I'll take Hillary Clinton any day of the week.

It was only a matter of time for the caustic Gingritch to self destruct. His own worst enemy is his own big mouth, and what he says more often than not makes him enemies, not friends. Today we should see Gingrich lose more steam as the process unfolds. Candidates need to focus on Chairman Obamao and his lawless regime, not attacking each other personally, but legitimately pointing our differences. Gingritch seems a petulant child with his personal off message attacks on the competition.

I'm of a different opinion. The democrats will have little left to bring to the table come election time. Gingrich, as much as I distrust him, appears to be the only candidate capable of reversing what Obama and the democratic congress have created. He's proving he has the mettle to fight back rather than play pattycake. For me, it still boils down to whether or not I can trust him to be a true conservative.

I've heard consistently that Newt is a problem, yet I see nothing he has done that any other candidate has not ALREADY done. He is fighting for his bid for President of the United States. The media want to demonize him because THEY don't like him. He is no friend to the media to be sure and I LOVE that! The media started this fight against Gingrich. They started badmouthing him first. Then the Romeny SuperPAC savaged him further. They expected him to boil over. I have seen nothing of the kind. He has simply begun to fight for himself. He is allowed to do just that. Gingrich is no "petulant child". He is a very intelligent candidate, that no one in the media seems to like. I could care less about the media than I ever did about their opinion on a presidential candidate. They have never been fair or balanced, and they never intend to be, unless things GO THEIR WAY. The media has turned out to be the petulant child in this situation. Brit Hume is fair salivating and Krauthammer has begun to liken Newt to Ahab. Unfortunately, these two never said one bad word about Romney. They have picked up their pitchforks and are trying to gouge the masses into voting for Romney. This is sickening to say the least. People are really easily led, I am afraid.

I will stand by Newt. He is the only one who can debate Obama and win. Beleive what you will, but Romney is a spoiled brat who always must have his way. There was no mention of Romney's arrest in 1982 for defiance of a park ranger in Massachusetts, yet it happened. The records had been sealed. Who wants records like that sealed unless they were in the wrong and acting like a "petulant child".

Sad who the masses are led around by their noses.

Another thing...Chris Christie uses his caustic tongue to manage the masses in FAVOR OF Romney and no one says a mean word about him...only praise, but let Newt try to fight back against the media and the other candidates... and all of a sudden he is a caustic human being who cannot be trusted. What a load of horse manure the people are being fed!

Believe what you will, but you are being led down the primrose path of biased media.

Little Mittens is a big boy---he doesn't need Mr. Murchison's help to beat up on Newt.

I'm no fan of either Mitt or Newt, but, really, is Newt's given name an important issue? I always thought that sort of childish stuff was a liberal trademark. Remember back when saying "J. Danforth Quayle" was some sort of inside joke among liberals? It probably still is (I quit talking politics with liberals some time ago). Anyways, it seems to that Mr. Murchison is the only one acting like a mole---a liberal mole, that is.

I am done with Newt. He has proven to me now that he will say anything needed to win.

His solution for solving the Healthcare management issue - computerized medical records - is naive and not based in bedside reality. He is an advocate for Health savngs accounts - but so are most real conservatives. That's not good enough.

Sorry Newt, but even tough the real conservatives have been beat down and out by the media and the Rhino elites, I will side with the most conservative I can find - and that looks like Santorum. Anyone can beat Obama, but the real test is going to be winnibg control of the senta and thus controling the Agenda in washington.

I am sending my money to the TEA PARTY candiates in many Republican primaries around the country. That is where we will save the country.

@ M Rick Timms MD: The last sentence of your response is the key: supporting Tea Party candidates for Congress. In my way of thinking, the Republicans have already lost the 2012 presidential election. Monkeys onstage, all. So, gain control of the House and Senate and tie the socialist president's hands until a decent candidate comes along.

Thanks Tex. I am a little more optimistic. I think Romney may win, but it will take a conservative Congress to drive the conservative legislative agenda. If he is faced with a conservative bill supported by both Houses, even Mitt would have to go along.

Obviously if Obama wins, it will take impeachment/conviction to remove him. Certainly the basis for such exists now, but that will continue to be ignored by the media.

Good points, Dr. Timms.