Options
Cry Racism! and Let Slip the Dogs of Politics
· Wednesday, July 28, 2010
In the last fortnight: 1) The NAACP called the tea party racists; 2) Andrew Breitbart called the NAACP racist; 3) Shirley Sherrod called Republican opponents of Obamacare racists; 4) Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack called Shirley Sherrod racist; 5) many in mainstream media called Andrew Breitbart racist; 6) Howard Dean called Fox racist; and, 7) it was revealed that liberal journalist Spencer Ackerman proposed calling Fred Barnes and Karl Rove racist.
Thus, through a confluence of bizarrely unlikely events, the vicious act of falsely accusing people of racism became a laughing stock. It went from being a career killer to a punch line; from villainy to vaudeville; from knife in the back to pie in the face.
It started at about noon Monday when Andrew Breitbart publishes on his website an edited video of Shirley Sherrod (giving a speech to an NAACP audience this spring), which he describes, in part thusly: "Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn't do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from "one of his own kind".
"She refers him to a white lawyer. Sherrod's racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement."
The week before, the NAACP, without evidence, had attacked the tea parties for alleged racism in its rank and file. This is part of a running smear now about a year old, by prominent Democrats such as Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and legions of Democratic Party support groups that the Tea Party (now identified with by about a third of the country) is racist, Nazi, un-American, etc.
Breitbart strikes back, with evidence (in the form of the video of the audience reaction to the moment in Sherrod speech before she talks of racial reconciliation) demonstrating anti-white racism in a NAACP audience. The story of the week is thus launched.
Notice, by the way, that he alerts the viewer that "Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help." It's in the video and it is in the text of Breitbart's original post on the topic. But the mainstream media selectively edits out this exonerating fact in virtually every story about Breitbart. So the subsequent charges against Breitbart by the mainstream media that his editing was misleading was itself misleading and wrong.
In a seemingly unrelated story just after midnight Tuesday morning (July 20) Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller reported on leaked emails from the liberal media cabal Journolist in which, when the Rev. Wright issue first emerged during the 2008 campaign, one of the participating liberal journalists, Spencer Ackerman, proposed defending Obama by using a racial smear tactic:
"If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they've put upon us. Instead, take one of them-Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares-and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction."
At last, we have the smoking gun that proves to the American public that at least some liberal reporters are quite prepared to make false charges of racism to advance their liberal political agenda-and to conspire with other like-minded character assassin journalists in the so doing.
So far, there are just two web site stories. But then the White House panics, and turns a couple of, until then, minor web stories into one of the worst political weeks for any White House since Nixon's many sad examples of terrible political weeks in 1974.
According to Mrs. Sherrod, she is forced to resign her post immediately at Department of Agriculture under pressure from the White House which was afraid that Glenn Beck was about to report the story of her NAACP speech. (In the Obama version of FDR "The only thing we have to fear is the Glenn Beck Show itself-- -nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. "
The compliant NAACP then itself apologizes. The next day, more of Mrs. Sherrod's speech becomes available, where she describes how she over comes that first instinct of racial bigotry three decades ago and helps out the white farmer. The white farmer's wife then goes on CNN and says what a nice and helpful lady Mrs. Sherrod is.
The White House panics again and instructs the Sec. of Agriculture to apologize and offer her job back to her. The NAACP then withdraws its apology and says it was "snookered" by Breitbart (even though it was their event with a room full of their members available to the NAACP last week.)
Then some more of her speech-after the reconciliation of the races section-is made available and includes the following sentences: "I haven't seen such a mean-spirited people as I've seen lately over this issue of health care. (Murmurs of agreement.) Some of the racism we thought was buried -- (someone in the audience says, "It surfaced!") Didn't it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bushes and we didn't do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black president. (Applause) " (Text courtesy of National Review).
In other words, she is accusing up to 70 million Americans (registered Republican voters) of opposing Obamacare because the President is black-rather than because we disagree with the policy-as we did with Hillarycare in 1994. That is a broad-brush bigoted attitude by Mrs. Sherrod against all of us who opposed the president's healthcare policy. She implicitly accuses all 70 million of us of being racist.
Then Mrs. Sherrod goes on CNN with Anderson Cooper and says she thinks that Andrew Breitbart wants America to return to slavery for the blacks. And that is the last mainstream television seems to want to present of Mrs. Sherrod live and unedited. After dominating the news for the week, the eloquent Mrs. Sherrod is not invited to a single Sunday show.
And so did the rank cynicism of overplaying the race card turn that dreaded knave into a joker.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Lyn Nofziger, "North Star" of the Reagan Revolution: "The Patriot not only does the best job of putting important news, policy and opinion in proper context, but also of cutting down to size the pompous praters and propagandists on the left." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Jeff Jacoby: What's So Good About a Long GOP Primary Fight?
- Chuck Colson: Komen Caves: An Object Lesson for All of Us
- Edwin J. Feulner: Mauling the Military
- Burt Prelutsky: Numbers Don't Lie, Liberals Do
- Michael Barone: Box-Checking Obama in a Liberal Cocoon
- George Will: Bailing an Ocean With a Thimble
- Peggy Noonan: A Battle the President Can't Win
- Burt Prelutsky: Heroes & Goats
- L. Brent Bozell: Obama Courts the Glitz Elite
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Chuck Colson: Judaism's Sexual Revolution: God's Plan for Sex
- Arnold Ahlert: Unions and Occupiers vs. the Super Bowl
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!





















Ann
One quick correction to what Mr. Blankley wrote--Breitbart did not present an "edited" clip of Sherrod's speech, but an *unedited* excerpt.
I can only hope Mr. Blankley is right and that the racist epithet has become a laughingstock. The left was free to throw this bomb without proof and do a lot of damage before, and I just hope the right will now ignore it, and the American people will see it as the spurious and desperate charge that it almost always is. (On the downside, this is a shame for the times racism really does need to be confronted, but the left's ridiculous use of the charge had made it become nearly meaningless already anyway.)
Posted July 28, 2010 at 12:41:21 AM
veritaseequitas
I truly wish the majority of black folks would wake up and see the damage the left has done to them as a race and to America in general. This includes that sad sack s.o.b. in the White House.
BO, Shirley Sherrod, Rev. Sherrod, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, King Shabazz - the list is long, have climbed on the backs of their brothers and sisters to make themselves rich and powerful and instead of helping their bretheren, they fan the flames of racism which keeps the black population in chains. Shame, shame, shame on them.
Too bad the "first black president" had to do such a poor job of representing America, he has done such a disservice to Americans and especially to blacks.
Posted July 28, 2010 at 6:24:45 AM
Dan
A question: What's the difference between discrimination based on race and discrimination based on class (or income)? It appears to me that the Administration is intent on keeping discrimination alive and flourishing by promoting tac increases on only one segment of the population. Before you say, "But they can afford it" try to imagine yourself saying things similar about different ethnic groups.
Posted July 28, 2010 at 11:54:12 AM
burrman
veritaseequitas
You have presented a clear, unobstructed and well defined view of the situation. Thank you. The current administration and it's supporters has regressed race relations, I believe, by more than thirty years. It's a travesty and will take decades to repair.
Posted July 28, 2010 at 6:27:11 PM
Omar Bradley V
I would really love it if certain shades of pink would cease with their condenscension when it comes to race in this country. I know you wouldn't dare tell an American Jew to stop crying Halocaust, but you're so dead certain every black or brown person is inable to get over racism as to be the dupes of the left. I pity your blatant ignorance.
You wishing the majority of blacks would wake up and see the damage done by the left, as if African-Americans are mindless zombies unable to even express their own experience without white assistance, would be exactly congruent to my own hopes that one day a majority of caucasians would stop letting the right scare them with black boogiemen.
Guess what, my monochromatically-minded fellow American? Black and white is an arbitration the rich devised as crowd control to keep indentured servants and slaves from revolting, and you fell for it like a crackhead falls for a Jedi mind trick.
Thanks for playing.
Posted July 30, 2010 at 4:09:57 AM