Black Opportunity Destruction
· Wednesday, February 10, 2010
"Do you mean he is taller than me am?" sarcastically barked Dr. Martin Rosenberg, my high school English teacher, to one of the students in our class. The student actually said, "He is taller than me," but Rosenberg was ridiculing the student's grammar. The subject of the elliptical (or understood) verb "am" must be in the subjective case. Thus, the correct form of the sentence is: He is taller than I.
This correction/dressing down of a student, that occasionally included me, occurred during my attendance at North Philadelphia's Benjamin Franklin High School in the early '50s. Franklin was predominantly black; its students were poor or low middle class. On top of that, Franklin had just about the lowest academic standing in the city. All of our teachers, except two or three, were white. Despite the fact that we were poor, most of Franklin's teachers held fairly high standards and expectations.
Today, high standards and expectations, at some schools, would mean trouble for a teacher. Teachers, as pointed out in one teaching program, are encouraged to "Recognize and understand the cultural differences among students from diverse backgrounds, and treat such differences with respect. Intervene immediately, should a fellow student disparage a Black student's culture or language." That means if a black student says, "I be wiff him" or "He axed me a question," teachers shouldn't bother to correct the student's language. What's more, should anyone disparage or laugh at the way the student speaks, the teacher should intervene in his defense. Correcting the student's speech might be deemed as insensitive to diversity at best and racism at worst, leading possibly to a teacher's reprimand, termination and possibly assault.
A teacher's job is to teach and failure to correct a student's speech, just as failure to correct a math error, is a dereliction of duty. You might say, "Williams, Ebonics or black English is part of the cultural roots of black people and to disparage it is racism." That's utter nonsense. During the 1940s and 1950s, I lived in North Philadelphia's Richard Allen housing project, along with its most famous resident, Bill Cosby. We all were poor or low middle class but no one spoke black English. My wife was the youngest of 10 children. Listening to her brothers and sisters speak, compared to many of her nieces and nephews, you wouldn't believe they were in the same family. The difference has nothing to do with cultural roots of black people. The difference is that parents, teachers and others in authority over youngsters have become less judgmental, politically correct and lazy; therefore, speaking poorly is accepted.
Language is our tool of communication. If a person has poor oral language skills, he's likely to have poor writing, reading and comprehension skills. To my knowledge, there are no books in any field of study written in Ebonics or black English. It is very likely that a person with poor language skills will suffer significant deficits in other areas of academic competence such as mathematics and the sciences. It doesn't mean that the person is unintelligent; it means that he doesn't have all the tools of intelligence. That is what's so insidious about the state of black education today; so many blacks do not have a chance to develop the tools of intelligence. Many might have high native intelligence but come off sounding like a moron.
Black Americans should thank God that non-judgmental, politically correct people weren't around during the early civil rights movement when blacks began breaking discriminatory barriers. Discriminatory employers would have had ready-made excuses not to hire a black as a trolley car motorman, cashier or department store sales clerk.
There are some significant challenges to being judgmental and politically incorrect and insisting on proper language. A professor or teacher can get cursed out by students or parents. A black student who speaks well, carries books and studies can be accused of "acting white" and find himself shunned and assaulted by other students.
I would be interested in hearing the teaching establishment's defense of permitting poor language.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Opinion
- Ann Coulter: My Health Care Plan
- George Will: Betting (Again) on an Education Fix
- Cal Thomas: Israel's New Enemy: America?
- Victor Davis Hanson: Another Partisan Push for Another 'Comprehensive Reform'?
- Larry Elder: Obama to America: Bend Over and Cough
- Matt Towery: Inappropriate Portrayal of First Lady Benefits No One
- Lawrence Kudlow: Is Dodd Ending Too Big to Fail?
- Michael Barone: What's Good for House Leaders Is Bad for Members
- Debra Saunders: Conyers Is the Wrong Guy To Chair Judiciary Committee
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: Moving Past Hillary
- Jeff Jacoby: Fixing 'the Mistake on the Lake'
- Jonah Goldberg: Reading Tea Party Leaves
- Michael Gerson: Democrats' True Colors
- Austin Bay: Obama's Iran Conundrum
- Jacob Sullum: Death in Juarez
Columnists
- Michael Barone
- Austin Bay
- Ken Blackwell
- Tony Blankley
- L. Brent Bozell
- Mona Charen
- Linda Chavez
- Ann Coulter
- Larry Elder
- Roy Exum
- Edwin J. Feulner
- Suzanne Fields
- Michael Gerson
- Jonah Goldberg
- Paul Greenberg
- Rebecca Hagelin
- Victor Davis Hanson
- Jeff Jacoby
- Terence Jeffrey
- Charles Krauthammer
- Lawrence Kudlow
- David Limbaugh
- Michelle Malkin
- William Murchison
- Peggy Noonan
- Oliver North
- Dennis Prager
- Burt Prelutsky
- Michael Reagan
- Debra Saunders
- Ben Shapiro
- Thomas Sowell
- John Stossel
- Jacob Sullum
- Cal Thomas
- Matt Towery
- R. Emmett Tyrrell
- George Will
- Walter E. Williams
The Patriot is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!



martin mayer
As a former Marine I formed bonds with other men I served with. Relationships that are strong as family ties. These are men I would without question,without hesitation give my life, my blood and everything I own. At the same time I know these men would do the same. That some of them are black doesn't even occur to me. What I am trying to say is that this political correctness is the single greatest problem of our society. Politics can be changed at any time and politcs ranged from times were Slave trade was perfectly acceptable to times were a darker shade of skin guarantees you entitlements. Instead of being political correct and listen to changing messages. We should be guided by Common Sense and simply use the framework of good standard morals. As long as our society singles groups out for being "special", "Different" as long as our society dispenses law differently because of the "Race card", there will be racism and hate. Hire and educate by the applicants merrits. Educate and advance by skill and talent. Don't force "Black History Month" on everyone with the social guilt sledgehammer but celebrate the accomplishments of the men and women we are supposed to recognize during black history month, by their merrits, their accomplishments and their individual achievements.
Dr. Martin Luther King should be remembered because of his message, his intellect, his strength of will and his place in history but not because he happend to be black. I am not saying that we should forget that he was black and that he fought and died for his dream, as part of his place in history, but his or any other persons accomplishments should not be singled out in a "special month" designated black history, but be part of American history. As long as we seperate by color and constantly remind everyone of superficial differences on the surface there won't be an end to racism.
And this is exactly what the political correctness movement does. It favors minorities, raises the issue of race on a pedestal and makes it a prime issue when it should be a no issue at all.
Posted February 10, 2010 at 4:36:29 AM
Dave
Wonderful article. I sent it to a relative who believes in "social justice."
Walter, what happened to your website? I can no longer find it.
Posted February 10, 2010 at 10:14:01 AM
Robert M. Smith
Your article explains one of the reasons why I gave up my budding career as a school teacher (over 20 years ago)and went into the corporate world to earn a living: much less need to bow to the gods of political correctness. I taught in both predominantly black and predominantly white high schools and encountered similiar degrees of PC. The school administrators were more interested in Johnny's feelings rather than his ability to read, write or critically analyze a subject. It has now become worse by a factor of 10.
The Department of Education should be abolished.
Posted February 10, 2010 at 2:50:56 PM
HawkWatcher, Mi.
Williams is one of my favorite opiners. Around the time of the last presidential election, I posted some of his critical writings at my workplace to see what would happen. A bunch of coworkers, not knowing who Walter is, asked me why I would put up controversial comments with racial overtones. Many others agreed with his opinions, and did not find him offensive in any way.
My next posting included Walters picture. This initiated a shop discussion about racial attitudes that went on for many months. Minds were changed during that period, and I am now the shop "pundit" when it comes to things political, social, or economical.
Williams has the surgical ability to dissect an issue, select a specific segment, and objectively describe it to us in black and white using great common sense. Many of his opinions have become part of my own, and I continue to use his writings in effectively promoting conservatism.
Robert, I agree, the DOE should go. There is no lawful authority for federal involvement in public education outside of a bully pulpit. Regardless of their intentions, federal meddling causes more harm than good, and much money could be saved by not filtering it through Washington.
Posted February 13, 2010 at 7:51:56 PM