Economic Fairness

· Wednesday, December 14, 2011

The most prevalent theme in President Barack Obama's Dec. 6 Osawatomie, Kan., speech was the need for greater "fairness." In fact, though the president never defined the term fair(ness), he used it 15 times. Explaining his new hero, Teddy Roosevelt, Obama said: "But Roosevelt also knew that the free market has never been a free license to take whatever you can from whomever you can. He understood the free market only works when there are rules of the road that ensure competition is fair and open and honest." What's fair competition is somewhat subjective, but let me suggest a few examples of what's clearly unfair.

Say a person wants to become a taxi owner. He has a driver's license, a car and accident liability insurance. Is it fair that in New York City, he has to first purchase a taxi license (medallion) that as of October sold for $1 million? Taxi licenses in Chicago go for $56,000. In Boston, they are $285,000, and in Philadelphia, they run $75,000. Is that fair competition?

In some cities, to own a taxi one must obtain a certificate of "public convenience and necessity." At a Public Utility Commission hearing, incumbent taxi owners show up with their attorneys to protest that another taxi company is not needed, and the application is denied. I'd like to have Obama -- or anyone else -- tell us whether that's fair competition.

The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 is a law with racist origins and broad congressional support. During the 1931 legislative debate over the Davis-Bacon Act, which mandates super-minimum (mostly union) wages on federally financed or assisted construction projects, racist intents were obvious. Rep. John Cochran, D-Mo., supported the bill, saying he had "received numerous complaints ... about Southern contractors employing low-paid colored mechanics getting work and bringing the employees from the South." Rep. Clayton Allgood, D-Ala., complained: "Reference has been made to a contractor from Alabama who went to New York with bootleg labor. ... That contractor has cheap colored labor that he transports, and he puts them in cabins, and it is labor of that sort that is in competition with white labor throughout the country." Rep. William Upshaw, D-Ga., spoke of the "superabundance or large aggregation of Negro labor." American Federation of Labor President William Green said, "Colored labor is being sought to demoralize wage rates." The Davis-Bacon Act remains law. Modern rhetoric in support of it has changed, but its effects haven't. It continues to discriminate against nonunion construction labor. Most black construction workers are in the nonunion sector. Tragically, both President Obama and almost all black congressmen, doing the bidding of their labor union allies, vote against any measure that would modify or eliminate Davis-Bacon restrictions. Would Obama see the Davis-Bacon Act as fair competition?

Probably the most unfair thing that happens to most blacks is the grossly rotten schools they attend. Often, fraudulent high-school diplomas are conferred that certify they can read, write and compute at the 12th-grade level when in fact they can't perform at the seventh- or eighth-grade level. President Obama's administration strongly opposes educational vouchers, even one as small as the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, with his Office of Management and Budget saying: "Private school vouchers are not an effective way to improve student achievement. The administration strongly opposes expanding (the program) and opening it to new students." The president is against school choice for low-income parents while his own children attend Sidwell Friends, one of the most prestigious private schools in D.C. Many members of Congress keep their own children out of D.C. public schools; 44 percent of senators and 36 percent of representatives do, and that includes 35 percent of Congressional Black Caucus members, who tend to vote against school choice. Their actions are dictated by what's good for the National Education Association, not low-income black children. Do you think that's fair? By the way, teachers at public schools are twice as likely as other parents to send their own children to private schools. That ought to tell us something.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Jeremy

Repeal Davis-Bacon? School vouchers? Obviously, Professor Williams is a racist...

Posted December 14, 2011 at 1:13:46 AM


Oathkeeper Scott

Excellent examples of how government should not be involved in such things.

By 'inviting the vampire into the house', corruption and market distortions are inevitable, and unintended consequences are legion.

The Constitution sought to forbid such things. Oh how far we've strayed and drifted.

Posted December 14, 2011 at 10:41:49 AM


anne bryant

Nope... Professor Williams is a realist. Read his books. You'll be glad you did.

Posted December 14, 2011 at 2:38:00 PM


Dave

Spot on as always ...

Posted December 14, 2011 at 3:00:21 PM


Will in Texas

Wow! I feel a little smarter today...Dr Williams brought up something I've been thinking on for a while and that is: Why doesn't anyone define "fairness" or fair share?? We need a good pie chart or something!

Posted December 14, 2011 at 4:53:39 PM


searchlight

Dr. Williams, you are a national treasure.

Posted December 14, 2011 at 5:29:38 PM


Convet

No. Jeremy is a racist!

Posted December 14, 2011 at 7:06:49 PM


Steve

"Fair" is defined by what the elites do. FAIR is exemptions and waivers for those with connections. FAIR is laws that apply to all US citizens EXCEPT the U.S. Congress and their favored friends. FAIR is enabling politicians to buy votes and power spending the money taken forcibly from others. FAIR is using government force to compel some people to work for the pleasure and benefit of others. {Cue the old Negro spiritual background music} 'FAIR' is slavery. Freedom is slavery. 'Compassion' is cruelty. 'Democracy' is tyranny of the majority.

Ever notice how life resembles an Orwell novel?

Posted December 15, 2011 at 1:23:17 PM


Elessar

I am quite certain that Jeremy is being sarcastic and has his tongue planted firmly in his cheek in "calling" Dr. Williams a racist!

If I am incorrect, Jeremy, correct me!!

RJA

Posted December 16, 2011 at 2:13:45 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund