A Hug Too Far

· Saturday, October 2, 2010

Am I the only one who saw weakness when President Obama and his departing chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, gave each other big, fat, full-bore hug following their speeches at the resignation event in the White House's East Room on Friday?

Remember, this is on global television. And it has to do with the very top of the United States government. Our friends and enemies were all watching.

I think the hug lacked dignity. It did not send a message of American power and forcefulness. So I fret about the reaction around the world to this kind of fraternity-like emotionalism in full public view.

Why not just a dignified, stand-up, serious handshake? That's what Ronald Reagan would have done. A strong handshake shows friendship, respect and even affection. But a big fat hug seems to go over the line.

Perhaps I'm overreacting to this. But when it comes to the presidency and the behavior of our top leaders, I think the image we want to send at home and abroad is one of serious strength of purpose. Not some kind of collegiate squeeze. Somehow the Obama-Emanuel embrace seemed demeaning -- to the presidency, to our officialdom and to our strength of purpose.

All right, let me move on to another point of weakness: Emanuel will be replaced by Pete Rouse, a White House insider who formerly worked in the Senate for leading Democratic liberals Tom Daschle, Dick Durbin and, yes, Barack Obama.

Why is this weak? Well, with their backs against the wall in an election that is likely to inflict a shellacking on the Democrats, Team Obama has been talking a lot about reaching out to business to fill the numerous open policy slots in the White House. But they didn't reach out to the world of business, nor to any new worlds at all.

So, best I can tell, there aren't going to be any policy changes. Despite sweeping and almost transformational big-government legislation for Obamacare, spending stimulus and banking control -- all of which is proving vastly unpopular -- the Rouse appointment suggests that nothing is going to change. No lessons learned. No real reshaping of the top team.

After all, it's often said that personnel is policy. Therefore, keep the same team, keep the same policy. That's more weakness.

And it comes on top of weakness in the final pre-election actions of Congress. This week, the Democrats walked away from any closure on extending the George W. Bush tax cuts. The whole country is waiting and worrying about a potentially huge tax hike that will put a major new drag on an already soft economy.

But the House did see its way, in a terrible bipartisan vote, to pass a protectionist currency and trade attack on China. If this measure is ever enacted, it will impoverish consumers and businesses everywhere through a big spike in Chinese import prices. Of course, China -- our banker -- will retaliate.

This should go to the World Trade Organization. Or better yet, China and the U.S. should work out a deal. Let's not repeat the Depression Era Smoot-Hawley tariff and trade war. Republicans are just as much to blame here as Democrats. Meanwhile, the threat of higher tariffs, on top of higher tax rates, only adds to uncertainty and weakens the foundation of growth.

Then there's the U.S. dollar. Another point of weakness embedded in the China legislation is the implied decline in the value of the greenback. And this follows the Ben Bernanke Fed's apparent decision to foster even more dollar depreciation. This, too, will ultimately lead to higher prices and a tax-hike effect on the economy.

There are many debates among economists about how to resurrect the sub-par, so-called recovery and generate some serious new job creation. But there is also widespread agreement that nations cannot tax their way into prosperity, devalue their way into prosperity, spend their way into prosperity or pursue trade-limiting protectionism as a path to prosperity. All of this is weakness.

The undignified Obama-Emanuel hug is just the tip of the weakness iceberg.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Kelly McKay

I'm curious, are you threatened by two men hugging? How about holding hands? Just curious.

Posted October 2, 2010 at 1:58:42 AM


Doktor Riktor Von Zhades

Well, I can understand the hug, but like the author, I feel that a solid handshake would have sufficed. I guess with neocommies, (since they are ruled by emotion, and not common sense), the hug goes part an parcel with that feely touchy good thing. They could have done that part out of the view of the cameras. I myself have done the hug thing, (a manly type one of course), and so am not ashamed to admit it. But it is something you do more in private, or in front of a small group or circle of close and trusted friends. JMHO.

As for China, all they need do is call in the debt and we're toast. The best thing that we could do is lower tax rates on business (and individuals for that matter), and try to get back all those companies that left for greener tax havens outside of the US. Perhaps then, we can compete within our own nation selling goods to our own people. There would be no need to put up trade barriers. If we can use our own economy to undersell the foreign competition we'll be doing fine.

Posted October 2, 2010 at 7:56:02 AM


g.wegmann

Everything that Obama and His Czars do is demeaning!

Posted October 2, 2010 at 8:37:31 AM


SLesser

Kelly,

The comments have nothing to do with "two men hugging". What is being said is that the picture sent to the world is that this administration is pathetic on a good day and that the walls are crumbling now.

The rats are jumping ship and no one wants to tell the king he is naked!

Posted October 2, 2010 at 11:03:45 AM


Larz

This is what puts you over the edge in thinking that this person who is the POTUS is making our once great country look weak? sheesh...

And Kelly, is that really your response? Really?

Posted October 2, 2010 at 11:47:07 AM


nifongnation

It did disturb me when I saw the photo too.

Posted October 2, 2010 at 3:43:41 PM


kev

kelly, I feel threatened by EVERYTHING this regime has done and hopes to do, and emmanuel is one of the driving forces. Frankly, though, after all the bowing and apologizing obama has done, I wasn't affected by this hug show at all. All I could really think of was "another rat leaving a sinking ship." emmanuel running for mayor of Chicago is simply par for the course for the uber-corrupt political scene in that city.

Posted October 3, 2010 at 12:08:30 PM


Merry Colin

C'mon Kelly---what was the REAL point of your comment?

Posted October 4, 2010 at 12:52:17 PM


BoFromTexas

Kelly. It is clear that you missed all the points made, and chose to comment on a different aspect of something that probably bothers most of the readers of this column--men acting too physically friendly to other men, inappropriate conduct in most situations. I hug my brothers. I hug my Dad. I do not hold their hands. I think that is weird, unnatural, over the top, puzzling, and strange.

Even for women.

Posted October 4, 2010 at 1:55:57 PM


Dutch

Hugging is a quintessentially middle-Eastern show of affection between males. I'm just saying...

Posted October 4, 2010 at 3:47:17 PM


Caseace

Has Obama done anything 'Presidential'?

Posted October 4, 2010 at 5:15:04 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund