Options
Top Five Most-Crime-Ridden U.S. Judicial Districts All on Mexican Border
· Wednesday, August 4, 2010
When measured by the number of criminal defendants charged with federal crimes by U.S. attorneys, the top five U.S. judicial districts for fiscal 2009 were all on the U.S.-Mexico border.
In fact, these five judicial districts are the only five on the U.S.-Mexico border -- covering its entire expanse from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean.
There are 94 federal judicial districts, covering the area of all 50 states, plus Guam, the North Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.
In the Southern District of Texas, which covers a stretch of border from Brownsville past Laredo, the U.S. attorney's office filed criminal charges against 8,801 defendants in fiscal 2009. That gave that district the nation's No. 1 ranking for most criminal defendants charged in 2009, according to data published in Table 1 of the United States Attorneys' Annual Statistical Report for Fiscal Year 2009.
The 8,801 criminal defendants charged in the Southern District of Texas, in fact, was more than four times the 1,959 charged in the Southern District of New York (which includes Manhattan and the Bronx) and more than six times the 1,377 charged in the Eastern District of New York (which included Staten Island, Brooklyn, Queens and Long Island).
Following the Southern District of Texas as the No. 2 district in the nation for the most criminal defendants is the Western District of Texas, which covers the rest of the U.S.-Mexico border in Texas. The U.S. attorney here filed charges against 8,435 defendants in 2009.
Rounding out the top five are the districts for Southern California (5,554 defendants charged), Arizona (5,155) and New Mexico (3,769).
The 5,554 criminal defendants charged in Southern District of California -- which includes San Diego and Imperial counties and covers the entire California stretch of the U.S.-Mexico border -- was more than twice the 2,581 charged in the Central District of California, which includes the nearby Los Angeles metropolitan area, but does not touch the border.
Not nearly as many criminals were charged in federal judicial districts along the Canadian border. There were 191 charged in the District of Alaska, 806 in the Western District of Washington, 468 in the Eastern District of Washington, 393 in Idaho, 430 in Montana, 355 in North Dakota, 531 in Minnesota, 567 in the Western District of Michigan, 956 in the Eastern District of Michigan, 925 in the Northern District of New York, 183 in Vermont, 290 in New Hampshire and 182 in Maine.
What is going on here?
The United States Attorneys' Annual Statistical Report for Fiscal Year 2009, compiled and released by President Barack Obama's Justice Department, is just more evidence that our government is not doing its job of defending our nation's border with Mexico. According to the Justice Department's own numbers, federal crime is dramatically disproportionate along that border compared to the rest of the United States.
The report also reveals that of the 81,577 defendants convicted in federal court in 2009, 26,538 were convicted in cases the Justice Department categorized as immigration cases. Another 26,399 were convicted in drug cases. That means 33 percent of federal convictions were in immigration cases and 32 percent in drug cases.
"Violence along the border of the United States and Mexico has increased dramatically during recent years," says the U.S. attorneys' report. "The violence associated with Mexican drug trafficking organizations pose (sic) a serious problem for law enforcement. Mexican drug cartels have taken over some of the drug trade in the United States and are working with several gangs, according to a report by the National Drug Intelligence Center titled National Drug Threat Assessment 2009. According to this threat assessment, Mexican drug trafficking organizations represent the greatest organized crime threat to the United States and the influence of Mexican drug trafficking organizations over domestic drug trafficking is unrivaled."
Clearly, the surge in immigration crime and drug crime and the concentration of crime at the U.S.-Mexico border are inter-related.
"Illegal immigration provides the initial foothold with which criminal elements, including organized crime syndicates, use to engage in a myriad of illicit activities ranging from immigration document fraud and migrant smuggling to human trafficking," said the U.S. attorneys' report. "Federal prosecution of border crime is a critical part of our Nation's defense, and federal jurisdiction over these offenses is exclusive. Proactive border law enforcement is an important component of our counterterrorism mission because it is known that terrorist organizations utilize cross-border criminal activity as a source of revenue and that smuggling organizations offer terrorists easy access to the United States."
Do you think Attorney General Eric Holder and President Obama have read this report? Do you think they will do anything about it?
Top Ten U.S. Judicial Districts for 2009 by Criminal Defendants
Southern Texas ---- 8,801
Western Texas ---- 8,435
Southern California ---- 5,554
Arizona ---- 5,155
New Mexico ---- 3,769
Central California ---- 2,581
Southern Florida ---- 2,514
Southern New York ---- 1,959
Middle Florida ---- 1,780
Eastern Virginia ---- 1,485
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Lyn Nofziger, "North Star" of the Reagan Revolution: "The Patriot not only does the best job of putting important news, policy and opinion in proper context, but also of cutting down to size the pompous praters and propagandists on the left." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
- Linda Chavez: Overreach by Unions in Wisconsin
- Mona Charen: Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again
- Jonah Goldberg: Big Business Gets the Hollywood Treatment
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Jennifer
Okay, warm weather and lots of non-whites walking in a very open high dry area. If you are on the Canadian boarder its not nearly as policed as the south. Is it any wonder as a teen in Minnesota "Canadian pot" was more popular. As well as stuff from Vancouver. However, Mexican pot is easier to get. The cold weather shuts it down a lot of the time! I'm not surprised, the cartels and running that stuff across the boarder. However, I don't believe everyone on the boarder is smuggly drugs some do just want a better life. No work in Mexico and you cannot go anywhere without murder. This is a war there, we have to have some compassion for the some of the people fleeing their war torn country.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 12:43:13 AM
Bruce
Illegal aliens ARE NOT immigrants. They ARE by definition criminals. Their illegal presence here DOES NOT entitle them to my life, liberty or property. Aiding and abetting a criminal IS A CRIME. Obama and Bolton are GUILTY AS CHARGED.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 8:27:48 AM
CharlieEcho
I feel for the Mexican people. But, it's their home to take care of. Running to ruin my home is not a good option. We should secure our border and then try to help them if we can. What is "their" government doing to end the problem? Blaming the US. Among their problems is the openness of the border to possible terrorist. In our local paper the publish court reports. Read the stops and many, more than half the stops, are Spanish sir names for no license and or no insurance, and many time drugs. I live on a main corridor to Chicago.
(Jenn)Besides as you said the "pot" in Canada slows with the cool weather. Perhaps it's all those darned Canadians running to the border for cheap pot and plentiful medicine to sell to the US citizens going to Canada for their medicine. Canadians gone wild.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 11:02:06 AM
Paul
Why is it that as a country, under both Republican and Democratic control, we do so little to deter drug use? Why are there no public service announcements linking drug use to the murders in Mexico and in the US? If we can decrease drug use we can reduce crime. If impressionable junior high and high schoolers understand that purchasing a dime bag of drugs contributes to this crime wave maybe they don't buy the drugs!!
Posted August 4, 2010 at 11:49:53 AM
Ronald
I agree with Paul. Illicit drugs are like any other business. Take away the consumer and the business dries up and goes away. I would think that Mexico has enough prospective tourist locations that they could make visiting much more attractive not only for Americans, but Canadians too. Year-round Tourism could create a huge service workforce and create work for everyone. They also have most of our small manufacturing plants through NAFTA. So, why are they not creating more jobs and why aren't Americans running to Mexico to work.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 1:32:14 PM
Marie
I agree with Bruce. Also, Charlie Echo says it best. The Mexican people should take care of their own home, not come to the US to ruin my home and take it away from me. I have worked extremely hard all of my life and I think I deserve what I have accumulated.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 1:48:28 PM
CharlieEcho
The revolving doors. My son is a policeman. He at one time worked on a state drug task force. The budget was and the officers went onto or back to their other assignments. Arrest after arrest the small timers were released. It took several years to finally catch and convict one of the prominent local dealers. Others are awaiting trial We see drunk drivers caught multiple times. Finally when someone is killed or severely injured they will do time.
We have the same problem with immigration on the Mexico border. The immigrants, illegal I will add, whether from Mexico or points South return after exportation. What is the draw? Our local news paper publishes court reports. More than half of the recently posted traffic stops are Spanish sir named persons. Either stopped for no license or no insurance. Some are stopped and found with drugs. We live near a major route into Chicago.
We need to secure the border and enforce the law. It's not going to be easy or cheap. But, like anything worthily it will benefit in the long run.
I do not expect our current leadership to address the issue.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 1:49:46 PM
Sam
jennifer, I think you must have smoked too much of that Canadian pot as a teen. If you look at the numbers in the article, clearly most of those are NOT just looking for a better life. They are criminals the moment they cross into the USA, their crimes just multiply from there.
There may be a war going on in Mexico, but that is no reason to bring it to the US. We need to enforce our border with Mexico to keep the war down there. We HAVE tried to support the Mexican government in that battle and the forces we trained for Mexico to use against the cartels (Los Zetas) turned tail and worked for the cartels. Mexico has not been too frugal with the funds we send them, corruption abounds and the funding doesn't go where it is supposed to.
Ronald, trying to change a country's source of income, especially when the majority of their income is from OUR country isn't going to work. We've tried that. It was a dismal failure. However, like you said, the business of drugs can be manipulated by the supply/demand principle has merit. Problem is, educating teens about the dangers of drug use is not working very well. This war against drugs has been waging for decades. Our education efforts have been pendulumic. When something seems to work--it slowly sinks (from unknown pressures).
What we need is a secure border--secured by agents/officers or military with orders to use deadly force. Laws like Arizona passed and law enforcenment leaders like Sherrif Joe. And an educated public that understands why all this is necessary and not politicize it.
JMHO
Posted August 4, 2010 at 2:25:17 PM
Rick
You will never, and I mean never, take away the consumer from the drugs. As a matter of fact, with all the Billions of dollars thrown down the drain in the drug war, and all the lives ruined, drugs are now better, and cheaper than they ever have been, and the pecentage of people that are lifetime users has not gone down.
The majority of the damage done has actually been by the drug war itself, much like with alcohol prohibition. You want to take the black market out of the equation for drugs? Simple, stop making it illegal. Cannabis has been proven time and time again to be far less harmful than alcohol or cigarettes. You cannot afterall OD on pot.
The drug war is what makes these people rich, nothing more. And they are laundering their ill gotten gains with banks that are all too complicet in the laundering (Wachovia and Bank of America are the 2 that happened to get caught).
Besides, is it really anybody else's business what someone chooses, as a sovereign, free person, to put in their bodies, so long as they are doing no harm? You can say "Well people will drive stoned!", all you want. I would reply, "they probably already do!). So when someone get's caught doing something stupid like that, they get charged with the appropriate crime. Someone kills another person while under the influence? Fine, charge them with murder. Stop filling our jails up with non violent cannabis users, and make room for child molesters, killers, and rapists, you know, the people that really do belong in jail.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 4:30:55 PM
John
Mexico has been a mess for a long time, they give instructions and directions to aid the illegals. There is absolutely no law that money cannot buy in Mexico. The backflow of US Dollars is all that is keeping the country afloat. Corruption has been rampant for as long back as I can remember or hear about from older persons. We had to go invade it twice. I had the thought that if we instituted a chain gang sentence for 120 days and gave them left over MRE's and got them to pick up the trash, feces, and junk dropped by other illegals that might prove to be the best deterrent for a while. nobummer has sent The National Guard to " protect the rights of aliens" rather than to enforce the law
Posted August 4, 2010 at 8:16:10 PM
James
Mexico is doing just fine. They send tens of millions of their people up here illegally, get them to ship all the money they can back into their country, make babies that are automatically granted US citizenship and who grow up with ties back to their families and zero loyalty to their illegally gotten homeland, while they steal every dollar of social programs our crooks in government will give them, and make way for armies of their gangs to bring in guns and drugs and then they get us to buy all their oil exports they can ship. Yes, Mexico is doing just fine. And now king hussein in Washington wants to hand over our border to Calderon. Just like he wanted. Yes. Mexico is doing fine. They'll be doing even better when they reclaim the south and the west completely.
Posted August 4, 2010 at 10:51:01 PM
Merry Colin
Jennifer....please learn to spell! The line of demarcation that sets one state or country apart from another is called a BORDER. When a "poor" Mexican crosses this border without permission, he is a criminal. Worse, he then becomes a BOARDER in our country. Obviously you don't live in a BORDER state; those of us in AZ, TX, CA, and NM are fed up with the BS. If we all acted with the PC "compassion" you suggest, then in order to be "fair" (the rallying cry of the liberal/progressives)we would just do away with all BORDER restrictions. Hell, let them come from EVERYWHERE---if they can get here they are in! Oh what a lovely country it would be---NOT!
The fact is, our forefathers founded this country for a "moral and religious" people whose thirst was for enduring personal liberty and equality UNDER THE LAW. How many immigrants have that kind of government where they come from? How would someone lacking those values, even if only due to ignorance, and understanding of our glorious history change the face of The US of A? Do you really believe our country could truly maintain the essential core beliefs that keep us as free as we can be? Do you think a new flood of immigrants will line up to fight with those of us who know the government has shredded the Constitution? Do you really think they care? Do you think that an American 25 year old today has any gut feeling about the Cold War or even the horrors of Viet Nam? Do you think schooling these criminals will somehow change their allegiance when even an American citizen hasn't mastered the spelling of BORDER? I think not.
Posted August 10, 2010 at 3:50:47 PM