The New Wannabe Ottomans

· Thursday, June 10, 2010

A Turkish Islamic group -- the "Humanitarian Relief Foundation," often associated by Western intelligence agencies with terrorist sponsorship -- orchestrated the recent Gaza flotilla. It was hoping for the sort of violent, well-publicized confrontation with the Israeli navy that later followed.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, immediately issued veiled threats to Israel. He then badgered the United States, Turkey's NATO patron ally, to condemn the Israeli interdiction.

While the world piled on in its criticism of Israel, there was also a sort of stunned silence over the actions of Turkey, without whose help the blockade-running flotilla would never have left a Turkish port.

Erdogan's hysterics emphasized the Islamic transformation of a once secular Turkey that has been going on for well over a decade. In 2003, Turkey forbade passage to U.S. troops in their efforts to remove Saddam Hussein from Iraq. State-run Turkish television instead aired virulent anti-American dramas, like "Valley of the Wolves," in which our soldiers appear as little more than blood-crazed killers who dismember poor Iraqi civilians.

Lately, Turkey has reached out to Iran and Syria. Both habitually sponsor Mideast terrorist groups and have aided anti-American insurgents in Iraq. Turkey and Brazil recently offered to monitor Iran's nuclear program, sidestepping American and European efforts to step up sanctions to stop Teheran's plans for a bomb.

Erdogan's anti-Israel attacks often match those of his newfound friends, Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah's Hasan Nasrallah. Former Turkish Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan, remember, once blamed the Jews for starting the Crusades, and for instigating World War I to create Israel. He also described them as a "disease" that needed to be eradicated.

What is behind the Turkish metamorphosis from a staunch U.S. ally, NATO member and quasi-European state into a sponsor of Hamas, ally of theocratic Iran and fellow traveler with terrorist-sponsoring Syria?

The Cold War is over. Turkey no longer guards the southeastern flank of Europe from the advance of Soviet communism, lessening its importance within NATO. Its Anatolian Muslim population grows, while more secular European and Aegean Turks have lost influence. Turkey senses a growing distance between Tel Aviv and Washington, and thus an opportunity to step into the gulf to unite Muslims against Israel and win influence in the Arab world.

Erdogan clearly identifies more with the old transnational Ottoman sultanate than with Kemal Ataturk's modern, secular and Western nation-state. Indeed, he has bragged that he is a grandson of the Ottomans and announced that Turkey's new goal was to restore the might of the Ottoman Empire.

And so, like the theocratic Ottomans of old, Erdogan's Islamic Turkey fancies itself a window on the West, absorbing technology and expertise from Europe and the United States in order to empower and unite the more spiritually pure Muslims across national boundaries.

Of course, Turkey tolerates no criticism about its own violations of human rights in suppressing its Kurdish population. It lectures Israel about occupied land but is silent about its sponsorship of the Turkish absorption of much of Greek Cyprus. It laments a divided Jerusalem but says nothing about the segregation of Nicosia.

Erdogan often accuses Israel of human rights violations, but to this day no Turkish government has ever acknowledged culpability for the genocide of the Armenians. Far from it: Not long ago, Erdogan threatened to deport Armenians from Turkish soil.

Where and how does all this end?

Turkey's new ambitions and ethnic and religious chauvinism are antithetical to its NATO membership. The United States should not be treaty-bound to defend a de facto ally of Iran or Syria, which are both eager to obtain nuclear weapons. European countries foresaw the problem when they denied Turkey membership in the now fragile European Union, fearful that Anatolian Islamists would have unfettered transit across European borders.

In response, the United States should make contingency plans to relocate from its huge Air Force base at Incirlik -- a facility that Turkey has in the past threatened to close. We should brace for new troubles in the Aegean region and Cyprus, as a bankrupt and often anti-American Greece is now alienated from both the United States and northern Europe -- and yet increasingly vulnerable to a return of Ottoman regional ambitions.

Just as the Shah of Iran's pro-Western, secular transformation failed and led to the Ayatollah Khomeini's anti-Western Islamic revolution, we are seeing something similar in Erdogan's efforts to turn Ataturk's Turkey back into the theocratic sultanate that ran the Eastern Mediterranean for more than three centuries.

If Erdogan is intent on a suicidal reinvention of Turkey into a pale imitation of Ottoman hegemony, we can at least take steps to ensure that it will be his mess -- and none of our own.

(C) 2010 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

patriot?

If you are a patriot, and truly care for America, then why would you back Israel? At a minimum you should be impartial. Turkey has NATO troops in Afghanistan. It has the 16 largest economy in the world, and the second largest standing army in NATO besides the U.S. Its influence in the Arab world is far better for American than Iran's influence. And 9 Turkish citizens were killed. Israel has no U.S. bases, a small standing army, no natural resources and little strategic significance. America already has close oil alliances with the Suadis. Other than creepy Biblical prophecy there is no reason for us to support Israel unconditionally. There are strategic interest for America in Israel, but not the 3 billion dollars in aid annually, 42 U.N. resolutions blocked, Israel can do no wrong type of interests. And definitely not the throw Turkey aside as ally interests. There are two sides to the conflict you don't know obviously. There is the terrorism against Israel on one side, and the 43 year occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, Palestinian home demolition and land confiscation, settlements etc. on the other side. And General Petraeus said "The conflict foments anti-American sentiment, due to a perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel." Or are you the "Bless the Jews and you will be bless end of times type where the Jews will be converted to Christianity." If so you need no strategic understanding of foreign policy. The Bible told you beforehand.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 1:27:24 AM


patriot fact

Turkey's turn is not religious it is strategic. Turkey sees a vacuum in the Middle East because America has weaken American Arab allies Jordan, Suadi Arabia,and Egypt. We weakened them so much by unconditionally supporting Israel Iran tried to fill that vacuum. But Iran is Shia. Turkey is Sunni. Most Arabs are Sunni. The idea that America can continue to unconditionally back Israel in that troubled region, and this would work long term for American interest has been one of the biggest debacles in America foreign policy since we won the Cold War.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 1:34:45 AM


concerned patriot

...the slow insidious rebuilding of the caliphate by way of chinese water torture, one drop at time. The "West" slowly melts away as the slow, patient, unspoken caliphate reemerges. Wake up and read history as it attempts to repeat itself right before your eyes.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 9:46:30 AM


JJStryder

Those who are obsessed with history decide on how far back in history to go to underline their own agenda. If you read the Bible, then READ IT. Muslims have no claim on Israeli territory unless it's because the Jews turned the desert into a garden, something those backward Muslims could never do. Turkey is no ally and should be treated as an enemy like Iran. This administration doesn't have the stomach or the ideological bent to do so. It's obvious. Obama likes the Muslims. Probably because of their totalitarian religion. Like you "patriot?".

Posted June 10, 2010 at 11:03:25 AM


Sammy

Amen Mr Stryder!!!! Patriot, you sound like a true Muslim.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 11:52:31 AM


Texas Tom

Israel is a long time trusted ally. The U.S. was the first to recognize Israel. It is a democracy like Turkey and it has been under siege since the day of it's founding. I contend that Israel has been hurt more by their association with us than we have been.

When doing the right thing and supporting Israel is right, just and the moral thing to do, you do not access the impact of your actions. To support Israel is the right thing to do, period, and to do anything else is to have your moral compass pointing south.

I contend that Israel has been hurt more by their association with us than we have been.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 12:52:26 PM


Jason

I wonder what would happen if Israel sent a flotilla of aid to the Turkish Armenians and Kurds.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 2:36:18 PM


Geoff Martineau

Hanson demonstrates that Turkey has been gradually changing course for some time. I submit that this has been at least partly caused by the Turkish realization that they will never, ever, be admitted to a Europe containing France and Germany. More recently, they, like virtually all the world, have realized the weakness and inanity of US policy under Obama. The US is systematically kissing up to its oponents -- and worse, its declared enemies --while insulting and picking quarrels with friends and allies. While we pretend that "soft power" and "willingness to reset" are, at least someday, going to be winning strategies, Iran and NKorea understand they can do as they like... and the Turkeys and Brazils understand that the once mighty USA can be snooted with impunity. Nothing demonstrates the irresponsible idiocy of Obama than his de-nuke program. Has anybody listened to Russia, whose defence minister proclaims that, first, a world in which the great powers have abandoned nuke weapons is infinitely more dangerous than the current one, in that the smaller, less responsible nations (think NKorea, Iran, and-- Venezuela, Syria, et al) will hold all the blackmailers cards --- and second, get this: Russia will never under any circumstances abandon nuclear weapons, because if conventional weapons are all anybody has the United States would win any war easily and rapidly. Repeat: Russia is convinced that posession of nuclear weapons is indispensible to their very existence as a nation.

