There Is No ‘Good’ Communist

· Thursday, June 24, 2010

If José Saramago, the Portuguese writer who died on Friday at 87, had been an unrepentant Nazi for the last four decades, he would never have won international acclaim or received the 1998 Nobel Prize for Literature. Leading publishers would never have brought out his books, his works would not have been translated into more than 20 languages, and the head of Portugal’s government would never have said on his death — as Prime Minister José Sócrates did say last week — that he was “one of our great cultural figures and his disappearance has left our culture poorer.’’

But Saramago wasn’t a Nazi, he was a communist. And not just a nominal communist, as his obituaries pointed out, but an “unabashed’’ (Washington Post), “unflinching’’ (AP), “unfaltering’’ (New York Times) true believer. A member since 1969 of Portugal’s hardline Communist Party, Saramago called himself a “hormonal communist’’ who in all the years since had “found nothing better.’’ Yet far from rendering him a pariah, Saramago’s communist loyalties have been treated as little more than a roguish idiosyncrasy. Without a hint of irony, AP’s obituary quoted a comment Saramago made in 1998: “People used to say about me, ‘He’s good but he’s a communist.’ Now they say, ‘He’s a communist but he’s good.’ ’’

But the idea that good people can be devoted communists is grotesque. The two categories are mutually exclusive. There was a time, perhaps, when dedication to communism could be absolved as misplaced idealism or naiveté, but that day is long past. After Auschwitz and Babi Yar, only a moral cripple could be a committed Nazi. By the same token, there are no good and decent communists — not after the Gulag Archipelago and the Cambodian killing fields and Mao’s “Great Leap Forward.’’ Not after the testimonies of Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Armando Valladares and Dith Pran.

In the decades since 1917, communism has led to more slaughter and suffering than any other cause in human history. Communist regimes on four continents sent an estimated 100 million men, women, and children to their deaths — not out of misplaced zeal in pursuit of a fundamentally beautiful theory, but out of utopian fanaticism and an unquenchable lust for power.

Mass murder and terror have always been intrinsic to communism. “Many archives and witnesses prove conclusively,’’ wrote Stéphane Courtois in his introduction to “The Black Book of Communism,’’ a magisterial compendium of communist crimes first published in France in 1997, “that terror has always been one of the basic ingredients of modern communism.’’ The uniqueness of the Holocaust notwithstanding, the savageries of communism and of Nazism are morally interchangeable — except that the former began much earlier than the latter, lasted much longer, and shed far more blood.

At this late date, there is no excuse for regarding communism and its defenders with one whit less revulsion than we regard neo-Nazis or white supremacists. Saramago’s communism should not have been indulged, it should have been despised. It should have been as great a blot on his reputation as if he had spent the last 41 years as an advocate of murderous repression and cruelty. For that, in a nutshell, is what it means to be an “unabashed’’ and “hormonal’’ communist.

Anyone who imagines that the horrors of communist rule is a thing of the past ought to spend a few minutes with, say, the State Department’s latest human rights report on North Korea. (Sample passage: “Methods of torture . . . included severe beatings, electric shock, prolonged periods of exposure to the elements, humiliations such as public nakedness, confinement for up to several weeks in small ‘punishment cells’ in which prisoners were unable to stand upright or lie down . . . and forcing mothers recently repatriated from China to watch the infanticide of their newborn infants.’’) Communism is not, as its champions like to claim, an appealing doctrine that has been perverted by monstrous regimes. It is a monstrous doctrine that hides behind appealing rhetoric. It is mass crime embodied in government. Nothing devised by human beings has caused more misery or proven more brutal.

Saramago may have been a fine writer, but he was no exemplar of goodness. Good people do not embrace communism, and communists are not good.

© Copyright 2010 Globe Newspaper Company.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

al paul

This is the best characterization of Communism I ever found. I would make a step further, adding, that it's an instruction manual for organized crime to take power over a country. Fascism or Bolshevism is the same Socialism, only with nuances of implementation and the speed of nationalization. As a second generation of Gulag's survivors I'm absolutely terrified to see this criminal regime being implemented by the current administration, step by step mirroring Mussolini... (even refusing 2000 foreign ships ready to help cleaning the Golf is the same as Stalin's refusal to let foreign ships with food to save millions of starvation)...Respectfully,

a

Posted June 24, 2010 at 10:20:24 AM


al paul

P.S. There is a book by Helen Rappoport (UK), which finally proves that Lenin was the only socialist of that time, who advocated immediate nationalization. Every one else was for gradual takeover of the private business and property. Thus Fascism is the "right way" to implement it, the true Socialism...

Posted June 24, 2010 at 10:25:58 AM


An Educated Patriot

Fellow Patriots, educate yourself on the tactics of Communism and you will as I have come to the realization that not only can this happen to the United States, it is and has been for some time, already happening:

A Study of Communism: J Edgar Hoover 1962

You Can Trust the Communists: Dr. Fred Schwartz 1960

Posted June 24, 2010 at 1:08:00 PM


Howard Last

A good communist is a dead communist. I am still waiting for someone to ask BHO, "how long have you been a communist?" The same goes for most of the democraps and many of republican leaders. BTW, the only difference between a communist and a socialist is how fast they want to act.

Posted June 24, 2010 at 4:57:17 PM


TJS

Communism is criminal. Its leader is always the most efficient combination of murder and cunning, same as the mafia or a drug cartel.

Defending communists has always been hallmark of most Democrat politicians. Thank God for Joe McCarthy, who made being a communist a permanent black mark.

Posted June 24, 2010 at 5:00:21 PM


Carole M.

Every post is so "right on" and chilling.

How can human beings be so blind - so many Americans refuse to see what BHO is about - they just don't seem to understand his ideology - heaven help us. He is moving so quickly to destroy all that we are - and yes, for whatever reason, overy the years, the word communism has become at least benign, if not a fuzzy, feel good word that indicates love and humanity for all.

Posted June 24, 2010 at 5:53:28 PM


Loftytom

Bravo Sir.

Orwell, who hated communist/fascist big brother saw it best.

A man may be a great artist, should he be a communist/fascist then he's a shabby human being.

Posted June 24, 2010 at 5:54:19 PM


Jimmy Darlington

My Mom's 87, going strong, and, unless there's a miracle, will die a Quaker atheist and a believer in communism. "Isn't communism the closest thing to the way Jesus wanted us to live, like in Acts, where they shared all things?" ("Yeah Ma, that's why He emphasized the need to shoot the ones that didn't wanna go along with that.")

My sister, well into her 60's, cares for her and does an excellent job and suffers pretty much from the same political dementia. "Oh, come ON, this is SO not the 50's, where we really have to worry about a stinking Commie under every bed."

My family is full of people who spent years verbalizing wishes for the demise of George Bush with little more seeming malice than one wishes for an end to rainy weather.

There are no end to people who are the unwitting recipients of centuries of Christian culture and who, only because of that, demonstrate habits of decency and compassion but who miss completely and deny the source of the elements of goodwill they retain.

The tragedy of that will play out in this world but the greatest pity of it is eternal. God honors those who distain Him by absenting Himself from that place of their eternal refuge and I suspect that in the course of aeons there nothing will remain of those seeming virtues they once displayed.

Posted June 25, 2010 at 1:41:15 AM


jocular joe

Jeff, you have it nailed! Great comments from everyone, especially Jimmy D. My grandfather claimed to be a communist. He pointed out that the Soviet Union was not a true communist regime...simply because they still had a Govt and not everyone was equal. Too bad I wasn't old enough to point out that his vision of communism could not take place in the real world. Real people have ambition and desire and they will take control if allowed. They may say "It is for the good of the people." But really, it is to satisfy their on ego of self-importance and to enrich their life at the expense of others...all the while contributing nothing to the well-being of the community.

Posted June 28, 2010 at 12:11:45 PM


A Grady

Please see that Sean Penn, Oliver Stone, and all those other Hollywood lunatics (and a certain president) get this memo.

Posted June 28, 2010 at 3:16:04 PM


A Grady

"There are no end...of goodwill they retain."

Jimmy, that was excellent, and eloquent. So many of these aetheistic and/or socialistic types draw much of their core beliefs from Christianity and yet they are too uneducated, or refuse, to acknowledge their debt. Actually, it is only when I started studying history as a pastime that I myself came to realize this debt myself. And it was entirely by accident. What a great irony is embedded in the beliefs of these "enlightened ones." "The truth will set you free." Christ's words are so sublime they scare me at times.

Posted June 28, 2010 at 3:39:42 PM


Jeremiah Bezalel

Communism is evil. But it is not enough to say what is wrong - one must say what is right and what we must do to assure human rights and liberty.

I have a free book (no strings, no ads) at http://jeremiahbezalel.org that addresses human rights and civil government from a thoroughly biblical perspective. You might take a look at it. It does address collectivism directly, but its emphasis is on what God requires of us in the areas of freedom, government and how we treat one another generally.

Jeremiah

Posted March 10, 2011 at 10:05:14 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund