Options
PatriotPost.US Alert: TSA Invasive Body Scanners
Friday, November 12, 2010
Breaking: An investigation by The Patriot Post has determine that the three primary manufacturers of full body scanners being purchased by TSA with Obama (taxpayer) "stimulus" funding, are located in (you guessed it) Democrat congressional districts favored for such boondoggle funding in California and Massachusetts.
L-3 Communications ($165 million contract) is in Massachusetts congressional district 7 (Demo Rep. Ed Markey). American Science and Engineering is in Massachusetts congressional district 5 (Demo Rep. Niki Tsongas). And, Rapiscan ($173 million contract) is in California's 36th congressional district (Demo Rep. Jane Harman).
If you think the TSA scanners now being deployed at airports around the nation -- thanks to $73 million in Obama (taxpayer) stimulus funding -- are not invasive, you might reconsider after viewing this virtual strip search, which is a low resolution of the much higher resolution TSA scans now being used.
Is there a privacy issue here? Want your wives and daughters scanned or searched using the "enhanced pat down procedure" if a woman refuses to subject herself to the scan? Did you know that TnA, er, uh, TSA employees have cached these images? Reuters reports and thousands of them have been posted on the Web. Further, there are also health related concerns about scanner radiation.
When it comes to airport security matters, we put some stock into what the Israelis have to say. In April of this year, former chief security officer of the Israel Airport Authority, Rafi Sela, who has been an expert in security and defence technology for 30 years, said of the body scanners: "I don't know why everybody is running to buy these expensive and useless machines. I can overcome the body scanners with enough explosives to bring down a Boeing 747. That's why we haven't put them in [Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion International Airport]." (Obviously Sela's security decisions are not directed by politicians with stimulus money to burn.)
Sela believes a "trusted traveller" network would be better because pre-approved low-risk passengers would be subject only to expedited screening and higher risk individuals could then be subject to much more proven technology like automatic sniffers now used to detect explosive residue on airline baggage.
As for the "random search" procedures in effect at U.S. airports, Sela says, "Random searches are like Russian roulette." He is an advocate of behavioral profiling, but that would offend the sensibilities of travelers who actually fit the profile of a terrorist.
Oh, and a footnote: This writer has walked perimeter gun for two presidents. Knowing colleagues in supervisory roles with presidential details, I can tell you that the Secret Service's primary means of protecting the president when he is on greeting lines with the public is, you guessed it, behavioral profiling of those who approach the president, the same method of profiling that the TSA should be using for anyone approaching an airport security checkpoint.
View a list of airports with scanners.
Links to more info on the new TSA protocols:
Assume the position:
Assume the position 2:
Assume the position 3:
Pilot Association says NO:
Columnist Steve Chapman concludes, "The war on terrorism is going to get personal. Very personal. Americans have long resented the hassles that go with air travel ever since 9/11 — long security lines, limits on liquids, forced removal of footwear and so on. But if the Transportation Security Administration has its way, we will look back to 2009 as the good old days. The agency is rolling out new full-body scanners, which eventually will replace metal detectors at all checkpoints. These machines replicate the experience of taking off your clothes, but without the fun. They enable agents to get a view of your body that leaves nothing to the imagination. For the camera-shy, TSA will offer an alternative: "enhanced" pat-downs. This is not the gentle frisking you may have experienced at the airport in the past. It requires agents to probe aggressively in intimate zones — breasts, buttocks, crotches. If you enjoyed your last mammography or prostate exam, you'll love the enhanced pat-down. And you'll get a chance to have an interesting conversation with your children about being touched by strangers. Besides the indignity of having one's body exposed to an airport screener, there is a danger the images will find a wider audience. The U.S. Marshals Service recently admitted saving some 35,000 images from a machine at a federal courthouse in Florida. TSA says that will never happen. Human experience says, oh, yes, it will."
Options
Subscribe
Howard Baker, Ronald Reagan's White House Chief of Staff, comments on The Patriot Post: "Thank you for your confidence in, and efforts to sustain the Reagan legacy." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























BlueFrog
Great article! The idea of the scanners going into democratic districts is most interesting. I still wonder when the People willfinally say 'enough of this crap' & take a stand.
Posted November 12, 2010 at 7:23:20 PM
Suzanne
I was wondering why in the world Memphis, Tennessee (since Memphis is such a hotbed of terrorism!) needed these scanners and now I know!
Posted November 13, 2010 at 12:16:44 AM
M Rick Timms MD
Reminds me of the GM takeover and Obama literally taking away ( closing down ) the GM dealerships with Republican owners. These guys are so corrupt it boggles the mind - yet the media ignores it -- Fox News cannot do it all.
I am expecting the new House to keep the Dems busy with lots of investigations into matters of corruption such as these.
Posted November 13, 2010 at 12:30:06 AM
Michael R Johnson
If the people really wanted a Gov. that is held accountable, then you would see to it that the below oath or affirmation was signed and that you will be held accountable.
3 The Senators and Representatives before
mentioned, and the Members of the several
State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial
Officers, both of the United States and of
the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation,
to support this Constitution; but no
religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification
to any Office or public Trust under the
United States.
Posted November 13, 2010 at 9:46:27 AM
Robin
That the scanner is built in democratic districts doesn't really surprise me. It figures. You learn SO much about this type of thing by watching Fox News or going to unbiased sources like the Patriot Post. This is just one of MANY reasons I probably won't fly anymore, unless I have to. I don't trust the federal govt much and I actually work for them. I don't trust them not to use the scans for other purposes, maybe some even obscene.
Posted November 13, 2010 at 10:22:07 AM
Alan Robinson
I'm a frequent business traveler. When the scanners were first introduced they were rare. Not anymore. My first scan was in the terrorist breeding ground of Salt Lake City, Utah.
It's outrageous to think that there's no fourth amendment protection here. Worse yet, that there's STILL no common sense approach to this issue.
Now, grandmothers, business travelers, wives and children must be subjected to what amounts to a naked photograph or an invasive physical search or be denied flight.And for what?!?! All to confirm what we already know: none of them are terrorists!
Note that Israel - the only nation on earth more leftist-despised than the United States - doesn't do any of the nonsensical things our TSA does. And when was the last time you heard of any incident on a flight to or from Israel?
Enough is Enough. Republicrats take note.
Posted November 13, 2010 at 10:28:20 AM
Decker
Evidence that if you work hard enough, you can make just about anything into partisan politics. Congratulations on your diligence and Machiavellian instincts.
Posted November 13, 2010 at 10:58:20 AM
aardvark
I'm shocked, I say -- shocked!
Now follow the money again: whose brother-in-law owns the company?
Posted November 13, 2010 at 12:02:17 PM
Doktor Riktor Von Zhades
I sort of wonder how many disciples of the religion of peace have been scanned as of late?
Posted November 13, 2010 at 6:29:32 PM
Howard Last
Old Ben Franklin said, "Those that give up a little essential liberty for a little security deserve either security nor liberty (sorry if it is not totally accurate, but you get the point). What would have been the outcome on 9/11 if the pilot or passangers were armed. I asked a liberal this and his response. it would have been worse. Figure that out if you have time to waste. When was the Second Amendment changed to say "But not on airplanes?"
Posted November 13, 2010 at 7:13:02 PM
carol
I read where muslims only have their head and neck scanned. Is this true? If so we should all become muslims. But of I recall correctly, who is responsible for the majority of terrorism?
Posted November 14, 2010 at 6:54:48 AM
barb
The New Star-Spangled Banner
Oh, say can you see into my body cavities
‘Scuse me, I’ve got gas and don’t mean to be a blast.
I was just singled out to remove all my undies
O’er the rest of you folks who were lucky and got bypassed.
And the worker’s blank stare, terrorists must be everywhere,
I guess the Bill of Rights exists no longer anywhere.
Oh, say does that freedom exist here anymore?
Are we the land of the sheep and the government to abhor?
In my butt, dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the TSA fingers are now feeling in there for bombs,
What is that which the breeze, it does somewhat reek,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of their light’s powerful beam,
Oh why does probing my butt require a TSA team?
It seems the star-spangled banner no longer waves
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
And how did our Congress tell us so many lies
And took away all our rights in the 9/11 confusion.
I just wanted to fly to visit my family. Not spy.
Treating everyone like terrorists is not a good solution.
I no longer want to fly, to be treated like a spy,
It seems our Constitution has been put into a grave:
And the star-spangled banner of sheep doth wave
O'er the land of the Nazis and the home of their slaves!
Oh, thus ends our freedom in what was our holy land
Be treated like prisoners, with no rights, facing desolation!
Unless the populations wakes up to take back our motherland
We will no longer exist as a great nation.
And conquer we must, our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner once more can wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Posted November 14, 2010 at 1:05:53 PM
B. B.
The TSA, absent any security threat or provocation, recently implemented new measures to intrusively search the body of every single US air traveler. Everyone is challenged and inconvenienced. Some are concerned that the technology might be dangerous. Many apparently feel safer, protected from fellow travelers. A few are obviously concerned by the harshness and pleasure TSA agents exhibit in implementing their new authority with impunity. Very few, however, are obviously concerned that warrantless searches, conducted without probable cause, constitute unreasonable searches from which we the people are protected by our Constitution. Very few obviously care that the Constitution, which government officials swear to uphold and defend or protect, is increasingly ignored and undercut to meaninglessness by such punitive measures. Very few obviously care that this unilateral action is being taken by a government already conducting and soon to expand its illegal surveillance against us citizens. And very few obviously care that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Then none need be concerned when we assuredly will see the increasingly power hungry, fascist nature of this government fully revealed and we wake to an America that is obviously the “Land of the Free” no more.
Posted November 14, 2010 at 1:12:15 PM
Mr. Ed
I would like to see an experiment conducted. It would require some brave capitalists working hard to overcome some hurdles.
The experiment entails the creation and operation of two new airlines: Hambaconhansa and Smith & Wesson Unlimited Air.
All passengers on Hambaconhansa airlines flights are obliged to enjoy a pork snack of their choice in flight.
All passengers on Smith & Wesson Unlimited Air are issued handguns loaded with lightweight frangible bullets.
Continue x-ray inspecting luggage, but discontinue the meaningless harassment of passengers by blue-shirted thugs. Then, compare the security-related safety records of these two airlines with the rest.
Posted November 14, 2010 at 3:50:12 PM
RV
What happened to the presumption of innocence? What is the probably cause for search and seizure under 4th amendment that simply because you are boarding a plane you may hijack it?
Posted November 15, 2010 at 11:31:55 AM
M Rick Timms MD
I recognize that it is a choice to fly and I am willing to comply with reasonable ( I use that word because lawyers and the Gov do and it works for them) measures to evaluate me as a potential threat to my fellow travelers. I do not claim an unalienable right to fly on Delta.
Unfortunately, TSA seems to be taking the simple route rather than do the real work that it takes to determine a threat. They search the stuff instead of evaluating the passenger. Of course, it is much easier to just take a naked picture, and more fun when the right passengers come along. And with our entrenched political correctness, we wouldn't dare challenge anyone of color, dialect or ones with a claim of Religious identity.
It will be interesting to see what happens when Muslim women refuse the pictures/search on religious grounds. Will they get the pass through?
The whole process is wrong and should be re-evaluated. There are better methods that could be employed, with less invasive technology, to provide a higher level of security and understanding of the threat.
Posted November 15, 2010 at 11:07:51 PM