Options
Obama Owes Bush an Apology
· Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Had it not been for opposing war, President Obama might never have catapulted to the White House.
It was taken for granted in the run-up to the presidential campaign of 2008 that candidate Obama had principled objections to the war in Iraq. He was the left's champion against Sen. Hillary Clinton, who had, along with 29 of the then 50 Democratic senators, voted in favor of the Iraq War resolution. That vote was to dog her throughout the Democratic primaries.
Though Obama was only a state legislator in 2002, he gave a highly partisan anti-war speech that improved his standing with the left wing of the Democratic Party. "What I am opposed to," he declaimed, "is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income, to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression." When the war began to go badly in 2006 and 2007, Obama was hailed as prescient.
After winning the nomination, Obama reiterated his opposition to the war in Iraq, which he claimed had been poorly led, unnecessary, badly motivated, and doomed to failure.
In a March 2007 Senate floor speech, Sen. Obama recited the leftist litany about Iraq. It was folly, he argued, to "go it alone" -- overlooking the fact that 27 nations participated in the coalition to remove Saddam Hussein. Obama repeated the common liberal trope of the time that only a political settlement would end the violence. "There is no military solution to this war," he pronounced.
When President Bush announced the troop surge in January 2007, Obama opposed it, saying, "I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq are going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, I think it will do the reverse." Even a year later, when evidence mounted that the surge was working, Obama continued to push for retreat ("phased redeployment") because "I don't think the president's strategy is going to work."
Only in mid-July of 2008 did the Obama campaign scrub criticism of the surge from its website.
By turning to the architect of the Iraq surge, Gen. David Petraeus, to save the war in Afghanistan, President Obama is acknowledging, if only implicitly, that he was quite wrong about the Iraq surge and that Bush was right.
But what remains of the rest of his critique about Bush's war in Iraq?
What distinguishes Obama's hopes for Afghanistan from Bush's much-despised aspirations for Iraq? At his press conference following the G-20 summit, Obama sounded like a neoconservative. "... I reject the notion that the Afghan people don't want some of the basic things that everybody wants -- basic rule of law, a voice in governance, economic opportunity, basic physical security, electricity, roads, an ability to get a harvest to market and get a fair price for it without having to pay too many bribes in between. And I think we can make a difference, and the coalition can make a difference, in them meeting those aspirations ..."
The "Come home, America" president is in full nation-building mode now. In that 2007 speech, he had predicted that only the removal of American troops would permit Iraq to thrive: "... it must begin soon. Letting the Iraqis know that we will not be there forever is our last, best hope to pressure the Iraqis to take ownership of their country and bring an end to their conflict. It is time for our troops to start coming home."
No more. Whereas candidate Obama was contemptuous of Bush's "open-ended" commitment in Iraq, President Obama is now walking back his promise to leave Afghanistan by July 2011. "There has been a lot of obsession around this whole issue of when do we leave," he said. "My focus right now is how to we make sure that what we're doing there is successful, given the incredible sacrifices that our young men and women are putting in." The July 2011 departure date is inoperative -- like the promise to close Guantanamo by January 2010.
I am not confident that the surge will work as well in Afghanistan as it did in Iraq. But I am sure that the president owes his predecessor an apology.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey: "Simply put, The Patriot Post cuts through the clutter and delivers timely, accurate, and colorful accounts of the week's most important news and policy issues. It's a mandatory read." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
- Linda Chavez: Overreach by Unions in Wisconsin
- Mona Charen: Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again
- Jonah Goldberg: Big Business Gets the Hollywood Treatment
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























Kathy
Good story, which goes to further prove just how long O has been talking in one direction while his actions go in the opposite direction.
Of course, no apology will ever happen. How could he keep blaming the Bush administration for everything if he was to apologize? He's a real winner, isn't he?
Posted June 29, 2010 at 10:29:25 AM
pete
"an ability to get a harvest to market and get a fair price for it without having to pay too many bribes"
We all know bribes are a part of politics, but they are usually kept under the rug in the back room. The current administration is the first to openly talk abou them.
This convinces me that he is so deep into taking and giving bribes, he them as so much a part of his way of doing business, that he thinks nothing of talking about them not just in public, but in his speeches.
Posted June 29, 2010 at 12:25:40 PM
Don
Obama is great! He has mastered the art of talking out of both sides of his mouth. and have the population on both sides believe him! I believe the proper term for a person like that is , ah, umm, hmm, ...... liar!
Posted June 29, 2010 at 12:44:49 PM
Doug Black
Obama owes the working people of the United States an apology for the disasterous policy and spending he has heaped on our next 10 or 20 generations, if we can last that long. He has done more damage than Carter did. Impeach him and Pe;losi and /biden and start over.
Posted June 29, 2010 at 5:05:24 PM
Frank E.
06/29/10
MONA CHAREN,OBAMA DOESN'T APOLOGIZE,NOT EVEN YOU,
OBAMA WOULD FIND AWAY TOO BLAME OTHERS!
REMEMBER HES THE MESSIAH...
Posted June 29, 2010 at 7:29:27 PM
Patriot
Instead of talk follow the Constitution. It allows the removal of those who can't follow it. Remember, the ballot box is the most peaceful power tool for the American people. Thank God they are waking up!
Posted June 30, 2010 at 11:37:41 AM
JP
"... I reject the notion that the Afghan people don't want some of the basic things that everybody wants -- basic rule of law, a voice in governance, economic opportunity, basic physical security..."
Hmmm, it doesn't seem President Obama rejects those things for US citizens in Arizona. He is not willing to allow the basic rule of law to be enforced, the Justice Dept wants to sue(!) the state government and the citizens are subject to more kidnappings and violence just like on the other side of the border.
If the Chief executive can't execute on nation-building in the USA how can we believe him with US military sacrificing daily in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Posted July 2, 2010 at 3:09:41 PM
bahmi
Mona, you are wrong here. Bush and his regime did much to reduce freedom of American citizens. Going back to the days of his father, this family has been a hugely destructive element in damaging the country. Both are guilty of treason and lying and need to be tried and executed. Disgusting family, liars from the get go. Obama, another mendacious idiot, can't sue other liars, now can he? Liars are everywhere, I can't figure 0ut where the lawsuit comes from. A band of thieves, all related. Both scumbags, horrific liars and highly damaging to the country.
Posted July 2, 2010 at 7:02:25 PM