ANYBODY HEAR ME UP THERE IN DC?

Posted June 10, 2010 at 2:47:47 PM


gunter hiller

Victor Davis Hanson is, as usual, right on the money.

His detractors are semi-literate pamphleteers.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 3:14:59 PM


Gordon DeSpain

Patriot?

Quite obviously you're a Turkish Patriot, and, that might be commendable, but, having studied the Koran does not make one a historian, nor, does it trump the judgement of a historian like VDH, who specializes in ancient and modern armed conflicts.

VDH can tell you why no army in ancient history would take the field without a contingent of 'Slingers' in the ranks: Slings have turned the tide in more battles than Swords, besides being a sure cure for Giants.

There has been a Jewish presence in Jerusalem for more than 5,000 years (they've owned it that long), and, no part of the land of Istael has ever been occcupied by Muslims prior to the British Accord which established both Jordan and Israel as nation states.

To claim it as rightfully or historically belonging to Muslims, is the definition of Hubris.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 3:46:38 PM


George Morovich

Yes the original article is right on target. Turkey is important, but it is being allowed to slip away. The current government of Turkey supporting an intrusion against Israel should be firmly rejected. Israel certainly reserves the right to blockade the insanely hostile neighbor (Gaza).

I recently visited Turkey and from what I saw the people appreciate their National Founder Attaturk and the 1923 revolution which delivered them from the Muslim Caliphate Ottoman Government.

My business hosts shared:

1) Concern about "conservatives" (their term for "Islamist") who have increased political and cultural power there. This situation has little to do with Israel, but was blamed on increasing lack of attention and influence by the USA (by both parties over the past 2 decades)

2) A overwhelming burden of illegal immigration (from Albania, Iraq, and others) and their influence.

3) The impact of "Globalist" Banking and Industry resulting in destruction of their economy, sending their industry out and allowing poor quality products (including food) in.

So looking at these 3 items it seems that we have many concerns in common with this ally of 80 years. It appears that there are some in our government who may relate to the totalitarian direction and posses no will to discourage a slide away from a "pro western" Turkey.

Posted June 10, 2010 at 9:03:36 PM


joem

Name me a country whose land (either in part or in total) was gained by war that is hung with the misnomer "Occupied". Israel was attacked and in defending themselves regained regions that originally belonged to them. When the Zionists were granted Israel in 1948, Jerusalem was a part of Israel. When they were attacked by all the surrounding muslim countries they gained their freedom, but the cease fire left Jerusalem in the hands of Jordan. The Jewish inhabitants of that city lost their homes, business', and their temples were destroyed.

When they later recaptured it in 1967 they became owners of all Jerusalem. The arabs living in East Jerusalem are living in areas stolen by Jordan and retaken by Israel. Turkey needs to tend to their own indiscretions and it's history of occupation, torture, and horrible treatment of it's enemies and indeed it's own population. If Erdogan thinks he is convincing anybody with his hysteria, he is fooling only himself.

Posted June 11, 2010 at 3:05:58 PM


TJS

Political movements are often built on hate, a great energizing force. Societies in the region all hate and fear each other. They hate whatever they can see, and the US is the most visible nation in the world, so their endemic hatred can be easily directed toward us.

Those nations which turn to prosperity channel their energy to more productive purposes. Those which do not have prosperity have plenty of unemployed, with the spare time to hate someone new. Hatred is a self-limiting disease, like diarrhea. They will eventually turn on each other, as they have in the past.

Posted June 11, 2010 at 3:58:09 PM


Major Stu

History teaches us that we learn nothing from history.

Posted June 12, 2010 at 1:19:21 AM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund