Beltway Christmas: Cash for Corruptocrats
· Wednesday, December 23, 2009
The Democrats are right. Sleazy bribes and pork payoffs didn't start with their government health care takeover bill. They've been doling out taxpayer-funded goodies for votes all year. Harry Reid's latest Cash for Cloture deals are the culmination of Washington's 2009 shopping spree at our expense.
Go back to January and February. The multitrillion-dollar stimulus bill was the mother of all legislative Christmas trees. The ruling party used the economic downturn to redistribute wealth from struggling Americans to favored congressional districts, phantom districts and special interests from golf-cart makers to fly-by-night beauty salons.
According to a new study by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Democratic districts have raked in nearly twice as much porkulus money as GOP districts -- without regard to the actual economic suffering and job loss in those districts. In fact, the researchers found that far more stimulus money went to higher-income areas than to lower-income areas.
That includes Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's backyard -- where a $54 million no-bid contract was awarded to a firm with little experience to relocate a luxury Bay Area wine train due to flood concerns.
And it includes Barack Obama's home state of Illinois, which reaped the single biggest earmark in the porkulus bill -- $1 billion for the dubious FutureGen near-zero emissions "clean coal" plant earmark championed by disgraced Democrat and former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich and Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin.
And it includes Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's backyard -- where he secured billions in high-speed rail stimulus earmarks from which he plans to fund a pie-in-the-sky public transportation line from Los Angeles to Las Vegas.
When taxpayers objected to business as usual masquerading as economic recovery, New York Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer sneered: "You lost." He jibed on the Senate floor while wagging a grabby finger, "And let me say this to all of the chattering class that so much focuses on those little, tiny, yes, porky amendments: The American people really don't care." The "American people" Schumer was referring to, of course, were the privileged minority of stimulus beneficiaries -- not the rest of us "chattering" dissenters stuck with the bill for those billions in "little, tiny, yes, porky amendments."
No legislation has been immune to congressional shakedown. After the Congressional Black Caucus balked loudly enough, Democratic Rep. Barney Frank -- chairman of the House Financial Services Committee -- larded up the majority's Wall Street regulatory "reform" bill with $4 billion in payoffs to minority special interests -- including former failed Air America radio partner Inner City Broadcasting Corp.
The cash-strapped firm is run by Percy Sutton, a New York City crony of Charlie Rangel's and Al Sharpton's. The money will come out of the ever-morphing TARP bank bailout fund -- which went from a toxic assets purchase plan to a capital injection plan, back to a toxic assets purchase plan, then to a life insurance company bailout and on to an auto-supplier bailout.
Leading the charge for the Cash for Cronies of Color drive: California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters, who had already extracted $12 million in TARP funds for OneUnited, a minority-owned bank that is one of her key campaign donors and a company in which both Waters and her husband own massive amounts of stock.
Which brings us to Demcare, the latest wealth redistribution scheme disguised as health care reform. In addition to the infamous $300 million "Louisiana Purchase" for Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu and the (at least) $45 million "Cornhusker Kickback" for sellout Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Harry Reid threw around other, less-publicized gobs of cash for cloture votes to cut off debate and ram the bill through. He tossed in a Hospital Helper of $100 million to Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., whose re-election bid is in hot water.
There are bennies for insurance companies and hospitals in Michigan, and "frontier freebies" for hospitals in Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota and Wyoming. There's a New England's Special Syrup for Vermont and Massachusetts -- who will get similar (though less generous) special treatment by the feds to that of Nebraska in covering Medicaid expansion costs. Combined with Nebraska's tab, the exclusive clique's payoffs will cost taxpayers at least $1.2 billion over 10 years.
There's also an ACORN/community organizer-friendly provision for minority health bureaucracies that was sought by Sen. Roland Burris, D-Ill., according to John McCormack of the Weekly Standard.
And there's a $10 billion socialized medicine sop to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for "community health clinics" serving in essence as universal health care satellite offices. "We are talking about a revolution," Sanders enthused during the Senate's sneaky Sunday session.
No, revolution will come when taxpayers have a chance to kick these reverse Santa Clauses posing as saviors out of office. It can't happen a minute too soon.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
Opinion
- Ann Coulter: My Health Care Plan
- George Will: Betting (Again) on an Education Fix
- Cal Thomas: Israel's New Enemy: America?
- Victor Davis Hanson: Another Partisan Push for Another 'Comprehensive Reform'?
- Larry Elder: Obama to America: Bend Over and Cough
- Matt Towery: Inappropriate Portrayal of First Lady Benefits No One
- Lawrence Kudlow: Is Dodd Ending Too Big to Fail?
- Michael Barone: What's Good for House Leaders Is Bad for Members
- Debra Saunders: Conyers Is the Wrong Guy To Chair Judiciary Committee
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: Moving Past Hillary
- Jeff Jacoby: Fixing 'the Mistake on the Lake'
- Jonah Goldberg: Reading Tea Party Leaves
- Michael Gerson: Democrats' True Colors
- Austin Bay: Obama's Iran Conundrum
- Jacob Sullum: Death in Juarez
Columnists
- Michael Barone
- Austin Bay
- Ken Blackwell
- Tony Blankley
- L. Brent Bozell
- Mona Charen
- Linda Chavez
- Ann Coulter
- Larry Elder
- Roy Exum
- Edwin J. Feulner
- Suzanne Fields
- Michael Gerson
- Jonah Goldberg
- Paul Greenberg
- Rebecca Hagelin
- Victor Davis Hanson
- Jeff Jacoby
- Terence Jeffrey
- Charles Krauthammer
- Lawrence Kudlow
- David Limbaugh
- Michelle Malkin
- William Murchison
- Peggy Noonan
- Oliver North
- Dennis Prager
- Burt Prelutsky
- Michael Reagan
- Debra Saunders
- Ben Shapiro
- Thomas Sowell
- John Stossel
- Jacob Sullum
- Cal Thomas
- Matt Towery
- R. Emmett Tyrrell
- George Will
- Walter E. Williams
The Patriot is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!



P Lewis
I'm shocked to find that politicians withhold their support for a bill until it contains something beneficial to their constituents. Clearly this is the first time in the history of lawmaking that such a thing has happened. Certainly no Republican would engage in such conduct. Shocked, I tell you.
Posted December 23, 2009 at 8:24:15 AM
MichaelSSEC
"Certainly no Republican would engage in such conduct"
So I guess if GOP lawmakers ever engaged in unethical or illegal behavior, that means Democrats have carte blanche? How typical of Leftist thinking.
The fact is, what these radical Democrats have been doing is the most corrupt and unethical government in the history of our great nation. These people should not only be removed from office but arrested and tried for fraud. This is egregious.
Since when does a government that buys votes with tens of billions in taxpayer dollars get a pass? Since when does an administration that pushes for legislation that two-thirds of Americans oppose deserve to keep their jobs? Since when does a group of lawmakers who blatantly violate conflict of interest laws get to stay out of jail?
P Lewis snidely raises the question of what would happen if the GOP did these things. That's easy. They would be excoriated in the media, there would be summary calls for their impeachment, and there would be investigations, arrests and trials. The media would turn this into the biggest story of the last 70 years and they would not turn loose their grip on the headlines until every last GOP lawmaker was punished. It would be a massive feeding frenzy.
But because it's Democrats, it's okay? Not in the America I grew up in, buddy.
Posted December 23, 2009 at 3:36:37 PM
P Lewis
MichaelS SEC
Since when? Since the first legislation was passed, that's when. Money to the home folks is not bribery, at least it wasn't before President Obama was elected. If you think Republican legislators have not held back their vote on a given piece of legislation until they got something they wanted then you are a fool.It's not a question of if the GOP did these things. This is the process (and you know it). Spare me your righteous indignation.
Regarding poll numbers, when Dick Cheney was presented with a poll showing 60% of Americans wanted out of Iraq, his response was "So?". Were you incensed by his callous disregard of the will of the majority, or did you consider him a bold leader who didn't hold a finger to the wind before making decisions? Again, your selective memory is laughable. Elections have consequences. The elected majority is enacting a program they campaigned on.Get used to it.
Posted December 23, 2009 at 4:13:49 PM
MichaelSSEC
You're actually trying to compare liberating a country from a murderous anti-American dictator to passing legislation that will bankrupt the country and wreck the economy? That's a very interesting take on matters.
Your missing a key point. In the poll on the war, Cheney was handed a poll put out by a rabidly biased media. A clear majority of Americans oppose Obamacare even in polls published by that same biased media. If you can't see the difference there, you're working too hard at missing it.
The elected majority is electing a program they campaigned on, that's true. Since when does that make it good for the country?
I agree elections have consequences. I recall there was one in 1860 that led directly to civil war. Obama is driving us toward another one. And if you think that's hyperbole, good luck with that delusion.
Posted December 27, 2009 at 12:03:22 PM