Options
Obama's Katrina: The Politics of It Is Oily, Too
· Monday, June 7, 2010
If you missed the president's news conference Thursday, his first in 10 months, here's a succinct summary: It was about the oil spill. And it's mainly somebody else's fault.
Whose? BP's or the previous administration's (his favorite scapegoat even though he's been president now for some 16 months). Or it's the fault of unnnamed "federal agencies" he really has nothing to do with, or the "culture" of the oil industry and government regulation thereof, or ... you name it.
This he called taking responsibility.
Yes, the president admitted his administration was too slow when it came to preventing the catastrophe, and "I take responsibility for that. There wasn't sufficient urgency in terms of the pace of how those changes needed to take place. Obviously, they weren't happening fast enough."
But that confession required only seconds; the rest of his hour-long press conference was pretty much devoted to how other people hadn't done their jobs. You'd think he was back on the campaign trail attacking the president. Somebody ought to tell him he's the president now.
Nothing has been so revealing of this commander-in-chief's lack of military training than his response or lack thereof to this long, slowly but ever deepening crisis. Because instead of just saying, "No excuse, sir," and clearing the air, there he was at still another rostrum last week talking, talking, talking ... instead of clearly acting on the ground, or rather in the water. The sludge, both physical and political, just keeps coming.
Campaigning and governing mix in a republic, and certainly in a democracy. It's hard to draw the line between spirit and substance. Which was it that buoyed the country when FDR and later Ronald Reagan lifted the nation's morale -- their sublime confidence or actual policies? The two mixed. But in this administration, they begin to separate -- as clearly as oil and water. Disenchantment sets in, and with it failure.
This administration, the president wants us to know, has been on this crisis since, yes, Day One: "Those who think we were either slow on the response or lacked urgency, don't know the facts. This has been our highest priority."
That's nice. But if the administration really has acted quickly, urgently, then why did his Director of Minerals Management have to resign just hours before his press conference? Was it just a coincidence? Did she just happen to pick this time to decide she needed some down time?
The director -- S. Elizabeth Birnbaum. Esq. -- left "on her own volition," announced Ken Salazar, who is still secretary of the Interior. Is it only the lower-downs in this administration who have enough shame to submit their resignation when things go terribly wrong on their watch? Who knows? Not the president. When asked about it, he said he'd just heard about the resignation that day, and didn't "know the circumstances in which this occurred." That was just after he'd got through explaining yet again how on top of things he's been.
So whom are you going to believe, the president's description of this administration as responsive and fast-acting, moving urgently to contain the catastrophe, or your own lying eyes?
Down in Louisiana, the Cajun Cato himself, James Carville, sounded less like the defender of the administration he's consistently been and more like another worried, frustrated and impatient Louisianan. The president, he complained, "just looks like he's not involved in this. Man, you got to get down here and take control of this and put somebody in charge of this thing and get this thing moving. We're about to die down here."
The moral of this story: When it's your own shoreline that's in danger, it kind of changes your perspective. It gives you, in the words of that scholarly work of political science, "A Boy Named Sue," a different point of view. (Cash, J.) That's when politics stops being some kind of abstract, spectator sport and becomes a matter of life and death. Mr. Carville has started sounding like Randy Newman singing the Looziana Blues: "Louisiana, Louisiana, they're tryin' to wash us away...." Again. In oil this time.
Last time, it was Katrina. By the time George W. Bush finally jettisoned his flood czar, Michael "Brownie, you're doin' a heckuva job" Brown, much of the damage -- human and political -- had been done. In the end, having to work with a bumbling governor and an equally inept but raging mayor of New Orleans, that president tried to muddle through -- and failed miserably. Finally, much too late, he found his can-do man in Lieut. Gen. Russel L. Honoré, U.S.A., a commander even Ragin' Ray Nagin, aforesaid joker of a mayor, had to approve of.
As soon as the Creole Napoleon landed, he could be seen all over the streets of the flooded city barking orders at mere colonels. Or as Mayor Nagin had to admit: "Now, I will tell you this -- and I give the president some credit on this -- he sent one John Wayne dude down here that can get some stuff done, and his name is Gen. Honoré. And he came off the doggone chopper, and he started cussin' and people started movin'. And he's getting some stuff done."
But where is this president's General Honoré? Happily, Louisiana now has a governor who actually seems to know his business -- Bobby Jindal -- but the feds keep dragging their feet whenever he makes recommendations. Such as: Quick, build barrier islands. (And send the bill to BP.) Quick, get out of the way and let city and parish officials protect their people and resources. Quick, get Louisiana more booms to ward off the approaching tide of gunk before the Gulf Coast starts to look like one big used oil filter.
