Unknown Unknowns

· Tuesday, July 12, 2011

When Donald Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense, he coined some phrases about knowledge that apply far beyond military matters.

Secretary Rumsfeld pointed out that there are some things that we know that we know. He called those "known knowns." We may, for example, know how many aircraft carriers some other country has. We may also know that they have troops and tanks, without knowing how many. In Rumsfeld's phrase, that would be an "unknown known" -- a gap in our knowledge that we at least know exists.

Finally, there are things we don't even know exist, much less anything about them. These are "unknown unknowns" -- and they are the most dangerous. We had no clue, for example, when dawn broke on September 11, 2001, that somebody was going to fly two commercial airliners into the World Trade Center that day.

There are similar kinds of gaps in our knowledge in the economy. Unfortunately, our own government creates uncertainties that can paralyze the economy, especially when these uncertainties take the form of "unknown unknowns."

The short-run quick fixes that seem so attractive to so many politicians, and to many in the media, create many unknowns that make investors reluctant to invest and employers reluctant to employ. Politicians may only look as far ahead as the next election, but investors have to look ahead for as many years as it will take for their investments to start bringing in some money.

The net result is that both our financial institutions and our businesses have had record amounts of cash sitting idle while millions of people can't find jobs. Ordinarily these institutions make money by investing money and hiring workers. Why not now?

Because numerous and unpredictable government interventions create many unknowns, including "unknown unknowns."

The quick fix that got both Democrats and Republicans off the hook with a temporary bipartisan tax compromise, several months ago, leaves investors uncertain as to what the tax rate will be when any money they invest today starts bringing in a return in another two or three or ten years. It is known that there will be taxes but nobody knows what the tax rate will be then.

Some investors can send their investment money to foreign countries, where the tax rate is already known, is often lower than the tax rate in the United States and -- perhaps even more important -- is not some temporary, quick-fix compromise that is going to expire before their investments start earning a return.

Although more foreign investments were coming into the United States, a few years ago, than there were American investments going to foreign countries, today it is just the reverse. American investors are sending more of their money out of the country than foreign investors are sending here.

Since 2009, according to the Wall Street Journal, "the U.S. has lost more than $200 billion in investment capital." They add: "That is the equivalent of about two million jobs that don't exist on these shores and are now located in places like China, Germany and India."

President Obama's rhetoric deplores such "outsourcing," but his administration's policies make outsourcing an ever more attractive alternative to investing in the United States and creating American jobs.

Blithely piling onto American businesses both known costs like more taxes and unknowable costs -- such as the massive ObamaCare mandates that are still evolving -- provides more incentives for investors to send their money elsewhere to escape the hassles.

Hardly a month goes by without this administration coming up with a new anti-business policy -- whether directed against Boeing, banks or other private enterprises. Neither investors nor employers can know when the next one is coming or what it will be. These are unknown unknowns.

Such anti-business policies would just be business' problem, except that it is businesses that create jobs.

The biggest losers from creating an adverse business climate may not be businesses themselves -- especially not big businesses, which can readily invest more of their money overseas. The biggest losers are likely to be working people in America, who cannot just relocate to Europe or Asia to take the jobs created there by American multinational corporations.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

RiverKing

There is a damaging ripple effect on the smallest of businessmen, too. That smallest of businessmen is the retired individual whose modest CDs mature and can only be reinvested at less than 1%. Why bother when a brokerage money market pays .5% and the money is immediately available without penalty? The result is money not available to small businesses or to home buyers.

Posted July 12, 2011 at 9:01:22 AM


Robert A. Hall

Dr. Sowell is on point as usual; I will link to this from my Old Jarhead blog. Obama desperately wants to fix the economy, if only to get reelected. But the deeply-held almost-religious worldview he , his advisors and his base hold means he will, given a choice, always jump towards statist intervention and tinkering in the markets, accelerating our decline towards disaster.

Robert A. Hall

Author: The Coming Collapse of the American Republic

(All royalties go to a charity to help wounded veterans)

Posted July 12, 2011 at 11:20:45 AM


Anton D Rehling

Why would I take on more responsibility by expanding my business, increasing my work hours, reducing the time I can spend with family and friends just so I can increase my taxes, increase government intervention in my business, be dictated to by buracrats on how I must operate my business and life for what will turn out to be less personal income and less freedom?

Posted July 12, 2011 at 11:37:45 AM


JG

Well articulated assessment Dr. Sowell, as always. I will be sharing this article with many friends of the Keynesian persuasion. Aside from awaiting the next election cycle, I suppose all we can do is continue to sound the warning bell and pray that those at the helm will come to their senses and change course. I'm not going to hold my breath though.

Who is John Galt?

Posted July 12, 2011 at 12:04:02 PM


Ol'Joe

Here is a quote by Abraham Lincoln: "Prosperity is the fruit of labor. Teach economy. That is one of the first and highest virtues. It begins with saving money." Funny how Dishonest Barack looks to Honest Abe when he can help him, but fails when Abe's words could help the county.

Posted July 12, 2011 at 12:45:25 PM


TruthInAction

Obamacare wants to levy a tax of $7-9,000 for every man, woman, and child. They want employers to pay this so "the people" won't "feel the pain".

Larger corporations understand this, so they will continue expand outside of the USA. The smaller employers seem to have caught a whiff of this, too.

Posted July 13, 2011 at 7:56:55 AM


Dexter60

Thank You Thomas Sowell . . . .

No thanks to [I have deleted the obscene, profane and abusive from the rest of my note even tho' comletely on-topic [includimg the explitive/name of our main malefactor].

Posted July 14, 2011 at 8:30:53 PM


pete

I got out of the stock market, including cashing in 401k, when pelosi began talking about 90% tax on profits. People, particularly politicians, who are stupid enough to make a threat are stupid enough to try to follow thru. And I have no doubt that while my meager retirement investments would be subjected to that 90% tax rate, pelosi's would not be. At $35.2 million in 2010, she was one of the richest in congress, and her 2011 to-date 62% profits would get a obama-waiver.

Posted July 23, 2011 at 9:19:35 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund