Government Killed California

· Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Growing up in California in the 1960s, it was impossible not to believe you lived in the greatest place on earth.

California had spectacular coastlines and mountains, luxuriant valleys and stretches of perfect weather that carried on unbroken for months at a time. Natives who ventured from the state -- to other parts of the country or the world -- invariably returned to say it was a mistake to ever leave.

In that not-so-long-ago era, a pioneering culture still gripped the Golden State. People came to California not take things from government, but to make things of themselves.

The first European settlers to arrive in California were Franciscan priests from Spain, who traveled to the far edge of the world as they knew it not to enslave native peoples, but to bring them Christianity. They were followed by hardy souls who crossed an entire continent to reach the Pacific. When these pioneers arrived, they built magnificent things. The Franciscans built churches. The gold-seekers ended up building the city of San Francisco around one of those churches.

Because it almost never rained during the growing season in the San Joaquin and Sacramento valleys, where the soil would grow almost anything, the people built massive dams in the Sierras and directed water from there to channels that crossed and irrigated farmlands that otherwise would have been summertime deserts.

A group of California counties collaborated in raising private money to build a bridge across the Golden Gate -- and they did not build just any bridge, they built the most beautiful bridge in the world. Then they paid off its construction costs with tolls assessed only on people who crossed the bridge.

Not a single taxpayer in Massachusetts or Montana every paid a penny for the Golden Gate Bridge -- unless he freely crossed it and paid the fare.

As America's population grew and prospered in the 20th century, California outpaced its sister states.

From 1900 to 1910, her population grew by an astounding 60.1 percent, according to the Census Bureau. In the remaining decades of the 20th century, it grew by 44.1 percent, 65.7 percent, 21.7 percent, 53.3 percent, 48.5 percent. 27.0 percent, 18.6 percent, 25.7 percent and 13.8 percent.

After each Census, California won additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and gained greater influence over the nation's political destiny.

Then came the population count of 2010. Last week, the Census Bureau announced that for the first time since California became a state in 1850, it would gain no additional seats in the House.

Over the past decade, it turns out, next-door Nevada enjoyed the largest percentage population gain of any state, growing by 35 percent -- perhaps because it is the nearest place Californians can flee.

Who killed the California dream? Politicians did -- specifically, politicians who pushed a vision of big government that called for redistributing wealth and rewarding indigence while penalizing the hard work and calculated risk-taking that marked Californians of generations past.

In October, the Tax Foundation rated all 50 states by how their tax climate treated business. California ranked 49th. Only New York rated worst. The foundation also judged that California had the 48th worst individual income tax system and the 49th worst sales tax system.

With established businesses fleeing and new entrepreneurs choosing to go elsewhere, unemployment has been trending up in California for four straight years. It is now at 12.4 percent -- tied with Rust Belt Michigan for the second highest unemployment rate of any state.

The Census Bureau's 2010 Statistical Abstract says that from 2000 to 2008, 1,378,706 "domestic" migrants left California for other parts of the country. That was balanced by 1,825,697 "international" migrants (the Census Bureau does not distinguish between legal and illegal) who moved to California from other countries.

The Pew Hispanic Center, meanwhile, reported in September that 23 percent of the illegal immigrants in the United States -- or about 2,550,000 illegal aliens -- live in California and make up 9.3 percent of the state's workforce.

Unlike previous generations that migrated to California, these immigrants are not coming to a frontier, but to a welfare state. Whether they replace indigenous workers by taking their jobs or increase the burden of government on those workers by going on the dole, the illegal immigrant population is helping to build California's welfare state -- as are pensioned state-government employees and native-born Americans who have grown accustomed to government dependency.

In November, California's state Legislative Analyst's Office issued a budget report estimating that the state's government will face a deficit of about $20 billion per year for the next six years.

At the same time, it estimates that Medi-Cal (the state's version of Medicaid) will cost an average of about $20 billion per year (rising from $17.6 billion next year to about $24 billion in 2016). Currently, 7 million of California's 37 million people are enrolled in Medi-Cal.

There are now only 11 states, according to the 2010 Census, that are populated by more people than California has populating its socialized medicine system.

California's Legislative Analyst's Office assumed in its budget report that in the coming years California will continue to have a net outflow of "domestic" migrants. That was wise.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Mark

California has gotten exactly what it's dimwitted, apathetic non-voting public allowed the illegal aliens and thieving state government take away from them.

Posted December 29, 2010 at 9:45:00 AM


DEB

Any state that assists in allowing illegal aliens to remain are broke. I live in Illinois, which is a sanctuary state, along with Chicago. Our state is overrun with illegals and now our state faces a deficit of $15 billion this year. The PC and illegal loving politicians see no correlation between pandering to illegals and record deficits. Until states realize that illegals are a major drain nothing will be done. Only legal Americans will suffer when the state makes drastic cuts to services and the illegals will continue to rape this country for all the benefits they can get away with. The only ones to blame are the pols who allow the criminals to remain. Glad to know the pols care more about illegals than legal citizens.

Posted December 29, 2010 at 11:18:54 AM


Dan

The liberal agenda in California should be an example to the U.S. It has taken a once great state and turned it into a state that is encouraging dependency, driving businesses out with overbearing regulations (consider the states cap and trade law). I am a fourth generation Californian and plan to move to another state when I retire. My kids have already left. But the voters of California have spoken and elected a Governor that was terrible at best when he governed in the 70s, but they also voted liberals into all the top positions in California.

Posted December 29, 2010 at 6:17:53 PM


David Beach

Mr. Jeffrey is very accurate in his assesment of California, except it's actually worse than what he details here. For example:

Jerry Brown was re-elected as governor. On his first tour in the 1970s, he stopped the State Water Project and a multitude of highway projects, deploying the creative idea, that 'if we don't build it, they won't come.' Well, he was wrong. They did come, as can be seen from Mr. Jeffrey's figures.

He appointed leftist Rose Bird as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. In an unusual display of common sense and morality, however, the people of California recalled her. We wouldn't today.

Leftist Kamala Harris was elected California Attorney General, and not one other statewide office went Republican. Obama has still a greater than 50% approval here.

Three positive things: I live in a red congressional district (yea Dan Lungren); the weather is great; and, I am in a position to move out of state (Virginia and Idaho are the current front runners).

Posted December 29, 2010 at 6:44:03 PM


kevin

David - should consider Michigan, we know have a full Republican government and home prices are rock bottom, lots of lakes and skiing. :)

Posted December 30, 2010 at 12:52:28 PM


Connie

Mr. Jeffrey,

I agree with your premise that government has killed California. The liberal, environmentalist-whacko, queer-, illegal-, and tax-loving legislature is at fault, as are the people who voted for them.

However, as a retired state employee, I must take exception to your statement that "pensioned state-government employees ... have grown accustomed to government dependency." When I hired in, the state made a contract with me, to wit: for services rendered, they would take a portion of my pay and invest it; then when I reached retirement age, they would pay out to me an annuity on which to live. The state and PERS are merely keeping their end of the bargain. If you paid into a retirement or insurance plan, wouldn't you expect to receive that for which you contracted?

Also, Nevada isn't growing by 35 percent "because it is the nearest place Californians can flee." Nevada is growing exponentially because it does not have a state income tax. People will move where it is most economical to live. Just ask Rush Limbaugh.

Posted January 3, 2011 at 2:11:49 AM


Rob

CA did really well at times and really poorly when they became less friendly to business. One of the most diverse and beautiful states in the country - but it needs to get it's business mind back on.

http://oldlicenseplates.org/License-Plates/california-license-plates

Posted September 1, 2011 at 2:32:44 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund