Options
Boehner Blew It
· Thursday, September 16, 2010
WASHINGTON -- Did my ears deceive me? Did I hear House Minority Leader John Boehner say on CBS' "Face the Nation" Sunday, "If the only option I have is to vote for those at 250 and below, of course I'm going to do that"? He was referring to voting for extending the Bush tax cuts to those making less than $250,000 a year. And he was referring to the issue when there is a building momentum to keep the tax cuts for everyone in an era of fragile economic growth and 9.6 percent unemployment. Even some Democrats are willing to keep the tax cuts, but Boehner just made it difficult for them.
There is a growing awareness that we are not getting out of this slowdown anytime soon. Independents and the tea party movement are siding with conservatives in favor of extending the tax cuts. There is a sense that economic growth is part of the answer to our economic problems. And there is a realization spreading across the country that official Washington is clueless.
President Barack Obama -- in his first 19 months in office -- increased the national debt by more than all presidential administrations from George Washington to Ronald Reagan combined. Obama's extravagance follows the huge amount of red ink splashed around by the Republicans when they were in office. It led to the Republicans relinquishing the presidency in 2008. Now Boehner just indicated that if his party gets back in power, the spending might very well continue. The very rich will have paid more in taxes, and -- that not being enough to pay for Washington's extravagance -- there will be a value-added tax for all of us. Yes, there will be a VAT. There just is not that much to be taken from the rich.
After all, those who make $250,000 are in the top 10 percent of economic earners, who pay 70 percent of all income taxes. Given our enormous budget deficits, the expropriation of the rich would not be enough. We could send them to re-education camps and still there would be deficits. We are facing budget shortfalls in the area of a trillion-plus dollars for the next few years. Long term the deficit will be in the neighborhood of $100 trillion! On the other hand, if we whack the rich, our troubles worsen, for they account for most of our investment and job growth. Better it is to have their money working for us on behalf of economic growth. Official Washington would penalize the rich so we all can suffer together rather than let us all prosper in a growing economy. Boehner blew it.
Of course, he rushed on to say that he will "fight to make sure that we extend the current tax rates for all Americans." But the damage had been done. What possessed him? Is it that President Obama has decided to make him his contemporary embodiment of George W. Bush, or is it that Boehner really has lived in Washington too long? Whatever the case, if he cannot stand the heat, he knows where to go.
Elsewhere in the country, the citizenry is rising up out of grave concern about the huge government deficits -- local, state and federal. That is the one issue that is getting out the vote, and many of the voters are new voters. They have come to the realization that these are not normal times. We face the recently acquired budget deficits and the cost of entitlements that were already scheduled to kick in when the baby boomers retire. No one paid it much attention, but now the tea party movement has.
The Republicans can claim the tea partyers' vote, but only if they work for it. Boehner just made that more difficult. Fortunately, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is sensitive to his party's fragile connection with the tea party movement and with multitudes of other alarmed citizens. He promises to block the Democrats' tax increase in the Senate with his 41 Republicans holding fast and four Democrats on his side, plus independent Joe Lieberman. As Lieberman said this week, "The more money we leave in private hands the quicker our economic recovery will be." Lieberman is for extending the tax cuts a year. Then the citizenry will have spoken, and we can get serious about long-term growth and economies in government.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Lyn Nofziger, "North Star" of the Reagan Revolution: "The Patriot not only does the best job of putting important news, policy and opinion in proper context, but also of cutting down to size the pompous praters and propagandists on the left." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Jimmy D
Who made John Boehner the crown prince anyway?
I tend to like him but also tend to see him in the same light as I see a lot of professional Pols.
Is it an absolute that he will head the House Republicans if they gain a majority? Is there anyone more reliably conservative who might rise to contest his leadership. Anyone?
Posted September 16, 2010 at 8:39:34 AM
JTG
I'd give Boehner the benefit of the doubt on this one. Had he not said what he said, it's inevitable that the spin would circulate that the GOP opposes givinh the middle class a tax break. However, better to have said that the GOP will work toward eliminating the income tax.
Posted September 16, 2010 at 11:20:49 AM
Edward Brown
I agree it was a bad slip up for Boehner. I still trust him, however. He has served my district in Ohio for 18 years and has never once tacked on any Pork for our district. If we want a tennis court or dog park, or a bridge for turtles, we find a way to fund it ourselves without federal tax dollars. The funds he has taken from lobbyists is among the lowest in Congress. What makes John unique is that the donations he accepted were for causes he believed in and not a way to line his own pockets.
Posted September 16, 2010 at 11:55:53 AM
Roger McBee
John Boehner, in this reader's opinion, is part of a Republican establishment that is in many ways no different than the Democrat establishment. I hear no new focus from the establishment Republicans, no new ideas, no refocused effort on adhering to the Constitution, no welcoming of those new conservative candidates who do support the Constitution and who are talking about new ideas. In fact, it certainly appears that the establishment Republicans feel threatened by the new approaches to governing that are being espoused by the Tea Party candidates and others. I, for one, am opposed to business as usual, whether it be from Democrats or Republicans. Where are the members of Congress who aren't afraid to step up to the plate for Constitutional law and rights, to consider the will of the citizenry rather than their own egos, to buck up and put some meaning behind the statement "let's make government smaller?" Frankly, I don't see it happening with John Boehner becoming Speaker, or with the establishment Republicans who are being spooked by those candidates who are voicing a desire to shake up the establishment. I'm ready for a "new" conservative Republican Party, ready to stand firmly behind the Republic's ideals.
Posted September 16, 2010 at 3:53:41 PM
Cylar
You're right about socking-it-to-the rich not being enough to get us back on track, and consequently you're also correct in making the case for extending the tax cuts across the board, for all income levels. That said, understand that Boehner was in a tight spot. If he holds the line and says "Tax cut extension for everyone, or for no one," the media and the Democrats (but I repeat myself) will accuse him of the tired old class warfare rhetoric. "Tax cuts for the rich! Trickle-down economics! Republicans only care about the wealthy! Republicans are in bed with Wall Street!" and all that crap. Sure, Boehner would have satisfied the purists on the right who understand where investment and job growth comes from, but too many Americans are still victims of the tireless, tireSOME media brainwashing that these "rich" upper-income earners apparently sit around on piles of cash, cash that ought to be taken from them for the benefit of everyone else. Boehner was probably trying to head-off that accusation. Cut him a little slack.
Posted September 20, 2010 at 3:12:08 AM