Whose Fault Is It?

· Friday, January 1, 2010

It may not be President Obama's fault that our multibillion-dollar Homeland Security apparatus is more Keystone Kops than "24," anymore than it was President Bush's fault that city, state, and federal agencies failed to respond adequately to Hurricane Katrina. The federal government is (alas) a vast ungovernable enterprise. And the bigger it gets, the less effective it will become.

Still, the entire Democratic Party -- led by Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and Harry Reid -- swarmed over President Bush like piranhas as the waters rose in 2005. "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job" entered the lexicon as one of the most ridiculed commendations in history. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano's declaration that "the system worked" after every relevant Homeland Security agency drunkenly nodded cash-paying, one-way-ticket-purchasing, Yemen-visiting, no-baggage-carrying, father-warning Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab onto Flight 253 deserves, but will not receive, at least as much scorn. In 2005, Democrats expressed outrage that it had taken Bush two days to cut short his Texas vacation. "He has to get off his mountain bike and back to work," declared then Rep. Rahm Emanuel. Somehow, if a Republican were to voice the identical sentiment now, demanding that "Obama has to get off his surfboard and back to work," the establishment would declare it a grievous breach of civility and possibly racist to boot.

I hope no Republican makes such a suggestion, though, because it contributes to the childish idea that the president must govern the nation at all times from the White House -- deploying Marines, structural engineers, tax assessors, and derivatives analysts as required. Ridiculous. Any emergency orders a president must issue can be issued from Texas or Hawaii or the space shuttle for that matter.

President Obama is not wholly responsible for the pathetic incompetence of the security agencies. But their "catastrophic" (his word) failure to perform the minimum functions assigned to them should give him pause. More than most Americans, even more than most Democrats, the president is in thrall to the illusion of a skilled, paternalistic government, able to handle the fortunes of car companies, the proper running of banks and insurance companies, the more equitable and cost-effective delivery of health care, and the exact calibration of the world's climate. Could the new New Deal just get airplane safety right first?

Leaving aside the failings of the CIA, the Department of State, and the Department of Homeland Security, some of this is entirely President Obama's fault. He has guaranteed that we will get far less intelligence from this terrorist than we would have under the Bush administration. Because the highly successful Clinton law enforcement model has been reintroduced to the war on terror, no sooner was the fire in Abdulmutallab's pants out than he was read his Miranda rights and provided with a taxpayer-financed public defender.

Under the terrible ancien regime, when the world hated us, and the terrorists were inspired to attack us because Guantanamo was not listed in Fodor's Guide (except, gosh, they seem not to have gotten the memo because they persist in attacking), Abdulmutallab would have been hustled down to Guantanamo to be interrogated. Yes, interrogated. Not tortured. Not waterboarded (that happened to only three detainees) but interrogated about his contacts, his experiences in Yemen, his explosives training, and so forth. If he wanted better treatment -- dessert, videos, music -- he could purchase these with cooperation.

Not now. His lawyer, Miriam Siefer (who has represented terrorists before), will advise him to stay silent. We will learn nothing of other plots Abdulmutallab might have provided leads to, and nothing of the whereabouts of his supposed mentor, American-born Yemen resident Anwar al-Awlaki -- the imam who also incited the Fort Hood killer, had contact with two of the Sept. 11 terrorists, and who has been described by Al-Arabiya as "the bin Laden of the Internet."

Speaking of Yemen, in the mad scramble to close Guantanamo by Obama's self-imposed deadline, just this month the administration released six detainees to ... Yemen, with the promise of 34 more to come. Well, didn't the Bush administration release two Yemenis to Saudi Arabia who later moved to Yemen and continued jihad? Answer: Yes. Here's another question: Why didn't the Obama administration study that failure?

And here's one more question: How does an over-grand, overreaching would-be messiah learn the humility to at least put first things first?

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

MichaelSSEC

What makes you think he's NOT putting first things first, by his own set of priorities?

Can somebody name a single Obama policy that has been in the best interest of America and her citizens?

Can somebody name a single Obama policy that has had as its aim the weakening and dismantling of America?

The puzzling attitude the administration takes toward terrorism is only puzzling when we assume Obama's goal is to protect Americans from terrorist attacks. We've seen no evidence that this is correct. Rather, all evidence indicates that his goal is to enforce Political Correctness, appease radical Islam and weaken America's effort to combat jihad. Once we realize that's his goal, suddenly every policy he's enacted or suggested makes perfect sense.

And as a result of those policies, innocent people will die just as they did at Fort Hood, and just as they very nearly did on Christmas day.

Posted January 1, 2010 at 1:11:16 PM


veritaseequitas

Excuse me Mona...BO donned the mantle of POTUS and CIC however undeserved they may be. That means that ultimately the buck stops with BO.

BO surrounded himself with incompetent people. BO asked that we judge him by the company he keeps. America is judging. BO has been weighed and BO has been measured and BO is found wanting.

This unrepentant socialist/liar/destroyer of the American way of life needs to be tossed out of office on his skinny rear along with his despicable posse.

Posted January 3, 2010 at 8:56:38 AM


Sam

I hate to agree with Michael but I am tending to more and more. Obama made a trip (here) to Michigan where he called our Governor Granholm a great success story. This was in the middle of Michigan leading the country down the drain. We had double-digit unemployment before the rest did and our automobile industry was being trashed and taken over. Yea, she was successful - at destroying the economy in Michigan. They are still talking about 'fixing' the -NO, not economy, but the- GOVERNMENT problems. Of course by raising more taxes! Driving more people and business out of the state. And sending us even deeper into poverty. THIS is what Obama calls successful!

It did not surprise me to hear the failed airline security to be called perfect. it DID what it was designed to do - NOT keep us secure. That flight could very well have landed ON MY HEAD. I am only 2 miles from the airport. Then I guess they would have called it a ROARING success.

How many attacks will we have to suffer under this regime before we realise that they are NOT concerned about OUR safety?

Posted January 3, 2010 at 3:56:20 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund