Options
Playing Freedom Cheap
· Tuesday, February 16, 2010
If eternal vigilance is the price of freedom, incessant distractions are the way that politicians take away our freedoms, in order to enhance their own power and longevity in office. Dire alarms and heady crusades are among the many distractions of our attention from the ever increasing ways that government finds to take away more of our money and more of our freedom.
Magicians have long known that distracting an audience is the key to creating the illusion of magic. It is also the key to political magic.
Alarms ranging from "overpopulation" to "global warming" and crusades ranging from "affordable housing" to "universal health care" have been among the distractions of political magicians. But few distractions have had such a long and impressive political track record as getting people to resent and, if necessary, hate other people.
The most politically effective totalitarian systems have gotten people to give up their own freedom in order to vent their resentment or hatred at other people-- under Communism, the capitalists; under Nazis, the Jews.
Under extremist Islamic regimes today, hatred is directed at the infidels in general and the "great Satan," the United States, in particular. There some people have been induced to give up not only their freedom but even their lives, in order to strike a blow against those they have been taught to hate.
We have not yet reached these levels of hostility, but those who are taking away our freedoms, bit by bit, on the installment plan, have been incessantly supplying us with people to resent.
One of the most audacious attempts to take away our freedom to live our lives as we see fit has been the so-called "health care reform" bills that were being rushed through Congress before either the public or the members of Congress themselves had a chance to discover all that was in it.
For this, we were taught to resent doctors, insurance companies and even people with "Cadillac health insurance plans," who were to be singled out for special taxes. Meanwhile, our freedom to make our own medical decisions-- on which life and death can depend-- was to be quietly taken from us and transferred to our betters in Washington. Only the recent Massachusetts election results have put that on hold.
Another dangerous power toward which we are moving, bit by bit, on the installment plan, is the power of politicians to tell people what their incomes can and cannot be. Here the resentment is being directed against "the rich."
The distracting phrases here include "obscene" wealth and "unconscionable" profits. But, if we stop and think about it-- which politicians don't expect us to-- what is obscene about wealth? Wouldn't we consider it great if every human being on earth had a billion dollars and lived in a place that could rival the Taj Mahal?
Poverty is obscene. It is poverty that needs to be reduced--and increasing a country's productivity has done that far more widely than redistributing income by targeting "the rich."
You can see the agenda behind the rhetoric when profits are called "unconscionable" but taxes never are, even when taxes take more than half of what someone has earned, or add much more to the prices we have to pay than profits do.
The assumption that what A pays B is any business of C is an assumption that means a dangerous power being transferred to politicians to tell us all what incomes we can and cannot receive. It will not apply to everyone all at once. Like the income tax, which at first applied only to the truly rich, and then slowly but steadily moved down the income scale to hit the rest of us, the power to say what incomes people can be allowed to make will inevitably move down the income scale to make us all dependents and supplicants of politicians.
The phrase "public servants" is increasingly misleading. They are well on their way to becoming public masters-- like aptly named White House "czars." The more they can get us all to resent those they designate, the more they can distract us from their increasing control of our own lives-- but only if we sell our freedom cheap. We can sell our birthright and not even get the mess of pottage.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Constitutional Scholar Dr. Alan Keyes reads The Patriot Post: "The Patriot recalls the noble tradition of our Founders. 'Publius' would have admired and endorsed The Patriot Post, as do I." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Ruth Ann Wilson
Communism - the politics of envy.
Now what is the solution???? Since we know that envy is one of the devil's chief destroyers, Then what?????
I John "...For this purpose the Son of God was manifest, that HE might destroy the works of the devil" So Communism is a target of the Righteous God, it is His Will to "destroy the works of the devil".
In a "righteous cause", you can expect the Lord's help.
"Who is on the Lord's Side"
Not for weight of glory, not for crown and palm,
But enter We the army, raise the WARRIOR Psalm (Psalm 91).....READ IT
Thou hast made us willing, Thou hast made us FREE.
We are on the Lord's side (America)
Saviour, we are Thine.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted February 16, 2010 at 9:13:51 AM
ILEANA
Congressmen are no longer public servants, they are public masters. And the more power they gain, the more tyrannical and abusive they become. (see Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd)
We must curtail their power by peaceful means before it is too late. We should not wake up one day and wonder, what happened? We chose to stay idly by and not participate in the political process because it is just politics and so corrupt anyway, why bother. You are part of the problem if you stay home on voting or rally day - you lose the right to complain and your freedoms when things go terribly wrong.
Posted February 16, 2010 at 10:06:51 AM
Marcus
I am reading "1984" for the second time. The first time was required reading in high school over 25 years ago. I am amazed at how much relevance a work like 1984 can take on when someone has experience in the world. The similarities between this work of fiction and what is going on the world is striking. Mr. Sowell's commentary is timely and reminiscent of 1984, in that he exposes well the career politician's intent of using hate and deception to control. In no way is it their object to unite this great country. Keeping people together in a group, yet divided and angry based on their beliefs keeps the group weak and controllable.
if in general, everybody wants the same basic things, which can be demonstrated when they go into the privacy of their homes, i.e. to live decently, to be a part of a good society, to raise their family as comfortably as possible, etc, then what is the dividing factor?
As Ben Franklin so aptly put it, "Here comes the orator, with his flood of words and his drop of reason!".
Hats off to Mr. Sowell for his flood of reason in his drop of words.
Posted February 16, 2010 at 12:35:53 PM
MichaelSSEC
"Public servant is semantically equal to public master" -- Robert Heinlein
I read Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" more than 20 years ago, and thought how remarkable it was that some of what she wrote about decades earlier was now coming to pass. I re-read it again last year. It was stunning, shocking, terrifying to see how prescient her novel turned out to be. Virtually every government blunder depicted in that story is taking place today at a pace so accelerated that nobody 2 years ago would have believed it could happen.
How did we get to a point where the government is telling private companies how much they're allowed to pay their employees? Where the government owns two of the largest companies on Earth? Where people think a depiction of Green Police arresting citizens for using hot water is amusing? Where people militate for government control over our health? Where politicians are caught red-handed lying to us and we feel it's just par for the course, instead of outraged? Where the news media routinely lies to us and when we catch them they call *us* names?
I could go on. Ileana is right. We must take back this country now, while it's still possible to do so peacefully. It must be done, one way or another. Or we will watch this country decline into the mockery of prosperity that are Greece and other European nations today.
We didn't get into this mess because the American people worked too hard. We got into it because we elected leaders who promised us anything we wanted to hear, and then hid the costs. I'm sorry but that's evil.
How did we get into this recession? Government required lenders to give mortgages to people who couldn't possibly repay them. So the banks repackaged the loans and sold them on the market as government-backed paper. When the bottom fell out, the same government hacks who created the mess refused to learn from the mistakes. Barney Frank, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, proposes not a return to fiscal sanity but an EXPANSION of the very policies that caused the recession! Their solution for widespread FAIL is.... EPIC FAIL!
The next two elections -- 2010 and 2012 -- may be the most critical in American history since the 1860 race. We hold our destinies in our own hands. We can decide the fate of this country, whether we will return to the policies of fiscal sanity with centuries of proven success behind them, or continue living in the Leftist fantasy land that has brought us nothing but failure and misery.
The United States of America is the greatest accomplishment of Man. Will we allow it to be flushed down a toilet by a crowd of radicals and spoiled whiners? Or will we take our country back from those who would dismantle it? Do we fight for our children's future, or do we turn on American Idol and pretend it's all a bad dream?
Posted February 16, 2010 at 2:41:58 PM
Brian
Aye, but there's the rub: politicians are experts at telling us what we want to hear, then doing just the opposite once in power. Any politician worth his salt will be crying "fiscal responsibility" from the top of the mountain, but what's to keep him on the straight and narrow once he's elected? We need tort reform, we need campaign finance reform, and most of all, we need to get rid of the lobbyists. We have the best politicians money can buy. What we need are politicians for whom money is not as important as leadership. Real leaders are not afraid to take chances. Real leaders cannot be bought at any price. Real leaders are not afraid to speak the truth. Most of all, real leaders are not afraid to lead. Where are our leaders?
Posted February 17, 2010 at 4:46:00 PM
MichaelSSEC
I've said before, and I'll say again with all sincerity, it would surely make my day if Brian would run for Congress in his district. Ileana too. America needs men and women with exactly that attitude.
Posted February 17, 2010 at 6:54:43 PM
ILEANA
Ruth Ann Wilson, MichaelSSEC, and Brian: I will support you 100% in a run for office in your districts - we need real, honest, Christian, and patriotic Americans like you in office.
Posted February 17, 2010 at 10:47:53 PM
Brian
Sorry y'all, I'd never survive as a politician. I'm uncorruptable.
Posted February 18, 2010 at 6:23:01 PM
Frances Cook
We used to read your column in the "Lancaster New Era" and loved it! We now live in Cumberland, MD and do not get to see or read your material. What can we do to encourage "The Cumberland Times-News" to publish your articles?
Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:28:41 PM
Arthur Grady
Last night I turned on the movie 1984 to fall asleep to. It turned out I couldn't stop watching it. The concentrating of the masses minds on far away enemies, the insistance that 4 can in fact be 5 if the state wills it so, and subservience of the individual to the state reminded me so much of the truly disturbing direction in which this country is headed. Keep up the goof fight Mr. Sowell. It's nice to be reassured that 2+2 still equals 4. You have me respect.
Posted February 24, 2010 at 4:40:38 PM
Wan
Well there's only one liberal thing I stand for and that's cagpaimn finance reform. Limit the amount a candidate can raise to an amount that's reasonable like 50 million instead of the 700 million obama got. The Constitution was made to restrain the size of government and that's what this does. Also I think we should have a law saying there is to be no more parties so bad bills passed only do to pressure by parties is eliminated.
Posted March 29, 2012 at 4:11:38 PM