Options
It's a Fiscal Problem, Not a Fed Problem
· Friday, July 23, 2010
Ben Bernanke threw a curveball in his midterm report to Congress this week. The Fed view of the economy has been downgraded since it last reported in February. Although the official Fed forecast for 2010-11 is still 3 percent to 4 percent real growth, Bernanke sounded particularly gloomy when he characterized the economy as "unusually uncertain." And he indicated that the majority view of the Fed Board of Governors and Reserve Bank presidents is that the risks to growth are "weighted to the downside."
But here's the disconnect. With no inflation and weaker growth, including stubbornly high unemployment, Bernanke mostly talked about an exit strategy that would shrink the Fed's balance sheet by removing liquidity. This was the Fed's bias last winter when the recovery looked stronger. Now that the recovery looks weaker, the stock market was hoping to hear Bernanke hint of an easier policy that would increase liquidity if necessary. Didn't happen.
At the end of two days of testimony, Bernanke's message seemed to be this: Expect the zero-interest-rate policy to be extended for another year. Futures markets now predict free money until September 2011.
Whether the economic outlook is as downbeat as Bernanke suggests is an interesting question. The vast majority of corporate profit reports for the second quarter show better-than-expected earnings and top-line revenues. In other words, the CEOs are a lot less pessimistic about the future economy than Wall Street or Main Street. And a combination of strong profits, a zero interest rate and a positively sloped Treasury yield curve would certainly seem to rule out a double-dip recession.
One year into recovery, however, private jobs should be growing much faster and unemployment should be a lot lower. Following a deep recession, economic growth should be closer to 8 percent than 3 percent.
But there are limits to Fed fine-tuning. The central bank can produce more money, but that doesn't mean it can produce more jobs.
Look, the Fed has already injected $1.4 trillion of new money into the economy, of which about $1 trillion of excess reserves are unused and on deposit at the central bank. Putting it another way, the economy has more liquidity than it knows what to do with. What's the problem? All that excess money is not being used. And this, I believe, is a fiscal problem, not a Fed problem.
Think of all the economic obstacles of spending, taxing and regulating coming out of Washington. What should be done to spur growth? Keep tax rates down. And stop passing massive regulatory bills, like the bank reform Obama just signed into law.
What else? The White House and Congress should end the war between business and Washington. Listen to what the CEOs are saying. Reduce the uncertainty premium caused by massive deficit spending and 2,500-page regulatory bills. Stop the assault against entrepreneurship. Keep down the cost of new job hires. Stay focused on free-trade expansion.
And then reduce tax rates for large and small businesses across the board. Speed up business investment tax write-offs. And extend the George W. Bush tax cuts for another couple of years until a true pro-growth tax reform can be developed -- one that will flatten rates, simplify the code and get rid of unnecessary tax expenditures (which really are spending increases, not tax cuts).
In other words, since businesses create jobs, provide businesses with a new round of tax incentives. Reduce their capital costs and raise their investment returns after-tax.
Noteworthy is a move by several Democratic senators -- like Evan Bayh, Ben Nelson and Kent Conrad -- who are calling for an extension of all the Bush tax cuts, including lower tax rates for upper-end earners, capital gains and dividends. These brave souls are now in open revolt against the White House.
With gold near $1,200 an ounce, the Fed has done its job and then some in providing liquidity. Easier tax rates, rather than easier money, is what will spur jobs and a faster recovery.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Author Cal Thomas: "The Patriot interprets current issues in the conservative context of history." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
- Linda Chavez: Overreach by Unions in Wisconsin
- Mona Charen: Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again
- Jonah Goldberg: Big Business Gets the Hollywood Treatment
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























TJS
Larry, Democrats love socialism more than they love prosperity. They are committing political suicide to prove it. All their major initiatives are unpopular by large margins, but they plow ahead anyway. It is time, in November, to plow Democrats under.
Businesses are being punished for not recognizing that Democrats are socialists. Many have still not figured it out. Shame on them.
Posted July 23, 2010 at 10:16:17 AM
Marcus
It is a fiscal problem based on a psychological problem...mistrust. We the people have lost whatever trust existed in the government. People are going to stay hunkered down until these maniacs have exited Washington, stage left. Fiscal maturity among the constituents as a result of this meltdown has left the economists scratching their pointy little heads. Nobody in their right minds is going to go into debt for any big ticket items right now. If other folks are like my wife and me, the credit cards are gone and we buy only what we need. If prices or taxes keep going up, we'll find ways to "need" even less. This is a vicious cycle and the only thing the government can do is to back the hell off or get rid of the income tax and institute a fairtax. Then everything will start to become predictable and stable again over time. Democrats can't be this stupid so we have to assume they are purposely destablizing the US by destabilizing the economy. They would then be considered enemies of state. Since they are US citizens (the president excepted) then we have become our own worst enemy. The fix for that is never painless. The next several years should be interesting.
Posted July 23, 2010 at 3:26:00 PM
Brian
I find it interesting that in left-math, a tax cut, i.e. a decrease in income for the state, is considered an expenditure on the books. In other words, the left has this hair-brained idea that, if the tax cuts are extended, the government will be "losing money". Reminds me of an acquaintance that works at the home office of a major retailer. A couple of years ago, when the retailer lowered the profit sharing percentage, this acquaintance wailed, "I'm losing money! They're cutting my pay!" The thing about profit sharing, much like tax revenue, is that it is not your money to begin with. You cannot claim income from money that has not yet been earned. Otherwise, the IRS could come after you for any money you may possibly earn in your lifetime. "You might win the lottery someday, so we're going to go ahead and tax your potential winnings right now."
Posted July 23, 2010 at 9:58:34 PM
DG
Congrats Kudlow. They'll read this and do the opposite, perverse little self-righteous fellows who think they are righting the world's wrongs. Maybe they'll make money available at a negative interest rate!!!
Good for Evan Bayh, Ben Nelson and Kent Conrad and their open revolt though.
PS to Brian: "You cannot claim income from money that has not yet been earned. Otherwise, the IRS could come after you for any money you may possibly earn in your lifetime." This has been done in my jurisdiction, Canuckistan. They taxed a guy on unsold paintings. He threatened a bonfire and they relented.
Posted July 25, 2010 at 4:09:07 AM