Options
Republicans Are Losing the Tax Debate
· Thursday, December 8, 2011
WASHINGTON -- Do my eyes deceive me? It seems that the Republicans are in danger of losing the debate on cutting taxes. Some 30 years after President Ronald Reagan proved that tax cuts encourage economic growth -- which enriches us all -- glum figures like President Barack Obama are roaming the land talking about the apolaustic lives of the very rich and the need to take their loot so we can all live better. Facts are facts: If you expropriated all the wealth from the top 1 percent, you would but dent our national debt, and then where would you get the money for next year and the year after that? Class warfare is not the answer.
Nonetheless, Democrats make the charge that the Republicans are defending tax cuts for the wealthy. Bravely stepping forward is Speaker of the House John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor to say they are not, or that they oppose tax increases. Every time, they leave something out.
In so doing, they play into the hands of those who would prolong this economic slowdown. Thus, Eugene Robinson in The Washington Post cites a Congressional Budget Office study that found that the income of the top 1 percent in America grew from 8 percent to over 17 percent from 1979 to 2007. And he claims this shows "why the Occupy Wall Street protests have struck such a nerve."
Robinson did not add that high-income earners suffered a vast decline in their percentage of national income from 2007 to 2009. Alan J. Reynolds estimates that they fell to 11.3 percent and that the losses suffered by the wealthy and by the small businesses was nothing to crow about, increasing, as it did, poverty and unemployment in the nation as a whole.
As for the Occupy Wall Street encampments across the country, I think the American people are catching on as these lawless settlements are disbanded. They are perhaps the greatest concentrations of crime, petty and not so petty, to be found in the country. From public masturbation to rape, from muggings to murders -- these encampments had it all, and they have yet to come up with a Mahatma Gandhi or even a Rev. Al Sharpton. Even the Rev. Jesse Jackson is staying away.
So what do the Republicans leave out in their rebuttal to the grim Democrats? They leave out that they have an economic model that is proven. It's called supply-side economics. According to the model, one does not raise taxes on anyone, certainly not in times of economic unease.
The very rich might be slobs or they might be living saints, but like everyone else, their taxes are not to be raised because they spend their money or invest their money in economic growth. They cannot help themselves. The way they spend or invest is always more efficient than the government. Money spent by the rich (and the middle class) leads to growth. Money spent by the government rarely leads to growth, and the following year the government has to come up with more money again.
Obamacare was sold to a gullible public in part with delusional claims that thousands of health care givers would be employed by the largess of the federal government. And who would employ them in the years ahead? If health care were paid for by private means, the health care givers would still be working in the years to come, and they would not be dependent on the government. Government is not a reliable source of funds. Ask a citizen of Greece or of Italy.
There is a way for Republicans to win the tax debate. They should say that all Americans know better how to invest and spend their money than the federal government. Then they should say that under Obama, the government is munching on up to 25 percent of the GDP. It should lower its intake back to the traditional 18 to 20 percent. No one can afford a government that consumes 25 percent of GDP.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Former Senator Fred Thompson: "Thanks to The Patriot for your considerable efforts to hold back the 'Clintonistas' while I was in the Senate. The Patriot's message provides a critical touchstone for those inside the Beltway who have forgotten who they serve." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Howard Last
Well would would you expect from the God Owful Party? They never fail to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory. They also never blow and opportunity to blow an opportunity.
Posted December 8, 2011 at 12:46:31 AM
TruthInAction
Doctors Sowell and Williams, and many others, point out the fallacy of these statistics. Simply put, the same people aren't in the categories each year.
Moreover, why not go further and eliminate this tax? It's a start!
I love to hear that 47% 0f Americans don't pay taxes Federal Income tax. It's what is done to the other 53%, which is bothersome. Repeal the XVI amendment while they are in a tax cutting mood (yeah, right).
Posted December 8, 2011 at 6:43:15 AM
Laura O
By passing the FairTax (HR25/S13), class warfare would no longer exist. The rich, middle class, and large corporations would be able to directly impact economic growth more positively when they spend and invest without being stifled -- and the government will be able to reverse their current negative impact as well!
Posted December 8, 2011 at 10:44:16 AM
mmccrindle
The message that the GOP should be conveying is that we DO NOT HAVE A TAX REVENUE PROBLEM, WE HAVE A SPENDING PROBLEM!!!
The message should be very simple so that the average voter (6th grade mentality) can get it.
Look at the empty rhetoric of "hope and change" that got a marxsist into the White House that has wrought more damage to our Country than ANY enemy we ever had.
Posted December 8, 2011 at 11:41:16 AM
d.w.hudson
Actually, R., I am of the opinion that the Occupy White House is a much bigger concentration of crime than Occupy Wall Street. And so far I've only seen Boehner bravely step forward to surrender.
Posted December 8, 2011 at 1:53:12 PM
M Rick Timms, MD
"It's The Spending, Stupid"
We have the most progressive tax rates in the world, including the so called 'socialist states".
We have 47% of Americans paying NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX!
The Feds can confiscate all earned income over $1,000,000 and run the country for only 32 days!
If the broaden the net and take ALL income over $200,000 that will run the country for 121 days.
As Biden said - we need to get some "skin in the game". But we need skin from the 47% freeloaders.
A flat tax percentage for all Americans on earned income is the ONLY fair approach.
Perhaps the left does not understand percentages.
Do they not understand that the wealthy will pay much more than the poor, even at the same rate?
Many of the uneducated left, and the masses of inattentive Americans clearly do not grasp the concept.
Flat tax rates for all, and a safety net for the poor is the only way this nation can recover from the spending of the democrat congress and Obama's Federal slush fund for democrat stimulus.
Posted December 8, 2011 at 9:45:20 PM
Robert
The flat tax is no panacea. It will never fly. Americans have always believed in a progressive tax structure, and yes, that should include capital gains. Why are my few dollars of capital gains taxed at the same rate as Buffet's billions? Therefore you need to be promoting tax reform. Eliminate the corporate income tax, and stop double taxation. A consumption tax is part of the solution, IMO,and is much more "fair". Reviewing and eliminating many deductions will be necessary. Those that think they can shift our country to a flat or "fair" tax overnight are deluding themselves and their efforts are in vain.
Posted December 9, 2011 at 9:58:37 AM
Greg
The sad story is that some Republicans are against extending the payroll tax reduction. This truly makes me sick. A true conservative understands that it’s just as immoral to over tax Joe six pack as it is his boss.
The best way to revive an economy is to let people have control of their own money.
I’ve said from the beginning that “stimulus” dollars are wasted. They are targeted to pay back union thugs for their votes. The dollars that start are turned into pennies as government waste, graft and corruption skim them away. Even then they sit for years waiting for red tape to get a project started.
When the people are allowed to keep more of their own money they put it to use. Even if they use the money to save or pay down debt they are providing or freeing up capital. At minimum they are keeping their household afloat. At best they are buying products and services that boost the economy.
Tax reduction is just as important for the average household as it is for the business owner. (When I say “average household” I’m talking about the average household that pays income tax, not the bottom 47% that don’t pay any.)
Posted December 9, 2011 at 12:31:59 PM
Robert
@Greg,
Why do you suppose the Republicans are against a tax cut, in this case payroll tax? You are aware that it is supposed to fund social security, a currently underfunded program that can most accurately be defined as a pyramid scheme? Social security is currently acting as a huge wealth transfer from young to old, where most of the wealth is concentrated already. As I approach retirement in the next 20 years, if I'm lucky, after paying into social security my whole life do you think I'm happy about the prospect of being "means tested" out of it, because Obama would rather play the feel good tax-cutter game to his minions, robbing me to pay Paul and buy votes with a temporary $1000 gift? Is this your idea of a long term solution, or are you convinced that this is a real, long term smart economic stimulous program we will all benefit from? Point being Obama is only playing politics and is not serious about economic solutions.
Posted December 9, 2011 at 3:11:49 PM
austin farrell
I agree with much of what you say. However, the stock market is just that. It provides liquidity for those who want to sell or those who want to buy the outstanding shares or debt of enterprises. The market is a market and nothing more. The only direct benefit a corporation gets is the money raised on the initial issuance of stock or bonds. Except for some indirect benefits the issuers get nothing more out of the market.. Accordingly all stock market "investments "are speculations whether made for the short term of the longer term. When executives compensation is largely based upon the outcome of wholly speculative market results, there is an understandable inclination for executives to game the market because it benefits them to do so. Hedge funds, options and trading on computerized algorithims just further distort it. And government and bailouts make it worse.,p[articluarly when banks and others are playing in themarket with virtually none of their own money., but ratherwith paper suued by the FED.
Posted December 19, 2011 at 8:25:10 PM