Rethinking George Bush?

· Thursday, September 16, 2010

Former President George W. Bush left office with the lowest approval ratings since Richard Nixon. In reaction, for nearly two years President Barack Obama won easy applause by prefacing almost every speech on his economic policies with a "Bush did it" put-down.

But suddenly Bush seems OK. Last week, the president did the unthinkable: He praised Bush for his past efforts to reach out to Muslims. Vice President Joe Biden went further and blurted out, "Mr. Bush deserves a lot of credit." Biden topped that off with, "Mr. President, thank you."

Even liberal pundits have now called on Bush to help Obama diffuse rising tensions over the so-called Ground Zero mosque and Arizona's illegal immigration law.

What's going on?

For one thing, recent polls show an astounding rebound in the former president's favorability -- to the extent that in the bellwether state of Ohio, voters would rather still have Bush as president than Obama by a 50-42 margin. Nationwide, Obama's approval ratings continue to sink to near 40 percent -- a nadir that took years for Bush to reach. It has become better politics to praise rather than to bury Bush.

Iraq seems on the road to success, with a growing economy and a stabilizing government. Don't take my word on that; ask Vice President Biden. He recently claimed that the way Iraq is going, it could become one of the Obama administration's "greatest achievements." Obama himself seconded that when the former war critic called the American effort in Iraq "a remarkable chapter" in the history of the two countries.

Then there are the growing comparisons with Bush's supposed past transgressions. Compared to Obama, they're starting to look like traffic tickets now. Take the economy and the war on terror. Americans were angry at the Bush-era deficits. But they look small after Obama trumped them in less than two years.

For six years of the Bush administration, Americans enjoyed a strong economy. So far, there hasn't been a similar month under Obama. Bush had a one-time Wall Street meltdown, but Obama's permanent big-government medicine for it seems far worse than the original disease.

If Hurricane Katrina showed government ineptness, so did the recent BP oil spill. Maybe such problems in the Gulf were neither Bush nor Obama's fault alone, but are better attributed to the inept federal bureaucracy itself -- or to freak weather and human laxity.

On the war on terror, Obama has dropped all the old campaign venom. Bush's Guantanamo Bay detention facility, renditions, tribunals, intercepts, wiretaps, predator drone attacks, and policies in Afghanistan and Iraq are no longer dubbed a shredding of the Constitution. All are now seen as national security tools that must be kept, if not expanded, under Obama.

In comparison to Obama and his gaffes, Bush no longer seems the singular clod whom his opponents endlessly ridiculed. The supposedly mellifluent Obama relies on the teleprompter as if it were his umbilical cord. His occasional word mangling (he pronounced "corpsman" as "corpse-man") and weird outbursts (he recently complained that opponents "talk about me like a dog") remind us that the pressures of the presidency can make a leader sometimes seem silly.

Bush now seems cool because he has played it cool. The more Obama and Biden have trashed him, the more silent and thus magnanimous he appears. Bush's post-presidency is not like that of Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton -- both have criticized their successors and hit the campaign trail -- but similar to that of his father, who worked with, rather than harped about, Bill Clinton. That graciousness not only has helped George W. Bush in the polls, but it finally seems to be mellowing out Obama as well.

Criticism of Bush got out of hand the last few years of his term. Writing novels or making documentaries about killing the president, or libeling him as a Nazi, is not the sort of politics that we want continued during the Obama years. So it makes sense before the general election to halt the endless blame-gaming, before what goes around comes around.

The frenzy of Bush hatred and Obama worship that crested in the summer of 2008 is over. We now better remember the Bush at Ground Zero with a megaphone and his arm around a fireman than the Texan who pronounced "nuclear" as "nucular." Meanwhile, hope-and-change now seems to offer little hope and less change.

America woke up from its 2008 trance and is concluding that Bush was never as bad, and Obama never as good, as advertised.

(C) 2010 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Carlos

People might like Bush, but they don't like his tax cuts for the wealthy, and I think Obama and the democrats have started to make up some ground by going after those.

Posted September 16, 2010 at 12:25:38 PM


pete

You can always tell a class act.

Bush = Class with a capital "C"

democrats in general, reid and pelosi in particular = all low class!

Posted September 16, 2010 at 12:57:18 PM


Major Stu

The Bush tax cuts weren't just for the wealthy, they were for all taxpayers. Now even the Democrats are saying that the "Bush tax cuts" for those making under $250k should be extended. Check the rhetoric from 2003 until this July, and you won't find any Democrats even admitting that fact. It was all "Tax Cuts for the Wealthy" and it was a lie.

Posted September 16, 2010 at 2:30:20 PM


hcp

Carlos, you are flat out wrong about the tax cuts for the wealthy. Dont' forget that they are the ones who provide the jobs for the rest of us, and the top 10% of taxpayers pay 70% of all the taxes! When was the last time you got a job from a poor person??

Posted September 16, 2010 at 3:50:03 PM


JAC

Carlos, you're an idiot if you continue to believe the crap obozo's minions continually spew about tax cuts only for the wealthy! If you pay a lot of taxes as the "wealthy" do, when there's an across the board tax cut, guess who gets a proportionate cut. If you don't pay any taxes, a position 47% of Americans are in, when there's a tax cut, you don't get one--and you shouldn't be complaining about getting something for nothing! Those in the middle class, who also got a tax cut in the Bush years, contrary to what obozo has said in the past, still have it. As the Democrats are now admitting because it suits their purposes, the cuts for them were there all along!

Posted September 16, 2010 at 6:03:15 PM


Jimmy D

Obama doeasn't want to "give" $700 Billion (of their own money) "to a bunch of wealthy people who don't need it".

Uh, how many jobs can the private sector create if the Feds "give" them $700 Billion (that they've actually already earned themselves). Oh, my bad. Rich people don't want to grow their businesses. They just like to hide all the gold in their money rooms and run their fingers through it.

Oh, and how many jobs do the Feds create with "Obama Stimulus Money". I keep hearing numbers bantering around in some imaginary echo chamber about the cost per federal stimulus job creation, $200K per job here, $350K per job there, and they all sound ridiculous but I can't get my brain around any of them (I must lack some Government Math Certification).

If you blow a couple unfunded trillion China Dollars and the net result's 20 million more people out of work than there were before the Democrats took power, then I think the formula should be more like how much are we paying per job lost, don't you?

Posted September 17, 2010 at 8:06:42 AM


Jimmy D

Ok, here we go. Sorry but I couldn't find my imaginary calculator. It was hiding over there in the corner behind a 12 foot tall hairy toothy snarling smelly hallucination of Barack Obama winning the 2012 election.

So...the cost per job lost under the Obama Administration is offically set at ONLY $43,689,63 per unemployeed American.

I dunno. I just don't have any faith that a Republican Administration could do it any cheaper.

Maybe we should think long and hard before we do anything rash and THROW ALL THESE BUMS OUT.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 8:20:12 AM


billy barney

Jon "the bomb" Meachem is long gone from Newsweek!! He run it into the ditch and the Washington Post sold it for $1.00. The new "boss" at Newsweek is Fareed Zakaria, not much of an improvement, but ole Jon Boy didn't set much of a standard. It'll be back on the market sooner rather than later.

Posted September 17, 2010 at 3:01:07 PM


Abu Nudnik

I wish I could agree America's woken from its trance. I'm skeptical and wouldn't underestimate the man. That would be dangerous.

Posted September 19, 2010 at 12:32:57 AM


Esteban Café

Abu: American has not fully awakened...yet. But the time is coming when their leftist pol's will turn on their leadership and, in typical 'blame game' fashion devour their own.

Posted September 21, 2010 at 10:25:15 PM


Navy John

I'd have to say, I was quite impressed with both George W, and George HW Bush when met in person. Both seemed calm, collected, articulate, and humorous. A short conversation reminded me that G-Dubba-ya wasn't anything like media and politicians made him out to be.

Posted September 22, 2010 at 3:39:36 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund