Oil and Snake Oil

· Thursday, June 17, 2010

The big oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is bad enough in itself. But politics can make anything worse.

Let's stop and think. Either the government knows how to stop the oil spill or they don't. If they know how to stop it, then why have they let thousands of barrels of oil per day keep gushing out, for weeks on end? All they have to do is tell BP to step aside, while the government comes in to do it right.

If they don't know, then what is all this political grandstanding about keeping their boot on the neck of BP, the Attorney General of the United States going down to the Gulf to threaten lawsuits-- on what charges was unspecified-- and President Obama showing up in his shirt sleeves?

Just what is Obama going to do in his shirt sleeves, except impress the gullible? He might as well have shown up in a tuxedo with white tie, for all the difference it makes.

This government is not about governing. It is about creating an impression. That worked on the campaign trail in 2008, but it is a disaster in the White House, where rhetoric is no substitute for reality.

If the Obama administration was for real, and trying to help get the oil spill contained as soon as possible, the last thing its Attorney General would be doing is threatening a lawsuit. A lawsuit is not going to stop the oil, and creating a distraction can only make people at BP start directing their attention toward covering themselves, instead of covering the oil well.

If and when the Attorney General finds that BP did something illegal, that will be time enough to start a lawsuit. But making a public announcement at this time accomplishes absolutely nothing substantive. It is just more political grandstanding.

This is not about oil. This is about snake oil.

Nothing will keep a man or an institution determined to continue on a failing policy course like past success with that policy. Obama's political success in the 2008 election campaign was a spectacular triumph of creating images and impressions.

But creating political impressions and images is not the same thing as governing. Yet Obama in the White House keeps on saying and doing things to impress people, instead of governing.

Once the elections were over and the time for governing began, there was now a new audience to consider-- a much more savvy audience, the leaders of other countries around the world.

However impressed the media and the Obama cult might be with the President's image, rhetoric and style, leaders of other countries-- allies and enemies alike-- are interested in results.

Even our domestic policies can affect foreign leaders, as Ronald Reagan's breaking of the air traffic controllers' strike impressed the Russians with what kind of man they were going to have to deal with, as former Soviet officials said publicly many years later.

By the same token, domestic bungling by Barack Obama sends a dangerous signal to countries hostile to us, in addition to the signal sent by his displays of amateurism on the world stage.

President Obama had barely settled into the White House before he began demonstrating his willingness to sell out this country's friends to appease our enemies. His trip to Moscow to try to make a deal with the Russians, based on reneging on the pre-existing American commitment to put a missile shield in Eastern Europe, was the kind of short-sighted betrayal whose consequences can come back to haunt a nation for years.

Obama spoke grandly about "pressing the reset button" on international relations, as if all the international commitments of the past were his to disregard.

But if no American commitment can be depended upon beyond a current administration, then any nation that allies itself with us is jeopardizing its own national security, because dangers in the international jungle last longer than 4 years or even 8 years.

We are already seeing the consequences. Even Turkey-- formally a NATO ally-- is cozying up to Iran, now that it is painfully clear that Obama is not going to do anything that has any realistic chance of stopping Iran from going nuclear.

If leaders of other nations can't depend on the United States, then they need to make the best deal they can with our enemies. They understand that preserving their nation's security is a leader's top priority, even if Barack Obama doesn't.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Jonas

The signal the US sends to the free world about caring on the environment in the last 20 years can only lead to the thinking that the US got what it deserved.

Now you can send the 100 M SUVs/trucks with 15 mpg directly to Alabama to get their fuel from the beach.

Posted June 17, 2010 at 1:52:26 AM


g.wegmann

What ecology freaks seem to dismiss is that the government made BP drill in 5000 feet of water, because they closed all other options to drilling off shore or on U.S. land. They also did not inspect or insist on saftey measures. And then they limited the liability to 75 million to encourage BP to drill in deep water!

Posted June 17, 2010 at 10:33:22 AM


Bill

Jonas, why not take a look at causes? The cause of a ruptured oil pipe a mile below the surface of the ocean is environmental regulation which prevented drilling in closer, more controllable areas. Many problems are the result of government trying to solve or prevent other problems. Legislators don't always grasp the big picture - Community Organizers even less.

Posted June 17, 2010 at 11:14:41 AM


Ralph

I'm glad that I'm not the only who thinks that prosecution and lawsuits at this point are counterproductive. Figuratively speaking, let the captain (BP) get his damaged ship safely back to port before starting the inquiry.

Posted June 17, 2010 at 3:17:44 PM


karl anglin

The Cloward-Piven strategy of Saul Alinsky

advocates the creation of crises to destroy

capitalist society. This explains Obama's

refusal of help from Denmark early on in

the oil spill.

Posted June 17, 2010 at 4:15:11 PM


Robert USN, Ret.

Well said, Sir! Always appreciate your thoughts. Would you say, or agree if I said, it is time to Impeach and remove this man! Any "Skipper" of a US Navy vessel of war would have long since been replaced for malfeasance! Read; ineptitude, narcissism, failur to protect the vessel, and the crew, on and on. This man simply does not have the knowledge or experience to command the Ship of State.

Posted June 18, 2010 at 12:11:02 AM


Brian

Yes, Robert, in principle, I agree. However, to use your Navy analogy, let us look at the chain of command: VP Joe Biden. Another empty suit, with an empty head to match. Speaker Nancy Pelosi. I think I'll quit there, I need to go lie down.

Posted June 18, 2010 at 8:31:06 AM


Pat

This president and his team love a crisis, remember? And to make a really, really big one, they are impeding a clean-up. Since the hole has been so-called 'capped', it flows more than ever. Soon people will come to realize that this is not mere incompetence, but a continuation of this admins. agenda to bring down this country and move us toward global governance.

Posted June 18, 2010 at 3:32:01 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund