Options
A Bad Year for the Experts
· Tuesday, December 8, 2009
As if policy "experts" were not growing almost daily in disrepute, along came the Environmental Protection Agency Monday to fortify, in a backward way, the case for just plain old, you know, common sense in public policy. No 2,000-page congressional bills; no international conferences; just homely intuition, leading to the conclusion that, Pa, this whole thing don't sound right.
Until recently we hadn't had that sort of whoa, hold it, in the face of untested testimony by phalanxes of scientists and the like. Doubtless this is why the EPA hopes, if probably vainly, to get by with drawing up, under the Clean Air Act, grand measures for the suppression of greenhouse gases as pollutants.
EPA's announcement of its intention to get tough coincided with the start of the Copenhagen conference on global warming, concerning which we'll all get an earful in coming days. World leaders, including the man who is driving current EPA policy -- President Obama -- will commit themselves in a meaningless way to shrinking the world's "carbon footprint."
Meanwhile, Senate Democrats soldier on, projecting miracle cures for a not-really-sick health care system provided, basically, that Americans look the other way and do as they're told.
The "experts" are in fullest flower, issuing analyses and orders as if they were, collectively, the Great and Terrible Oz. They aren't. People are prudently looking with greater suspicion on the men behind the curtain who cook up schemes for general betterment.
A new Rasmussen poll shows just 43 percent of Americans in favor of the health care bills now before Congress, whereas 51 percent oppose the bills. Why so? Start with the fact that both bills are about 2,000 pages. That's enough pages to give anyone pause, except maybe an expert. Back during the financial collapse, which was brought on in part by a wide resort to shaky, complicated investments, we learned supposedly the lesson that you invest only in what you understand.
Here's Congress, even so, asserting the truth of things it can't possibly know, e.g., that bringing health care under total federal control would make us healthy, wealthy and wise. It sure enough don't sound right, Pa, as half the population seems to be saying. Not that the Democrats care, when expert legislative craftsmen -- can't we just take their word? -- have supposedly got everything fixed up.
The experts on climate change are equally confounded. Don't we understand that if the world doesn't act now on global warming and climate change, the polar caps will melt and drown New York City? Either various Americans fail to see drowning New York City as a bad idea, or they doubt the wisdom of trusting supposed scientific "consensus" when outside the consensus other scientists are telling us the dangers are greatly inflated.
Likewise, as common sense notes vividly, the case for sharply reducing carbon-based fuel use in favor of "clean" sources that aren't even ready yet is a case with many holes in it. For instance, how do we phase down oil and coal without dire effects on the economy? How do we know for that matter if we did so the strategy would save New York?
The scientists who pat us on the head, saying, there, there, trust us, have yet frankly to earn that trust. What about the "Climategate" flap in England: those blatant attempts (discovered in stolen e-mails) to quieten or ostracize contradictory evidence on climate change? What about the EPA and its decree that We Begin Now -- Now! -- to Regulate Green House Gases!? What about the accompanying admonition by the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (a mere businessman) that the decree points us toward "a top-down command-and-control regime that will choke off growth"? Yes, and job creation. During a grave recession. While Congress works to cure the sick and lame by bringing health care under its thumb.
Pa, this stuff sure don't sound right: A good enough reason, many Americans would say, not to do it. Not without much, much, much more careful thought than the world army of experts seems prepared for.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Harvard Political Review notes: "The Patriot Post is leading a surprisingly well-organized charge into the world of Internet politics." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Ileana
Thomas Friedman, who is an expert on everything, stated recently that Co2 stays in the atmosphere for 3,000 years. Someone please tell him that plants and trees need and use lots of Co2 to thrive.
If we reduce Co2, we are reducing the planet's flora thus a great source of food for many animals and humans. The Co2 regulation imposed by EPA will skyrocket the cost of everything, goods, energy, food, oil, services and reduce jobs at a time when we cannot afford it. It will put many companies out of business, people out of jobs, and consumers will ultimately pay the price passed on to them by producers.
Posted December 8, 2009 at 12:18:58 AM
Howard Last
Anyone know if AlBore's relatives invested in the Cardiff Giant and Piltown Man?
Posted December 8, 2009 at 12:54:25 PM
TJS
We need to cut the size of government in half, in order restore robust growth. If we restore 5% economic growth, we could double GDP in 15 years; three such doublings in the working lifetime of 45 years; a GDP 8 times larger. That growth would make all who invest just 5% of their income into multi-millionaires by retirement. Then we wouldn't need the (failed) socialist programs which are bankrupting the nation.
Posted December 8, 2009 at 3:21:25 PM
G Dub
My wife accuses me of cursing too much. I feel that I have a warranted excuse: that being our Congress and Administration are hell ( oops, sorry ) bent on destroying our economy and the Republic.
But isn't that the plan => Establish crisis, scare the populace, don gleaming armor, and ride in astride a magnificent steed. Then convince us that the Central Gov't will save us from all ills, both real and Al Gore-like.
I think not.
Most of Congress MUST be removed asap. Obumble should remain in Copenhagen until Nov 2012, repeal Stumblebus I, II and III, halt the UnHealthCare Reform bills, send all Czars to Russia, or . . .
or there maybe a second 4th of July in 2010.
Posted December 8, 2009 at 3:43:01 PM
JBU
Unbelievable that we seem to be headed in the direction of more central government and less freedom...or maybe it's only the people who do understand the issues and consequences and who pay taxes that are concerned....Hmmm....somewhere I saw that about 40% of US citizens don't pay federal income taxes....
Posted December 8, 2009 at 4:39:18 PM
Ileana
Random Thoughts
I wonder how much Co2 do 6.75 billion people exhale in a year and all the animals on the planet? How does that compare with industrial Co2 in a year?
What are the soda manufacturers going to do since their pops contain and fizzle Co2 in the air?
Since EPA declared Co2 damaging to human health, are we damaging each other? Are some people more damaging to the environment and to humans than others? Who will be the human EPA regulator?
Do we all exhale the same amount of Co2? What about when we exercise or run marathons?
Are we going to have to pay taxes based on our exhalation of Co2? How will it be measured? Do we go to jail if we don't pay? Will they build more jails if many don't comply?
Will we have to buy and exchange carbon credits so that Al Gore, Goldman Sachs, and J.P. Morgan can trade in and make money off carbon credits?
If doctors will begin to retire or change professions because they don't like bureaucrats telling them how to practice medicine, where they can practice, and to deny lifesaving procedures to people, how will Congress get their Cadillac healthcare? Who will provide it? If I were a doctor, I would tell them to go to Cuba for their healthcare.
Posted December 8, 2009 at 9:27:42 PM