GM Made 'Mr. Herb' Cry

· Monday, August 23, 2010

In June of last year Herb Adcox got the worst news of his life when a despicable letter from a company he has loved for 51 years told him his Chevrolet dealership had fallen prey to "Dealer-gate," the government-mandated restructuring of General Motors and Chrysler. After he read it, he wept.

He cried not for himself but for the hundreds who worked for him, the tens of thousands of customers who had trusted his good name for half-a-century, and the more than 2,200 other auto dealers across the nation who were also reduced to little more than collateral damage in a ravaged economy.

But his bitterest tears were for the United States itself. Our Federal government, in its misguided effort to help, had not only cost over 100,000 Americans their livelihoods but had clearly shattered the dream of free enterprise, blatantly discriminated against rules against race and age, and foisted the gross mismanagement of General Motors into what is today better called "Government Motors."

Barack Obama called it "shared sacrifice" but Herb, one of the most active auto dealers this country has ever known, has another word for it. "It was wrong," he said several weekends ago, this after he received a paltry buyout for a lifetime of honor, achievement and the undeniable fact the Chattanooga businessman "has never cost GM a penny."

At the time he received his "death notice," Herb Adcox Chevrolet ranked 186 among the largest 300 Chevrolet dealers in the country. If you'll remember, there were actually 4,000 Chevy dealers in the United States so that yardstick allows us to better say that Herb Adcox's dealership was the 186th biggest Chevrolet store in the nation.

"We never cost General Motors a dime. We paid for our cars, our facility, the salaries and benefits of everyone who worked here. We even bought our own brochures. Any national advertising was included in the price of the cars and trucks we bought from the factory. Not one person can justify why, the day I got the letter, that I never got another vehicle," he said.

"My district manager was shocked, my zone manager was speechless, and, for all practical purposes, I was dead," he continued. "It wasn't a 'wind down,' as they promised, but instead an abrupt cancellation."

Herb, who'll be 81 years old in October, soon learned the same thing had happened to his friend Pat Kelly, now in his 80s, who had Kelly Cadillac, Saab, Hummer and GMC. His dear friend Jack Hall, age 78, lost Hall Chevrolet in Cleveland and the classy Don Ledford, also age 80, is still fighting to keep Ledford Buick, GMC, and Cadillac open in Cleveland.

"Don is a prince of a guy and he's hanging on because of what is called 'Paragraph Three' in the dealer agreement. This states that upon your death your franchise will immediately go to another family member. Don's will go to his daughter but, under the guidelines set by Special Inspector General for Troubled Asset Relief Program, any preference was given to minorities and women. Who does that leave out?" he asked.

Herb would have obviously left his dealership to his son-in-law, the quite capable Dana Robinette, but Dana is very much a white male. "I think that is a clear case of discrimination that can now be applied to any business owner in this country."

"The biggest part of the puzzle, of course, is 'Why me?' I've had hundreds of people ask and I tell them if I knew, I could try to explain it, but the absolute truth is there is no reason. That's why there is no answer."

"The free enterprise system was built to reward those who achieve, who are successful. When the car business stalled in 2008, we tightened our belt just like everybody else and our books were solid the day we were informed of the 'shared sacrifice.' This isn't the way America works. You have natural attrition, survival of the fittest, and you do all you know how to support those who make your business a success," he said calmly.

"My worst day, obviously, was the day my son Grant was killed in Atlanta (1989) and the cancer was pretty bad but this is the cruelest thing I have ever known. What's worse is that I can't do one thing about it," he said. "Is this where we are as a nation? I pray to God it isn't but what are my options?"

"Mr. Herb" is changing his company to "Herb Adcox Automotive" but the 13-month "prison sentence," where he was forced to endure without any GM assistance at all, has taxed him. "It has been terrible."

It has been widely reported that before General Motors yielded to giving the government a 61 percent ownership (the UAW union owns 17 percent), GM had assets of $80 billion and liabilities of $170 billion. When GM was forced by the government to declare bankruptcy, the bondholders were paid roughly 10-cents on the dollar. Old General Motors stock certificates became worthless paper.

"With the bailout, GM gets to start over with no outstanding liabilities and about $50 billion clear. The way you sell cars is through dealers. Explain to me how eliminating 2,200 distribution outlets -- dealerships that cost you nothing to sell your product -- makes General Motors more profitable. That is sheer insanity."

"There are reports GM will soon have a big stock offering to pay back the government. I don't know if they can be successful at that. I know I'd have to think long and hard about it before I would invest good money after what I've seen."

Personally, there is something else you need to know. Mr. Herbert G. Adcox has been one of the leaders for domestic cars in the United States for years. He's earned more awards than he has wall space working tirelessly for the industry. He served on the Tennessee Motor Vehicle Commission under four different governors and is known by every car dealer in Tennessee as truly one of its greatest advocates.

But now, presumably because he is white and old and a male, a government panel and a horribly mismanaged General Motors have skewered the man who was a lifelong leader of the National Automobile Dealers Association, who has been a fair and respected merchant, a much-beloved employer, and a fun-filled business owner who has played by the rules his entire life.

Two weeks ago, when GM sent him his buyout check or severance or whatever you call that nasty money, he cried once more. As always, it wasn't for himself.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

JohnH

As all too often these days, when talking about our federal government and it's administration, it is SAD BUT TRUE!

Posted August 23, 2010 at 7:35:06 AM


Bruester

And so we have yet one more battle won in President Hussein's incessant, to the death, war on American business and, by that, his war on us personally. Are we going to fight back? Or will we all just cry and surrender? Ironic that in fighting for Iraqi Freedom, we have completely lost our own.

Posted August 23, 2010 at 9:56:34 AM


kevin

Sad story but all so true. Also, start paying attention to any commercial that has a white male in it. More often than not it depicts the white male as some dorf, stupid, inconsiderate, immature, lazy slob.

I point these out to my wife all the time and she can't believe how many are like this.

Posted August 23, 2010 at 10:55:31 AM


Billy Bob

Kev - the reason you're seeing those commercials is because they're based on fact. Who do you think gave away your rights and this country with it? I can't believe how many there are in our electorate like this there are either.

Posted August 23, 2010 at 11:46:21 AM


Lee Schumacher

I am curious if maybe Herb had made a campaign contribution to The Republican Candidate for President instead of The Democrat Candidate? If he backed the Republican, then I guess he is another victim of "Pay to Play" politics aka "Chicago Style"....

Posted August 23, 2010 at 12:25:42 PM


MichaelSSEC

Let's play a game. Let's pretend that with the restructuring of GM, the govt controlled company chose to close hundreds of dealerships under the guise of saving money.

Now let's pretend that later on, it came out that many of the dealerships that were closed were profitable whereas many of those allowed to remain open were in rough shape financially.

Let us further pretend that an analysis of the closures revealed that many of the closed dealerships were owned by minorities, women, or people who donated money to Democratic candidates.

What do we suppose the reaction would be by the media? Would they bury the story? Ignore it? Denounce it as the ravings of a paranoid fringe group, bloggers and tabloids? Would they laugh it off and call those whose businesses were forcibly closed "malcontents"?

Or would they stir up a firestorm of outrage, level charges of racism and sexism and political favoritism? Would they demand investigations by the US Attorney General's office? Would they hold Congressional hearings? Would the bureaucrats responsible for the malfeasance be prosecuted and jailed?

You're damned right they would, and rightfully so.

Yet, that's exactly what happened with the GM dealership closures, except the dealers discriminated against were white male and in many cases Republican. And the media thinks that's no outrage. The media thinks that's hilarious. Funny how morals and principles are the fabric binding our society together when the Left can use those things to beat us over the heads with. And they're puritanical fancies best left in the ancient past, whenever the Left finds morality working against them.

It's time to show them once and for all that morality isn't convenient. Morality isn't a tool with which to bludgeon an opponent. Morality is a set of rules by which we live, even when it's hard. Even when it doesn't help us win. Because short term gain is often long term destruction. Liberals never seem to learn that lesson.

Posted August 23, 2010 at 7:10:34 PM


Howard Last

Anyone remember when Harry Truman tried to nationalize the railroads and the supremes said "no way". How come no comparisons by the crooks and/or mental midgets in Washington?

Posted August 23, 2010 at 8:17:53 PM


Jim C

Mr. Adcox doesn't realize that since he was a solvent dealership, he positively HAD to go. There would be little profit to be made by the government from someone who did not require their "HELP." His dealership wouldn't require their bailout and thus he didn't fit their profile of (losers) dealerships to keep. He also was probably of the wrong political persuasion, aka "non-donor to the dummycrats."

Posted August 24, 2010 at 12:03:39 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund