Options
Ridiculous Idol Excuses
· Friday, November 27, 2009
If there is an entertainment trend ripe for satire, it is the begging-for-attention smut routines at nationally televised music awards shows. How low can these "artists" go? Sadly, there is always another frontier. "American Idol" runner-up Adam Lambert was the latest offender at the Nov. 22 American Music Awards on ABC, with a routine complete with S&M bondage slaves, deep male-on-male kissing and simulated fellatio on stage.
All in front of millions upon millions of impressionable youngsters. It was another in-your-face Janet Jackson moment.
There's only one thing that makes this funny. It's the idea that somehow none of this was planned, that it was just a spontaneous eruption. ABC was embarrassed enough by Lambert to cancel a planned performance on "Good Morning America." If they expected cheers for that, they're sadly mistaken. ABC clearly wanted to avoid making its news division question the entertainment division's horrendous decision-making.
Every piece of evidence we have suggests ABC and Lambert knew exactly what they were going to do. Lambert told MTV to expect something really sexy. "I was looking for a certain sensuality," he explained about choosing his dancers, and said the S&M wardrobe was "amazing." MTV reported it would feature the sensibility of his music video for the song he performed: "Adam Lambert is fully embracing the S&M lyrics featured in his single. Greased up dancers are dolled up in leather, dog collars, nipple clamps (zoinks!) and platform boots."
The rough-sex lyrics of the song ABC approved for national consumption are very clear: "I'ma hold ya down until you're amazed/Give it to ya till your screaming my name." And this: "Baby, I'm in control/Take the pain/Take the pleasure/I'm the master of both."
For their part, ABC repeatedly told viewers to stick around for Lambert's routine. They scheduled it at the very end of show so they could suggest it was irresponsible for parents if their children caught this porny show right before the late news.
It is clearly offensive to watch ABC and Dick Clark Productions now play dumb in their official statement: "Due to the live nature of the show we did not expect the impromptu moment in question," they jointly declared after the edited West Coast version. There was no "impromptu moment" that was in question. It was the entire disgusting performance, approved and promoted by ABC and Dick Clark Productions.
CBS News jumped in to promote Lambert where ABC left off. How dumb did Adam Lambert think America was? Let's survey his comical answers.
1. Did you have any idea your performance at the AMAs would ignite this firestorm? Lambert said: "No clue. No clue at all."
2. Did you plan those sexually charged moves in the rehearsal? Lambert: "Those kind of came from more of a impromptu place. No, those were not rehearsed."
3. This was the best question from CBS interviewer Maggie Rodriguez: Now that you have had time to think about the children, your child fans, do you feel that you need to apologize to them? Lambert's absolutely classic answer: "I think it's up to the parents to -- to discern what their child's watching on television."
4. Rodriguez followed up: "Well, but they had no idea they were about to see something like that on network TV." That's where Lambert started sounding like a lawyer: "Well, you know -- and you know, just to play devil's advocate with you, Lady Gaga smashing whiskey bottles. Janet Jackson grabbing a male dancer's crotch. Eminem talked about how Slim Shady has '17 rapes under his belt.' There's a lot of very adult material on the AMAs this year and I know I wasn't the only one. I'm not using that as an excuse and I don't have any -- I didn't take any offense with those performers' choices, I'm just saying I think it's up to a parent to watch the television. It was almost 11 at night. If they're concerned with certain material, maybe TiVo it and preview it before your small child is watching it."
Oh, shut up. Rodriguez summed up Lambert's lack of regret:
5. So you don't feel that it's your responsibility to issue an apology? Lambert unfurled what could be a motto for the entertainment world in general: "I'm not a baby sitter. I'm a performer."
So we can blame Lambert, we can blame ABC, and for starting this all, we can blame Fox and "American Idol." They took up Lambert and made him a gender-bending crusader for gay liberation in entertainment. Sexual politics trumped his screechy (and let's face it, lack of) talent. Lambert's honesty about his absolute, leather-bound mission to offend came out at the CBS interview's end. He was asked if he had to do it over again, what would he do differently? "I would sing it a little bit better."
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Syndicated Radio Host Dr. Laura Schlessinger: "The Patriot is the most informative and witty publication on the Internet. I read every issue!" It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























Joan P.
Did you miss Janet grabbing one of her dancers crotch right at the opening and 2 hours before Adam! Offended parents should have turned off the TV at that moment! Since when it is OK for Janet to grab a crotch and not for Adam! Did you see all the sexual moves and half-naked back-up dancers on most acts? Maybe you and I did not watch the same AMA!
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, except female turns on macho males so no complains!
Posted November 27, 2009 at 12:19:32 AM
JC
Yeah, I'm with you. It's ridiculous in this day and age for parents to take any shred of responsibility for what their children watches. Let's blame ABC and the performers for destroying the virtue of America.
Thanks for the big old conservative belly laugh.
Posted November 27, 2009 at 2:58:37 AM
Bill
Great commentary. I've never been so disgusted in my life...Not with just Adam Lambert...ABC too. To say that it wasn't planned is a big fat lie. And what does ABC do after...when everyone starts raising h***?
They play dumb. They pretend the only reason people were upset was because of the "Gay Kiss". They act like the rest of the performance never even happened.
Let me recap what I found objectionable...
1. LEADING PEOPLE AROUND LIKE ANIMALS ON LEASHES.
2. FORCING A GAY KISS ON A STRAIGHT MAN. (Assault)
3. FORCING A MAN'S FACE TO HIS CROTCH. (Again assault)
4. FORCING HIS HAND INTO THE CROTCH OF A FEMALE DANCER. (Once again....assault)
5. GIVING THE FINGER TO AMERICA. (Why is nobody saying anything about this?)
6. SINGING THE SONG BADLY.
I hope and pray that the F.C.C. does the job they paid to do.
Sorry for the long comment but I needed to vent a lot of anger. Again...good story.
Posted November 27, 2009 at 8:14:32 AM
MichaelSSEC
Funny how whenever it's something that rankles non-Liberals, we're told parents need to take charge of their kids. But whenever it's something that rankles the Left, the omnipotent Government must take charge of our kids.
For instance, that NH court that ruled a little girl must be sent to public school because she wasn't getting enough Liberal indoctrination.
Or the church that wanted to display a Nativity scene for ONE NIGHT on Christmas Eve, but was forbidden by the town because a few inches of the ground to be used was considered town land. No concerns about "rights" or "free speech" there. Isn't that odd??
Or the endless attempts to end-run parental authority on issues like morality, abortion, sexuality, etc. Somehow, Liberals contend the State has a compelling interest in showing 10-year olds how to roll a condom onto erect penises.
And nobody on the Left was the least bit concerned about Free Speech when they protested Mel Gibson's movie about Christ.
So let's see what we've learned. Soft-porn gay fellatio -- check. Abortions for 12-year old girls without her parents knowledge -- check. Teaching elementary school kids how to apply condoms onto erections -- check. Assigning "homework" to 4th grade girls to draw pictures of ejaculating penises -- check. But a nice quiet manger scene? Strictly forbidden!!
Nobody has a right to yell FIRE in a crowded theater, or incite terrorism, or any of a hundred things not covered by the 1st amendment. Likewise, nobody has a "right" to perform soft-porn on live NETWORK television, regardless of the time of day. This sleazy-boy performed his act intending to be provocative, and then he has the nerve to whine when he provokes exactly the reaction he was looking for. Typical dishonesty of the Left, and I notice some of the commenters here were not quick enough to see through the ploy. How's that Hope & Change working out for you?
Posted November 27, 2009 at 4:17:01 PM
Becky
In my opinion there all to blame! Bill you post some good points! I was sickened down to my stomach the raunchy antics that Adam displayed.. he can try every excuse in the book and to me it's irrelevant..He is guilty for going as far as he did..He just wants to make a name for himself!! well in my book he's zero! Any man who tries to use control and sex is sick!!!
Posted November 30, 2009 at 2:09:38 PM
star
Adam has made a name for himself. He found a new way to become the latest American Idol LOSER.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 6:00:05 PM
felicity
Hey, Michael, I'm left and I was offended by what this guy did on the AMAs. Being on the left politically or "liberal" as you want to stereotype us, doesn't mean we aren't offended by indecency or provocative images being fed to our children and impressionable teenagers.
Posted November 30, 2009 at 11:20:55 PM