Department of Education: Catholic Schools Beat Public Schools

· Wednesday, February 22, 2012

When two schools meet in a basketball game, the winner is indisputable. One team outscores the other.

The same is true in certain types of academic competition. When students take standardized national tests, students from some schools outscore students from others.

In the most recent round of National Assessment of Educational Progress tests, which are administered by the U.S. Department of Education, the winners were indeed indisputable. Catholic schools thrashed public schools.

It wasn't close.

"In 2011," says the Department of Education in a report on the NAEP tests, "the average reading score for eighth-graders attending public schools was 19 points lower than the overall score for students attending private schools,and 20 points lower than for students attending Catholic schools specifically."

If the Catholic school in your community beat the public school in basketball by 20 points, partisans of both teams would deem it a rout. If the Catholic school beat the public school by similar margins year after year, people would wonder what was wrong with the public-school basketball program. Were the coaches incompetent? Did they not care about instilling excellence in their teams?

Well, in the Department of Education's national eighth-grade reading test, the Catholic schools not only routed the public schools by 20 points last year, they have made a habit of such routs.

In every round of NAEP reading tests over the past 20 years, Catholic-school eighth-graders have defeated public-school eighth-graders by double-digit margins. The closest the public schools ever got to the Catholic schools was 17 points -- and that was in 1992, long before today's elementary school students were even born.

The Catholic victory margins are not as great in mathematics, but the history of unbroken domination is the same.

"In 2011," says the Department of Education, "the average mathematics score for eighth-graders attending public schools was 13 points lower than the overall score for students attending private schools and 13 points lower than for students attending Catholic schools specifically."

In math, the closest the public schools ever got to beating the Catholics schools was when they lost by only 9 points -- but that was 22 years ago. Since then, the Catholic schools' victory margin in math has gradually grown.

So, what is the matter with public schools? Why can't they compete with Catholic schools in basic academic disciplines like reading and math?

One thing is certain: It isn't a lack of money.

In the 1998-99 school year, according to the Department of Education, U.S. public elementary and secondary schools spent $9,923 per pupil (in inflation-adjusted 2009-2010 dollars). In the 2007-2008 school year, they spent $12,236 per pupil (in 2009-2010 dollars). In just eight years, America's public schools increased average per-pupil spending by $2,313 in inflation-adjusted dollars -- a real increase of 23 percent.

But in that same period, the average public-school eighth-grade reading score virtually flat-lined -- going from 261 (out of a possible 500) in 1998 to 264 in 2011.

The average public-school eighth-grade math score showed slightly more improvement for the additional $2,313 per student. It crawled from 272 (out of 500) in 2000 to 283 last year.

If significantly increasing the money transferred from taxpayers to public school administrators and teachers cannot significantly increase the math and reading scores of the students these administrators and teachers are supposed to serve, what will?

Ideally, organized on a community-by-community basis, all parents of all students would get a voucher equal to the cost of educating a child in the local public school, and the parents would be able to choose, in a free market, exactly where they wanted their child educated.

But, unfortunately, if we did this in today's America -- where the president believes he can order Catholics and Catholic institutions to act against their faith -- people in government would surely use a voucher program as a political weapon to sap the spirit from religious schools and turn them into dismal facsimiles of the failed public schools that the voucher-bearing parents and their children have fled.

The truth is the primary purpose of the average American public school -- like the Catholic school -- is not to teach children reading and math. It is to develop character -- to help assimilate students into the school's vision of our civilization.

And here, even more than in reading and math, our public schools have become the leading indicator of national decline.

In the public schools today, children are not taught to believe that the traditional family is the indispensible foundation of our society, or that every human being -- including those still unborn -- has an inalienable God-given right to life, or that the United States of America enjoys an exceptional place in the history of nations because our Founding Fathers instituted a government that was constitutionally limited in its functions, leaving it to a moral and self-reliant people to thrive and prosper in a free society.

The liberal elites who generally define and determine what is taught in our public schools do not believe these things and do not want the children who graduate from the government academies to believe them, either.

Today, public schools are competing with Catholic and other religious schools not just in developing the math and reading skills of their students, but for the very soul of America.

May the private religious schools win this all-important contest, too.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

wjmccrindle

There is another great distiction between the two school environments, where one has strict discipline and the other organized chaos. Can you guess which is more condusive to learning? The public education system is the indoctrination arm of the liberal marxist statist system, producing unemployable useful idiots that are dependant on Government for there miserable existance, and vote to continue their own slavery to the state.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 8:17:54 AM


mac

@ wjmccrindle -

Right on bro!

Public Schools - "It takes a Village" -CRAPPOLA!!!

Private/Catholic - Family values, and see above.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 9:04:05 AM


Richard Ryan

The DOE would be the first thing to be abolished if it was up to me. However; that is as likely to happen as is Hell to freeze over.

Richard Ryan

Lamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman

Posted February 22, 2012 at 2:45:58 PM


Susan

Years ago, I was part of a parent group that traveled to Washington--on our own dimes, of course-- to lobby for tuition tax credits for private school students.

We seldom met with legislators, but rather a member of the administrative staff...who had all attended private school. Generally, the legislators' children all attended private school.

However, the Teachers' Unions all have 'way more money to lobby than we humble parents do. As long as the unions have a death grip on Congress, the decline of the country, as embodied in public school-taught children, will continue.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 3:23:50 PM


Daniel

It is a pity that you make so many great points in the first half of the article, and then ruin your whole thesis with a paranoid, entirely inaccurate diatribe at the end of the article. Catholic schools have provided a superior academic product for well over a century. Few people who really study education could not argue with that. Instead of descending into right wing, barely lucid vitriol, you might delve a little more deeply into why Catholic schools are so much better. An examination with this end in mind could help out those children who are not being properly educated. And that should be the goal of responsible adults.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 7:34:46 PM


Frank

Am I the only one who is struck by the strangeness of reading an article filled with so much anti-American-public propaganda on a web site that calls itself "patriotic"?

If Catholic schools have the secret to a superior education, why not share it with the rest of us? Hint: It's because the "secret" is selective admissions.

Posted February 22, 2012 at 11:17:10 PM


KarenS

Tax-payer funded vouchers would only serve to increase the entanglement between government and education. Whenever the government funds a project, the government necessarily grows and size and power.

Because tax dollars would be used for the vouchers, the government could rightfully claim that it had an obligation to control how the money was used, even to the point of dictating the content of the curriculum. This is what is now occurring in several home-education programs in which the parents receive money from the government to educate their children at home.

Parents already have a choice regarding their children's education: continue with the public schools, or choose private or home school. The government should not pay parents to educate their own children.

Posted February 23, 2012 at 11:41:31 AM


Army Officer (Ret)

KarenS is correct: the cost of education should be borne by parents, not taxpayers.

Mr Jeffrey should spend more time reading Dr. Williams and less time pontificating about stuff he doesn't understand if he can write this:

"Ideally, organized on a community-by-community basis, all parents of all students would get a voucher equal to the cost of educating a child in the local public school, and the parents would be able to choose, in a free market, exactly where they wanted their child educated."

Exactly how is giving parents a voucher I paid for, "a free market?" The whole point of "a free market" is that one is more conscious of how one spends one's own money than if one gets to spend someone else's money?

Can't feed 'em? Don't breed 'em. (That includes educating them as well.)

Posted February 24, 2012 at 7:49:15 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund