Alexander's Column

BO's BS

Exposing Obama's Socialist Dezinformatsia

By Mark Alexander · Sep. 13, 2012
“The republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind.” –Thomas Jefferson (1790)

There’s been a flood of BS from Barack Hussein Obama in the last week, and high ground is in short supply. H. L. Mencken had it right: “Democracy is a form of religion. It is the worship of jackals by jack asses.”

Rather than try to capture all the piles of BO’s socialist dezinformatsia in narrative form, allow me to depart from that format and just list the larger loads.

At the Demo Confab last week, the “We Make It Possible” theme asserting “Government is the only thing we all belong to” picked up where Obama’s assertion “you didn’t build that … somebody else made that happen” left off.

We all “belong” to government? This should strike all freedom-loving Americans as being exactly backward.

For those of us who were counting, in his coronation speech, Obama, the consummate narcissist, said “I” (not in reference but in credit to himself) 55 times and “we” (that’s the socialist collective “we” not as in “We, the people…”) 75 times. Moreover, in the 40-page Demo platform, Obama is cited on 38 pages more than 200 times. By way of comparison, the 2012 GOP platform makes reference to Mitt Romney once.

According to BO, “You didn’t elect me to tell you what you wanted to hear. You elected me to tell you the truth. And the truth is, it will take more than a few years for us to solve challenges that have built up over decades.”

The truth is, it will take Obama another term to complete his plan for fundamentally transforming the United States of America.“

Apparently this pledge from February 2009 missed the mark: "One nice thing about the situation I find myself in is that I will be held accountable. You know, I’ve got four years. And, you know, a year from now, I think people are gonna see that we’re starting to make some progress. But there’s still gonna be some pain out there. If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s gonna be a one-term proposition.”

So did this one a year later: “I’d rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.”

According to Team Obama, not only did you not build it, you didn’t create it either. “Over the past, you know, 27 months we’ve created 4.5 million private-sector jobs,” said Obama campaign spokesperson Stephanie Cutter.

While the 4.5 million jobs claim is patently false, most analysts have missed the real substance of the administration’s message. “We created” is the flip side of “you didn’t build that.”

Who created those jobs?

Obama’s plan to “solve the challenges” is shaped by his lifelong socialist indoctrination, and he has based his re-election campaign on two foundational pillars: redistributive justice and class warfare. His plan is not about building it; it’s about redistributing it.

Of those pillars, the great prevaricator Bill Clinton observed: “Now [Obama] has laid the foundation for a new, modern, successful economy of shared prosperity. And if you will renew the president’s contract, you will feel it. You will feel it. … The old economy is not coming back. … Are we better off than we were when [Obama] took office, with an economy in free fall…? The answer is yes.”

The answer is, of course, unequivocally, “NO!” The audacity of that whopper reminds me of Adolf Hitler’s dictum in his 1925 autobiography “Mein Kampf,” in which he noted that the key to successful deception is to lie so big that the public would be confident that no national leader “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”

Are we better off than we were when BO took office?

Certainly not if you’re among the 23 million Americans now out of work after 43 straight months of 8-percent-plus unemployment – unprecedented since the Great Depression… Of course, the real unemployment figure is much higher – closer to 19 percent.

Arnold Ahlert aptly summed this one up: “No doubt many of the media outlets determined to get this president re-elected will tout the fact that the unemployment rate dropped from 8.3 percent to 8.1 percent, even as they bury the reason why: 368,000 Americans simply gave up looking for work. That exodus dropped the labor force participation rate to 63.5 percent, a 31-year low. For perspective’s sake, if the number of people in the labor force had remained the same as last month, the unemployment rate would be 8.4 percent. If the labor force were as large as it was when Obama took office in 2009, the unemployment rate would be a staggering 11.2 percent. … And when one gets past the ‘official’ unemployment rate and examines the BLS’s U-6 number – representing Americans who have been out of work for six months, along with those who are involuntarily part-time workers, due to cutbacks in their days or hours – the under-employment rate has held steady for months at around 15 percent of the workforce. Add those who have given up looking for work and that number jumps to 19 percent.”

Indeed, Obama so loved the poor that he created millions more. And make no mistake, his road “Forward” is a dead end!

Are we better off than we were when BO took office?

Certainly not if you think the historic $16 trillion national debt (more than $50,000 for every American) is a problem. And need I remind you, while on-budget debt is $16 trillion, the off-budget unfunded liabilities deficit is $222 trillion – and that’s the real “Debt Bomb” that will complete Obama’s transformation of America.

Are we better off than we were when BO took office?

Not if we consider the fact that median household income has dropped to its lowest level since 1995. The median income adjusted for inflation in 2011 dropped to $50,054 – 4.1 percent below household income in 2009 when Obama took office.

BO claimed, “By 2008 we had seen nearly a decade in which families struggled with costs that kept rising but paychecks that didn’t.” The truth is that “stagflation” (e.g. higher inflation, higher unemployment, and lower economic growth) has only gotten worse since Obama’s election. During the Bush administration, average median income rose and inflation was low.

There’s been much comparison between the GOP and DNC conventions, but I think one of the most revealing distinctions between them is not what was said, but what was worn. Both Romney and Obama wear TAG Heuer watches, but Romney’s Link Automatic is valued at $3,500 while Obama wears an Aquaracer valued at $15,600.

There’s also been much talk this week about Obama’s post-DNC bounce in the polls, which in recent days has disappeared. Regardless, the real Obama bounce is best measured in the surge in gun sales this year, which reminds me of former Republican Rep. Larry McDonald’s observation, “We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.”

The truth is, we built it, Obama broke it, and now we need to expel him so we can repair it and move on!

On the more somber and solemn side of the news this week, The New York Times dutifully did its part as Obama’s “Blame Bush” surrogate by blaming 9/11 on, you guessed it, George W. Bush.

Noticeably absent from the NYT’s “20/20 hindsight analysis” of 9/11 was any mention of the name “Clinton.”

Truth is, the terrorists who led the 9/11 attack settled into American suburbs under Clinton’s watch, while the Clintonistas were too busy rejecting FBI reports because of “ethnic sensitivity.” One such report was from an agent who wanted to open a case file on a group of Islamists who requested flight training – more specifically learning to take off in a large jet … but not land. Her request was denied.

Also absent from The Times' analysis was the fact that U.S. forces had bin Laden, literally, dead in their sights twice in 1998 and 1999, but CLINTON REFUSED to green-light the specops shooters. According to former CIA analyst Michael Scheuer, who was Chief of the Bin Laden Issue Station (a.k.a. “Alec Station”) from 1996 to 1999, Clinton had more than EIGHT opportunities to kill bin Laden long before 9/11, but declined.

Meanwhile, as Americans observed in solemn remembrance the murder of 3,000 civilians by bin Laden’s al-Qa'ida Islamists, practitioners of “the religion of peace” attacked U.S. missions in Egypt and Libya. In the former, they tore down and burned the American flag, replacing it with an Islamist flag; in the latter, they murdered U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other mission personnel, including two Marines. (More to come, I guarantee it – now that Obama has declined to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, empowering Islamist radicals in the region and around the world.)

Last week, Obama, the consummate national security neophyte said of Romney and Ryan: “My opponent and his running mate are new to foreign policy. But from all that we’ve seen and heard, they want to take us back to an era of blustering and blundering that cost America so dearly.” Does he mean back to the Carter era…which is just where Obama finds himself today?

In response to a report that the violence was associated with a web-based video critical of Islam, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chimed in, “This video is disgusting and reprehensible.” (Much better to blame a video on YouTube than failed foreign policy!)

Obama condemned the attack and then APOLOGIZED to the attackers. Of the web video, Obama said, “the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others,” and the administration “condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.”

Really? Last week, Demo confab delegates loudly rejected the most central tenet of Liberty – that it is “endowed by our Creator,” not the gift of benevolent political masters.

Apparently the 40-page Demo platform omitted any mention of “God,” despite the aforementioned citation of Obama more than 200 times. After a proposed amendment to the platform including a white-bread reference to God, the chairman couldn’t muster a “two-thirds” delegate vote to approve, even after three attempts.

Realizing a failure to amend the platform would create serious problems for Obama’s re-election prospects, the chairman unilaterally passed the measure anyway.

Obama has led the charge to eradicate “God” from every corner of public life in the U.S. because his Socialist ideology cannot tolerate competition with its goal of authoritarian state power. While Obama quickly apologized for an amateur web video which Muslims find offensive, he has yet to apologize for the “God” omission, especially to the families of American Patriots who have fought and died to support and defend our Constitution – itself constituted on the basis of the endowment of Liberty by our Creator.

Mitt Romney took Obama to task for his soft apology to Islamists, prompting Obama to respond, “It’s important for you to make sure that the statements that you make are backed up by the facts and that you’ve thought through the ramifications before you make them.” A few hours later Obama said in a media interview on events in Egypt, “I don’t think that we would consider them an ally, but we don’t consider them an enemy.” Uh, colossal FAIL!

The truth is, as Clint Eastwood commented after the GOP convention, “Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.” For ample evidence, check out Obama in his own words. And don’t forget this treasonous exchange caught by an open mike.

Ronald Reagan warned us about the consequences of inept leadership. Did we learn anything?

If the American people do not resoundingly defeat Obama on November 6, it will most certainly affirm this observation from 19th-century German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: “The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history.”

View all comments

161 Comments

Dioneikes in Colorado said:

The D-RATs picked the right symbol for their party - a stupid jackass. I hope with all my heart that the Ovomit gets ousted by a landslide of epic proportions. I fear that not enough Americans love their liberty enough anymore to fight the encroachment of governmental tyranny. The younger folks seem especially thick between the ears about liberty. They want for mommy and Daddy to care for them until they are in their 30's then its the gummint's turn. To paraphrase - they want to be coddled first by their parents then by you and I (i.e. Joe Taxpayer).

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM

demsarerats in Oregon replied:

Son of Liberty, love to see you use “Drats,” and you are correct that “not enough Americans love their liberty enough anymore to fight the encroachment of governmental tyranny.” After centuries of growth the West embraced the suicide pact called universal suffrage and since then we have seen every European empire collapse and all of those once-great nations become feminized nanny states. It is no surprise that we are becoming like them; we embraced the same suicide pact, and it is not in the nature of a feminized society to fight.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 11:41 PM

Luis in AZ replied:

I think the ChickfilA phenomenon on August 1 is a good indication of what Americans are feeling these days about the libs/lefties. Not all of the people who actually went to a ChickfilA that day are voters, but the ones who are will definitely not vote for Obama and are representative of many more who couldn't go, as in my case I almost wasn't able to go but ended up going. The wait was one and a half hours and everybody in line was commenting that they didn't care how long the wait was.

Friday, September 14, 2012 at 3:10 AM

Paul in Murfreesboro, ,TN said:

In Yahoo news, Hillary said that the anti-Islam film was disgusting and reprehensible. Now why is it OK to have anti-Christian and anti-Hebrew movies? That right we just protest without blowing/shooting-up the place. Talk about wrong people in a good form of government. The US has a great form of government, just dumb/bad/uneducated people have elected the wrong ones in office.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM

demsarerats in Oregon replied:

Paul, that movie was a sham, you can bet that it was financed by islamosavage oil money as an excuse for the terrorism set to coincide with 9-11 and planned well in advance. Notice how the scum media ignored it until after the attacks although it was completed at least a couple months earlier, and only now do the Christian-hating media rats hype it and use it as an excuse for the terror attacks.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 11:50 PM

The Texas Cooke in Lockhart, Texas said:

Truth be told…I was better off when Barry lived in Indonesia!

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:26 PM

Paul in Murfreesboro, ,TN replied:

I have a new window art.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM

Denise Graves in Mishawaka, Indiana said:

My dad used to say, the larger the government, the smaller God becomes to that nation. Hmmmmm-pretty prophetic

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:26 PM

David Dwyer in Nashville TN replied:

Denise, your father was a wise man.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:54 PM

Scott in Ballston Spa NY replied:

I tend to agree with your dad, but it was not always that way.
I encourage all of the readers to look at the pre-amble for each of our 50 states. In each one it mentions our Lord and savior.
I just do not understand the mentality of this once great Country anymore. It breaks my heart.
The only chance we have at turning this around, and it's only a start, is to get rid of obama once and for all this November.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM

Nelson in BANGKOK replied:

Lots of DemoRats are godless, all need to go.

Monday, September 17, 2012 at 3:51 AM

William Parker in Headland, Alabama said:

Patriot Post does a great job in communicating to like minded Patriots but there should be more effort to reach those poor, misguided liberals who support the progressive ideas espoused by the Obama administration's objectives of class warfare and government dependency. Too many Americans take freedom for granted and think it can continue to exist by accepting more government control. I wish I had the answer to the best way to reach them.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM

Kathy in West Texas replied:

I'm with you. In fact, I've tried to reach some of them by going onto Media Matters and 'discussing' issues, but all I received was slander and hatred. They don't want to talk, let alone change their minds. I've never seen our country so divided as it is now, but I keep trying some of the other sites so maybe I'll get through to one undecided voter.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM

Chris706 in Hudson, Ohio replied:

Good for you, Kathy!! I know exaclty what you mean. I am so tired of just being called names. But, if we get through to one, then it is worth it. So keep up the good fight!

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 1:45 PM

M Rick Timms MD in Georgia replied:

Kathy, the country has always been closely divided. Most presidential elections are won by very small margins, especially when there are third party candidates. It seems that just like flipping a coin - you are gonna get 50/50 heads/tails over time.

The problem now is that the democrat side has chosen to buy the votes of American using the largess of the governmnet which is stolen from the hard working 53% who pay taxes. The Democrats are without character and are not worthy of trust. I pray that once elected - the Republicans will not fall prey again to the temptation to negotiate and compromise with them. This is our last chance. It will be close as usual, because there are som many ignorant people who do not follow issues but "get out to vote" usually in their best interest - not the best interest of the nation.
I am confident that this election will be different - and the quiet citicen who follows law - will rise up at the ballot box and defeat Obama by 4-6% in polpular vote.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 5:02 PM

John Q Citizen in Colorado replied:

William, sadly the liberals have their minds already made up as to whom the enemy is and it is us. They would just rather shut down this fine periodical.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 3:34 PM

Denver Bandit in Denver, CO replied:

I have no opinions left for this joker. I think our best hope is to reach out to young people. They are not all set in their liberal ways as some would believe. And it is THEY who will bear the burden of his exercise in self-worship. Many are starting to get it that NObama coming to campus for an hour, totally disrupting traffic and life for two days, and promising not to raise the interest rate on their studen loans isn't all that rosy of a deal. Many have (or have friends who have) graduated from college that are still working at the pizza place. Maybe living at home. They're not all stupid. When options and different ideas are laid out in front of them, many are starting to pay attention. Help them all you can.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM

demsarerats in Oregon replied:

William, the Drat core vote is comprised of parasites who feed off the rest of us, you are not going to reach them through reasoned argument.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 11:55 PM

Luis in AZ replied:

William, I agree with your post, both about the great quality of this article and about the need for the libs/lefties who are still thinking that they will vote for Obama to see this article, so I forwarded the article and pointed out especially the two last links, 'Obama in his own words' and the one about Obama telling Medvedev to tell Putin to give him some space because he can be more flexible after he is reelected.
Each of us has to find a way to get rid of Obama, a oax, a no good S O B, a flim flam, a phony, a lightweight, an ego in a suit, an arrogant thug, a community organizer.

Friday, September 14, 2012 at 2:59 AM

Luis in AZ replied:

forwarded the article to many friends, that is

Friday, September 14, 2012 at 3:04 AM

NavyPilot in Fall River, MA said:

A narcissist with dangerous tendencies, anti-republican and wholly unsuited to be President of the United States. Come on, November 6th!

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:33 PM

Luis in AZ replied:

c'mon Bernard, you're entirely too nice to him!

Friday, September 14, 2012 at 3:06 AM

Luis in AZ replied:

Obama is, as Clint Eastwood said, a hoax, and I add a flim flam, a phony, a no good S0B, a lightweight, a community organizer, an ego in a suit, an arrogant thug and we have to get rid of him, the sooner, the better. If someone accuses me of being a racist, I would have to admit it: YES, I AM A RACIST, I AM A BIGOT, I AM A HATER--I hate people of the phukhead race and Obama, Eric Holder, Valerie Jarrett, Hillary Clinton, John Holdren, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, the head of NASA, Michelle Obama, Joey Biden, you get the idea, are all phukheads.

Friday, September 14, 2012 at 3:16 AM

Fran in Anchorage, AK said:

We the People must get rid of 99% of the elected officials, give the states back their job of electing and voting their senators and reps, and set term limits for everyone of them. If we can limit the President, we can certainly limit the Senators, the Representatives, and the courts.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:35 PM

Richard Regan in Chattanooga, TN replied:

I couldn't agree more, Fran. I've always stated 12 years. Two six-year terms, or six two-year terms, or any combination thereof. Then get yourself out of Washington and back home where you belong. And absolutely no lobbying in Washington (or anywhere else, for that matter) for 20 years after you leave. That'll shut em up!

Also, I recommend punitive action for any person, current or former Representative, Senator or President, who has voted even ONE time to spend money we didn't have, i.e., contribute to the debt situation (that's all of them, by the way). The punitive action: they just lost their government-provided pension. Gone. Retirement benefits? Gone. SS and Medicare? Gone. No more money - not one thin dime from "We the People." You need money? Go get a job, or better yet, create one like the millions of small businessmen/women and entrepreneurs have to do every day, the ones you've hamstrung with so much debt that our children's children's children's children won't be able to pay it off.

And as a warning to any current or future gummint' official - you add one thin dime to the national debt with your vote, all your benefits are gone too.

For ex-Presidents? Nothing. Not one thin dime, except for 1 Secret Service agent. His name is Tony. You better treat him nice. If you happen to get off'd, well, we're not sorry to see you go. You were elected with a public trust, and you failed that trust. You need money? Go write a book or give a speech or get a real job. But no more public money whatsoever for anything. Not for libraries. Not for travel. Not for living expenses. Not for nothing.

I know it sounds extreme, but I'm fed up with it. Clint Eastwood struck a nerve. These people have forgotten that THEY WORK FOR US!

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 1:37 PM

Ken Windeler in Hastings, Florida replied:

If the majority of Americans would get off of their lazy behind and vote, then "We the People" could hold these elected officials accountable. If the elected knew that they would be, or could be un-elected each election cylce, then we would not need term limits.
And yes Clint Eastwood was correct: The ones that don't do an acceptable job; ONE term

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 2:05 PM

ssgtgood in Shenandoah VA replied:

Hurrah!!!! Now I know that there's at least 1 very smart man in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Some of the best ideas I've ever heard. They ARE supposed to be public servants after all. Its not like they joined the military and got their asses shot off. Good for you Richard!

Semper Fidelis

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 10:16 PM

Doug Brooks in Greeneville, Tenn replied:

Richard,
You and I are on the same page. You are being far too generous, though. I say three 2 yr terms for the house and one 6 yr term for the senate. If you can't get it right in 6 yrs, you don't deserve to be there anyway.

Saturday, September 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM

John Hill in Texas said:

Who in America, or their right mind, would vote for Obama after they read this?Obama must really want to be a one term president! The soldiers who wake up inWalter Reed Medical Center are in Maryland, not communist China. But,under the Navy's new rules, they may not know the difference!After months of peeling away the military's core values, Obama's army is on the move. And this time, it has a high-value target: the Bible.In a memo obtained by FRC, Navy officials have announced that "no religious items (including Bibles, reading material, and/or artifacts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit." The new orders are buried in a four-page document about patient care, which an Army officer forwarded to us in disbelief!Effective immediately, families, friends, and even pastors will have to check their beliefs at the door to visit one of the largest military hospitals in the United States

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM

Barb in WV said:

Some 42,389,619 Americans received food stamps in August 2012, a 17% rise from the same time a year ago, according to the USDA, which tracks the data. That number is up 58.5% since August 2007. Unemployment in July 2012 was at a rae of 8.3% compared to January 2008 when it was 5.0% The median income dropped another 1.5% in the past year while the poverty level rose.

America literally can not afford another four years of 0.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM

demsarerats in Oregon replied:

Barb, yes, that is another example of universal suffrage as suicide pact, those parasites have a vote that counts the same as yours, and guess who they will vote for.

Friday, September 14, 2012 at 12:06 AM

JtC in TX replied:

That's why the Obomination will win the election . . . IF there is one, which I doubt.

Friday, September 14, 2012 at 8:39 AM

stan.... in spartanburg, s.c. said:

I have a Knack for Transforming a Narcissist P.O.S. in approximately 1/10 of 1/20th of a second ! Semper Fidelis

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:37 PM

John Hill in Texas said:

Who in America, or their right mind, would vote for Obama after they read this?
Obama must really want to be a one term president! The soldiers who wake up inWalter Reed Medical Center are in Maryland, not communist China. But,under the Navy's new rules, they may not know the difference!
After months of peeling away the military's core values, Obama's army is on the move. And this time, it has a high-value target: the Bible.
In a memo obtained by FRC, Navy officials have announced that "no religious items (including Bibles, reading material, and/or artifacts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit." The new orders are buried in a four-page document about patient care, which an Army officer forwarded to us in disbelief!
Effective immediately, families, friends, and even pastors will have to check their beliefs at the door to visit one of the largest military hospitals in the United States

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:38 PM

Richard Regan in Chattanooga, TN replied:

Given away or used? Seriously? They're restricting the reading material of the soldiers/patients? This can't be possible.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 1:41 PM

MARIE ROSATO in SMITHVILLE NJmlr548@comcast.net said:

Finally someone is giving credit where credit is due.Bill Clinton only succeeded in balancing budget because of New Gringrich and the reps forcing him too with the contract for america.BARACK OBAMA has pulled the greatest hoax in history of this country.His policies arre bringing us to our knees especially in the middle east.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:39 PM

Jiggs in Millen, GA said:

If any of you have been following my comments on the Obomination Adminstration, you know there has been one recurring phrase to describe him and his minions: "Liar, liar, pants on fire!" His narcissist two-faced self appears on TV constantly as he flits from photo-op to photo-op. At this point in time, he is just so much environmental wallpaper. Fortunately, my TV remote has a "mute" button. I wish it worked on him rather then just the TV. So I say it once again, and will keep it going until he flits off to Chicago for good: LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:40 PM

Saint Peter in North GA said:

That's a bumper sticker right there!

"Obama so loved the poor that he created millions more."
Alexander 9:12

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:41 PM

Barack Obama in Washington, D.C. said:

Oh crap, if it weren't for that pesky record of mine, I'd be all set up for another four years of golfing, giving taxpayer money to contributors (note to self: find a replacement for Solyndra), and galavanting all over the globe dissing punks like Bibi, and solidifying my hatred of this country in general. But that record is gonna be my Waterloo. How can I hang on to this sweet gig? There must be a way.

Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 12:42 PM

Nam_Vet68 in Philadelphia replied:

You need to change your name from Barack Obama to Mr. Spin because everything that happens is someone else fault. These demonstrations all around the world, Oh, it's not that the Muslims hate America, it's because of the video on You Tube. Give me a break. Keep spinning the truth O spin master. Yes, the American media is on your side and there are a lot of stupid people in our country that are too lazy to actually think for themselves but you can't fool all us. Maybe when footfall season is over we will put our beers down, get out of our lounge chairs and have our own demonstration against you

Saturday, September 15, 2012 at 5:05 PM