Wednesday Chronicle
Arizona Ruling a Mixed Bag
The Foundation
"Born in other countries, yet believing you could be happy in this, our laws acknowledge, as they should do, your right to join us in society, conforming, as I doubt not you will do, to our established rules. That these rules shall be as equal as prudential considerations will admit, will certainly be the aim of our legislatures, general and particular." --Thomas Jefferson
Editorial Exegesis

"Arizona and other states suffering from out-of-control illegal immigration won an important if partial victory in the Supreme Court [Monday]. In a rebuke of the Obama administration, all eight justices (Elena Kagan recused herself) upheld Arizona's requirement that police officers determine the immigration status of anyone they stop, detain, or arrest if a 'reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien unlawfully present in the United States.' ... The Court threw out three other provisions of SB 1070, including one that made it a misdemeanor for an unauthorized alien to seek work in Arizona. But taken in perspective, these aren't critical to the effectiveness of Arizona's law. ... But as noted, this is only a partial victory. For example, in upholding the core provision of the law, the justices read it narrowly and left the door open to challenges to the way it is enforced. Also, Justices Scalia and Thomas got it right when they argued in their dissents that all four provisions of SB 1070 should have been upheld. There is no conflict between federal immigration law and SB 1070. As Scalia notes, Arizona has 'moved to protect its sovereignty -- not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.' Arizona's laws do 'not extend or revise federal immigration restrictions, but merely enforce those restrictions more effectively.' As Scalia scathingly concludes, 'If securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign State.' There is a reason we have 50 states instead of one, and the states are not mere administrative subdivisions of the federal government. Each has its own powers and its own interests, a fact that is of particularly acute interest when the federal government is failing to meet one of its fundamental responsibilities, which is precisely what is happening with illegal immigration. ... [O]n the issue of immigration the states remain dependent upon a federal government that is not to be depended on." --National Review
Essential Liberty
"Arizona and other states are fighting the Obama doctrine of cherry-picking which legal requirements the chief executive will enforce. This was the basis of the policy announced June 15 that the government would give large numbers of illegal immigrants de-facto amnesty by suspending deportation proceedings against them and allowing them to work in the country legally. The Department of Homeland Security added fuel to the fire Monday by announcing it was suspending agreements with Arizona police over enforcement of federal immigration laws. These and other actions call into question President Obama's commitment to his sworn executive duty under Article 2, Section 3, Clause 4 of the Constitution to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed.' ... The framers of the Constitution didn't envision a president preventing states from upholding the law. ... When the federal government abrogates its constitutional duty to protect the states, the states must protect themselves. A statute on the books is useless when the occupant of the White House calculates that it's in his political interest not to enforce it." --The Washington Times
Upright
"The whole federal conflict with Arizona has come about not because Arizona wanted to make its own laws contradicting federal law, but because it wanted to enforce federal laws itself. What does it say about the Obama administration's priorities that it effectively scraps its sworn pledge to uphold the law, usurps the legislative function by ignoring federal laws, punishes those who comply and puts its own re-election first?" --Investor's Business Daily
"What Barack Obama wishes to accomplish by way of immigration outreach, chiefly to Hispanics, is his re-election. ... This is all a shame, if not a scandal. When politics, meaning the quest for votes, comes to dominate an urgent question, we are assured nothing substantive, or perhaps even useful, is going to be done. Every move becomes outreach: the act of begging. It is pretty much how we live these days. The political parties, as in Europe prior to the financial debacle, are focused on giving things, not on taking them away. When you take something away -- a well-paying government job, the right to strike against or bargain collectively with the government -- you offend, meaning you drive away votes. When, by contrast, you hand out favors, you sometimes could listen all day without hearing all the expressions of gratitude and fealty. If your profession is the harvesting of votes, which outcome do you prefer?" --columnist William Murchison
Why Support Us?
Wednesday's Chronicle is a fantastic tool for conservatives to keep on top of events such as the Supreme Court's ruling on Arizona's immigration law. That's just one battle in a long fight against the tyranny of the Left, and we at The Patriot Post need your help to sustain our efforts for Liberty and Rule of Law.
Help us by making a secure online donation to our 2012 Independence Day Campaign today. If you prefer to support us by mail, please send your check with our printable donor form.
We have just 7 days to raise the remaining $192,500 for our campaign, and though we are closing the gap, we remain about 25 percent behind were we should be.
Thank you!
Nate Jackson
Managing Editor
Insight
"Never blame a legislative body for not doing something. When they do nothing, that don't hurt anybody. When they do something is when they become dangerous." --American humorist Will Rogers (1879-1935)
"A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself." --economist Milton Friedman (1912-2006)
The Demo-gogues
Poo-pooing the economy: "You know, it's fashionable right now for people to be cynical. We go in cycles like this and right now a lot of people are saying, 'Oh, America is doing terribly' and 'What are we going to do?'" --Barack Obama
Class warfare: "We created a whole lot of millionaires to boot. Businesses did just fine. And you know there are plenty of patriotic, successful Americans all across the country -- I meet them every day -- who'd be willing to make this contribution again because they understand there is such a thing as the common good. They understand that we're in this thing together." --Barack Obama
Strange thing to brag about: "I will be the first president in modern history to be outspent in his re-election campaign, if things continue as they have so far." --Barack Obama
Out of touch: "One of the things that I resent about these guys is they talk about us middle class guys and I don't live a middle class life anymore; I live in a beautiful home, they fly me around, you know what I mean?" --Joe Biden
"Make sure of two things: Be careful -- microphones are always hot, and understand that in Washington, DC, a gaffe is when you tell the truth. So, be careful." --Joe Biden
Protesting too much: "Don't forget, [Republicans are] going after [Attorney General] Eric Holder because he is supporting measures to overturn these voter suppression initiatives in the states. This is no accident, it is no coincidence." --House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claiming that efforts of charging Holder with contempt of Congress has nothing to do with "Fast and Furious"
"It's clear that [charging AG Eric Holder with contempt of Congress] is nothing more than a political witch hunt to distract from the fact that Republicans in Congress have no interest in focusing on what we need to focus on, which is jobs and the economy." --Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)

Dezinformatsia
Preparing to mourn: "Were the health-care law to be eviscerated, those who battled so hard on its behalf might draw at least bittersweet comfort from what could be called the Joni Mitchell Rule, named after the folk singer who instructed us that 'you don't know what you've got till it's gone.'" --Washington Post opinion writer E.J. Dionne Jr.
Hysteria: "Does anyone wonder like I do what this Supreme Court -- the one personified by Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas -- would have done in the landmark decisions in the post-World War II era? ... The fact is we have the most conservative court since the early 1930s, and maybe more conservative than that. These justices, led by Scalia, believe in original intent. They wanna judge cases the way the Founding Fathers would. Well, the Founding Fathers -- need I remind us all -- wrote slavery into the Constitution. It took a Civil War and the 13th Amendment to get it out." --MSNBC's Chris Matthews
Belly laugh of the week: "President Obama, his administration, has been remarkably scandal free. Really. And so [Republicans have] been trying with Solyndra, with Fast and Furious to get something going." --MSNBC political commentator Krystal Ball
Race bait: "I think it's a tough time to be a white man in America where the minorities are really taking over, to be quite honest." --Washington Post editor Cathy Areu
Questions no one is asking: "Is it a good goal for everyone in the world to have access to air-conditioning -- like clean water or the Internet? Or is it an unsustainable luxury, which air-conditioned societies should be giving up or rationing?" --The New York Times
Newspulper Headlines:
The Lonely Lives of Activists: "Activists Take Out Frustration on ... Ronald Reagan" --TheWeeklyStandard.com
The Private Sector Is Doing Fine: "Anti-Romney Protesters Say They're Paid to Heckle" --BuzzFeed.com
Too Much Information: "Unsatisfied, Gays Demand More From Obama" --Washington Examiner website
Everything Seemingly Is Spinning Out of Control: "Don't Look Now, but the Senate's Actually Working" --Politico.com
'Boy, I'm Glad That's Over With!': "Captain of Navy Ship Relieved Following Collision" --Associated Press
Breaking News From 2010: "Millions Still Go Without Insurance if Law Passes" --Associated Press
(Thanks to The Wall Street Journal's James Taranto)
Village Idiots
Shut up, he explained: "Bottom line is, after a level of cooperation that I think demonstrates this administration's absolute interest in finding out the truth about the Fast and Furious operation, and why that flawed tactic was used, its origins and its implementation, its efforts to work with Congress to provide it the information that was required under legitimate oversight needs, an assertion was made -- because this has become a political fishing expedition. And it is absolute evidence -- and I would refer you to the statements by congressional House -- rather, Republican congressional leaders from the beginning of the year, where they made clear that one of their chief priorities for this year was to use their investigative power in the House to score political points in this election year. I think knowing that tells you everything about the motivations here." --White House Press Secretary Jay Carney
Tax me more: "When arguing against paying their fair share of taxes, wealthy regressives claim 'it's my money.' But it's their nation, too. And unless they pay their share, America can't meet the basic needs of our people. True patriotism means paying for America." --Clinton administration Labor Secretary Robert Reich
Tax everyone more: "Where taxes are implemented on sugar-sweetened beverages, using revenue for anti-obesity programs and educational campaigns explaining the adverse effects of excessive consumption of these beverages will help to reduce the consumption of these caloric beverages and improve public health." --American Medical Association (AMA) board member Alexander Ding, M.D.
Hollyweird: "And I think ... we're going to be in a lot of trouble if we don't re-elect [Obama] because people on the other side of the fence scare me." --actor Morgan Freeman
From one Peace Prize winner to another: "Instead of making the world safer, America's violation of international human rights abets our enemies and alienates our friends." --Jimmy Carter denouncing the use of drone strikes on terrorists
Short Cuts
"President Obama was ripped by conservatives for his decree that overturned the defeat of his Dream Act in Congress. The act allows illegal alien children to stay in the U.S. but placed a ten percent tax on tanning salons. Leave it to Democrats to subsidize brown people who want to be Americans and tax Americans who want to be brown people." --comedian Argus Hamilton
"Scholars have all their precedent saying why Obamacare should be upheld; there's just the stupid text of the Constitution still in the way." --humorist Frank J. Fleming
"White House Press Secretary Jay Carney described the congressional hearings on Fast & Furious as 'a political fishing expedition.' And from what we've heard so far ... we're gonna need a bigger boat." --Fred Thompson
"The Congressional Black Causes says it is racist to refer to President Obama as 'cool.' Well, it is a good thing no one's calling him that anymore." --NewsBusted's Jodi Miller
"Gas prices are expected to drop to around $3 a gallon by this fall. The price drop is the result of a complicated system. It's called the election." --comedian Jay Leno
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
111 Comments
The Texas Cooke in Lockhart, Texas
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:34 AM
I loved the comment of the court over Arizona's sovereignty, but my primary comment is about Big Sis's removal of immigration deputization of Arizona's LE folks. Here's a suggestion for the Governor of Arizona. Mail to Washington D. C. ALL deputizations that allow ANY Arizona law enforcement agent to enforce ANY federal law. Start with Game and Fish, Agriculture, pollution enforcement etc. Evict ALL federal employees currently occupying office, parking or storage space that belongs to the State of Arizona. And remind the feds that there may be some federal taxes that USED to be collected by the State of Arizona on their behalf [e.g., gasoline, excise taxes etc.] that they are going to have to be collecting on their own. And recall all enforcement deputizations of federal employees that allow them to carry guns in the State of Arizona.....and their vehicles are no longer exempt from State licensing and inspection requirements. STRONG MESSAGE TO FOLLOW! Let's show the children in the WH how the game is played.
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:37 AM
Outstandig Idea, but just not for Arizona, ALL conservative run states!
RK Sprau in L.C. N.M.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 1:00 PM
I like your idea. The only question I have is how to implement it and who will run them, ie:parks and Federal buildings?
My only complent about Mit is reference to the above is what the heck is his stance and why doesn't he listen to the people who have thoughts on the matter?
Son of Liberty in Colorado
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM
If a strong message is to be sent to Washington to the Obaminator it needs to be this - "We reserve the right to tell you to pound sand and reassert our 10th Amendment rights as of this moment! You no longer have suzerainty within our borders, and if you don't like it - we can always secede from the Union." Unfortunately my State doesn't have enough spine, as we have a Democrat for governor whos too busy playing Mr. Popularity.
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:35 AM
a gaffe is when you tell the truth. So, be careful." --Joe Biden
Joe Biden, the gaff machine, with the sage advice to the Democrats: LIE!
NoCrud in KY
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:42 AM
Considering that SB-1070 was written specifically to parallel Federal Law and that the Supreme Court said that three out of four points were NOT Constitutional, what does that say about the Federal [illegal immigration] Law that Obama & Co. are pretending to support and enforce???
warren seal in Metairie, La.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:45 AM
I agree with Scalia. Furthermore, Obama took an oath to "protect and defend". He is publicly doing neither, so why can't he be impeached?
MNIce in Mankato, MN
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 5:16 PM
There are 50 reasons why not. You can see them at the beginning of the list at http://www.senate.gov/general/contactinformation/senatorscfm.cfm?OrderBy=party&Sort=ASC
Oathkeeper in Roswell, GA
Sunday, July 1, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Because impeachment trials are in the Senate.
William F. Brna in Monongahela, PA
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:48 AM
It's long past time when Obama should be impeached. His refusal to carry out the laws enacted by Congress should make impeachment a slam dunk.
Bob in Doylestown,PA
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:51 AM
These nine justices have never had the wisdom of Solomon and have proven it again. This ruling can go along with their determination that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. Citizens in Arizona are living a nightmare because of these illegal immigrants. Governor Brewer was correct with her assessment that she doesn't think she lives in America anymore. She doesn't and none of us do either. I just cannot get over that a country of over 300 million people is being destroyed in Washington by less that a thousand corrupt or gutless politicians..
Kathy in AZ
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:51 AM
Supreme Courts ruling on SB 1070 is a travesty for the Rule of Law. We are seeing tyranny in action by those in black robes with the help of a lawless Obama Administration. The Supremes have just assisted Obama Admin in their fraudulant voting registry. I believe Legal citizens will see this attack on our Sovereignty and vote accordlingly at all levels of Govt. If not, we will surely no longer be the United States of America (which is exactly by Obama's design).
Gator in In Florida
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM
I agree with Justice Scalia. Why do I get the feeling that the high court will rule in much the same manner on the healthcare bill? Obviously, the Chief Justice and Justice Keenedy may be the heroes for Obama. I'll bet Justice Kagan didn't recuse herself on the healthcare bill she helped craft. Anyway, same thing tomorrow, an appeasement. Will it really matter though, if the decision goes completely against Obama or even partially, he has no problem with putting his thumb in the eyes of the SCOTUS again. Our three branches of government have been relegated to only one. As Obama apparently governs, "It's my way or the highway."
Bob Alexander in NYC
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM
Here is why I'm voting republican. GW came to office with a balanced budget and surplus and ruined it in his first year. Invading Iraq knowing there were no WMD and leaving Iraq as a good friend of Iran. Outing a CIA agent whose name had to be declassified by Bush Pulling back bank regulators so Wall Street could loot the system Turning down a request from the field to kill binladin in the first week of the war. Privatize Social Security using the people from Wall Street.
Pretending that Iraq wanted to buy yellow cake from Niger, when Iraq already had 500 tons. Yea I guess I am an idiot but I love my country and love selling you stuff
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Even if you are a complete idiot, voting for liberty over marxist statist tyranical treason is a wise choice.
NoCrud in KY
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 12:13 PM
Either you are, as you say, an idiot or maybe just trying to stir the pot and get real and true Conservatives to respond. Anyway, at least you see that a vote for The Obamaroid is national suicide. At least I think that's what you tried to say although I could not grasp your rational by its meaty import because they were statements that would make a Liberal/Leftoid proud.
Kathy in AZ
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM
Another comment - Sheriff Joe and all other AZ officers should deport all illegals (no matter their nationality) directly to the Washington DC, preferably the White House and then we will see how open Obama's doors are. Afterall there is a fence surrounding his house to keep We the People out. When the Washington elite have illegals right out their door step, I'm sure they will be singing a different tune.
Charles Spence in Plano
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:55 AM
Once again the Court is acting like the rest of the Federal Government in that it did not recognize the sovereignty of the State of Arizona and it's right under the Constitution, Article 1,Section 10, paragraph 4- engage in war , unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. What else can you call what is happening to the border states except invasion and the Federal Government refuses to stop the invasion.
Scott in El Dorado Hills, California
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM
While Arizona and, by extension, other States, were confirmed as having the right to check on the status of possible illegal immigrants, Obama and his administration continue in their desire to deliberately and willfuly ignore the illegal issue program, attempting to bury their heads in the sand in what is probably an attempt to garner votes from the Hispanic community in the United States. But why should this surprise anyone, considering Obama's views on an inconvenient Constitution and its many requirements that the Federal Government to see that the best interests of America are defeneded and promoted?
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 12:01 PM
They are not burrying their heads in the sand, but willfully violating the law. If a bank guard stood by and allowed a robery to happen, he didn't actually commit the crime but would be complicit in the illegality. Obamao and the traitors now calling themselves Democrats are no different.
Brian Ehni in Nashville, TN
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM
I hereby challenge Mr. Matthews to point out the word slavery in the U.S. Constitution. The word exists in only once place, and then only once, in the 13th Amendment.
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Has Mr Mathews ever had a cogent thought not based on emotion? Mr thrill up his leg wouldn't know facts if they hit him in the head.
John D in Miami, FL
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 11:59 AM
The language of the SCOTIS decision contains a message not much talked about in the media. The decision acknowledges that people in Arizona are frustrated; that they want a more safe and secure environment, etc. So, in the lines and between the lines, the Justices are saying," If you don't like what is not being done by the Feds, this is the wrong road to take. Make changes at the Federal enforcement level!" Indeed. Arizona and any other state witnessing the transparent attempt to turn our country into Amexica, can get off the sofa and vote in November. Before it really is demasiado tarde, amigos. ¿Acuerdo?
NoCrud in KY
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM
I wonder if it is not already 'demasiadamente tarde.'
What The Obamaroids have put in place are things that are either forced to go to the Supreme Court to decide (and then be ignored by Obama & Co.) or have in them provisos that cause those laws/policies to be forever in place with no possibility of being nullified.
While Conservatives sleep, the Obamaroids sit up nights plotting and scheming. They are not going to lose, they are "unified" in what they do and love fragmenting and destroying the opposition, which is also key to their design.
MNIce in Mankato, MN
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 5:21 PM
I see by your acronym for the Supreme Court that you no longer refer to the "United States." What does "IS" stand for?
Lisa in MD
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM
I am glad for Arizona. BHO changes rules/laws to fit his needs. He is a disgrace to this country.