Alexander's Column

Pollaganda -- Political Polling as Propaganda

By Mark Alexander · Jan. 18, 2008

“We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections.” –John Adams

At the time of our nation’s founding, journalists, like judges, were expected to comport with the highest standards of objectivity in order to protect the public virtue. Neither has held to that standard.

The press was charged with a heavy burden – that of providing impartial reports about the issues of the day and those running for political office. Unbiased reporting was essential so that the people could discern for themselves what was best for our country.

First Amendment champion Thomas Jefferson penned, “Where the press is free and every man able to read, all is safe.”

Likewise, James Madison wrote, “The right of freely examining public characters and measures … has ever been justly deemed the only effectual guardian of every other right.”

But no sooner had the press outlets discovered they wielded enormous power over public opinion, did they begin to use their pages to that end. And, neither Madison nor Jefferson could have imagined the power of television, or that of the tabloid media’s dumbed-down message for the masses.

At the conclusion of his presidency, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “During the course of administration, and in order to disturb it, the artillery of the press has been leveled against us, charged with whatsoever its licentiousness could devise or dare.”

Two centuries later, “the press” is composed largely of Leftmedia propagandists, those who have mastered the art of partiality cloaked as objective journalism in pursuit of their own political .

Explicit examples of this partiality abound on the pages of major Leftmedia outlets such as The Washington Post and The New York Times.

However, the most deceptive Leftmedia method to influence national elections, especially presidential elections, is the implementation and reporting of political polling.

Polls, ostensibly, represent the views of a particular group of voters within an acceptable margin of error, but they are also used for a much more subtle and sinister purpose.

At best, reputable pollsters can get it wrong – even though they poll representative statistical samples and ask objective questions.

However, most media-designed and reported polling is as “objective” as the mainstream media (MSM) outlets that sponsor them.

To that end, it is worth familiarizing oneself with the practice of Pollaganda, a propagandistic disinformation technique where political polling masquerades as “objective journalism” and instead advances a liberal bias.

Americans who participate in public-opinion polls about political performance are not political analysts, national-security specialists, economists or policy experts. They are folks who hold common labor and professional jobs in order to support their families and make ends meet. They are thus the backbone of our nation. Unfortunately, a large measure of their perspective on politics, national security, the economy and public policy is shaped by the MSM.

Pollaganda uses outcome-based opinion samples (polling instruments designed to generate a preferential outcome) reflecting prior-opinion indoctrination or cultivation by the media. The results are then used to manipulate public opinion further by advancing the perception that a particular opinion on an issue enjoys majority support. The MSM then presents this “data” as if it were “news.”

I say “outcome based” because most polls reflect intentional propagation of a particular bias by Leftmedia television and print outlets to manipulate public opinion. They accomplish this by first indoctrinating viewers with “reporting” that reflects a particular bias, then conducting “opinion polls” which, of course, reflect that indoctrination.

Then the media uses poll results to proselytize further by treating the results as “news,” which, in turn, induces “bandwagon” psychology – the human tendency of those who do not have a strong ideological foundation to aspire to the side perceived to be in the majority – and thus further drives public opinion toward the original media bias, ad infinitum.

Pollaganda, then, is self-perpetuating.

Polls are so often manipulated for this purpose that The Patriot Post NEVER reports polling (conservative or liberal) as legitimate news because virtually all polling is nothing more than a well-crafted lie used to propagate a particular bias.

This is not to say that polls don’t provide an accurate account of public sentiment. It is simply to say that such sentiment is largely a reflection of MSM indoctrination – and thus comports with a liberal viewpoint. Conservatives are therefore forced to run a considerable and unrelenting MSM opinion gauntlet.

Given the Left’s domination of the mainstream media, it’s remarkable that any political candidates to the right of the news editors of ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN or NPR, or their ideological kin on the editorial boards of The Washington Post and The New York Times, ever make it to Washington.

Indeed, several academic studies to assess the political views of national reporters in the major press pools of Washington and New York, conclude that those reporters overwhelmingly self-identify as “liberal” or “Democrat.” In fact, one academic survey (not a popular poll) determined that only eight percent of reporters would consider voting for a conservative – no surprise to objective media analysts.

I do not suggest that there is anything but a benign Leftmedia conspiracy to undermine anything conservative; the bias is largely the consequence of the mass-media zeitgeist and culture, which are uniformly and profoundly left of center. Such liberalism has become so embedded within the collective consciousness of print copywriters and television talkingheads that it flows freely from every front page and broadcast.

And a final note on the use of propaganda to corrupt public opinion. Propaganda was a staple in the playbook of Marxist Socialists (Dezinformatsia) and Nationalist Socialists (Gleichschaltung), as it is today with Democratic Socialists (Leftmedia). Consider this observation from Adolf Hitler from his book, Mein Kampf: “Propaganda must always address itself to the broad masses of the people. All propaganda must be presented in a popular form and must fix its intellectual level so as not to be above the heads of the least intellectual of those to whom it is directed. The art of propaganda consists precisely in being able to awaken the imagination of the public through an appeal to their feelings, in finding the appropriate psychological form that will arrest the attention and appeal to the hearts of the national masses. … Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and…must present only that aspect of the truth which is favourable to its own side. The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward.”

“Hope and Change” ring a bell?

So much for the “free examination of public characters and measures.” When confronted with the next headline or talkinghead report about the latest poll results, caveat emptor!


MMitchell said:

Here are some other aspects of polling that few consider. There are many polling sources to choose from. If a poll is taken that does not support the desired Liberal slant, it's just as easy to decide not to use that particular poll, or to bury it. Second, we assume every poll that is reported is truthfully and scientifically conducted. Why do we assume that? Are all polls audited and certified by an independent agency? Who would know if some poll results are made up, or if the reported results are untouched? Third, when conducting phone polls, pollsters can skew results by phoning only certain area codes that are known Liberal voting areas. Now I wonder how those poll results might come out...?

Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 2:35 PM

Michael Capatina said:

It's a damn shame that the large majority of people don't realize this. The "bandwagon" effect has worked on me in the past, so I suspect it does in fact work in the 'lefts' favor somewhat regularly.

Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 2:37 PM

David Krueger said:

I have been saddened in the past by co-workers who on election day have stated they are going to "pick the winner". I advise them they should be voting for whomever they want to win, but they feel good about voting if they find they have voted for the person who has indeed won. It is a self-congratulatory reaffirmation that they seek. Pollagenders know this so well, so that all they have to do is report their desired candidate is in the lead to sway people to vote for their candidate. The recent so-called "tightening" of the polls is only reported among Leftmedia outlets. The Liberal fundraisers are citing this so-called "tightening" in their fundraising efforts. After the election losses among Liberal candidates we will hear the "if only" comments, that if only they had a little more time, the election outcomes would have been different. Pollaganda and pollagenders are real and are an afront to us all.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010 at 9:25 AM

kris said:

propaganda is hardly the truth and it's like WE have to teach again what FREEDOM is and WHAT hate and those that try to use power and money to spread their agenda by buying votes and media to lull us into securtiy, It's truth that IS stranger that fiction and WE have to get RON PAUL and some conservative sharp women (whom they are trying to make seem dumb real classy and respectful)like PALIN and BACHMAN and Herman Cain for example. I want to KNOW my PRESIDENT stands for AMERICA,period.WE have to be sure to protect our freedom and what the press and media have done to collude with the socialist agenda is bizarre. It's like a liberal also like JARED LOUGHER is said mentally ill--because his ANARCHY does not FIT their case and to use this doesn't suit SOROS and MEDIAMATTERS and BRITTISH OWNED socialized fools....WE AS AMERICANS CANNOT FORGET WHAT and HOW WE FOUGHT to get our CONSTITUTION and how this has creeped into our COUNTRY and our education systems and colleges....for our own good, right. WRONG! WHY can't we get people to connect the dots....BECAUSE we are outnumbered in the media and we HAVE to start using our strenths to stand up to these cowards and bullys who use contrarianisms by rote.

Sunday, May 22, 2011 at 4:37 PM

Phyllis Poole said:

I have been saying the same thing and blog it whenever possible. The media is choosing our candidates - please be aware. The "frontrunners" have much baggage and according to what I read in blogs, most people don't want these things that they have been accused. So why are these people frontrunners?Polls are misleading. Reagan's polls were way down and he won by a landslide. DON'T LET THE MEDIA CHOOSE OUR REP. CANDIDATE!!!PLEASE GOD HELP US ////// we are sheep!

Thursday, October 20, 2011 at 12:24 PM

PJR in Easton Pa. said:

Surprise, the progressive propaganda industry skews polls to hopefully confuse conservatives about who is the best republican candidate. Forget the polls, make a decision on the basis of a candidate's history of conservative commitments. Judge the nominee on performance. Translation, Romney and Perry are progressive light, not true conservatives and that is why the progressive propaganda industry promotes them. In a contest between progressive and progressive light progressive wins. It's like lite beer, why bother when you can have the real thing. If we field a true conservative in opposition to a pure progressive,the conservative wins.

Thursday, October 20, 2011 at 3:21 PM