Options
Words for Potent Jerks
· Friday, November 20, 2009
It is amazing how a phrase can emerge seemingly out of nowhere to become the statement du jour -- used, overused and ultimately abused. Last year, there was "low-hanging fruit" everywhere. Today, everyone's being "thrown under the bus."
Sometimes, it's just one word. "As a writer, you're always reaching for a more potent way to call somebody a jerk," Dan Harmon, the creator of the new NBC sitcom "Community" told The New York Times. In a surprisingly controversial front-page story Nov. 14, Times reporter Edward Wyatt tried to identify the zeitgeist by one hot "potent" word for jerk: "douche."
In total, the word has surfaced at least 76 times already this year on 26 primetime network series, according to research by the Parents Television Council, which compiled the statistics at the request of The New York Times. That is up from 30 uses on 15 shows in all of 2007 and just six instances on four programs in 2005.
Harmon explained: "This is a word that has evolved in the last couple of years -- a thing that sounds like a thing you can't say."
The word has "evolved" so much that the excuse-makers for trashy talk are suggesting that hip teens today don't even mean to toss the word in a vulgar way, since they probably don't even know the word's feminine-hygiene origins. Which raises the question: Then how would it "sound like a thing you can't say"? How would it have any naughtiness attached to it?
Bloggers and trashy gossip sites scolded The Times for using a scold like PTC in its story. One even implied The Times should hire its own staff to watch the five broadcast networks for nine months at a time to avoid any association with annoying pressure groups who scandalously fail to love all the vulgar words. But the story was another fascinating episode in Hollywood's ridiculous attempts to explain itself when this kind of raw data is exposed in the nation's most prestigious establishment newspaper.
When confronted by questions about D-word-employing shows in the "family hour" like her network's "The New Adventures of Old Christine," Nina Tassler, the president of CBS Entertainment, commented that the "family hour" was antiquated and CBS shows "merely reflect a different family dynamic."
That "different dynamic" is the assumption that families don't watch television together, and that if anyone under 12 is watching sleazy shows at 8 p.m., it's the fault of careless parents, not the blameless vulgarity distributors. (It was just last year that Tassler was touting their CBS's '70s-polyester-orgy flop, "Swingtown," as "something fun and fresh in the summer ... the summer gives you a kind of different license." She said that sensationalistic series was right in her "sweet spot.")
But there were funnier quotes in the Times story. "We are still in the line-drawing business," said Martin D. Franks, executive vice president for planning, policy and government relations at the CBS Corporation. "We may not have a formal family hour at 8 o'clock, but we are trying to be respectful of our audience and who makes up our audience at a particular time of day."
Forget it. The Times reported that recent research by Barbara K. Kaye of the University of Tennessee and Barry S. Sapolsky of Florida State University found that in 2005 television viewers were more likely to hear offensive language during the 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. hours than at 10 p.m.
The Times also found that TV producers think the recent "evolution" of cable stations re-running bedtime shows in mid-afternoon isn't a reason for more caution, but a reason for more carelessness. Neal Baer, an executive producer of the sex-crimes show "Law & Order: Special Victims Unit," said that because his show was repeated in syndication and on cable during daytime hours, producers "could not worry" about who might see it. "It's hypocritical to say that you have to have shows on broadcast networks at 10, but they run at 3 or 4 or 5 in the afternoon on cable," Baer said. "Kids have access to cable." In fact, TNT will run an "SVU" marathon all day on the Friday after Thanksgiving.
People need to listen to Hollywood, for their words may be foul, but they are quite clear. Hollywood believes broadcast standards aren't fair. They are not in the line-drawing business. The only use for rules is to break them for fun and profit. The only use for words in a script is to search for "a thing that sounds like a thing you can't say."
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Author Charles Colson: "The Patriot is a refreshing antidote to the mainstream media establishment, and an invaluable resource for straight thinkers." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























Jim Bolin
All Hollywood writers are Jerks, Brent. That is the reason I seldom go to movies (perhaps once a year). Also Hollywood's indiscretions in creating ridiculous expressions or catchy nuances is the main reason I watch Sports broadcasts and nothing except National news and good blogs.
I am not a PC type of person, and quite frankly, don't give a darn whom I occasionally offend, especially if it is needed. I treat all people equally. I have yet to read or hear of a non racist definition of the oxymoron term, African American, but when the term comes up, I envision a black, brown, or mulatto American who traces lineage back to Africa.
If people get offended with their race by use of racial epithets, why should I be concerned? They call attention to their race by using their national origins to identify themselves. To me African American is a racial ID for a black person.
So is their racial prejudice in the term's use.
Many black people refer to Caucasions as "Whiteys"
Not politically correct, but many of my black friends use the "N" word against themselves, but resent it when a white Italian American uses the term.
Also, common sense is obliterated when people are trying to absorb, define and use all these subtle
TV remarks. When people do dumb things, I csll them, "Chuckleheads", but I'll be darned if I can remember where I picked that term up, And just maybe that is the breach of family values where children use phrases or words that they have no idea where they originated?
I have no problem with these phrases or glib definitions. My family down through my great grandchildren know that in God's eyes folks are equal....sticks and stones may break my bones, but slurs will never hurt me.
They learn to receive in kind whatever they dish out. They are taught there are consequences to being unnecessarily unpolite.
Posted November 21, 2009 at 12:00:33 PM
MichaelSSEC
Liberal hypocrisy at its finest. Don't blame us, it's the parents who let their kids watch our vulgar shows. But of course when parents actually try to teach their kids values, the same Liberals are right there working hard to undermine every effort with their "feel good" immorality. It's all the same. Tear down values, morality, decency, standards, objectivity. Replace it with vulgarity, attitude, crassness, immorality, subjectivity and total lack of standards.
This is how we get to the point where Hollywood can't tell a guy who drugs and rapes a 13-year old girl is a rape-rapist. They line up to defend him and attack the decent people who want him in prison. They promote the total absence of morality, and then can't figure out when their product isn't welcome in American homes. But we're the ones who are out of touch? That's actually pretty funny, in a sick twisted way. So they actually ARE the D-word they love to use during family hour.
Posted November 23, 2009 at 8:10:04 PM