Options
Don't Trust Your Instincts
· Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Simple answers are so satisfying: Green jobs will fix the economy. Stimulus will create jobs. Charity helps people more than commerce. Everyone should vote.
Well, all those instinctive solutions are wrong. As Friedrich Hayek pointed out in "The Fatal Conceit," it's a problem that in our complex, extended economy, we rely on instincts developed during our ancestors' existence in small bands. In those old days, everyone knew everyone else, so affairs could be micromanaged. Today, we live in a global economy where strangers deal with each other. The rules need to be different.
Hayek said: "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."
You might think people have begun to understand this. Opinion polls show Americans are very dissatisfied with government. Congress has only a 12 percent approval rating. Good. People should be suspicious of what Congress would design. Central planners failed in the Soviet Union and Cuba and America's public schools and at the post office.
Despite all that failure, however, whenever a crisis hits, the natural instinct is to say, "Government must do something."
Look at this piece of instinctual wisdom: Everyone should vote. In the last big election, only 90 million people voted out of more than 200 million eligible voters. That's terrible, we're told. But it's not terrible because a lot of people are ignorant. When I asked people to identify pictures of Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, almost half couldn't.
This is one reason I say those "get out the vote" drives are dumb. I take heat for saying that, but Bryan Caplan agrees. He's a professor of economics at George Mason University and author of "The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies."
"A lot of bad policies ... pass by popular demand," Caplan told me. "In order to do the right thing, you have to know something."
The "informed citizen" is the ideal of democratic societies, but Caplan points out that average citizens have no incentive to become informed, while special interests do. The rest of us have lives. We are busy with things other than politics. That's why our democratic government inflates the price of sugar through trade restrictions, even though American sugar consumers far outnumber American sugar producers.
Caplan has a radical proposal for citizens: Be honest. If you know nothing about a subject, don't have an opinion about it. "And don't reward or penalize candidates for their position on an issue you don't understand."
Political life differs from private life. If you vote for a candidate while ignorant about issues, you'll pay no more than a tiny fraction of the price of your ignorance. Not so in your private affairs. If you're dumb when you buy a car, you get stuck with a bad car. You get punished right away.
"And you may look back and say, 'I'm not going to do that again.' ... It's not so much that voters are dumb. Even smart people act dumb when they vote. I know an engineer who is very clever. ... But his views on economics (are) ridiculous."
It's not what people don't know that gets them into trouble. It's what they know that isn't so.
"A very common view is that foreign aid is actually the largest item in the budget," Caplan said. "It's about 1 percent."
Actually, even less. Medicare, Social Security, the military and interest on the debt make up over half the budget. But surveys show that people believe foreign aid and welfare are the biggest items.
So, you ignorant people, please stay home on Election Day. And those of you who do vote, please resist the instinctive urge to give our tribal elders more power.
If Americans keep voting for politicians who want to pass more laws and spend more money, the result will not be a country with fewer problems, but a country that's governed by piecemeal socialism. Or corporatism. We can debate the meaning of those words, but there's no doubt that such central planning leaves us less prosperous and less free.
COPYRIGHT 2012 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Acton Institute Senior Fellow, Marvin Olasky: "Liberals say and do so many nutty things. The Patriot puts them all in a nutshell--easy to crack and fun to read." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Chuck Colson: Coming Apart: The Growing Cultural Divide
- Arnold Ahlert: Greece's Problems Are Far From Over
- Michael Reagan: Whitney's Death Should Be a Lesson
- John Stossel: Politicians Fiddle While Fiscal Crisis Looms
- Jonah Goldberg: Mr. Right Eludes the GOP
- Jacob Sullum: Contraceptive Failure
- Terence Jeffrey: Department of Education: Catholic Schools Beat Public Schools
- Thomas Sowell: The 'Fairness' Fraud
- Ken Blackwell: Chris Matthews' 'Strategizing'
- Michelle Malkin: The High Priests of Eco-Destruction
- William Murchison: The Illegitimacy Rate and Us
- L. Brent Bozell: The Bill Press Hate Machine
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























mmccrindle
So True!!!!!!
Case in point - All those who voted for "hope & change".
Another case in point - Blacks will still vote for Obummer because he's black. Never mind they are far worse off now.
BTW- Class warfare hasn't worked in the past but Obastard will have over a billion stimulis bucks. We need to educate and get the (tea party) vote out!!!!
Posted January 18, 2012 at 9:46:01 AM
Jsmith
Amen!
Anyone who voted for Jon Stewart to be America's #1 newsman (yes, he won) should be barred from voting -- not because I hate Stewart, but because he's not a newsman!
So many Americans don't watch the news, don't read the paper (or get the news online), but still come out to vote. If you don't know the issues and don't know the candidates, your uninformed vote is a disservice to the country.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 11:28:29 AM
wjmccrindle
Vladimir Lenin predicted the United States would never be conquered by an outside enemy, but by the useful idiots that embraced marxist theory. The marxists have taken over the media and education, and are now indoctrinators and agents of propoganda. There is no education or real impartial factual news anymore. Those that would vote for the destruction of America, the usefull idiots, are the result of the statist marxist takeover. They are nearly 50% of the population, and they willfully vote to destroy this country. I would encourage as many as can be persuaded to vote, and for anyone with the (R). A vote for the (D) is a vote for the destruction of America.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 11:39:11 AM
Tex Horn
But, John, if you eliminate those voters who have no knowledge about the political machine and who the candidates are, that would reduce the number of voters in America to maybe, maybe, ten million! If you take from that the grunts who will vote a party line, or for a liberal, it's about five million. Take from that the people who will vote for a liberal Republican "hack" like the ones currently running, we might as well stay home on election day because nothing changes.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 11:41:53 AM
Robert Sweeney
I wish there were a "like" button so I could show my approval of Tex's post. Excellent point! With the candidates we have to choose from, ain't nuthin' gonna change!
Posted January 18, 2012 at 12:39:46 PM
Howard Last
Tex you are correct. The great unwashed know who is on American Idol (BTW, I never watched the program) but have no idea of what the candidates for President stand for. And if you asked what Samuel Adams did, most would say made beer. And a few would say, I buy his beer. Don't forget James Madison's claim to fame, his wife made ice cream.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 1:40:37 PM
Sherry
Again, this attack on the post office. Who is directing this assault on the post office?
Posted January 18, 2012 at 4:54:28 PM
Sherry
The real problem is that it is the news that is providing ALL of the MISinformation! So, the really ignorant ones are the ones who watch the most news. They vote for the wrong person intentionally for the reasons the misinformed have told them to believe.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 4:59:57 PM
Richard Ryan
Mr.Stossel, it`s not that I did not already know that foreign aid is less than 1 percent of the budget. I actually did know that. It`s about what Everett Dirksen once said; A billion here, a billion there; pretty soon you`re talking about real money. It`s not about the percentage of the budget that one lone, unconstitutional item is, it`s the fact that we have literally thousands, if not tens of thousands of such items. Therein lies the problem. Everyone says, it`s only 1 percent, or it`s only 5 percent. It`s not the one lone item, it`s the cumulative effect of all those small items that matters.
Richard Ryan
Lamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman
Posted January 18, 2012 at 5:09:31 PM
Howard Last
Richard - Anyone remember Lend Lease after WW-II? We still have not been paid back for that. There was a book in the 1960's, "None Dare Call it Treason". More people should read it.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 8:01:34 PM