Options
Never Trust Government Numbers
· Wednesday, February 15, 2012
President Obama said in his State of the Union speech, "We've already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings."
That was reassuring.
The new budget he released this week promises $4 trillion in "deficit reduction" -- about half in tax increases and half in spending cuts. But like most politicians, Obama misleads.
Cato Institute economist Dan Mitchell cut through the fog to get at the truth of the $2 trillion "cut."
"We have a budget of, what, almost $4 trillion? So if we're doing $2 trillion of cuts," Mitchell said, "we're cutting government in half. That sounds wonderful."
But what the president was talking about is not even a cut. The politicians just agreed that over the next 10 years, instead of increasing spending by $9.48 trillion, they'd increase it by "just" $7.3 trillion. Calling that a "cut" is nonsense.
Mitchell gave an analogy: "What if I came to you and said, 'I've been on a diet for the last month, and I've gained 10 pounds. Isn't that great?' You would say: 'Wait, what are you talking about? That's insane.' And I said: 'I was going to gain 15 pounds. I've only gained 10 pounds, therefore my diet is successful.'"
Democrats use this deceit when they want more social spending. Republicans use it for military spending.
And the press buys it. The Washington Post has been writing about "draconian cuts."
"The politicians know this game," Mitchell said. "The special interests know this game. Everyone gets a bigger budget every year. ... And we wind up, sooner or later, being Greece."
We are definitely on the road to bankruptcy.
"We have maybe 10, 15 years' advanced notice. And what's frustrating is that we're not taking advantage of that, even as we see these other countries collapsing into social chaos and disarray."
Mitchell points out that the politicians don't even have to make actual cuts to save the future. If they just slowed the growth of government to about 2 percent per year, the U.S. economy could grow out of this mess. But the politicians won't do even that.
"Being from the Cato Institute, I actually do want to cut spending. But if all we're trying to do is balance the budget over 10 years, which is sort of the minimal thing that politicians keep saying we should do, if we simply limit the growth of spending to 2 percent a year, which is about the projected rate of inflation, we'll have a balanced budget in 2022. ... But instead, the politicians say, 'Oh, we'll have draconian and savage budget cuts.' ... They don't want to put government on a diet, even if that diet allows spending to grow 2 percent a year."
They also continually mislead us about what their schemes will cost.
President Bush said the war in Iraq would cost $50 billion to $60 billion. It cost $800 billion. When Medicare Part A was created, the government said it would cost $9 billion in 1990. It cost $67 billion. They said the hiring of TSA airport security screeners would cost $100 million. Then they spent $700 million. Yet the media report the estimates as if they are realistic. Again and again, politicians get away with underestimating the cost of their programs.
Often the cost goes up because people change their behavior to get free stuff. A program meant to help the needy costs a certain amount. The next year, it costs more, because now more of the needy know about the program and more social workers know how to tap it. The next year, the non-needy feel like suckers if they don't get the handout, and they figure out a way to game the system.
Then, Mitchell point out, "what do politicians do the next year? They expand the program to buy more votes. And the year after that, they add a new benefit. That's what's happened with Medicare. It's not just that they got the fundamental estimates wrong. They did. But every new generation of politicians figures out some new expansion, some new benefit."
And so we're on the road to Greece.
Bottom line: Don't trust the politicians' numbers.
COPYRIGHT 2012 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Author Dr. Bill Bennett: "The Patriot is leading the charge in the battle to restore America's values -- a vital ally on the front...." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Jonah Goldberg: Big Business Gets the Hollywood Treatment
- Charles Krauthammer: The Joy of Winning
- Arnold Ahlert: Catholics vs. Obama
- Michael Reagan: White House Website Gone Wild
- Ken Blackwell: I'll Have Another
- Jeff Jacoby: The Peace Process Battered Israel's Reputation
- Victor Davis Hanson: The Bad/Good Idea of Removing Assad
- Michael Barone: Cocooned Liberals Are Unprepared for Political Debate
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Great Debate
- Cal Thomas: The Media's Religion Deficit
- Larry Elder: Why Jeremiah Wright Matters -- Still
- Ben Shapiro: First, They Came for Cory Booker
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























mmccrindle
Misleads?
Please.
LIES, pure and simple.
The truth has never been printed on his teleprompter.
Posted February 15, 2012 at 8:30:56 AM
alex torello
If fiscal conservatives would frame their responses in the same, simple and direct way Stossel does in the above, more Americans would begin to understand the deceit for what it is.
Posted February 15, 2012 at 9:26:06 AM
Holmes Simons
@: You are exactly right; it's that lying teleprompter. What else could it be?
Just think of the unlikelihood that every one of 535 HUMAN BEINGS, elected to represent the interests of a mere 313 MILLION American citizens, would swear an Oath of Allegiance to protect and defend the US Constitution, only to repudiate that Oath by approving unconstitutional legislation, and, by passive complicity, endorse ONE ineligible, treasonous INDIVIDUAL whose job performance highlights include unconstitutional executive acts, illegal acts of war, illegal exporting of guns, lying to taxpayers, stealing money from taxpayers, and giving the stolen money to his cronies. The odds of this happening seem incredibly high.
Who wins the Power Ball-less Lottery? Congress.
Who is the leader of the criminal syndicate called the federal government? Barack Hussein Obama, Head Criminal, Top Dog, Giant among Dishonorable Men, and Giant Piece of Dog Poop.
Posted February 15, 2012 at 9:38:50 AM
JJStryder
I think the leviathan govenment is so out of control, that even well meaning politicians are powerless to stop it. We just need to starve the beast. THAT will be our Concord bridge moment. Massive non-compliance. O.K. ..Now ...who wants to start?
Posted February 15, 2012 at 10:33:51 AM
JG
Who is John Galt?
Posted February 15, 2012 at 10:44:31 AM
Peter
But instead, the politicians say, 'Oh, we'll have draconian and savage budget cuts.' So what? I couldn't are less. I don't want or need and will probably never get any of the so called benefits they make me pay for.
Posted February 15, 2012 at 2:20:37 PM
Patrick
I don't know why President Obama doesn't just announce the we have decided to strike a planned lease/purchase option on the planet Mars for $15 trillion dollars, and viola! We have $15 trillion dollars in savings and thus, we no longer have any national debt!
Posted February 15, 2012 at 3:04:37 PM
JTG
I'm surprised that Obama hasn't tried floating an IPO while calling it FacethemusicUSA. On second thought, it couldn't work as China already owns the better part of the country through its treasury purchases.
Posted February 15, 2012 at 4:57:53 PM
pete
Double dealing, bottom dealers, card sharks and cheats. But it's ok if the majority of the dummies you playing against know what you're doing and let you get away with it.
Problem is, the only ones who see it and agree is the media. Of the rest of us, some of us see it and fight back, and some of us see it and don't know how to fight back.
VOTE THEM ALL OUT
Posted February 15, 2012 at 5:51:57 PM
H. D. Schmidt
As staunch supporter of Ron Paul, may I suggest that, if George W. and his cronies had been any better than Obama, he, Obama most certainly would not be the Commander in Chief today! Besides, it seems to me that Gingrich, Romney and Santorum are not much better than Goerge W. and his cronies were! Yes, continuing to shoot the world to pieces like all previous Empires, which is the road to hell for all Empires.
Posted February 21, 2012 at 12:45:19 AM