in response to fake conservatism which was nothing more than socialist-lite (ala Bush I & Bush II w/ assist from a compliant GOP Congress). Unfortunately, it may take a couple cycles to work the socialists out of the Republican Party so it can repair its duplicitous image. And time, given the damage done by both parties especially over the last 20 years, is not on our country's side. If the rest of the world was tumbling toward the socialist abyss we'd have time since capital seeks its most efficient environment. But China continues to relax gov't control and her people are responding to freedom by producing more and relishing the higher standard of living that comes with it. The only viable solution for our Republic is to slash, and I mean viciously, government spending and regulation at every level.

Posted September 29, 2010 at 10:20:30 AM


4gotnblud

Luther is correct in that the Tea Party arose from the failures of RINO's to adhere to plainly conservative ideals in the Republican Platform. The RINO's merely joined hands with the Democrats and continued the assault on fiscal responsibility, destruction of sovereignty through illegal immigration and continuation of trade policies that are in no manner "free" much less fair.

They failed to ensure our energy needs by not opening drilling in ANWAR,domestically and off-shore. They projected our military into theatres that have not enhanced our nation's security.

There must be no more "go along to get along" from the Republican Party or its representatives will find that a new breed of constitutents are waiting in the wings to challenge them in future primaries.

It is time for all to grow a pair and demand that our trade agreements represent fair trade. To demand passage of the FAIR TAX and disposal of the 70K page tax code that is INSANE. To return manufacturing to this nation whose population alone will provide a healthy customer base. Thinking globaly is tatamount to asking for loss of sovereignty. Time to demand energy policy to reflect reality and build nuclear plants and develope domestic oil sources. Let the private sector develope untested energy sources with some research grants to those that show viable promise and results.

Intellectuals will cringe and wail but it is past time to allow the United Nations to take a hike. We should cease providing aid ($$$$$) to the world except in humanitarian crises. The GLOBALIST PERIOD will be looked at as the greatest transfer of wealth and intellectual property in mankind and more than evens the playing field for other nations. But they and the socialists in this country will not rest until Americans have allowed the Progressives to settle into a third-world nation.

Posted September 29, 2010 at 2:10:39 PM


GordAuch

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

This is the whole rationale for the establishment of a central authority. Observe it and prosper; ignore it and perish.

Posted September 29, 2010 at 2:41:12 PM


Nick

Sorry. But even if they write it down and sign their names, I'm distrustful of the career politicians. I'm a conservative who believes that our political system, even though it's the best in the world, breeds corruption on both sides of the aisle. Politicians and government workers in general should not be afforded opportunities to make careers out of government service and public service. I will not vote for an incumbent on Nov 2.

Posted September 29, 2010 at 6:02:40 PM


Convet

It's "show and tell" time. Or, an axiom by Ronald Reagan: trust but verify.

I'll believe it when they cut pork and earmarks.

Posted September 29, 2010 at 9:46:47 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund