This was not the first time Holder was soft on "terrorists". Holder was also involved in Clinton's decision to reduce the criminal sentences of 16 members of the Boricua Popular Army, an organization that has been categorized by the FBI as a terrorist organization. The clemency request was initially opposed in 1996 by U.S. Pardons Attorney Margaret Love. When Holder was elevated to Deputy Attorney General in 1997, he was asked to reexamine the issue by three members of Congress. In July 1999, Holder recommended clemency to Clinton with a report from then U.S. Pardons Attorney Roger Adams that neither supported nor opposed clemency. A month later, Clinton granted the clemency. According to The Hartford Courant, the clemency was unusual because it was opposed by the FBI, the federal prosecutor and the victims. According to the newspaper, it was also unusual because, before the commutations, the Boricua Popular Army members were not required to repudiate their actions, and they were not asked to provide any information concerning the whereabouts of Victor Manuel Gerena, a co-conspirator and one of the FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, or the millions of dollars stolen by the group in a 1983 robbery of Wells Fargo in West Hartford, Connecticut. It would seem that Holders opposition to the death penalty has some influence on his decisions. The man is a threat to our National security in my opinion!

The only possible rationale for coddling terrorists is to give them a platform from which to air their hatreds and anti-American views to a compliant American media. The Obama administration clearly wants to make these trials into showcases for Islamic complaints against the West. Put America on trial. Turn the terrorists into victims of American oppression. Muddy the waters so that more people will be confused about what is the right thing to do. Greater confusion leads to greater paralysis, which weakens the country.

There's just one small problem with this scheme: Americans are not buying it. Obama's softness on terrorism has been a key impetus in his fall from grace. I doubt he realizes it, nor do I think he would care. Obama never accepts responsibility or blame for anything. Even his incredible blunder with Obamacare was blamed on the American people being too stupid to understand its wonderfulness; Obama actually believes the problem was that he didn't explain it enough to the imbecilic voters, a bill about which he spoke roughly 40,000 times.

Obama's goal is not to keep America safe. If he wanted to do that, he would be turning these captured terrorists over to the CIA where they belong. He would be hunting Islamic radicals down and helping them meet Allah. He would not be calling obvious acts of terror by other less-accurate names. He would not be calling obvious terrorists with undeniable ties to al Qaeda "isolated extremists." And he would not have changed our soldiers' rules of engagement to something Code Pink thinks is "fabulous."

Innocent people have already died as a direct result of Obama's policies vis-a-vis the war on terror. Unless he can forced to change his mind, or he can be forced out of office, many more innocents will die in the coming weeks and months. We had three terrorist attacks on US soil in just one year, and we can expect more this year. How many must die before we force Obama to put American security first?

Trust

Trust is a two edge sword. We trust you to act on our behalf for the good of the citizenship or we trust you to act on behalf of your personal agenda without regard to the country as a whole.

Faith has three elements......Knowledge of certain facts, belief that those facts are true and "trust" willing to risk something precious.

The current attitude of today's citizen should concern the present administration. We are beginning to believe you will hurt us and need to be replaced. How? November 2010.

02/16/10

When all the POLITICAL CORRECT ORAL WORSHIPERS

elect a MUSLIM SYMPATHIZER who shows his HATEFUL

disregard for our CONSTITUTION,won't SALUTE our

flag,change freedom to Communism.His NOMINATIONS

to enforce his policies are,THOSE that are TAX

CHEATS,COMMUNIST BACK GROUNDS,no experience for

the office they are in charge of! His CONGRESS is

A PARTY of TREASON!SO WHAT CAN AMERICA EXPECT!!

Why are Holder and Obama are so sympathetic to people who LOVE a prophet that is a slaver, approved of rape and the beating of wives and children? Maybe in their hearts the wish the same rights that Mohamad granted his followers? Not only was Mohamad was ok with his cut of the plunder been lower because a pregnant captives price will be lower.(who wants to pay a lot for a atressed out woman who may die of childbirth in a few months), he also eased any guilt about any potential child produced by raping captive women - he said that Allah alone determins pregnancy. He also said a good muslim woman is obedient to her husband and can be beaten by her husband if she persists in disobeying. Mohamad said 7year olds should be told to pray,while 10 year olds should be beaten into praying. Sunni islamic law permits no punishment for Muslims who kill their children and grandchildren. Wow, if those men truely find Islamic values to be wonderful, their families are sure lucky they are American citizens.

Mr. Holder needs to find a job more suitable with his capabilities. Walmart greeter comes to mind.

We shouldn't be too hard on him, he's probably searching for the secrets hidden on the back of the Constitution, like the hollywood know it alls. If I might humbly suggest, the secrets to our national treasure are written on the front of the constitution in plain English not on the back in code...