The last president we had was done in by a natural disaster; this one could be done in by an unnatural one. One president demonized by his kneejerk critics was enough. Please, not again. Barack Obama needs to find his General Honoré in a hurry. Wouldn't it be something if he chose this young, energetic, proven governor to lead the charge? Even if Bobby Jindal is a Republican. At last Barack Obama would begin to carry out his promise to be a leader who can work across party lines to get things done. And, boy, does something need to get done. Like yesterday. No, last month. 'Cause they're washing Louisiana away again. And ain't nobody in charge.
(c) 2010 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Syndicated Radio Host Dr. Laura Schlessinger: "The Patriot is the most informative and witty publication on the Internet. I read every issue!" It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
- Linda Chavez: Overreach by Unions in Wisconsin
- Mona Charen: Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again
- Jonah Goldberg: Big Business Gets the Hollywood Treatment
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























M Rick Timms MD
We do not have any real understanding of who Mr. Obama actually is, but we do know is that he is NOT a leader. He had no leadership experience in an executive role, and it shows. Unlike those candidates that had extensive experience as business leaders and decision makers, or in the executive branch of State government, as Governor (or even as Mayor of a Major city) - Mr Obama has never run anything bigger than a corrupt community council of Chicago radicals.
Who is this guy and what made half of America think he was capable of leading the country? We have never seen a single document written by him during his college or Law School training. Something is not right with this picture. We still do not have the full story on this guy.)
Can he read a speech - absolutely.
Can he run a political campaign - absolutely.
Can he manufacture a crisis - absolutely.
Can he handle a real one - absolutely not.
All of our best Presidents have brought executive experience to the office. Obama has none, and although he has a corrupt political machine that has allowed him to bypass the rule of law temporarily, he is not an effective leader. I can only hope and pray that our real enemies do not underestimate American ability based on the manifest weaknesses of this President.
In the meantime, just stop the damn oil leak. Stop trying to save the well and salvage the leaking oil. Just stop it. Protect the shoreline with all available resources, now. Obama clearly is not capable or interested in managing this problem. He simply needs to find someone who is - and put them in charge.
Posted June 7, 2010 at 4:01:27 AM
kev
His declarations of responsibility, though very few they are, are always followed by a "but," or a "if not for..." This guy is no leader, but simply a puppet, a mouthpiece for the extreme left. He is ineffective, inept, incompetent, and, hopefully, unelectable. We must get the right people elected to office so that we can begin to stop this leftward push. And I agree with M Rick, where is his background? Why has he covered up even his school records and writings? What would they reveal about this person? How can this country elect a man president when they don't even know him. Worse yet, how can a legitimate press let him get away with hiding most of his life?
Posted June 7, 2010 at 7:25:38 AM
Pamela Heckel
Obama is just another pretty face, a prom queen, a blond. Don't know how this man ever made it through Harvard.
Posted June 7, 2010 at 11:55:32 AM
kev2
'I am who my friends are' - Not much else to say.
Posted June 7, 2010 at 11:59:28 AM
Dan DG
Personally, I like gasoline. I would like to see more of it and less ethanol. When are the American people going to see that the real fault in this spill belongs to the government? The government said no drilling close to shore, the government said this is how you prevent a spill with a government approved valve setup and the government insisted on inspecting the valve and the operations on the oil platforms and gave their tacit approval. I want to see Americans in the street with signs that say, "Give as the oil wells we want!" instead of ones that place ALL the blame on BP.
Posted June 7, 2010 at 12:21:17 PM
John Bostick
Dr Timms
Your statment " I can only hope and pray that our real enemies do not underestimate American ability based on the manifest weaknesses of this President."
should not cause concern.
Mr.Obama is in total alliance wth Americas real enemies.
Posted June 7, 2010 at 12:53:52 PM
John Bostick
Our real enemies rejoice because Mr. Obama is our president
Posted June 7, 2010 at 1:19:29 PM
CaseAce
Obama would never hire Bobby Jindal and not just because he's Republican, but because the American people would then see what a real leader in action looks like exposing the emperor with no resume.
Posted June 8, 2010 at 2:26:02 PM
Debbi
Dr Timms, you got it right! And your closing statement "He simply needs to find someone who is - and put them in charge." ... they are on site and that would be the local leaders - govenors, parish/county presidents and mayors. The locals know what needs to be done and can get it done right and sooner than later! This is such a catastrophic travesty!! The Gulf of Mexico is to become the Gulf of Oil?
Posted June 9, 2010 at 2:56:38 PM
Cuffs
Obama is not interested in handling the spill. He and his marxist cohorts have never been interested in anything but fundamentally changing the economic
and social foundations of America.
This spill is merely an inconvenience for them.
Obama never was capable of leadership; why do we
expect that now.
Imagine Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani as president.
The entire world of "spill" experts would have been
on the job from day one.
Posted June 11, 2010 at 2:13:02 PM