Odious Conservatives

· Thursday, April 1, 2010

WASHINGTON -- A major proposition that I advance in a book that will be published later this month, "After the Hangover: The Conservatives' Road to Recovery," is that there exists an odious subgroup of conservatives who, since the beginning of the conservative movement, have made their way to prominence in the mainstream media by a cheap act. They disparage, with great melodrama, other conservatives. Liberals love it -- and, for a while, love the disparagers. In the late 1990s, Arianna Huffington exploited this instrument of self-promotion brazenly. For several years, David Frum has been doing it haltingly, even timorously. However, in the past two weeks, he has been pulling a Huffington with unusual boldness.

First he smeared Sean Hannity. Then he reproached conservative opponents of the Democrats' health care monstrosity. Now he is claiming martyrdom at the hands of Arthur Brooks, the head of the American Enterprise Institute, which housed him as a resident fellow for seven years, reportedly at a salary of $100,000 a year. Brooks was willing to let him stay on at AEI but without a salary. Very theatrically Frum(p) quit, and the liberals pronounced him a great man. My thesis is again vindicated, and you will understand my satisfaction in reporting that in "Hangover," I have embalmed Frum(p) as a perfect example of the conservative hustler, manipulating liberal approval. I call his type the Reformed Conservatives, or RCs.

Of a sudden, Frum(p) is in a mad rush to become the Arianna Huffington of the present moment. He smears Hannity, snipes at opponents of Obamacare and calumniates AEI. What will be his next move in pulling an Arianna? Perhaps he will find a rich Texan to marry and fleece tens of millions of dollars so he can move to California and open a salon for Hollywood pinheads. Maybe he even will affect an unintelligible foreign accent -- Dahling.

Frum(p)'s attack on Hannity was particularly galling to me, for he sought legitimacy by dragging in my magazine, The American Spectator. He cited an unedited entry on our Web site's blog that was not only inadvertently published but also colossally inaccurate and misleading. Upon hearing of it, I immediately ordered it removed and replaced with the following notice:

"Information regarding Freedom Alliance (a Hannity charity smeared by Frum) that appeared earlier in this spot was inaccurate or misleading and has been removed. Any further mention of this material as having appeared in this post will either mention our disavowal or be deceiving to readers."

In his original smear of Hannity, Frum(p) had not even verified the charges against him. He simply republished the rubbish, claiming the charges to be "credible." Eventually, he discovered the bogosity of the charges and acknowledged his error, but he has yet to note that AmSpec repudiated them, too.

Since then, he has rebuked Republicans for opposing Obamacare, claiming that they failed to negotiate with Democrats. This attracted the approval of White House flack Robert Gibbs. It also attracted the attention of a lead Wall Street Journal editorial, which noted that Frum(p) "now makes his living as the media's go-to basher of fellow Republicans." In typical WSJ fashion, the editorial then proceeded to cite the Democrats' record of cutting the Republicans out of any possible bipartisan legislation.

Truth be known, Frum(p) is as much a hustler as Carlos Allen, the third gate-crasher at President Barack Obama's state dinner for Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Allen, you will recall, is the proprietor of something called the Hush Galleria, "an exclusive and luxurious private social club whose members enjoy unparalleled access to elite movers and shakers." Maybe when Frum(p) moves to Hollywood and opens his salon, he will found a similar establishment. It could be called "Comfort Station," promising "an exclusive and luxurious private social club whose members enjoy unparalleled access to elite movers and shakers."

With a little luck, he might get Arianna to attend his grand opening after she helps him with his new continental accent -- Dahling.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

abides

I must ask - why is it accepted as canon among conservatives that they must never, ever, criticize (or as you would say: "disparage") one an other?

To caution against challenge - even from within ones own ranks - suggests a fraility of conviction.

By the way - to mock a former acoloyte's name (aka 'ad hominen') is a tired trick that is evidence of a weak argument. It is also wholly reminiscent of the shrill cadence Scientologists levy against their former, and now-critical, cult members.

Posted April 6, 2010 at 8:33:29 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund