How to Split and Spoil a Party

· Tuesday, January 31, 2012

What's all this "Republican establishment" vs. "grassroots populist" business; would somebody kindly inform me? I have rarely heard of anything nuttier.

The essence of this widely retailed story is that rebellious men and women of the grassroots wish to prevent the nomination of Mitt Romney for president. If Romney got elected, we are apparently to believe, he would spend all his time at the country club, checking in periodically with his brokers, instead of removing the cultural and political debris left by the Obama administration. Whereas -- ah! -- if Newt Gingrich became the people's man in the White House, he and Joe the plumber would lead a national revival.

I do not mean to mock. The matters at hand in the Republican presidential contest are serious, but reducing the contest to a race between some Wall Street guy and a feisty little ex-speaker of the House is, um, ludicrous. When in creation did Newt Gingrich, lately celebrated for his payday as a consultant at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, become a man of the people? And, true enough, Romney has lot of money, but does having a lot of money (power to him by the way) mean he connects only to men in dark, thousand-dollar suits? Horse feathers!

The Romney-Gingrich contest (I say this with all deference to Mr. Three in the contest, Rick Santorum, a good guy) has less to do with populism and establishmentarianism than Barack Obama has to do with warmth and candor.

To paraphrase George Wallace's view of the two main political parties, there isn't a dime's worth of difference, philosophically speaking, between Romney and Gingrich. Neither wants to preserve in amber the works of the Obama Congress and administration. Both want, if with different emphases and approaches, to reduce the size, weight and ponderousness of the federal government and stimulate economic growth and job creation.

The whole argument over Wall Street and Main Street -- to which Sarah Palin added her increasingly valueless viewpoints the other day, jumping on Romney and defending Gingrich -- is no argument at all. We can't get along without people on both of these caricatured thoroughfares adding ideas, investment and hard work to the economic mix. The two of them buy and sell, hire and fire, invest and dis-invest -- just at different rhythms and paces. For that matter, the real wealth of the country is on Main Street. Wall Street merely facilitates Main Street's activities. National prosperity depends on the freedom of movement that both boulevards afford.

All right? What's the real argument? The real argument is ancient, rooted in human jealousies that have been alive in the republic since Jefferson threw his arm around the farmers and small merchants even as Hamilton danced regally with the post-colonial royalty of bankers and brokers.

The damaging aspect of it all, right now, involves staging a nonsensical family feud in front of the whole country: Gingrichian "populists" pretending to see in Romney a social enemy; Romneyites slugging back in kind, making the whole party appear in the grip of mass stupidity.

The whole neo-populist notion of portraying Romney as the liberal Republican reincarnation of Tom Dewey and Nelson Rockefeller is dumb and self-defeating. If candidate Romney (like candidate John Kerry a few years back) might benefit from spending less time around yachtsmen and more around the stock car fraternity, how does this result in the anointing of candidate Gingrich as the horny-handed son of toil come to save us from robber barons and boardroom rapists?

The Republican race is, or should be, an embarrassment to Republicans who trumpet the urgency of freeing Washington, D. C., from the grip of a party less populistic even than Gingrich imagines Romney to be: A party wedded lovingly to public service unions and demographic interest groups. The power of that party to mobilize followers and voters next November should be plain to Republicans who remember 2008 -- provided they can be pried from the task at hand, the demolition of Republicans by other Republicans.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

kilt1iron

Plainly stated. Save for the comment about Sarah Palin, I agree.

My "ilk" will work tirelessly, forever, to have Constitutional Conservatives elected to the US House and Senate, in numbers enough to protect the First Principles from the power grabs of a President and "God-complex" judiciary. That's right, I said it -- the fraternity wearing flowing black robes needs to be taken to the People's elected representatives, and reminded about the Founding Father's intent for "this greatest nation on Earth." They have usurped power, and have a litany of un-Constitutional decisions.

Tell me I am wrong.

Posted January 31, 2012 at 1:50:30 PM


Howard Last

I for one blame what is going on, on the Republican Big Shots (you can't call them leaders). The republicans (small r) had the Presidency, Senate and House. So what did they give us, No Child Left Behind, ban on incandescent light bulbs, the TSA, the Patriot Act, the first bailout, pushed amnesty for illegal aliens (oops undocumented workers), etc, etc, etc. I have yet to hear a republican big shot call Barry a communist, which he is. They still have not learned anything. They went along with the debt being raised and at the end of last year voted for the Defense Appropriations Act with its unconstitutional provisions. They have not abolished or repealed one agency, bureau, department, rule, regulation, law, etc. Has Boeher or McConnell even whispered at articles of impeachment. Oh well I guess I will vote whig this time around. What they became irrelevant and no longer exist.

Posted January 31, 2012 at 3:43:39 PM


gjnuvalde

I'm surprised no one has risen up against Mr. Murchison's screed! To say that there REALLY IS NO DIVIDE in the Republican Party is simply to either not see, or deny the obvious.

The 'elites', 'country-clubbers', or 'establishment' - whatever - DO want the party to stay moderate and 'electable' at all costs. They have no great concern for conservatism. They simply use us as a base, so as to continue to get elected. And, we continue to "settle" for moderates, so as to have a 'say', politically. The problem is that we never GET anything conservative from these people.

Mr. Murchison pretends that the divide in the party is a fictional bogeyman. Methinks he protesteth too much.

These people are 'hiding' in plain sight. We just have to open our eyes, and see what's going on. We have a compromised party 'establishment' that still sidles up to us every 4 years with platitudes and promises. But, they never deliver. And they never intend to, either.

Posted January 31, 2012 at 4:52:12 PM


gjnuvalde

I'm surprised no one has risen up against Mr. Murchison's screed! To say that there REALLY IS NO DIVIDE in the Republican Party is simply to either not see, or deny the obvious.

The 'elites', 'country-clubbers', or 'establishment' - whatever - DO want the party to stay moderate and 'electable' at all costs. They have no great concern for conservatism. They simply use us as a base, so as to continue to get elected. And, we continue to "settle" for moderates, so as to have a 'say', politically. The problem is that we never GET anything conservative from these people.

Mr. Murchison pretends that the divide in the party is a fictional bogeyman. Methinks he protesteth too much.

These people are 'hiding' in plain sight. We just have to open our eyes, and see what's going on. We have a compromised party 'establishment' that still sidles up to us every 4 years with platitudes and promises. But, they never deliver. And they never intend to, either.

Posted January 31, 2012 at 4:54:19 PM


Jeri L

Of course there is a divide in the republican party and to deny it is crazy. First of all, we either stay as we are or change in order to keep attracting the younger people under us to the party. This country has always been center right and that is firmly where my feet are planted. This is going to be a fight to the convention between the far right conservatives in this party and those who are center right. My gut tells me that due to the infighting and no candidate who has been able to rally the enthusiasim of both sides, we will lose come November 2012. I hate to say that, but that is what I see. I admire and a lot in both Romney and Gingrich, but am I excited? No and I keep wondering is this the best we have?

Posted February 1, 2012 at 2:11:27 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund