Options
American Groupspeak
· Thursday, October 28, 2010
Juan Williams was just fired from NPR. His sin? He confessed to occasional anxiety when Muslims board airplanes, and then went on to explain why stereotyping is wrong.
The fate of Williams reminds us that Americans have developed two personas -- one public and politically correct, the other private. Mix the two and big trouble ensues.
Here are some reminders about what to shut up about.
Don't discuss the deficit. Instead, call borrowing "stimulus." Trillions are not much different from billions. Debt can be paid back with more borrowing and someone else's higher taxes. Ignore the lessons of Greece and California. To appear noble, call for more unemployment benefits, free medical care and more entitlements. To sound cruel, talk about borrowing to pay for them.
Keep silent about Social Security and Medicare. If the system is insolvent, it cannot be because we are living longer, retiring earlier, often taking out more than we paid into the pot, abusing disability provisions, or facing an aging and soon-to-be-shrinking population. Instead, rail at fat cats who need to pay more payroll taxes, and at wasteful programs like defense that can be cut to ensure more for the elderly and needy. The checks will always come in time, and "they" will always pay for them.
Most Americans choose to be called "cowards" by Attorney General Eric Holder rather than accept his invitation to talk about race on his terms. The NAACP has accused the Tea Party of racist views. The anger over high taxes, debt and big government warrants more concern among the Beltway's black leadership than exploring the causes of inordinately high incidence of crime, incarceration and one-parent homes, and low high school graduation rates. Whatever one's private views, groupspeak requires that answers are found outside, not inside, the black community -- and demand more programs and more federal money.
Closing the border is a taboo subject. Also taboo is the phrase "illegal alien." Speak instead about the need for social justice, not the enforcement of mere laws. Illegal aliens broke no real law when enticed northward by greedy employers. That is why the secretary of labor released a video calling for workers to report employer abuses -- whether the workers are "documented or not." Passing laws to subvert federal immigration laws, such as "sanctuary city" legislation, is commendable. Passing laws to enforce federal immigration statutes earns a lawsuit, and condemnation by the president of Mexico from the White House lawn. Ask Arizona.
Don't get caught up in discussing global warming. If you must go there, employ the term "climate change" so that anything from a tornado to a blizzard can be blamed on man-caused carbon emissions. Instead of citing recent doctored research or the inconsistencies in Al Gore's advocacy, just mention that Sarah Palin denies climate change.
Do not, under any circumstances, associate global terrorism with Islam -- despite the countless terrorist operations that have been carried out worldwide by Muslims since Sept. 11, 2001. If Muslims must be mentioned, it should only be in the context that a tiny number, without support and often due to past oppression, commit such terrorism -- earning the furor of the Muslim community at large. Do not end up like Juan Williams of NPR, who was fired for his candid remarks. For insurance, talk ad nauseam about Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing as proof that white male Christians blow things up just as frequently.
Do not weigh in on gay marriage. Millions of Neanderthals voted to oppose it; a few sophisticated judges ruled to overturn bans on it. If you talk positively about traditional marriage and the special and historical relationship between a man and a woman, that is code for homophobia.
Lay off the university. It hikes tuition costs higher than the rate of inflation. It exploits part-time teachers while clinging to archaic notions like tenure. It cannot guarantee that its graduates are competent in either basic reading or math -- or that they will even find a job these days. And it shuns true diversity of thought. Yet question its budgets, hiring practices, political tolerance or affirmative action, and one is dubbed anti-intellectual, racist, against the student loan industry, and cold-heartedly against letting someone be all that he can be.
We do not quite know how Americans will vote next week, in part because citizens fear to talk openly about their concerns and instead employ groupspeak. We suspect that in the privacy of the voting booth, they may prove angrier and more frustrated than we think.
But why not, when they know that candor and honesty can earn a presidential lecture, a job firing or a lawsuit?
(C) 2010 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Former Senator Fred Thompson: "Thanks to The Patriot for your considerable efforts to hold back the 'Clintonistas' while I was in the Senate. The Patriot's message provides a critical touchstone for those inside the Beltway who have forgotten who they serve." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Scott
It feels like a lie whenever I say something in terms that are "Politically Correct". I only do it if I have no alternative. Lying has never been very difficult for me to do, but it has always required a philosophical adjustment in order to rationalize what I'm saying as in some way necessary. "Political Correctness" is essentially dishonest. Anyone who knows me well, who's heard me speak with unguarded candor, knows instantly that my reference to "climate change" is sardonic wit. Maybe someone is fooled, someone who has drunk the cool-aid, but I'm pretty sure that none of the issues Mr. Hanson references here can be honestly discussed by me in terms that are "Politically Correct." Frankly, and honestly, I'm not at all "Politically Correct".
Posted October 28, 2010 at 7:29:58 AM
John
Political Correctness is a ploy to control the content and direction of conversations. You will not have an "honest" conversation with Eric Holder about race relations than you will with the Re. Wright. As soon as you disagree with their position you will be labelled as politcally incorrect. if you think about it - to have a politically correct conversation with anyone on any subject - you apparently have to agree with each other because disagreement is politcally incorrect.
Posted October 28, 2010 at 12:36:48 PM
MSW
Good for you, Scott. I'm not politically correct either. However, if you are in a situation where you feel you can't say anything without being "politically correct," maybe it would be best to say nothing. If you say nothing, you don't have to lie about how you really feel. There are times when we should and must speak up, but for those times I feel as if my speaking would profit nothing, I smile thoughtfully and say nothing. That speaks volumes, because everyone who knows me knows who I really am.
Good article, Mr. Hanson!
Posted October 28, 2010 at 12:43:11 PM
Lit linstock
About thirteen years ago, when I was in the middle of my "teacher education" classes, I had to take a Multicultural Issues in Education class. One of the assignments was to create a lesson on "global warming." I refused to use that term, and instead went with "climate change" because I wasn't about to buy into all the hysteria about global warming. My lesson plan called on my students to come to their own conclusions based on research, not to simply regurgitate the dire warnings and doomsday predictions. (Unfortunately, I knew the "research" of the time was "man bad/nature good"). The good news: this was a sample lesson and I never had to actually foist it upon teenagers. The bad news is that now the term "climate change" has been co-opted to avoid the pejorative "global warming." Just goes to show that today's acceptable PC term will someday become un-PC, and some other more PC term shall take its place.
Posted October 28, 2010 at 12:47:15 PM
Lit linstock
About thirteen years ago, when I was in the middle of my "teacher education" classes, I had to take a Multicultural Issues in Education class. One of the assignments was to create a lesson on "global warming." I refused to use that term, and instead went with "climate change" because I wasn't about to buy into all the hysteria about global warming. My lesson plan called on my students to come to their own conclusions based on research, not to simply regurgitate the dire warnings and doomsday predictions. (Unfortunately, I knew the "research" of the time was "man bad/nature good"). The good news: this was a sample lesson and I never had to actually foist it upon teenagers. The bad news is that now the term "climate change" has been co-opted to avoid the pejorative "global warming." Just goes to show that today's acceptable PC term will someday become un-PC, and some other more PC term shall take its place.
Posted October 28, 2010 at 12:56:45 PM
Scott
There is no time like the present to confront and dismantle the lying and misleading of the politically correct, no, politically corrupt power structure that has put me and you in a morally compromised position. I want to speak truth without fear of reprisal. I want to be who I am without worrying about hurting someone's feelings. I have a right to free speech. So do you. Let us now stand up for that right. Let us now confront the forces of dishonesty and ulteriorum. We are confronted today with a force of lies. Shall we lie down and be trod upon by the liars? Should we not fight to the death for the truth? I will fight, will you?
Posted October 28, 2010 at 2:34:42 PM
Marcus
To hold people in the bonds of politically correct speech is a violation of free speech, pure and simple. It elevates the minorities and other groups to elite status and takes away the power of white heterosexual religious folks. If we're going to be honest, let's be honest.
Posted October 28, 2010 at 3:18:47 PM
Caseace
Dr. Hanson, Way to tell it like it is! Errrr...Ahhh...I mean like it isn't.
Posted October 28, 2010 at 4:15:37 PM
John H
Great article, but, sadly, it only shows why we, as a nation, have come to our present, broken down, and indebted nation. To me, being PC is just another way of being IRRESPONSIBLE. In almost every case, our problems, social, personal, and national, are all fostered by being irresponsible. In order to be politically correct, our nation turns away from directly confronting, naming, and responding to our myriad problems. In order for us to return to our status as the greatest nation on earth, it's high time our leaders, in all facets of life, to tell it like it is, and confront our problems with sane, realistic, and definitively NON PC, words and actions.
Posted October 28, 2010 at 4:21:34 PM
Just saying
I first met this phrase in the early 90s, freshly arrived from Romania. It struck me as the most inane and absurd requirement in a free country. How can anyone ask for political correctness? What is that? Party approved speech code? Propaganda? How can people in this country accept this concept, and use it so freely, like it's the most natural thing to do?
Still cannot understand it. In socialist countries, we knew what we could and couldn't say, but in a free country nobody should have restrictions, of any kind, on their speech.
Posted October 28, 2010 at 6:16:34 PM
Abu Nudnik
Not meeting the requirements of, say, employment, is not the same as getting fired. It's just not getting hired. There was never a "ban" on same-sex marriages. Same-sex couples didn't fit the definition of marriage, that is all.
Posted October 29, 2010 at 11:37:41 AM
desert
In the Patriot Post, you commented "citizens are afraid to speak openly and therefore use groupspeak"....I suggest you get your fat butt out from behind that desk and go out and see for yourself!! NO ONE I know has any qualms of "speaking" out............"keep quiet and be thought a fool, or open your mouth and remove all doubt"!!!
Posted November 1, 2010 at 11:27:25 AM