Options
Newt Gingrich: Our Bill Clinton
· Thursday, January 26, 2012
WASHINGTON -- How long have I been saying it? At least for 15 years, but in private, I have been aware of it longer. Newt Gingrich is conservatism's Bill Clinton, but without the charm. He has acquired wit, but he has all the charm of barbed wire.
Newt and Bill are, of course, 1960s-generation narcissists, and they share the same problems: waywardness and deviancy. Newt, like Bill, has a proclivity for girl-hopping. It's not as egregious as Bill's, but then Newt is not as drop-dead beautiful. His public record is already besmeared with tawdry divorces, and there are private encounters with the fair sex that doubtless will come out. If I have heard of some, you can be sure the Democrats have heard of more.
Nancy Pelosi's intimations are timely. Newt up against the Prophet Obama would be a painful thing to watch. He might be deft with one-liners, but it would be futile. There are independent and other uncommitted voters to be cultivated in 2012 -- all would be unmoved by Newt's juggling of conservative shibboleths.
Newt and Bill, as 1960s generation self-promoters, share the same duplicity, ostentatious braininess and a propensity for endless scrapes with propriety and the law. They are tireless hustlers. Now Newt is hustling my fellow conservatives in this election. The last time around he successfully hustled conservatives in the House of Representatives and then the conservatives on the House impeachment committee. He blew the impeachment and in fact his role as speaker. He backed out in disgrace.
He now says Republicans in the House were exhausted with his great projects. Nonsense. I knew many of them, and they were exhausted with his atrocious leadership. He is not a leader. He is a huckster. Today Mitt Romney has 72 congressional endorsements. Newt has 11. Possibly the 11 have yet to meet him.
Now he has found his key for hustling the conservative electorate. He is playing the "liberal media" card and saying he embodies conservative values. Like Bill, with his credulous fans, Newt is hoping conservatives suffer amnesia. Possibly some do. Perhaps they cannot recall mere months ago when this insufferable whiz kid was lambasting the great Congressman Paul Ryan for "right-wing social engineering" -- more evidence of Newt's not-so-hidden longing for the approval of the liberal media.
After his Ryan moment, Newt's campaign was a death wagon, and it will be so again -- hopefully before he gets the nomination. And conservatives should not climb onto that wagon. He is a huckster, and I for one will not be rendered a contortionist trying to defend him. I did so in his earliest days and learned my lesson.
After Newt's and Bill's disastrous experiences in government, both went on to create empires -- Bill in philanthropy and cheap thought, Newt in public policy and cheap thought. As an ex-president, Bill has wrung up an unprecedented $75.6 million since absconding from the White House with White House loot and shameless pardons. I do not know how much Newt has amassed, but he got between $1.6 million to $1.8 million from Freddie Mac, and he lobbied for Medicare Part B while receiving, according to the Washington Examiner's Tim Carney, "Big Bucks Pushing Corporate Welfare." Now, after a lifetime in Washington, he is promoting himself as an outsider.
Contending with Newt for the Republican nomination are Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, and Mitt Romney. All three are truer conservatives than Newt. I like them all. But John Bolton, former ambassador to the United Nations, and John Lehman, Ronald Reagan's secretary of the Navy, are for Mitt, and they are solid conservatives. Governor Chris Christie and the economic pundit Larry Kudlow laud Mitt on taxes, on spending, and on attacking crony capitalism. Kudlow calls Romney "Reaganesque." Ann Coulter seems to loathe Newt. That is good enough for me.
Back in 1992, I appeared with Chris Matthews on some gasbag's television show. Was it Donohue? At any rate, I said candidate Clinton had more skeletons in his closet than a body snatcher. It was a prescient line then, and I always got a laugh. I can apply the same line today to Newt, though he has skeletons both inside and outside his closet. Conservatives should not be surprised by the scandals that lie ahead if they stick with him.
Those of us who raised the question of character in 1992 were confronted by an indignant Bill Clinton, who treated the topic as a low blow. To listen to him, character was the "C-word" of American politics. It was reprehensible to mention it.
By now, we know. Character matters. Paul, Santorum and Romney have it. Newt has Clinton's character.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Heritage Foundation President Dr. Edwin Feulner, Jr.: "The best Websites wield remarkable influence in the marketplace of ideas. The Patriot Post is a 'must read' for informed conservatives." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Richard Ryan
Emmett, you left out two very important points. Clinton won two presidential elections. Let`s see: we have Ron Paul, who although he has some good conservative ideas is so far out in left field concerning foreign affairs; Santorum, who cannot seem to get a foothold, and Romney, the Thomas Dewey of our time. I usually agree with you, but on this one, I`m going with Newt. If he goes down in the general election, at least he will go down fighting.
Richard Ryan
Lamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman
Posted January 26, 2012 at 11:35:26 AM
Old Patriot
Emmett: The truth is the Republicans have no viable candidate in the race so far. In my opinion, none of the current or former crop(Bachmann the exception) have true character and consequently are not true statesmen. I have no one to vote for. Romney will be in the race till the end and will be the establishment candidate just like all the Republican candidates since Reagan. The only reason Bush won is because the people were fed up with Bill Clinton and the Democrats. But, Bush was the establishment candidate. My prayer is that people will wake up to the fact that we have a true socialist in the White House and he hates this country and everything it stands for. My prayer is that someone will rise up who has the faith and character of our fathers and lead us out of this self-imposed mess that our country is in. If Obama is reelected, it will be the end of America as we know it. Obama's debt bomb is going to explode and we will be living in third world status almost overnight. Unless America turns back to the God of our fathers it does not really matter who is in the White House or the Congress.
Posted January 26, 2012 at 1:33:51 PM
PDK
Good post Emmett.
In my opinion, it will come down to Mit or Newt. This because Liberals controll the MSM, and liberals "moderate" the debates. Liberals use this power of the wagon master and the ramrod to shape our perspective of our own republican candidates and we, like mesmerized dolts prefer the ones they choose for us.
Michelle Backmann was the most conservative of the lot, but we failed to back her. Perry was the next most conservative with a splendid resume as governor but we did not back him. The liberals want our republican candidates to be the most liberal and we allow them to "lord" over us.
Understanding this, the choice between Newt and Mit for me, comes down to real world experience. People who never work in the real world live with their heads in the clouds, never have they, nor do they, walk on the face of the earth, never do they come back down to earth.
The mindset born of this unreality, of this academican world display a proclivity for both the folly of illusion and a dereliction of responsibilty.
Because Mit has some real world experience while Newt has none that I am aware of, given the choice of Mit or Newt, Mit becomes my choice.
It is time we conservatives get out from under the Liberal MSMs whip and choose our candidates our way, not the liberals way.
Lastly, I would vote for Bozo the clown over Barac Obama. Bozo maybe a dolt, but Obama is on a mission to destroy America, he is ruining America intentionally, and deliberately.
Nobama 201, vote republican. Thank you.
Posted January 26, 2012 at 3:14:31 PM
A.R. Nash
Obama isn't on a mission to destroy American but his vision and competence are so totally lacking that he and his fellow socialist dolts in the Congress will accomplish it just as surely as if they *had* deliberately intended it. If you believe he is doing the best for the country that he can, it won't matter because he is so clueless about cause & effect and is so oblivious to any concerns about the consequences of his and his minion's decisions that he will do as much damage by what he doesn't do and doesn't allow as by what he has signed into law that was passed by the Sociocrats in Congress.
Posted January 27, 2012 at 2:19:27 AM