Oil Fuels Better Lives

· Thursday, June 10, 2010

As the deepwater Horizon spill continues to foul the Gulf of Mexico, pundits and policymakers everywhere are once again reaching for the A-word.

The BP disaster, proclaims Washington eminence David Gergen, is “a wake-up call to end our addiction to oil.’’

Without “a real climate bill,’’ warn the editors of the Washington Post, “America might be addicted to oil a lot longer than it needs to be.’’

We must “begin to wean ourselves from our addiction to oil,’’ intones Senator John Kerry on ABC, while syndicated columnist Thomas Friedman lambastes “the powerful lobbies and vested interests that want to keep us addicted to oil.’’

To be sure, this isn’t a new trope. Barack Obama liked to say during his presidential campaign that we are bankrolling “both sides of the war on terror’’ through our “addiction to oil.’’ George W. Bush, a onetime oilman, memorably announced in his 2006 State of the Union address that “America is addicted to oil.’’ According to Nexis, the media database, the metaphor dates back at least as far as 1974, when psychiatrist Thomas Szasz wrote in The New York Times that “oil addiction is equivalent to drug addiction.’’

But it’s not.

The explosion of BP’s oil rig in the Gulf has been a calamity in so many ways, above all the loss of 11 human lives. With hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil gushing daily from the crippled wellhead, the environmental impacts have been excruciating. BP is responsible for a dreadful mess, one that will take years and many millions of dollars to clean up.

Awful as the catastrophe has been, however, life without oil would be far, far worse.

Americans consume oil not because they are “addicted’’ to it, but because it enriches their lives, making possible prosperity, comfort, and mobility that would have been all but unimaginable just a few generations ago. Almost by definition, an addiction is something one is healthier without. But oil-based energy improves human health and reduces poverty — it makes life longer, safer, and better. Addictions debase life. Oil improves and expands it.

“Oil may be the single most flexible substance ever discovered,’’ writes the Manhattan Institute’s Robert Bryce in “Power Hungry,’’ a new book on the myths of “green’’ energy. “More than any other substance, oil helped to shrink the world. Indeed, thanks to its high energy density, oil is a nearly perfect fuel for use in all types of vehicles, from boats and planes to cars and motorcycles. Whether measured by weight or by volume, refined oil products provide more energy than practically any other commonly available substance, and they provide it in a form that’s easy to handle, relatively cheap, and relatively clean.’’ If oil didn’t exist, Bryce quips, we’d have to invent it.

Of course there are problems created by oil, as the Deepwater Horizon calamity so heartbreakingly demonstrates. But most things of great value come with downsides. There are 40,000 traffic fatalities in the United States each year, but no rational person suggests doing away with cars, trucks, and highways. Airplanes sometimes crash and boats sometimes sink, but air and sea travel are not derided as “addictions’’ we need to break. Deaths due to hospital infections, medication errors, or unnecessary surgery number in the scores of thousands annually, but who would recommend an end to medical care?

Someday there may be an energy source that is as abundant, efficient, clean, and economically viable as oil. But nothing today fits that bill — certainly not biofuels, wind farms, or solar power. Besides, it isn’t only energy products that we get from petroleum. Crude oil refining also makes possible plastics, synthetic fibers, lubricants, waxes, asphalt. “Other products made from petroleum,’’ notes the US Energy Information Administration, “include ink, crayons, bubble gum, dishwashing liquids, deodorant, eyeglasses, CDs and DVDs, tires, ammonia, [and] heart valves.’’

The United States consumes more than 300 billion gallons of oil per year, nearly two-thirds of it imported. There is no denying the drawbacks associated with oil, but its advantages are equally undeniable. American wealth, progress, and autonomy — the most dynamic and productive economy in history — would be impossible without it. What we have isn’t an addiction, but a blessing.

© Copyright 2010 Globe Newspaper Company.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Randall Culp

Finally, somebody "gets it". Look around the place you're sitting right now, there are a hundred things within reach that are only possible as a product of oil; the plastics in the keyboard, monitor and the computer itself come from oil, the components of the chair, the desk, the walls, the carpet, the ceiling, the baggie for your tuna sandwich, all have petroleum origins. Even the so-called "green" products are only possible because of the oil based products necessary for their manufacture.

And before anyone complains about "obscene" profits (whatever the heck those are), they need to examine just who it is that profits most from the price of fuel at the pump; the government. Before we kill that golden goose, someone needs to figure out how to replace all the federal revenues that currently come from oil and the jobs that it creates.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 2:27:47 PM


Frank

Thanks Jeff for the rational reasonable argument in favor of oil. Rarely does anyone point out the cause and effect of our amazing standard of living and the resource that makes it possible!

Posted June 10, 2010 at 3:11:26 PM


Howard Last

Anyone want to go back to living in caves? Back in the 1970's there were two bumper stickers common along the Texas gulf. "Drive 90 freeze a yankee" and "Let the bastards freeze in the dark". We need these again.

There was one form of energy not mentioned, nuclear. There was a nuclear plant built on Long Island in the 80's, Shoreham. The chicken littles complained and the plant was shut down and dismantled after initial testing at low power. The morons (should not insult morons) are complaining that they are still paying for a plant that no longer exists. And yes there is talk of building a fossil fuel plant because more power is needed. Who would have thunk it?

Posted June 10, 2010 at 3:53:56 PM


Pete Damon

" BP is responsible for a dreadful mess"

NO, BP in NOT responsible. BP is responsible for drilling, not WHERE they drilled.

EPA rules that forced BP to go deep are responsible for the blow-out, the fire, the deaths, and all the ensuing damage. Had the well been in more shallow water clean up would have been 10,000 times easier - if there had been an accident in the first place.

The EPA is the one single agency that prevents drilling in areas that could be easily monitered and easily repaird and cleaned should there be a problem. EPA forbids American companies from drilling in the same locations that Mexico, Venzuala, Brazil, and even China (thru an agreement with Cuba) drill. Do all those other countries have some kind of magic pass that protects them from failures of equipment that was mostly invented, developed and built in the US?

Posted June 11, 2010 at 3:07:38 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund