Options
Politicians Fiddle While Fiscal Crisis Looms
· Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Imagine this family budget:
Last year, you earned $24,700. But you spent $37,900, incurring $13,300 in debt, and you were already $153,500 in debt.
So you say, "I promise I'll spend $300 less this year!"
Anyone can see that your cutback is pathetic and that you need to spend much less.
Yet if you add eight zeroes, that's America's budget.
The president says again that he will cut spending -- but don't be fooled. He wants to spend more on some items, those he euphemistically calls "invest(ment) in the things that will help grow our economy." (As though politicians can know what a free market would reveal.)
He says he wants to reduce the deficit by raising taxes on the rich -- but again, don't be fooled. Even if he took every penny over $1 million from the rich, it would reduce the deficit by only $616 billion.
The politicians are spending us into oblivion. But I can't blame only them. The American people are complacent. We like the goodies. We think we're getting something for nothing. We are like alcoholics who know we have a problem but just can't resist one last fix. One more infrastructure bill or jobs plan will jumpstart the economy. Then we'll kick our spending addiction once and for all.
But we don't stop spending. Almost all budget categories grow, even when adjusted for inflation. This is a break with most of America's history. When the economy grew most dramatically, government was less than 5 percent of gross domestic product. Today, it's well over 20 percent.
Since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty began in the late 1960s, government spending has gone up relentlessly. This is just not sustainable. So what do we do? We must cut. But I fear Americans aren't up for that. People on the street told me that the budget is out of control. But when I then asked them, "What would you cut?" most just stared ahead.
But there's plenty to cut. We can easily cut things like foreign aid, NPR, Amtrak and post office subsidies, and the war on drugs. But we should not pretend that such cuts would be enough to stop the coming crisis. They're not. Killing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a hundred other subsidy programs would help more. But that still makes only a dent in the deficit.
To really save America, we need to cut whole departments: Commerce, Energy, Education, Agriculture, Labor. We don't need them.
Commerce just happens. It doesn't need an expensive Cabinet department that hands out money to politically connected businesses.
The same is true for the Energy and Agriculture departments. Some states now have more agriculture bureaucrats than farmers!
Education is not a federal responsibility. Federal spending of $106 billion a year has not raised test scores one bit.
Now I've cut $329 billion. It's still not enough.
The military is about a fifth of the budget. I want to support our troops, but we could do that and save money if the administration would shrink the military's mission to what it is supposed to be: protecting us from external threats. We cannot put America on a road to solvency without cutting military spending, too.
Of course, what will really bankrupt America are entitlements, especially Medicare. That's the big one.
Why even call it an entitlement? Are we entitled to the money? People think we are, but the money is taken from the taxpayers -- by force. The program is totally unsustainable. We now live so long that most of us get back about three times what we paid into these programs.
So we have to raise the retirement age, maybe index it to life spans, and turn Medicare into an insurance plan that sustains itself. That will mean that if I want the latest in high-end medicine, I have to pay for it myself.
We're on the way to becoming Greece -- while our "leaders" stand and watch. A catastrophe is happening before our eyes, but the politicians won't act to avert it. How did they ever end up with enough power to sink our society?
COPYRIGHT 2012 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey: "Simply put, The Patriot Post cuts through the clutter and delivers timely, accurate, and colorful accounts of the week's most important news and policy issues. It's a mandatory read." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Jonah Goldberg: Big Business Gets the Hollywood Treatment
- Charles Krauthammer: The Joy of Winning
- Arnold Ahlert: Catholics vs. Obama
- Michael Reagan: White House Website Gone Wild
- Ken Blackwell: I'll Have Another
- Jeff Jacoby: The Peace Process Battered Israel's Reputation
- Victor Davis Hanson: The Bad/Good Idea of Removing Assad
- Michael Barone: Cocooned Liberals Are Unprepared for Political Debate
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Great Debate
- Cal Thomas: The Media's Religion Deficit
- Larry Elder: Why Jeremiah Wright Matters -- Still
- Ben Shapiro: First, They Came for Cory Booker
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























ME1452
We the people handed it to them. No one to blame but ourselves.
Posted February 22, 2012 at 7:47:04 AM
mac
C'mon John, just go ahead and say the obvious - socialism can't work. Never has, never will.
Add to that a marxist agenda that speeds up the inevitable crash and burn so that our government can then take over completely.
If anyone thinks a totalitarian government can't happen here in the good 'ol USofA they've got their head up their arse.
It's happening now.
Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:53:44 AM
Jeremy
"When the economy grew most dramatically, government was less than 5 percent of gross domestic product. Today, it's well over 20 percent."
Today, Federal spending is rapidly approaching 25% of GDP, while government at all levels is somewhere between 40% and 50% of GDP, depending on where you live. As recently as the 1920s, Federal spending was in the range of 5% of GDP.
Unfortunately, any attempt to even reign in spending is met with howls of protest. IMHO, the only thing that is certain is that cuts will happen at some point in time. The question is whether it's an orderly process or a chaotic one when faced with impending bankruptcy. At this point, I'd have to bet on the latter.
Posted February 22, 2012 at 10:18:08 AM
Pamela Heckel
Boehner promised to hold spending to 2008 levels. The current House budget is more generous than that, but Reed won't bring it up for a vote in the Senate. Is he afraid that it will pass?
Posted February 22, 2012 at 1:43:56 PM
BJ
Government's job is to protect us from each other, in despotism and tyranny it now alleges to protect us from ourselves. Government's job is to protect our borders and property but instead has endeavored to supervise our health care, our religion, our schools, and our sex lives.
The reason politicians don't seem as alarmed about what's happening as you and I is because in their subconscious or heart of hearts they want big government-big government that includes them running things.
If there were any real justice anymore most of them wouldn't be running for re-election-they'd be running for cover and for their lives.
Why no term limits, why no impeachment proceedings, why are we letting them police themselves?
TERM LIMITS-IMPEACH-PROSECUTE
Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:41:25 PM
steve
Amen! Amen, Brother Stossel, amen!
As long as we accept IMPOSSIBLE PROMISES and elect people who promise them, all we'll get are broken promises and bankruptcy.
Everyone wants their goodies; too many Americans are looking to live at someone else's expense. Our own immorality, acquiescence to theft and slavery and coveting the property of others will be our downfall.
Once upon a time, proud Americans would bristle at the suggestion that they take charity or accept stolen goods. Now they clamor for the government to steal on their behalf. If we don't turn this around, we deserve our fate.
Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:14:13 PM
sclose
Obama has turned the corner on trying to appeal to anyone but his known constituency. When an opponent is finally established for the coming election we will see Axelrod, Jarret and the others put forth the most filthy campaign ever. Most know this to be so. However, you can also anticipate that if Obama is defeated the resultant hew and cry of racism, accompanied by rioting, will make 1968 Chicago look like a Sunday picnic.
Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:35:44 PM
mac
sclose-
You think they'd riot when Obama loses?
I'd recommend full auto mode.
Posted February 22, 2012 at 4:46:41 PM
Jim G
Barack Obama to the American people:
"Pay no heed to that poor Greek writhing in poisoned pain upon the ground beside our path. Drink ye from the Cup of Socialism and ye shall be saved."
So sayeth the Despot.
Posted February 22, 2012 at 5:41:22 PM
Jason
John,
You could get your wish...Ron Paul 2012!!!!
Posted February 22, 2012 at 6:48:36 PM