Has Obama Moved Center on Nuclear Power?

· Tuesday, February 2, 2010

The perennially optimistic strained to find evidence of a new centrism in President Obama's State of the Union address. Well, the Hyde Park liberal embraced nuclear power, they say. And he did seem to.

" ... To create more ... clean energy jobs," the president intoned, "we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country."

It's a nice sentiment. The Nuclear Energy Institute pronounced itself "delighted." But hold the champagne.

The other nuclear news this week is that the Obama administration's new budget will propose to zero out funding for Nevada's Yucca Mountain nuclear repository -- in effect, killing it. Instead, the Energy Department has announced the formation of a "blue ribbon" commission "to provide recommendations for developing a safe, long-term solution to managing the nation's used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste." It will consist of the usual blue ribbon members (Lee Hamilton, Brent Scowcroft, Susan Eisenhower) and produce an interim report in 18 months and a final report in 24. The commission will have 15 members and God knows how many staff, and accordingly, the costs will run into the millions.

And why are we forming yet another blue ribbon commission to study a matter that has already been studied to death? The commission is empowered to study "all options" except the one that has already been chosen by the United States government. So much for the previous blue ribbon commission that had settled on the Yucca Mountain site.

American taxpayers have already invested more than $13 billion over 30 years to build the facility and make it redundantly safe. In 1982, the U.S. government agreed to begin accepting nuclear waste at the site in 1998. Failure to meet that deadline has already cost us $565 million in legal settlements and is estimated to run up to $11 billion over the next decade.

The Yucca Mountain repository is 1,000 feet underground in the most lifeless desert of North America. Its storage tunnels have been engineered to enhance the natural protective effect of thick rock by adding multiple layers of steel, titanium drip shields to prevent erosion, and other safety features to ensure that the waste (which becomes less harmful with the passage of time) will not leak.

How safe is it? Consider millirems, units of radiation. A cross-country airplane ride subjects travelers to 2 or 3 millirems (from cosmic rays). A dental x-ray yields 1 millirem. People who live in Denver get twice the dose (50 per year) as those who live at sea level. An earlier Energy Department study examined whether the Yucca containment facility could withstand normal aging, plus volcanoes and earthquakes. The conclusion was that it would emit no more than 1 millirem per year of radiation for 750,000 years!

But goodbye to all that. It wasn't safe enough for Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., who has worked to kill the Yucca facility. (Reid was not alone among Nevada politicians. Former Sen. Chic Hecht had memorably promised to oppose "nuclear suppositories" in his state.) And it was not safe enough for Barack Obama, who campaigned energetically in Nevada promising to terminate the project. In addition to zeroing out funding, the administration proposes to suspend the license application for the facility and withdraw it completely within the month.

Why are they wasting our time and money on a new blue ribbon commission to go over plowed ground? The administration hopes that the commission will reassure the nuclear industry that provision will be made for the waste. But when? In another 30 years? At the cost of another $13 billion or more?

There is nothing dishonorable about opposing nuclear energy -- though the greenies who claim that global warming is their chief worry have some explaining to do if they reject nuclear power -- but there is something dishonest about claiming to favor nuclear power while simultaneously short-circuiting the most viable solution to the problem of long-term waste storage.

They are wasting their time, squandering our money, and insulting our intelligence.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Jimmy D

Thanks a lot Mona.

Just when I though there was a grain of sanity in that mountain of idiocy called SOTU and along you come to clue me in.

Oh well. My best efforts to imagine Mr Obama somehow worthy have never lasted more than a day or two, anyway.

"They are wasting their time, squandering our money, and insulting our intelligence."

I think they are biding their time, stealing our money and counting on our stupidity.

There's no such thing as just informing the public any more. Now it's all about sounding the alarm.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 12:38:04 AM


jbrad

Gee! That's funny....I didn't see anything at all about that on tv or in the paper. Maybe the 'journalists' were busy elsewhere.....

And why doesn't the blue ribbon panel talk to other nations that are using nuclear power?

Posted February 2, 2010 at 1:33:31 AM


Victor

Mona:

"They are wasting their time, squandering our money, and insulting our intelligence".

Anything to avoid our "embarassment of riches" of oil, natural gas and coal.

When you add them all together, we have the largest reserves on the planet.

In three states alone, Wyoming, Utah and Colorado, we have nearly 300 years of shale oil.

We would not only be energy independent, but we would be able to flood the market with cheap oil, employ countless people, generate revenues and jump start the economy.

He only wishes to appear that he is serious about doing something, such as the "Blue-Ribbon" commision to "study" the deficit that will not start until November.

He works harder to get out of doing something than he would if he did the thing in the first place.

That will be the hallmark of this mis-administration.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 9:14:37 AM


Jack

Old native american comment "He speaks with forked toungue"

Posted February 2, 2010 at 9:54:17 AM


Kathy

WORDS and ACTIONS are two very different things. At times, they are diametrically opposed.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 9:58:36 AM


bflaskerud

The one thing not mentioned is the less safer alternative that we have today and the impact of further delaying the decision to hold materials at Yucca Mountain. If DOE estimated the impact of prolonged storage at the current sites, it would probably far out exceed the estimates for storage at Yucca Mountain even under a worst case scenario.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 10:30:26 AM


Brian Mays

Correction: The ratepayers (i.e., the people who purchased and used the electricity) have invested more than $19 billion over 30 years to build the facility. This combined with the $13 billion of interest that has accrued over the years puts the total at over $33 billion dollars for the facility, of which almost $11 billion has been spent.

This money was collected through a 1/10th of a cent per kWh fee on the electricity generated at nuclear power plants. The taxpayer hasn't paid anything for Yucca Mountain, except perhaps for lawyers fees to defend against lawsuits from the utilities to get their money back, since the federal government hasn't lived up to its responsibilities under the law.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 12:49:35 PM


Jack

Brian if I understand you right, then Yucca Mountain has become a private matter and the Government has no say in the matter. If tax payer moneys have not been used then the project is the utility companies project.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 3:07:56 PM


Ken C

Doesn't France recycle a vast percentage of their nuclear waste? Why can't we do something similar instead of storing it forever?

Posted February 2, 2010 at 3:49:11 PM


Rex

Wasn't it Einstein who said the definition of an idiot was someone who keeps doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results every time. God help me, but sometimes I think our Government kind fits that definition.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 5:47:00 PM


Anton D Rehling

Obama, You lie. Pelosi, Reid et al you contemptfull lot, to put it nicely, you are all a bunch of manipulative liers.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 9:20:35 PM


Anton D Rehling

Obama, You lie. Pelosi, Reid et al you contemptfull lot, to put it nicely, you are all a bunch of manipulative liers.

Posted February 2, 2010 at 9:45:34 PM


Edwin Joseph Karlis

Obomer has given The EPA all the power & there will never be a nuclear plant safe enough or clean enouch. This is what is called in Washington "smoke & mirrors" that has replaced the "Potomic Two Step"

Posted February 3, 2010 at 8:39:36 AM


KIM

It has become abundantly clear that whatever this man, who many call President, says should be absolutely discarded as less than the truth, if not outright lies. Whatever he says he will do, you can count on him to do the opposite. It is appalling how many still seem to fall for his meaningless smooth talk.

Posted February 4, 2010 at 2:21:00 AM


Edwin J. Karlis

Mona:

They are taken in by "Smoke & Mirrors". Obomer

gave all the power to the EPA & there will never

buiuld a nuclear plant clean enough to meet their stamdards. As the red man would sat,"you forked tongue devil".Nuclear power has not got a chance in this country. The only way is to get the U.S. Navy

involved because they have had nuclear shipe since the 50's. They could build us clean safe nuclear plants. Also there is a company that will take the spent fuel rods & make them useable.Excellant article.

Thank You

Posted February 6, 2010 at 1:13:34 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund