Options
Terror Wins Another One
· Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Here's what we can look for as the federal government implements new rules meant to thwart the likes of Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalib, the would-be pants bomber:
-- Sharp drop-offs in beverage sales as passengers find themselves barred from restrooms during the last 60 minutes of international flights.
-- Airport check-in times longer than airplane flight times.
-- An upsurge in employment for people turned on by the prospect of "patting down" strangers.
-- A decrease in human dignity, across the board.
Here 's what we likely can't look for:
-- Federal acknowledgement that young Arabic or African men deserve more official attention than do the normal riff-raff of air travel -- businessmen, grandmothers, babies, young couples from Wyoming, etc., etc.
-- Broad political recognition of a broad need for broad (meaning decisive and certainly non-compassionate) measures to discourage and punish people who want to kill Americans.
Fascinating to contemplate is the hard truth that the terrorists have beaten us. Well, not in everything, of course, but certainly in ways significant for modern life.
Everything we can't do at airports these days -- walk to the gate unimpeded, keep our shoes and clothes on at checkpoints, feel joy and fulfillment in the experience of air travel -- is owing to the terrorists. They have us handcuffed. We can't quit thinking about them lest they do something to us. In a weird way, they've won without winning.
Let us contemplate how.
That terrorists aren't nice is just boilerplate -- we've always known it. That they want to kill us is the central consideration here. What do you do when people want to kill you? Generally, not enough, so dark and subterranean is the world they inhabit and hide in.
What matters most, nonetheless, is advertising them as enemies. Here is where the U. S. government -- or better said, the U. S. political process -- sometimes loses out.
The constant theme of too many journalists, bloggers and politicians since the early years of the supposed War on Terror is that Americans may not be a lot nicer than terrorists. The outcry over abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq telegraphed this viewpoint to us. The outcry merged with endless blather about "illegal" wiretaps, disregard of constitutional niceties by the Bush administration and, most of all, waterboarding and varied other "outrages" at Guantanamo.
Nothing would do, it seemed, but to close Guantanamo and extend constitutional protections to the enemy operatives held there. So, just as soon as the Obama administration figures out where to stash the delightful inhabitants of Guantanamo, we'll shutter the camp. Meanwhile, the confessed mastermind of the Sept. 11 catastrophe awaits criminal trial in New York City, with all due constitutional protections.
A steady procession of events like this takes its toll in terms of civic morale. Americans grow suspicious -- of each other. Maybe it's all just a mix-up, this terrorism business. Maybe they don't really want to kill us -- just wake us up to their concerns? Maybe?
A little bit more indisputable is the harm our ambivalence about means and ends in the terror war is wreaking on national morale. A nation that consents to take its shoes off at the airport, and to abstain from the urgency of the restroom, without equating sacrifice to necessity -- that nation would seem headed for nervous breakdown. If, indeed, it hasn't already had one.
There isn't much human dignity in meek acceptance of unnecessary hardships, such as submission to manhandling in the process of innocent travel. Yet on a generally received sense of dignity everything worthwhile depends. Our leaders seem not to understand the harm they do the American spirit by handcuffing rather than liberating it so as to get a vital job done -- the extinction of (even if, shhh, we can't say it) terrorism rooted in the hatreds and phobias of too many Muslims.
First things first: smash the people whose legacy is restroom lockouts and airport shoe inspections. Then ask them if they care to lodge any human rights complaints.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Lyn Nofziger, "North Star" of the Reagan Revolution: "The Patriot not only does the best job of putting important news, policy and opinion in proper context, but also of cutting down to size the pompous praters and propagandists on the left." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Ruth Ann Wilson
Thieves, Cowards, and Thugs
I am not sure that the " International Community" wants an "end" to this "piracy"!!!
ARMED SHIPS would end all of this "intrigue".
We have another "Piracy situation" on the seas.
What about this "airplane terrorism"? What ended it? When somebody "subdued" the wicked one.
The "solution" to all of this is not "let everyone on an airline flight, sit one hour before landing with their hands in their lap!!!????" UGH The solution is that the Second Article to the Bill of Rights be respected.
Think about it. Why is crime kept at bay when the citizens are armed???? You only get one guess!!!!!!
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted December 29, 2009 at 11:11:16 AM
Jeff Cameron
It's interesting that the terrorist who tried to blow up a plane with his underwear bomb was subdued by passengers, who are correctly considered to be heroes. The terrorist is now under arrest and will get full Constitutional rights, including probably a lawyer and a trial. Meanwhile, three U.S. Marines who captured a known and admitted terrorist murderer are being court-martialed for giving the terrorist a fat lip in the process. What's wrong with this picture?
Posted December 29, 2009 at 1:35:55 PM
Howard Last
What would have been the outcome if the pilots or passangers were allowed to fly armed on Sept.11, 2001? Ask a liberal or a RINO and the answer, it would have been worse. Figure that out if you have time to waste. Benjamin Franklin said it best, "Those that give up a little esential liberty for a little security deserve neither security nor liberty". (The quote is not exact. Can you get the actual quote?) The events of Sept. 11 proved Franklin rights. Why am I not surprised?
Posted December 29, 2009 at 8:12:22 PM
Ruth Ann Wilson
Amen, Howard, I talked to someone who flies a lot. They were mad at me because I was upset about this "rig and insult" to passengers. I thought of Franklin's quote when I met with such response.
May the Spirit of 1776 once again rule in our midst.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted December 30, 2009 at 7:24:31 AM